建议做

Birmingham, United Kingdom
本站使用指南
2026/27 规则区分 AI misuse 与 poor academic practice。Tariff 有不同等级及有理由调整。Officer 与 Board 是不同十工作日申诉路线。representative 可代言,friend 提供支持。工具公告不证明 rollout 或任务许可。
本站解读;官方证据保留原文。
尚无完整的学生政策摘要;可先查看已收录条款及来源。
2026/27 规则区分 AI misuse 与 poor academic practice。Tariff 有不同等级及有理由调整。Officer 与 Board 是不同十工作日申诉路线。representative 可代言,friend 提供支持。工具公告不证明 rollout 或任务许可。



补充资料采集: 2026-10-08 · 现行适用性未独立确认
本站解读
Aston 2026/27 规则把任务说明禁止或限制 AI 而仍生成内容当本人原创提交定义为误用,并区分抄袭/作弊与 poor academic practice,后者通过评分而非纪律程序处理。不能把全部 AI 辅助当违规。
适用范围: students governed by the cited source and stage · Limited to the captured official source, stated conditions and relevant course/programme/stage. Retrieval does not certify exhaustive legal currency.
Aston’s 2026/27 Regulations define AI misuse where the assessment forbids or limits AI in its brief and generated content is submitted as the student’s original work. They distinguish plagiarism/cheating from poor academic practice; the latter is addressed through assessment rather than disciplinary proceedings. Do not treat all AI assistance as misconduct.
适用范围: students governed by the cited source and stage · university
h Plagiarism – where a student uses, without appropriate acknowledgement, the
work of other people and presents it as their own which may give an unfair
advantage over others. Intentional and unintentional acts of plagiarism will be
construed as offences.
i Misusing Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools – In an assessment where the use of
Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools is not permitted, or permitted in only a specific
manner as outlined in the relevant assessment brief, a student uses one or more
AI tools to generate assessment content which is then submitted as their own
original work. AI tools can include Chatbots used to generate text or AI tools
used to generate images.
C1.3 The University recognises that a distinction should be made between (i) plagiarism
and cheating and (ii) poor academic practice. The University considers judgements
made regarding this distinction in relation to particular pieces of student work to be
a matter of academic judgement. Poor academic practice will be addressed through
the assessment of the work and will not result in disciplinary proceedings being
brought against a student.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 755–771
SHA-256: 1066442954f32d3c02bc4703924e94dd2eee3465cd0a63b763e38bd9a8a1dcba
本站解读
University Academic Misconduct Board 听证须提前至少十个工作日发书面传票,列指控、代理权、时间及程序。学生有权听取支持证据、陈述,并作最后总结发言。
校方 · 采用此程序时须遵守
校方 · 至少提前;参照日期:听证日期
工作日,排除周六周日、bank holidays 及学校关闭日;A1.20 保留按个案变更时间尺度;须核对通知。
适用范围: students governed by the cited source and stage · Limited to the captured official source, stated conditions and relevant course/programme/stage. Retrieval does not certify exhaustive legal currency.
For a University Academic Misconduct Board hearing, written summons is sent at least ten working days beforehand, with charge, representation right, time and procedure. The student is entitled to hear supporting evidence, state their case and make the last concluding statement.
适用范围: students governed by the cited source and stage · university
PART E UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT BOARD
E1 Cases referred to the University Academic Misconduct Board
E1.1 A student whose case is to be heard by the University Academic Misconduct Board
shall be sent a written summons by the Secretary to appear before the University
Academic Misconduct Board at least 10 working days before the date of the hearing.
The student will be given notice of the charge, of the right to representation, the date
and time of the hearing and the procedure to be followed by the University Academic
Misconduct Board.
21
AU-UESEC-25-6663-A 2026/27
E1.2 At a hearing the student shall be entitled to hear all the evidence in support of the
charge and to state their own case. The case against the student shall be presented
first. Both parties shall have the right to make a concluding statement, that of the
student being heard last.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 1041–1060
SHA-256: 1066442954f32d3c02bc4703924e94dd2eee3465cd0a63b763e38bd9a8a1dcba
A1.20 Timescales: ‘days’ in these Regulations means working days i.e. not including
Saturdays, Sundays or bank holidays or days on which the University is closed.
Whilst the University will take all reasonable steps to comply with the timescales set
out in these Regulations, it reserves the right to vary them depending on the
circumstances of individual cases.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 305–309
SHA-256: 1066442954f32d3c02bc4703924e94dd2eee3465cd0a63b763e38bd9a8a1dcba
本站解读
2026/27 Tariff 将违反任务说明且未标明的 AI 使用列为可能 severity 1–4。非典型案件可为一致与公平作有理由调整,因此不是全部 AI 案件同一等级或处分。
适用范围: students governed by the cited source and stage · Limited to the captured official source, stated conditions and relevant course/programme/stage. Retrieval does not certify exhaustive legal currency.
The 2026/27 Tariff places unreferenced AI use contrary to the assessment brief across possible severity levels 1–4. It allows justified variations for atypical cases to balance consistency and fairness. It therefore does not assign every AI case the same severity or penalty.
适用范围: students governed by the cited source and stage · university
The following table indicating severity of common offences is used:
The Tariff gives the penalties that should be applied in the majority of cases. Where the circumstances
are atypical, variations to the Tariff may be made to secure fairness, in line with the advice from the
Office of the Independent Adjudicator that higher education institutions should balance consistency of
penalties with fairness in individual cases. Members of staff dealing with atypical cases have discretion
(within the limits of the penalties allowed under this Tariff) to impose lower or higher penalties if the
circumstances justify them.
Example offence Likely severity level
Direct inclusion of unacknowledged material of lesser quantity and/or 1 or 2
importance e.g. inclusion of a small amount of material which is of subsidiary
importance to the main argument or theme of the work
Collusion within fixed-window or coursework assessments, depending on 1, 2, or 3
extent and nature
Unreferenced use of artificial intelligence in an assessment in contravention 1, 2, 3, or 4
to the relevant assessment brief.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 18–33
SHA-256: e3f4d62606b28b5839e13e918cd6fa92d5e3200aafe75615668ad67b5a747c88
Severity Penalty
0 No penalty to awarded mark. A warning will be given. A Level 0 penalty can only be
arrived at through mitigation.
1 Up to 25% penalty to awarded mark obtained for the element of assessment.* For
Pass/Fail assessments where no final mark is awarded, there will be no penalty to
assessment result, but the offence will be added to the student’s academic record.
2 Up to 50% penalty to awarded mark obtained for the element of assessment.* For
Pass/Fail assessments where no final mark is awarded, the element of assessment will
be awarded a fail mark and a resit opportunity granted if applicable.
3 Award 0% for the element of assessment*
4 Offences of severity level 4 should be referred to the University Academic Misconduct
Board will determine the penalty, with the additional penalties listed in Regulations D1.4
and D1.6 of the Regulations on Student Discipline becoming available. In addition to
the penalties available within this Tariff of Penalties (Regulation D1.5), penalty D1.4(f),
and D1.4(g), (j) and (k) in the most serious cases, are the most appropriate penalties
for academic offences. Normally at least a reprimand (formal warning) will be given.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 62–77
SHA-256: e3f4d62606b28b5839e13e918cd6fa92d5e3200aafe75615668ad67b5a747c88
本站解读
Authorised/Academic Offences Officer 决定可在通知后十个工作日内向 University Discipline Officer 书面列理由及案件摘要申诉。理由限重大程序不当或有充分理由此前无法取得的重要新证据;承认违规者仅可就处罚减轻申诉。
学生 · 采用此程序时须遵守
学生 · 起算:Officer 决定被通知
工作日,排除周六周日、bank holidays 及学校关闭日;重大程序问题/重要新证据;承认违规者仅可求减轻处罚。A1.20 保留按个案变更时间尺度;须核对通知。
适用范围: students governed by the cited source and stage · Limited to the captured official source, stated conditions and relevant course/programme/stage. Retrieval does not certify exhaustive legal currency.
An Authorised/Academic Offences Officer decision has a written grounds-and-case-summary appeal to the University Discipline Officer within ten working days of notification. Grounds are material procedural irregularity or material new evidence unavailable for good reason; admitted offences may be appealed only in mitigation of penalty.
适用范围: students governed by the cited source and stage · university
F1 Appeal against the decision of the Authorised Officer or Academic Offences
Officer
F1.1 The grounds for appeal are:
a procedural irregularity of a material nature, including the commission of an
error during the disciplinary hearing;
b new evidence material to the case which the student can demonstrate was for
good reason not previously available.
F1.2 A student who has admitted an offence may only appeal in mitigation of the penalty.
F1.3 Appeals against the decision of the Authorised Officer or the Academic Offences
Officer
F1.3.1 A student who wishes to appeal against the decision of the Authorised
Officer, or the Academic Offences Officer must give notice in writing of
the grounds for appeal including a summary of their case, to the
University Discipline Officer within 10 working days of the decision being
notified. The University Discipline Officer will determine whether there are
grounds for appeal. If valid grounds for appeal are identified for
consideration the appeal against the decision of the Authorised Officer
will be heard by a University Disciplinary Board Chair. Appeals against
the decision of the Academic Offences Officer may be heard by a
University Academic Misconduct Board Chair.
F1.3.2 The student will receive these Regulations and the detailed procedures查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 1118–1139
SHA-256: 1066442954f32d3c02bc4703924e94dd2eee3465cd0a63b763e38bd9a8a1dcba
A1.20 Timescales: ‘days’ in these Regulations means working days i.e. not including
Saturdays, Sundays or bank holidays or days on which the University is closed.
Whilst the University will take all reasonable steps to comply with the timescales set
out in these Regulations, it reserves the right to vary them depending on the
circumstances of individual cases.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 305–309
SHA-256: 1066442954f32d3c02bc4703924e94dd2eee3465cd0a63b763e38bd9a8a1dcba
本站解读
最初由 University Disciplinary Board/Academic Misconduct Board 决定及 precautionary exclusion 的案件,另走 Senate Disciplinary Appeals Committee 路线,在通知后十个工作日内向其 Secretary 书面列理由。适用重大程序不当/新证据理由,与 Officer 申诉路线不同。
学生 · 采用此程序时须遵守
学生 · 起算:Board 决定或 precautionary exclusion 被通知
工作日,排除周六周日、bank holidays 及学校关闭日;此路线与 Officer 决定路线不同。A1.20 保留按个案变更时间尺度;须核对通知。
适用范围: students governed by the cited source and stage · Limited to the captured official source, stated conditions and relevant course/programme/stage. Retrieval does not certify exhaustive legal currency.
For initial University Disciplinary Board/Academic Misconduct Board decisions (and precautionary exclusion), the Senate Disciplinary Appeals Committee route separately requires written grounds to its Secretary within ten working days of notification. Material procedural irregularity/new evidence grounds apply; this is distinct from the Officer appeal route.
适用范围: students governed by the cited source and stage · university
F2 The Senate Disciplinary Appeals Committee for cases heard initially by a
University Disciplinary Board or a University Academic Misconduct Board
F2.1 The grounds for appeal are:
a procedural irregularity of a material nature, including the commission of an
error during the disciplinary hearing;
b new evidence material to the case which the student can demonstrate was for
good reason not previously available.
F2.2 A student who wishes to appeal against precautionary exclusion or the decision of
the University Disciplinary Board or University Academic Misconduct Board must give
notice in writing including a summary of the grounds on which the appeal is made, to
the Secretary of the Senate Disciplinary Appeals Committee within 10 working days
of the decision being notified.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 1167–1179
SHA-256: 1066442954f32d3c02bc4703924e94dd2eee3465cd0a63b763e38bd9a8a1dcba
A1.20 Timescales: ‘days’ in these Regulations means working days i.e. not including
Saturdays, Sundays or bank holidays or days on which the University is closed.
Whilst the University will take all reasonable steps to comply with the timescales set
out in these Regulations, it reserves the right to vary them depending on the
circumstances of individual cases.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 305–309
SHA-256: 1066442954f32d3c02bc4703924e94dd2eee3465cd0a63b763e38bd9a8a1dcba
本站解读
学生 representative 通常来自 Students’ Union Advice Centre,可发言及询问证人。普通会议至少前三个工作日、Academic Misconduct Board 前五个、Disciplinary Board/Appeals Committee 前十个提供姓名。Officer 须尽早指向 Advice Centre 或 Personal Tutor 支持。
学生 · 采用此程序时须遵守
学生 · 至少提前;参照日期:相应会议日期
工作日,排除周六周日、bank holidays 及学校关闭日;representative 可代言和问证人;friend 提供道德支持、不预期正式发言。A1.20 保留按个案变更时间尺度;须核对通知。
学生 · 采用此程序时须遵守
学生 · 至少提前;参照日期:相应会议日期
工作日,排除周六周日、bank holidays 及学校关闭日;representative 可代言和问证人;friend 提供道德支持、不预期正式发言。A1.20 保留按个案变更时间尺度;须核对通知。
学生 · 采用此程序时须遵守
学生 · 至少提前;参照日期:相应会议日期
工作日,排除周六周日、bank holidays 及学校关闭日;representative 可代言和问证人;friend 提供道德支持、不预期正式发言。A1.20 保留按个案变更时间尺度;须核对通知。
适用范围: students governed by the cited source and stage · Limited to the captured official source, stated conditions and relevant course/programme/stage. Retrieval does not certify exhaustive legal currency.
A student representative, normally from the Students’ Union Advice Centre, may speak and question witnesses. Provide the representative’s name at least three working days before ordinary meetings, five before an Academic Misconduct Board and ten before a Disciplinary Board/Appeals Committee. Officers must direct students to Advice Centre or Personal Tutor support early.
适用范围: students governed by the cited source and stage · university
A1.18 Student representative: students may be represented. Normally, this role is fulfilled
by a member of staff from the Students’ Union’s Advice Centre. A representative
has the right to speak to and question witnesses on the students’ behalf. One
representative may attend any meeting at which the student is present. The name
of the representative must be provided not less than three working days before the
date of any meetings, 5 working days before the date of a meeting of the University
Academic Misconduct Board and 10 working days before a meeting of the University
Disciplinary Board or University Disciplinary Appeals Committee.
A1.19 Support and guidance: the Authorised Officer, University Discipline Officer or
School Academic Offences Officer must advise the student at the earliest
opportunity of the availability of support and guidance from the Students’ Union
Advice Centre or their Personal Tutor. Students should be advised to make proper
use of digital security measures at all times. Whilst it is important that students
should retain all notes and other resources used in drafting assessments until marks
have been finally released, they should also be alerted to the danger of such
resources being copied without their knowledge, especially computer files stored on
hard disks or networks.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 288–304
SHA-256: 1066442954f32d3c02bc4703924e94dd2eee3465cd0a63b763e38bd9a8a1dcba
A1.9 Friend: students may be accompanied by one friend in addition to their
representative. The role of the friend is to provide moral support to the student if
desired. A friend is not expected to speak or take any formal part in disciplinary
proceedings. One friend may attend any meeting at which the student is present.
The name of the friend must be provided not less than three working days before
the date of any meetings, 5 working days before a meeting of the University
5
AU-UESEC-25-6663-A 2026/27
Academic Misconduct Board and 10 working days before a meeting of the University
Disciplinary Board or University Disciplinary Appeals Committee.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 211–225
SHA-256: 1066442954f32d3c02bc4703924e94dd2eee3465cd0a63b763e38bd9a8a1dcba
A1.20 Timescales: ‘days’ in these Regulations means working days i.e. not including
Saturdays, Sundays or bank holidays or days on which the University is closed.
Whilst the University will take all reasonable steps to comply with the timescales set
out in these Regulations, it reserves the right to vary them depending on the
circumstances of individual cases.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 305–309
SHA-256: 1066442954f32d3c02bc4703924e94dd2eee3465cd0a63b763e38bd9a8a1dcba
本站解读
Aston 公告区分教职员完整 Microsoft 365 Copilot 与全体学生 Copilot Chat,并预计2026年7月完成 rollout。较新 student essentials 页也列 Adobe Creative Cloud Pro+ 及每月生成积分。这是访问公告,不证明 rollout 已完成、个人登录或任务许可。
适用范围: students and staff under the captured service conditions · Limited to the captured official source, stated conditions and relevant course/programme/stage. Retrieval does not certify exhaustive legal currency.
Aston’s announcement distinguishes full Microsoft 365 Copilot for staff from Copilot Chat for all students and projected full rollout by July 2026. The newer student essentials page also lists Adobe Creative Cloud Pro+ and monthly generative credits. These are attributed access announcements, not proof of completed rollout, individual login or task permission.
适用范围: students and staff under the captured service conditions · university
Aston University is first Midlands University to provide all staff with Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Chat for Students
Aston University is first Midlands University to provide all staff with Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Chat for Students
Published on 06/03/2026
Share this Article:
Copied to clipboard
Jen Wyatt, director of education, Microsoft UK and Professor Aleks Subic, Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive of Aston University
Aston University has become one of the first universities in the UK to provide full Microsoft 365 Copilot capabilities to all staff
The strategic partnership will give all staff access to the full suite and provide students with chat capabilities
The initiative will provide students with work-ready skills, and academic staff tools to boost their research.
Aston University has become one of the first universities in the UK to offer Microsoft 365 Copilot to all staff with training and support, as well as providing access to Copilot Chat for all students.
The strategic partnership with the company which is the first announced by a Midlands university, will equip students with future-ready skills and will strengthen teaching and research. All staff will benefit from the full Microsoft 365 Copilot suite, including specialist agents such as Researcher and Analyst, and productivity apps like Word, Excel, and PowerPoint that have Copilot built in.
The full roll out will be completed by July 2026 and will give students the skills they need to flourish in an AI-driven economy. The initiative will also help the University’s staff to benefit from tools to become more innovative and operationally efficient, giving them more time for higher-value, strategic activity.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 145–156
SHA-256: 9e522af814e42f24605be764477bbe76eb65407782892e20d055de64ed10b65d
Value-add! Adobe Creative Cloud Pro+ and Microsoft Copilot for our students
At Aston, every student has access to Adobe Creative Cloud Pro+ and Microsoft Copilot as part of our commitment to helping you succeed in your studies and future career.
This gives you access to industry-leading tools for learning, creativity, collaboration and AI-powered productivity, including Adobe Acrobat AI, PDF Spaces, Student Spaces, Photoshop, Express, InDesign and many more.
You'll also receive 1,000 Adobe generative AI credits every month, enabling you to create, edit and enhance content using Adobe Firefly and partner AI technologies integrated across Adobe applications.
Find out more
Aston is the only UK university currently providing this level of access to both Adobe Creative Cloud Pro+ and Microsoft Copilot for all students, helping you develop the digital and AI skills expected by employers.⚡查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 178–183
SHA-256: e78654bdf1a689727e4fcebe7be8223b087fb420d2d06c0f457839986f614d52
已发布的来源补充。英文摘要与原语言引文和已审核记录分开展示。这里列出可能的程序与结果,不是使用 AI 的自动处罚;现行适用性尚未独立确认,请核对来源的适用范围和版本。
按所存原文核对;不是官方译文
哈希仅用于核对所存内容,不证明现行有效性或不可篡改。这些主题不表示每个学生都会经历的流程。
能获取工具不等于获准在作业中使用。请同时核对任务规则、适用人员和数据限制。
存档工具记录;当前获取方式请核对官方来源。 以下获取说明与证据引用保留原文语言。
Aston gives students free use of Adobe Creative Cloud, including Adobe Express and its AI technology.
Sign in to Adobe with Aston login details and install or use Creative Cloud applications and services.
Free to Aston students.
原文引用
Aston is proud to be the Midlands' only Adobe Creative Campus, giving students free use of the Adobe Creative Cloud. Students have access to the full suite including Adobe Express, including new AI technology from Adobe; sign in to the Adobe website using Aston login details.Aston provides full Microsoft 365 Copilot capabilities, including Researcher and Analyst, to all staff with training and support.
Provided to Aston staff as part of the Microsoft 365 Copilot rollout.
Not specified.
原文引用
Aston University has become one of the first universities in the UK to provide full Microsoft 365 Copilot capabilities to all staff. All staff will benefit from the full Microsoft 365 Copilot suite, including specialist agents such as Researcher and Analyst.Aston provides Copilot Chat access for all students through its strategic Microsoft partnership.
Available to Aston students as part of the Copilot rollout.
Not specified.
原文引用
Aston University offers Microsoft 365 Copilot to all staff with training and support, as well as providing access to Copilot Chat for all students. The strategic partnership will provide students with chat capabilities.Reviewed record
8 条已审核条款
Academic Integrity
标准化值: ai_generated_content_submitted_as_own_when_not_permitted
原始证据
证据 1Misusing Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools – In an assessment where the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools is not permitted, a student uses one or more AI tools to generate assessment content which is then submitted as their own original work.
Academic Integrity
标准化值: unreferenced_ai_contrary_assessment_brief_offence
原始证据
证据 1The offence relating to the misuse of artificial intelligence tools has been reworded: Unreferenced use of artificial intelligence in an assessment in contravention to the relevant assessment brief.
教学
标准化值: ai_use_disclosure_and_clear_specification_guidance
原始证据
证据 1Use of AI tools should be disclosed – especially when applied in the generation of content. Appropriate application and use of AI tools should be clearly specified for learners and researchers.
Ai Tool Treatment
标准化值: {"tool":"adobe_express","rawToolName":"Adobe Express with AI technology","description":"Aston gives students free use of Adobe Creative Cloud, including Adobe Express and its AI technology.","howToObtain":"Sign in to Adobe with Aston login details and install or use Creative Cloud applications and services.","costToUser":"Free to Aston students.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}
原始证据
证据 1Aston is proud to be the Midlands' only Adobe Creative Campus, giving students free use of the Adobe Creative Cloud. Students have access to the full suite including Adobe Express, including new AI technology from Adobe; sign in to the Adobe website using Aston login details.
本地化显示 only
Aston is proud to be the Midlands' only Adobe Creative Campus, giving students free use of the Adobe Creative Cloud. Students have access to the full suite including Adobe Express, including new AI technology from Adobe; sign in to the Adobe website using Aston login details.
Ai Tool Treatment
标准化值: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft 365 Copilot","description":"Aston provides full Microsoft 365 Copilot capabilities, including Researcher and Analyst, to all staff with training and support.","howToObtain":"Provided to Aston staff as part of the Microsoft 365 Copilot rollout.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}
原始证据
证据 1Aston University has become one of the first universities in the UK to provide full Microsoft 365 Copilot capabilities to all staff. All staff will benefit from the full Microsoft 365 Copilot suite, including specialist agents such as Researcher and Analyst.
本地化显示 only
Aston University has become one of the first universities in the UK to provide full Microsoft 365 Copilot capabilities to all staff. All staff will benefit from the full Microsoft 365 Copilot suite, including specialist agents such as Researcher and Analyst.
Ai Tool Treatment
标准化值: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot Chat","description":"Aston provides Copilot Chat access for all students through its strategic Microsoft partnership.","howToObtain":"Available to Aston students as part of the Copilot rollout.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}
原始证据
证据 1Aston University offers Microsoft 365 Copilot to all staff with training and support, as well as providing access to Copilot Chat for all students. The strategic partnership will provide students with chat capabilities.
本地化显示 only
Aston University offers Microsoft 365 Copilot to all staff with training and support, as well as providing access to Copilot Chat for all students. The strategic partnership will provide students with chat capabilities.
Ai Tool Treatment
标准化值: assessment_brief_ai_status_required
原始证据
证据 1For every assessment, without exception, the status of the assessment regarding permitted/prohibited use of generative AI must be explicitly indicated to students in the assessment brief.
Ai Tool Treatment
标准化值: permitted_ai_as_starting_point_not_replacement
原始证据
证据 1When permitted to use AI in an assessment, use it as a starting point to assist and/or structure your thinking rather than a solution to replace your thinking.
Source record
5 个来源
aston.ac.uk
aston.ac.uk
aston.ac.uk
aston.ac.uk
aston.ac.uk
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Aston University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/aston-university
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
打开变更日志Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.