Birmingham, United Kingdom

Aston University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources3Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/aston-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence74%

AI disclosure

Aston University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence71%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Teaching guidance

Aston University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence71%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

Aston University has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence71%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

Aston University's 2024/25 student discipline regulations define misusing AI tools as an academic offence where AI use is not permitted and a student uses AI tools to generate assessment content submitted as their own original work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: ai_generated_content_submitted_as_own_when_not_permitted

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Misusing Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools – In an assessment where the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools is not permitted, a student uses one or more AI tools to generate assessment content which is then submitted as their own original work.

Ai Tool Treatment

Aston University staff guidance says each assessment brief must explicitly state whether generative AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: assessment_brief_ai_status_required

Original evidence

Evidence 1
For every assessment, without exception, the status of the assessment regarding permitted/prohibited use of generative AI must be explicitly indicated to students in the assessment brief.

Academic Integrity

Aston University's 2025/26 general regulations update identifies unreferenced use of artificial intelligence in an assessment in contravention of the relevant assessment brief as an academic offence category.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: unreferenced_ai_contrary_assessment_brief_offence

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The offence relating to the misuse of artificial intelligence tools has been reworded: Unreferenced use of artificial intelligence in an assessment in contravention to the relevant assessment brief.

Ai Tool Treatment

Aston University's student guidance advises that when AI is permitted in an assessment, students should use it as a starting point to assist or structure thinking rather than as a replacement for their own thinking.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: permitted_ai_as_starting_point_not_replacement

Original evidence

Evidence 1
When permitted to use AI in an assessment, use it as a starting point to assist and/or structure your thinking rather than a solution to replace your thinking.

Teaching

Aston University's AI code of conduct guidance says use of AI tools should be disclosed, especially when applied in the generation of content, and appropriate uses should be clearly specified for learners and researchers.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Normalized value: ai_use_disclosure_and_clear_specification_guidance

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Use of AI tools should be disclosed – especially when applied in the generation of content. Appropriate application and use of AI tools should be clearly specified for learners and researchers.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities