Bologna, Italy

Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna

更多政策信息

已发布的来源摘要 (10)

这些摘要依据留存的官方来源材料;现行适用性尚未独立确认。其余摘要保留原语言,官方引文始终保留原文。

作业与考试许可

AI 明示条款

本站解读 · 官方原文见下方

The policy does not prohibit or monitor GenAI universally, but students must follow course permissions, verify outputs, acknowledge original sources and explain their critical contribution. General encouragement is not unconditional assessment permission.

记录的适用范围
学生 · university · Teaching/research students and staff; professional staff activity excluded
记录的主题
作业与考试许可
记录的约束程度
permitted
官方来源与存档引文
官方来源与存档引文 ↗
In line with the principles of mutual trust and openness to change, the University considers that the use of GenAI should be permitted and does not adopt measures aimed at prohibiting or monitoring its use, believing that adherence to the values and principles of the Statute, the Code of Ethics and Conduct, and the Regulations on research integrity are sufficient to ensure that every member of the community acts responsibly and consciously in the face of the opportunities and risks of GenAI, thus avoiding improper or harmful uses.

采集日期: · 行号: 56–61

存档哈希: eb65d3642d6734a3bff8228bf07cf186a2b5938130e8e389590076afa38b7162

使用披露

AI 明示条款

本站解读 · 官方原文见下方

Substantial GenAI use must be declared, with relevant third-party contractual requirements followed. Substantial/non-substantial distinctions depend on the contribution and discipline: translation or language work can itself be the core disciplinary task.

记录的适用范围
学生 · university · Teaching/research students and staff; professional staff activity excluded
记录的主题
使用披露
记录的约束程度
mandatory
官方来源与存档引文
官方来源与存档引文 ↗
• Declaring when GenAI is being used substantially in research and teaching, and in the exploitation of their results, and, in any case, verifying and adhering to any specific indications on the responsible use of GenAI contained in agreements with third parties such as contracts with publishers, funding bodies, companies, etc.

采集日期: · 行号: 208–211

存档哈希: eb65d3642d6734a3bff8228bf07cf186a2b5938130e8e389590076afa38b7162

隐私与学生作品

AI 明示条款

本站解读 · 官方原文见下方

The policy restricts sharing third-party data without consent or another legal basis, and confidential/unpublished material without the stated confidentiality/non-retraining safeguards. Separately, NDA-protected data must not be uploaded. The stronger NDA prohibition is not weakened to the general safeguards exception.

记录的适用范围
学生 · university · Teaching/research students and staff; professional staff activity excluded
记录的主题
隐私与学生作品
记录的约束程度
禁止
官方来源与存档引文
官方来源与存档引文 ↗
• Refraining from providing online GenAI systems with personal data of third parties, including special categories of data such as health or genetic data, unless the data subject gives his or her consent or another suitable legal basis for the processing exists. • Refraining from uploading confidential information into GenAI systems, including protected or confidential data (other than personal data), information covered by non- disclosure agreements with third parties, business strategy data that are not in the public domain, unless there are assurances that the data will be kept confidential.

采集日期: · 行号: 164–171

存档哈希: eb65d3642d6734a3bff8228bf07cf186a2b5938130e8e389590076afa38b7162

AI 评分与人工监督

AI 明示条款

本站解读 · 官方原文见下方

The policy advises avoiding substantial GenAI use that affects others, including grading and peer review. This is not converted into a ban on every incidental AI-assisted grading activity.

记录的适用范围
evaluators · university · Teaching/research students and staff; professional staff activity excluded
记录的主题
AI 评分与人工监督
记录的约束程度
建议
官方来源与存档引文
官方来源与存档引文 ↗
• Avoiding substantial use of GenAI tools when this could impact other people or organisations, e.g. for peer review, research project evaluation, student test assessment.

采集日期: · 行号: 149–150

存档哈希: eb65d3642d6734a3bff8228bf07cf186a2b5938130e8e389590076afa38b7162

边界与疑虑

AI 明示条款

本站解读 · 官方原文见下方

Human authors remain responsible for avoiding plagiarism and preserving integrity when using GenAI. The policy does not make permitted AI use itself misconduct or supply an automatic AI-specific punishment.

记录的适用范围
学生 · university · Teaching/research students and staff; professional staff activity excluded
记录的主题
边界与疑虑
记录的约束程度
描述性说明
官方来源与存档引文
官方来源与存档引文 ↗
• Thoroughly checking research products, teaching products and student assessment tests, including dissertations, to make sure that they do not contain plagiarism, especially when GenAI is used substantially to generate, expand or rework content. • Respecting other people’s work and giving them credit for it, since the output of GenAI tools may rely on other people’s results. Each person using GenAI is fully accountable for the accuracy and consistency of the output, as well as liable for any plagiarism.

采集日期: · 行号: 183–189

存档哈希: eb65d3642d6734a3bff8228bf07cf186a2b5938130e8e389590076afa38b7162

调查与回应

通用违规处理框架;不是使用 AI 的自动后果

本站解读 · 官方原文见下方

The Rector exercises disciplinary initiative by sending a charge note. University communications must provide reliable evidence of awareness and students use institutional email. The accused has ten days from receipt of the charge note for a written defence and/or request to be heard orally; a trusted person may attend the hearing.

记录的适用范围
学生 · university · Official landing states effective25April2026; pending old-charge cases retain2019rule · Programme-specific rules/compatibility exceptions apply
记录的主题
调查与回应
记录的约束程度
描述性说明
官方来源与存档引文
官方来源与存档引文 ↗
Art. 7. Potere di iniziativa 1. Il potere di iniziativa disciplinare è esercitato discrezionalmente dal Rettore nel rispetto delle norme statutarie, inviando nota di contestazione agli studenti interessati. Art. 8. Comunicazioni tra studenti e Ateneo 1. L’Ateneo esegue le comunicazioni previste dal presente Regolamento con modalità telematiche idonee a garantire prova dell’avvenuta conoscenza da parte degli studenti destinatari, oppure con lettera raccomandata con avviso di ricevimento. 2. Gli studenti comunicano con l’Ateneo con la propria mail istituzionale. Art. 9. Diritto di difesa 1. Lo studente incolpato ha diritto ad esercitare le proprie difese nel termine di dieci giorni dal ricevimento della nota di contestazione. 2. Lo studente incolpato può presentare difese scritte e/o chiedere che venga fissata la sua audizione per presentare difese orali. 3. La Commissione Disciplinare Studenti fissa giorno e ora in cui procedere all’audizione innanzi a sé, con l’avviso che la mancata presentazione dello studente alla data indicata lo farà decadere dal diritto di essere ascoltato a propria difesa. Lo studente che dimostra di non aver potuto partecipare all’audizione per causa a lui non imputabile può chiedere venga fissata altra seduta allo scopo. 4. All’audizione può presenziare insieme allo studente una persona di sua fiducia.

采集日期: · 行号: 135–154

存档哈希: 245781b777d84613688333b517cef4960d73bd387a53d6ac46921163a956d477

通用违规处理框架;不是使用 AI 的自动后果

本站解读 · 官方原文见下方

The Committee imposes sanctions other than university suspension; for suspension it submits a proposal to the Academic Senate, which can adopt or vary it with reasons. Committee members do not vote in that Senate decision. The actor distinction is retained.

记录的适用范围
学生 · university · Official landing states effective25April2026; pending old-charge cases retain2019rule · Programme-specific rules/compatibility exceptions apply
记录的主题
调查与回应
记录的约束程度
描述性说明
官方来源与存档引文
官方来源与存档引文 ↗
Art. 12. Decisione del procedimento disciplinare 1. La Commissione Disciplinare Studenti, dato seguito all’eventuale audizione delle persone incolpate, esamina l’intera istruttoria eseguita ed emette direttamente il provvedimento disciplinare in calce al verbale della seduta, tutte le volte in cui ritiene applicarsi una sanzione diversa dalla sospensione. 2. Se la Commissione Disciplinare Studenti ritiene doversi emettere un provvedimento di sospensione, avanza questa proposta al Senato Accademico alla prima seduta utile, che può farlo proprio oppure discostarsene motivatamente. I membri della Commissione Disciplinare Studenti non possono partecipare alla votazione del Senato Accademico sulla proposta di sanzione formulata e non vengono conteggiati nel quorum costitutivo e deliberativo del Senato medesimo. 3. L’applicazione dei provvedimenti disciplinari deve rispondere a criteri di ragionevolezza ed equità, avuto riguardo alla natura della violazione, allo svolgimento dei fatti e alla valutazione degli elementi di prova, alla durata del corso, nonché all’irrogazione di precedenti sanzioni disciplinari, anche relative a pregresse carriere attivate nell’Ateneo da parte del medesimo studente.

采集日期: · 行号: 201–213

存档哈希: 245781b777d84613688333b517cef4960d73bd387a53d6ac46921163a956d477

通用违规处理框架;不是使用 AI 的自动后果

本站解读 · 官方原文见下方

The proceeding must end within180 days from the disciplinary charge; the rule is expressly peremptory. The stated Rector-ordered suspension for serious reasons connected with court proceedings interrupts the running period. This is a case-processing limit, not a student appeal deadline.

记录的适用范围
学生 · university · Official landing states effective25April2026; pending old-charge cases retain2019rule · Programme-specific rules/compatibility exceptions apply
记录的主题
调查与回应
记录的约束程度
描述性说明
官方来源与存档引文
官方来源与存档引文 ↗
4. In ogni caso, la decisione del procedimento disciplinare deve avvenire nel termine perentorio di centottanta giorni dalla contestazione disciplinare.

采集日期: · 行号: 224–225

存档哈希: 245781b777d84613688333b517cef4960d73bd387a53d6ac46921163a956d477

通用违规处理框架;不是使用 AI 的自动后果

本站解读 · 官方原文见下方

The2026 regulation repeals the2019 regulation, but proceedings with a charge note already signed on the effective date continue under the old regulation. New tariff and procedure are not automatically applied to all pending earlier cases.

记录的适用范围
学生 · university · Official landing states effective25April2026; pending old-charge cases retain2019rule · Programme-specific rules/compatibility exceptions apply
记录的主题
调查与回应
记录的约束程度
描述性说明
官方来源与存档引文
官方来源与存档引文 ↗
Art. 24. Entrata in vigore 1. Il presente Regolamento entra in vigore nel termine indicato dal Decreto Rettorale di emanazione. Art. 25. Effetti dell’entrata in vigore 1. Con l’entrata in vigore del presente regolamento viene abrogato il Regolamento per i Procedimenti Disciplinari degli Studenti emanato con D.R. n. 1918 del 09/10/2019 e ss.mm.. 2. I procedimenti disciplinari avviati in vigenza del Regolamento emanato con D.R. n. 1918 del 09/10/2019 e ss.mm. continuano ad essere disciplinati da questa disciplina fino alla loro naturale conclusione. 3. Si considerano avviati in vigenza del Regolamento emanato con D.R. n. 1918 del 09/10/2019 e ss.mm. tutti i procedimenti in cui la nota di contestazione risulta firmata alla data di entrata in vigore del presente testo normativo.

采集日期: · 行号: 308–318

存档哈希: 245781b777d84613688333b517cef4960d73bd387a53d6ac46921163a956d477

可能的处理结果

通用违规处理框架;不是使用 AI 的自动后果

本站解读 · 官方原文见下方

Available sanctions range from admonition to examination exclusion for one day–three months, exclusion from specified courses/exams for three months and one day–six months, and university suspension for six months and one day–twelve months. They operate when made known; this generic tariff is not an automatic AI sanction.

记录的适用范围
学生 · university · Official landing states effective25April2026; pending old-charge cases retain2019rule · Programme-specific rules/compatibility exceptions apply
记录的主题
可能的处理结果
记录的约束程度
possible
官方来源与存档引文
官方来源与存档引文 ↗
Art. 17. Ammonizione 1. L’ammonizione consiste in una nota di biasimo indirizzata allo studente che ha commesso la violazione. Art. 18. Esclusione temporanea da uno o più esami 1. L’esclusione da uno o più esami può avere una durata minima di un giorno e una durata massima di tre mesi. 2. Lo studente escluso da uno o più esami non può iscriversi né sostenere esami di profitto o la prova finale per il periodo stabilito nel provvedimento sanzionatorio. Art. 19. Interdizione da uno o più insegnamenti e dai relativi esami 1. L’interdizione da uno o più insegnamenti ha una durata minima di tre mesi e un giorno ed una durata massima di sei mesi. 5 Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna NormAteneo - Sito di documentazione sulla normativa d’Ateneo vigente presso l’Università di Bologna – 2. Lo studente interdetto non può partecipare alle attività di didattiche di uno o più insegnamenti specifici, né sostenere esami di profitto o la prova finale per il periodo stabilito nel provvedimento sanzionatorio. Art. 20. Sospensione temporanea dall’Ateneo 1. La sospensione temporanea dall’Ateneo ha una durata minima di sei mesi e un giorno e una durata massima di dodici mesi. 2. Nel periodo di sospensione lo studente non può compiere atti di carriera, partecipare ad attività didattiche o sostenere esami di profitto o la prova finale. Art. 21. Efficacia della sanzione 1. Tutte le sanzioni acquistano efficacia dal momento in cui sono rese note al loro destinatario.

采集日期: · 行号: 259–290

存档哈希: 245781b777d84613688333b517cef4960d73bd387a53d6ac46921163a956d477

Reviewed record

已审核主张

7 reviewed claims

隐私

University of Bologna community members covered by the teaching and research GenAI policy are responsible for not entering third-party personal data or confidential/protected information into online GenAI systems unless an appropriate legal basis, consent, or confidentiality assurance exists.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: Personal data and confidential information restricted in online GenAI systems

原始证据

证据 1
Refraining from providing online GenAI systems with personal data of third parties, including special categories of data such as health or genetic data, unless the data subject gives his or her consent or another suitable legal basis for the processing exists. Refraining from uploading confidential information into GenAI systems, including protected or confidential data

Ai Tool Treatment

The University of Bologna policy treats GenAI as permitted support for teaching, learning, research and knowledge valorisation, while stating that GenAI should serve people and not replace creative and intellectual activity.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: GenAI permitted as responsible support, not replacement

原始证据

证据 1
The Policy guidelines aim to ensure that GenAI is used in a responsible and conscious way; to help improve the quality of teaching, learning and research also in collaborations with society and businesses; at the service of the people and not to replace their creative and intellectual activity.

Academic Integrity

University of Bologna citation guidance says substantial GenAI contributions in teaching and research should be acknowledged and declared, with the statement identifying tools or models, date or period of use, modes of use, and where the tool was used.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%

标准化值: Substantial GenAI use should be declared with tool, timing, use mode, and location details

原始证据

证据 1
it is crucial that each and every contribution deriving from substantial use of GenAI is acknowledged and declared... a complete GenAI statement should include the GenAI tools or models used and their version, the date or period of use, specific modes of use, and specific chapters, sections or subsections where the tool was used.

Ai Tool Treatment

The University of Bologna policy says it considers GenAI use permitted and does not adopt measures aimed at prohibiting or monitoring its use, relying on existing university values and regulations for responsible conduct.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%

标准化值: No general prohibition or monitoring measure stated in policy

原始证据

证据 1
the University considers that the use of GenAI should be permitted and does not adopt measures aimed at prohibiting or monitoring its use, believing that adherence to the values and principles of the Statute, the Code of Ethics and Conduct, and the Regulations on research integrity are sufficient

Academic Integrity

Under the University of Bologna GenAI policy, students are responsible for checking permitted uses, following teaching staff instructions, verifying GenAI output, acknowledging original sources, and being able to explain work produced with GenAI support.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: Students responsible for permitted-use checks, verification, source acknowledgement, and explanation

原始证据

证据 1
The responsibilities of students include checking the permitted uses of GenAI and using GenAI as instructed by the teaching staff and teaching assistants... using GenAI output only after checking its content and provided that the original source is acknowledged... being able to illustrate their work generated with the support of GenAI

教学

For GenAI use in assessed student work such as dissertation structure, dissertation writing, or programming code, University of Bologna guidance says the uses comply with policy principles only with active supervision, critical thinking, accountability for results, citation where required, and checking with the teacher whether the use is permitted.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度89%

标准化值: Assessed-work GenAI use conditioned on supervision, accountability, citation, and teacher permission checks

原始证据

证据 1
It complies with the University Policy principles, provided you implement active supervision and critical thinking and are able to account for the generated results. It requires citing the use of GenAI. It is recommended that you check with your teacher whether this use case is permitted and follow their instructions.

教学

For GenAI use in student learning, University of Bologna guidance says researching/explaining concepts, querying with examples, and summarising books or articles comply with policy principles and generally do not require citation, while students should check generated information, references and sources for accuracy.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度86%

标准化值: Learning uses comply with policy principles with source and accuracy checks

原始证据

证据 1
Researching and explaining concepts, theories, topics. It complies with the University Policy principles. It does not require citing the use of GenAI. Check the generated information for accuracy. Closely check all references to cited sources. Check the output relating to non-established knowledge for reliability. Check the sources used for accuracy also by means of specialist search engines.

Source record

官方来源

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度94%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 14, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/alma-mater-studiorum-universita-di-bologna

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志