University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

变更日志

Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

审核: 智能体已审核最后检查时间2026年5月14日最后更改时间2026年5月14日声明7来源4版本记录0
大学页面公开 JSON月度报告大学索引

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月14日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+14-0
11 # Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna AI policy record
2+privacy: University of Bologna community members covered by the teaching and research GenAI policy are responsible for not entering third-party personal data or confidential/protected information into online GenAI systems unless an appropriate legal basis, consent, or confidentiality assurance exists.
3+Evidence (en, 8e552b2ec5dd): Refraining from providing online GenAI systems with personal data of third parties, including special categories of data such as health or genetic data, unless the data subject gives his or her consent or another suitable legal basis for the processing exists. Refraining from uploading confidential information into GenAI systems, including protected or confidential data
4+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Bologna policy treats GenAI as permitted support for teaching, learning, research and knowledge valorisation, while stating that GenAI should serve people and not replace creative and intellectual activity.
5+Evidence (en, 8e552b2ec5dd): The Policy guidelines aim to ensure that GenAI is used in a responsible and conscious way; to help improve the quality of teaching, learning and research also in collaborations with society and businesses; at the service of the people and not to replace their creative and intellectual activity.
6+academic_integrity: University of Bologna citation guidance says substantial GenAI contributions in teaching and research should be acknowledged and declared, with the statement identifying tools or models, date or period of use, modes of use, and where the tool was used.
7+Evidence (en, efbce1343d04): it is crucial that each and every contribution deriving from substantial use of GenAI is acknowledged and declared... a complete GenAI statement should include the GenAI tools or models used and their version, the date or period of use, specific modes of use, and specific chapters, sections or subsections where the tool was used.
8+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Bologna policy says it considers GenAI use permitted and does not adopt measures aimed at prohibiting or monitoring its use, relying on existing university values and regulations for responsible conduct.
9+Evidence (en, 8e552b2ec5dd): the University considers that the use of GenAI should be permitted and does not adopt measures aimed at prohibiting or monitoring its use, believing that adherence to the values and principles of the Statute, the Code of Ethics and Conduct, and the Regulations on research integrity are sufficient
10+academic_integrity: Under the University of Bologna GenAI policy, students are responsible for checking permitted uses, following teaching staff instructions, verifying GenAI output, acknowledging original sources, and being able to explain work produced with GenAI support.
11+Evidence (en, 8e552b2ec5dd): The responsibilities of students include checking the permitted uses of GenAI and using GenAI as instructed by the teaching staff and teaching assistants... using GenAI output only after checking its content and provided that the original source is acknowledged... being able to illustrate their work generated with the support of GenAI
12+teaching: For GenAI use in assessed student work such as dissertation structure, dissertation writing, or programming code, University of Bologna guidance says the uses comply with policy principles only with active supervision, critical thinking, accountability for results, citation where required, and checking with the teacher whether the use is permitted.
13+Evidence (en, eadc0aaa3a4a): It complies with the University Policy principles, provided you implement active supervision and critical thinking and are able to account for the generated results. It requires citing the use of GenAI. It is recommended that you check with your teacher whether this use case is permitted and follow their instructions.
14+teaching: For GenAI use in student learning, University of Bologna guidance says researching/explaining concepts, querying with examples, and summarising books or articles comply with policy principles and generally do not require citation, while students should check generated information, references and sources for accuracy.
15+Evidence (en, f34614369dfd): Researching and explaining concepts, theories, topics. It complies with the University Policy principles. It does not require citing the use of GenAI. Check the generated information for accuracy. Closely check all references to cited sources. Check the output relating to non-established knowledge for reliability. Check the sources used for accuracy also by means of specialist search engines.

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

7 声明 条记录

privacy

University of Bologna community members covered by the teaching and research GenAI policy are responsible for not entering third-party personal data or confidential/protected information into online GenAI systems unless an appropriate legal basis, consent, or confidentiality assurance exists.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据1语言en

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Bologna policy treats GenAI as permitted support for teaching, learning, research and knowledge valorisation, while stating that GenAI should serve people and not replace creative and intellectual activity.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据1语言en

academic_integrity

University of Bologna citation guidance says substantial GenAI contributions in teaching and research should be acknowledged and declared, with the statement identifying tools or models, date or period of use, modes of use, and where the tool was used.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%证据1语言en

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Bologna policy says it considers GenAI use permitted and does not adopt measures aimed at prohibiting or monitoring its use, relying on existing university values and regulations for responsible conduct.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%证据1语言en

academic_integrity

Under the University of Bologna GenAI policy, students are responsible for checking permitted uses, following teaching staff instructions, verifying GenAI output, acknowledging original sources, and being able to explain work produced with GenAI support.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言en

teaching

For GenAI use in assessed student work such as dissertation structure, dissertation writing, or programming code, University of Bologna guidance says the uses comply with policy principles only with active supervision, critical thinking, accountability for results, citation where required, and checking with the teacher whether the use is permitted.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度89%证据1语言en

teaching

For GenAI use in student learning, University of Bologna guidance says researching/explaining concepts, querying with examples, and summarising books or articles comply with policy principles and generally do not require citation, while students should check generated information, references and sources for accuracy.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度86%证据1语言en

源快照

4 source attributions