University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Claims7Sources4
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+14-0
11 # Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna AI policy record
2+privacy: University of Bologna community members covered by the teaching and research GenAI policy are responsible for not entering third-party personal data or confidential/protected information into online GenAI systems unless an appropriate legal basis, consent, or confidentiality assurance exists.
3+Evidence (en, 8e552b2ec5dd): Refraining from providing online GenAI systems with personal data of third parties, including special categories of data such as health or genetic data, unless the data subject gives his or her consent or another suitable legal basis for the processing exists. Refraining from uploading confidential information into GenAI systems, including protected or confidential data
4+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Bologna policy treats GenAI as permitted support for teaching, learning, research and knowledge valorisation, while stating that GenAI should serve people and not replace creative and intellectual activity.
5+Evidence (en, 8e552b2ec5dd): The Policy guidelines aim to ensure that GenAI is used in a responsible and conscious way; to help improve the quality of teaching, learning and research also in collaborations with society and businesses; at the service of the people and not to replace their creative and intellectual activity.
6+academic_integrity: University of Bologna citation guidance says substantial GenAI contributions in teaching and research should be acknowledged and declared, with the statement identifying tools or models, date or period of use, modes of use, and where the tool was used.
7+Evidence (en, efbce1343d04): it is crucial that each and every contribution deriving from substantial use of GenAI is acknowledged and declared... a complete GenAI statement should include the GenAI tools or models used and their version, the date or period of use, specific modes of use, and specific chapters, sections or subsections where the tool was used.
8+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Bologna policy says it considers GenAI use permitted and does not adopt measures aimed at prohibiting or monitoring its use, relying on existing university values and regulations for responsible conduct.
9+Evidence (en, 8e552b2ec5dd): the University considers that the use of GenAI should be permitted and does not adopt measures aimed at prohibiting or monitoring its use, believing that adherence to the values and principles of the Statute, the Code of Ethics and Conduct, and the Regulations on research integrity are sufficient
10+academic_integrity: Under the University of Bologna GenAI policy, students are responsible for checking permitted uses, following teaching staff instructions, verifying GenAI output, acknowledging original sources, and being able to explain work produced with GenAI support.
11+Evidence (en, 8e552b2ec5dd): The responsibilities of students include checking the permitted uses of GenAI and using GenAI as instructed by the teaching staff and teaching assistants... using GenAI output only after checking its content and provided that the original source is acknowledged... being able to illustrate their work generated with the support of GenAI
12+teaching: For GenAI use in assessed student work such as dissertation structure, dissertation writing, or programming code, University of Bologna guidance says the uses comply with policy principles only with active supervision, critical thinking, accountability for results, citation where required, and checking with the teacher whether the use is permitted.
13+Evidence (en, eadc0aaa3a4a): It complies with the University Policy principles, provided you implement active supervision and critical thinking and are able to account for the generated results. It requires citing the use of GenAI. It is recommended that you check with your teacher whether this use case is permitted and follow their instructions.
14+teaching: For GenAI use in student learning, University of Bologna guidance says researching/explaining concepts, querying with examples, and summarising books or articles comply with policy principles and generally do not require citation, while students should check generated information, references and sources for accuracy.
15+Evidence (en, f34614369dfd): Researching and explaining concepts, theories, topics. It complies with the University Policy principles. It does not require citing the use of GenAI. Check the generated information for accuracy. Closely check all references to cited sources. Check the output relating to non-established knowledge for reliability. Check the sources used for accuracy also by means of specialist search engines.

Claim changes

7 claim records

privacy

University of Bologna community members covered by the teaching and research GenAI policy are responsible for not entering third-party personal data or confidential/protected information into online GenAI systems unless an appropriate legal basis, consent, or confidentiality assurance exists.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Bologna policy treats GenAI as permitted support for teaching, learning, research and knowledge valorisation, while stating that GenAI should serve people and not replace creative and intellectual activity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Bologna citation guidance says substantial GenAI contributions in teaching and research should be acknowledged and declared, with the statement identifying tools or models, date or period of use, modes of use, and where the tool was used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Bologna policy says it considers GenAI use permitted and does not adopt measures aimed at prohibiting or monitoring its use, relying on existing university values and regulations for responsible conduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Under the University of Bologna GenAI policy, students are responsible for checking permitted uses, following teaching staff instructions, verifying GenAI output, acknowledging original sources, and being able to explain work produced with GenAI support.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

For GenAI use in assessed student work such as dissertation structure, dissertation writing, or programming code, University of Bologna guidance says the uses comply with policy principles only with active supervision, critical thinking, accountability for results, citation where required, and checking with the teacher whether the use is permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

For GenAI use in student learning, University of Bologna guidance says researching/explaining concepts, querying with examples, and summarising books or articles comply with policy principles and generally do not require citation, while students should check generated information, references and sources for accuracy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions