Perugia, Italy

Università degli Studi di Perugia

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage6 reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources3Source languageitPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universita-degli-studi-di-perugia.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence81%

Privacy and data entry

Università degli Studi di Perugia has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

Università degli Studi di Perugia has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Source Status

The University of Perugia has an official institutional policy on the ethical and responsible use of generative artificial intelligence, listed in its official regulations index as issued with D.R. n. 3123 of 3 December 2025.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: official_genai_policy_issued_dr_3123_2025-12-03

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Policy per l'Uso Etico e Responsabile dell'Intelligenza Artificiale Generativa dell'Università degli Studi di Perugia Emanato con D.R. n. 3123 del 3/12/2025 Policy Decalogo

Localized display only

The official regulations index lists the UniPG GenAI policy and decalogue and says it was issued with D.R. n. 3123 of 3 December 2025.

Academic Integrity

UniPG says every substantial use of GenAI must be declared and verifiable; for students, when AI use is allowed and substantial, it must be explicitly declared.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: substantial_genai_use_must_be_declared_and_verifiable

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Ogni uso sostanziale della GenAI deve essere dichiarato e verificabile. Quando l'uso dell'IA è consentito e sostanziale ... le studentesse e gli studenti devono dichiararlo in modo esplicito.

Localized display only

Every substantial use of GenAI must be declared and verifiable; when students' AI use is allowed and substantial, they must explicitly declare it.

Academic Integrity

UniPG says students may use AI for a first draft or text reformulation if declared, but may not present an entirely AI-produced work as their own without personal contribution and adequate indication.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: students_may_use_ai_for_drafts_or_reformulation_if_declared_not_submit_entire_ai_work_as_own

Original evidence

Evidence 1
È ammesso usare l'IA per generare una prima bozza o per riformulare un testo, mentre non è consentito presentare come proprio un elaborato prodotto interamente dall'IA senza contributo personale e senza adeguata indicazione.

Localized display only

Students may use AI to generate a first draft or reformulate text, but may not present entirely AI-produced work as their own without personal contribution and adequate indication.

Ai Tool Treatment

UniPG states that its GenAI policy applies to students, teaching staff, researchers, language experts, tutors, technical-administrative staff, and library staff, and that GenAI should support rather than replace human critical judgment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: genai_policy_applies_broad_community_human_judgment_support_only

Original evidence

Evidence 1
La Policy si applica a studenti, docenti, ricercatori, CEL, tutor, personale TA e bibliotecario. La GenAI deve supportare ma non sostituire il giudizio critico umano.

Localized display only

The policy applies to students, teaching staff, researchers, CEL, tutors, technical-administrative staff, and library staff; GenAI should support but not replace human critical judgment.

Teaching

UniPG says teaching staff who use AI tools should make the mode and intensity of use explicit in the syllabus and communicate GenAI-use limits to students.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: teachers_disclose_ai_use_in_syllabus_and_communicate_student_limits

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Il docente che decide di avvalersi di tali strumenti ne renderà esplicita la modalità e l'intensità in Syllabus. ... il personale docente ... si impegna a comunicare ... i limiti di utilizzo di strumenti GenAI.

Localized display only

A teacher who uses AI tools should make the mode and intensity explicit in the syllabus and communicate limits on GenAI tool use to students.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 21, 2026Last changedMay 21, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities