Policy presence
University of Texas at San Antonio has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
San Antonio, United States
University of Texas at San Antonio
University of Texas at San Antonio has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 5 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 25, 2026.
University of Texas at San Antonio AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
University of Texas at San Antonio has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 5 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 25, 2026. Discovery context: University of Texas at San Antonio is listed as QS 2026 rank 1001-1200.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Texas at San Antonio as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 25, 2026 and last changed on May 25, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 5 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-texas-at-san-antonio.json. The entity-level confidence is 90%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Texas at San Antonio has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of Texas at San Antonio has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Texas at San Antonio has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Texas at San Antonio has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of Texas at San Antonio has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of Texas at San Antonio has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Texas at San Antonio has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of Texas at San Antonio has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
UTSA's faculty generative AI guide advises faculty to clearly state in the syllabus and course homepage whether and how AI use is allowed, while recognizing that faculty may choose different course approaches.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Faculty guide advises course-level AI-use expectations in syllabus and course homepage.
原始证据
Evidence 1Faculty are responsible for their syllabus and courses. Because faculty may choose different approaches for generative AI, clearly state in the syllabus and the course homepage whether and how you are allowing the use of AI.
Source Status
UTSA Academic Affairs maintains an official Teaching, Learning and Artificial Intelligence page that links separate UT San Antonio-created AI resources for students and faculty.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Official UTSA AI hub links student and faculty AI resources.
原始证据
Evidence 1AI resources created by UT San Antonio ... For UT San Antonio Students ... AI Essentials: Guidelines and Approaches ... For UT San Antonio Faculty ... Using Generative AI in Teaching, Learning and Research.
Ai Tool Treatment
UTSA's faculty generative AI guide identifies Microsoft Copilot as the only UTSA-approved AI tool in that guide, citing commercial data protection, and separately cautions users to avoid sharing private data to any LLM.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Microsoft Copilot identified in faculty guide as only UTSA-approved AI tool; avoid private data in any LLM.
原始证据
Evidence 1Faculty, staff and students can use the Microsoft CoPilot license to get started with generative AI. This is the only UTSA-approved AI tool because it offers the power of GPT-4 ... with Microsoft’s stringent commercial data protection ... Users should be careful to avoid sharing private data to any LLM.
Academic Integrity
UTSA's faculty guide warns that AI detection tools are imperfect and recommends using established university conduct processes and evidence-based evaluation rather than relying solely on AI-detection results.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: AI detection results should not be the sole basis for academic-integrity handling under the faculty guide.
原始证据
Evidence 1AI detection tools ... are inherently imperfect and prone to false positives and false negatives. Relying solely on detection tools can lead to inaccuracies ... To uphold academic integrity, we emphasize following the established processes and guidelines outlined in the university's code of conduct.
Academic Integrity
UTSA Libraries' Artificial Intelligence guide says AI-generated information should be fact-checked and that AI used as a source or content generator needs to be cited in submitted work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: UTSA Libraries AI guide tells users to fact-check AI and cite AI when used as source or content generator.
原始证据
Evidence 1Fact-check: AI can generate false information. Verify with additional sources. ... Acknowledgement: If you use AI as a source or as a content generator, it needs to be cited in your work.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
5 source attribution
AI Essentials: Guidelines & Approaches
provost.utsa.edu
Artificial Intelligence: Citing
libguides.utsa.edu
Teaching, Learning and Artificial Intelligence
provost.utsa.edu
Updated for 2025: AI Guide for UT San Antonio Faculty
provost.utsa.edu
Using Generative AI in Teaching, Learning, and Research
provost.utsa.edu
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.