University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

San Antonio, United States

University of Texas at San Antonio

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: 1001-1200UpdatedJul 19, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

6 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Texas at San Antonio in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"University of Texas at San Antonio provides or institutionally supports Microsoft Copilot.","howToObtain":"Use the campus-wide Microsoft Copilot licence.","costToUser":"No individual price is stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Last checked
Jul 19, 2026
Last changed
Jul 19, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Faculty, staff and students can use the Microsoft CoPilot license to get started with generative AI

Localized display only

Faculty, staff and students can use the Microsoft CoPilot license to get started with generative AI

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
b6282410…
Retrieved
Jul 19, 2026

Teaching

UTSA's faculty generative AI guide advises faculty to clearly state in the syllabus and course homepage whether and how AI use is allowed, while recognizing that faculty may choose different course approaches.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: Faculty guide advises course-level AI-use expectations in syllabus and course homepage.

Last checked
May 25, 2026
Last changed
May 25, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Faculty are responsible for their syllabus and courses. Because faculty may choose different approaches for generative AI, clearly state in the syllabus and the course homepage whether and how you are allowing the use of AI.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
7f2c6e78…
Retrieved
May 25, 2026
Evidence locator
Getting Started with Generative AI / Set student expectations

Source Status

UTSA Academic Affairs maintains an official Teaching, Learning and Artificial Intelligence page that links separate UT San Antonio-created AI resources for students and faculty.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: Official UTSA AI hub links student and faculty AI resources.

Last checked
May 25, 2026
Last changed
May 25, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI resources created by UT San Antonio ... For UT San Antonio Students ... AI Essentials: Guidelines and Approaches ... For UT San Antonio Faculty ... Using Generative AI in Teaching, Learning and Research.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
3f64d38e…
Retrieved
May 25, 2026
Evidence locator
AI resources created by UT San Antonio section

Ai Tool Treatment

UTSA's faculty generative AI guide identifies Microsoft Copilot as the only UTSA-approved AI tool in that guide, citing commercial data protection, and separately cautions users to avoid sharing private data to any LLM.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: Microsoft Copilot identified in faculty guide as only UTSA-approved AI tool; avoid private data in any LLM.

Last checked
May 25, 2026
Last changed
May 25, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Faculty, staff and students can use the Microsoft CoPilot license to get started with generative AI. This is the only UTSA-approved AI tool because it offers the power of GPT-4 ... with Microsoft’s stringent commercial data protection ... Users should be careful to avoid sharing private data to any LLM.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
7f2c6e78…
Retrieved
May 25, 2026
Evidence locator
Campus-Wide Licenses section, January 2025 faculty guide

Academic Integrity

UTSA's faculty guide warns that AI detection tools are imperfect and recommends using established university conduct processes and evidence-based evaluation rather than relying solely on AI-detection results.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%

Normalized value: AI detection results should not be the sole basis for academic-integrity handling under the faculty guide.

Last checked
May 25, 2026
Last changed
May 25, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI detection tools ... are inherently imperfect and prone to false positives and false negatives. Relying solely on detection tools can lead to inaccuracies ... To uphold academic integrity, we emphasize following the established processes and guidelines outlined in the university's code of conduct.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
7f2c6e78…
Retrieved
May 25, 2026
Evidence locator
AI Detection Tools and Recommendations section

Academic Integrity

UTSA Libraries' Artificial Intelligence guide says AI-generated information should be fact-checked and that AI used as a source or content generator needs to be cited in submitted work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: UTSA Libraries AI guide tells users to fact-check AI and cite AI when used as source or content generator.

Last checked
May 25, 2026
Last changed
May 25, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Fact-check: AI can generate false information. Verify with additional sources. ... Acknowledgement: If you use AI as a source or as a content generator, it needs to be cited in your work.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
d82d87f4…
Retrieved
May 25, 2026
Evidence locator
Citing Works section

Source record

Official sources

6 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence97%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Texas at San Antonio AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-texas-at-san-antonio

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log