University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Glasgow, United Kingdom

University of Glasgow

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: 79Updated2026年7月19日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

13 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Glasgow in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot Chat","description":"University-approved Copilot Chat with enterprise data protection for University data.","howToObtain":"Use from Microsoft 365, Teams or the mobile Copilot app while logged in with UofG credentials.","costToUser":"Not stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

最后检查时间
2026年7月15日
最后更改时间
2026年7月15日

原始证据

证据 1
University of Glasgow identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as its University-approved Generative AI platform and the only AI service approved for University data. It is available from Microsoft 365, Teams and the mobile app when logged in with UofG credentials and enterprise data protection.

本地化显示 only

University of Glasgow identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as its University-approved Generative AI platform and the only AI service approved for University data. It is available from Microsoft 365, Teams and the mobile app when logged in with UofG credentials and enterprise data protection.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
fd643676…
已检索
2026年7月15日

Academic Integrity

Regulation 32 states that assessed student work should not contain content produced by another person, website, software, or AI tool except where AI use is explicitly permitted.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: assessed_work_no_ai_generated_content_except_explicit_permission

最后检查时间
2026年5月13日
最后更改时间
2026年5月13日

原始证据

证据 1
All work submitted by students for assessment is accepted on the understanding that it is the student's own effort. This means students' work should not contain content that has been produced by another person, website, software or Artificial intelligence (AI) tool (except where AI use is explicitly permitted).
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
b7688dc5…
已检索
2026年5月13日
证据定位器
32.1 Introduction

Security Review

University of Glasgow IT guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as the only AI service approved for use with University data and says users must be logged in with UofG credentials for approved use.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: copilot_chat_only_ai_service_approved_for_university_data

最后检查时间
2026年5月13日
最后更改时间
2026年5月13日

原始证据

证据 1
Microsoft Copilot Chat is a Generative AI tool that uses the same large language models as Open AI's ChatGPT, but with added security. It is the only AI service approved for use with University data.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
9cb73945…
已检索
2026年5月13日
证据定位器
The University-approved Generative AI platform

Academic Integrity

Regulation 32 says use of websites or generative AI software that generates answers or references is prohibited, while some Schools may allow AI tools for specific purposes and any AI use must be referenced.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: generated_answers_references_prohibited_specific_school_exceptions_referenced

最后检查时间
2026年5月13日
最后更改时间
2026年5月13日

原始证据

证据 1
Using any website or generative artificial intelligence (AI) software that generates answers or references is prohibited. In some Schools, AI tools may be used in some circumstances and for specific purposes, but students must not misuse AI tools outwith specific assessment instructions. Any use of AI must be referenced in the work for transparency.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
b7688dc5…
已检索
2026年5月13日
证据定位器
32.3 Generative Artificial Intelligence/Ghost writing

研究

University of Glasgow researcher guidance states that any use of generative AI tools by staff, students, and researchers must be accompanied by critical analysis and oversight by the user.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: genai_research_use_requires_critical_analysis_oversight

最后检查时间
2026年5月13日
最后更改时间
2026年5月13日

原始证据

证据 1
There is therefore one overriding principle, which applies to all staff, students, and researchers at the University: any use of generative AI tools must be accompanied by critical analysis and oversight on the part of the user.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
deb3bed4…
已检索
2026年5月13日
证据定位器
Generative AI Guidance for Researchers

Academic Integrity

University of Glasgow student guidance says using AI or other computational aids in university work without acknowledging the input counts as academic misconduct.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: ai_use_without_acknowledgement_academic_misconduct

最后检查时间
2026年5月13日
最后更改时间
2026年5月13日

原始证据

证据 1
It is important to note that using any form of AI or other computational aids in your university coursework, study, exams, or research without acknowledging that input counts as academic misconduct.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
fbe160c7…
已检索
2026年5月13日
证据定位器
Quick Guidance for Students

隐私

University of Glasgow IT guidance says confidential or sensitive information belonging to the university or a third party should not be put into AI tools.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: confidential_sensitive_information_not_into_ai_tools

最后检查时间
2026年5月13日
最后更改时间
2026年5月13日

原始证据

证据 1
Confidential or sensitive information (including, for example, IP) belonging to the University or any third party should not be put into AI tools.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
9cb73945…
已检索
2026年5月13日
证据定位器
Using other AI services

研究

University of Glasgow researcher guidance says AI tools used as part of research design, methods, disciplinary toolkit, or research subject should be covered by relevant ethical approval and data protection processes.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: research_ai_methods_subject_require_ethics_data_protection_processes

最后检查时间
2026年5月13日
最后更改时间
2026年5月13日

原始证据

证据 1
Where AI tools form part of your research design or methods, the tool kit within your discipline, or are a subject of your research, your use of them as a researcher should be covered by relevant ethical approval and data protection processes.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
deb3bed4…
已检索
2026年5月13日
证据定位器
Generative AI Guidance for Researchers

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Glasgow student guidance says the university does not seek to prohibit student AI-tool use generally and instead supports effective, ethical, critical, and transparent use.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%

标准化值: student_genai_use_supported_with_ethics_transparency

最后检查时间
2026年5月13日
最后更改时间
2026年5月13日

原始证据

证据 1
Consequently, rather than seek to prohibit your use of these tools, we want to support you in learning how to use them effectively, ethically, critically, and transparently.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
fbe160c7…
已检索
2026年5月13日
证据定位器
What is the University of Glasgow's position on AI?

教学

University of Glasgow staff guidance says Schools are advised by central policy to decide locally whether AI is allowed not at all, under specified circumstances, or without restriction with acknowledgement.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: schools_decide_local_ai_allowed_levels

最后检查时间
2026年5月13日
最后更改时间
2026年5月13日

原始证据

证据 1
Schools are advised by central UofG policy to first decide locally on which of 3 levels of AI are allowable in their courses: not at all; under certain circumstances as outlined by the School; or without restriction (though it must always be acknowledged where used).
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
c5e3f133…
已检索
2026年5月13日
证据定位器
What we can do for your students

隐私

University of Glasgow's PGR GenAI checklist advises PGR students to avoid uploading confidential or sensitive information, including research data and peer review content, to AI tools.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: pgrs_avoid_confidential_sensitive_research_peer_review_content_ai_tools

最后检查时间
2026年5月13日
最后更改时间
2026年5月13日

原始证据

证据 1
Avoid uploading confidential or sensitive information to an AI tool (this includes research data and peer review content).
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
5819d22a…
已检索
2026年5月13日
证据定位器
Step 9

教学

University of Glasgow's GenAI assessment guidance is intended to explain university policy on GenAI tools in assessment practice and outlines three assessment-use scenarios.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度89%

标准化值: genai_assessment_guidance_three_scenarios

最后检查时间
2026年5月13日
最后更改时间
2026年5月13日

原始证据

证据 1
The purpose of this guidance is to help you understand the University's policy on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in relation to assessment practice. It outlines three scenarios that detail how GenAI can be used in assessment.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
bf70fcc3…
已检索
2026年5月13日
证据定位器
Introduction to GenAI Guidance at the University

教学

University of Glasgow assessment-design guidance says GenAI use in assessment should not always be treated as plagiarism and encourages assessment design that lets students demonstrate skills beyond knowledge recall.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度86%

标准化值: assessment_design_consider_genai_beyond_plagiarism

最后检查时间
2026年5月13日
最后更改时间
2026年5月13日

原始证据

证据 1
It is important to recognise that the use of GenAI in assessment should not, in all cases, be treated as plagiarism. Rather we should carefully consider how we design assessment to ensure that students can demonstrate skills beyond purely knowledge recall.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
4f7cc9de…
已检索
2026年5月13日
证据定位器
How can I adapt assessment to deal with generative AI?

Source record

官方来源

9 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Glasgow AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-glasgow

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志