Glasgow, United Kingdom Last checked
Independent · Open access · Not an official university page
Scoped public references; review incomplete
The retained student record supports effective, ethical, critical and transparent AI use generally. That support does not establish permission for a particular assessment; old scenario rules remain excluded.
Scoped public references; review incomplete
No retained current-conclusion Claim establishes a Glasgow exam-use rule here. The old Regulation32 and three-scenario statements are historical/pending, not substitutes for the assessment brief.
Scoped public references; review incomplete
The student record says unacknowledged AI or computational help in university work counts as misconduct. Acknowledgement is necessary context, not blanket permission to use AI.
Scoped public references; review incomplete
IT guidance says confidential or sensitive university or third-party information should not enter AI tools. The PGR checklist separately cautions against research data and peer-review material.
Scoped public references; review incomplete
The IT record identifies Copilot Chat for university data when using UofG credentials. This is a scoped data-security record; individual eligibility and assessment use remain separate.
Scoped public references; review incomplete
Research guidance records critical oversight and relevant ethics/data-protection processes. The PGR checklist has a separate audience; full current-source verification remains incomplete.
Scoped public references; review incomplete
The retained acknowledgement rule addresses undisclosed assistance. It does not itself establish investigative steps, penalties or appeal deadlines, and old Regulation32 conclusions remain excluded.
Scoped public references; review incomplete
Assessment-design guidance encourages demonstrating skills beyond recall and says AI use is not always plagiarism. It does not remove assessment-specific restrictions or approve a new scenario policy.
Scoped public references; review incomplete
Copilot university-data approval depends on the university-account context and security conditions. It is not approval for every data category, service mode or examination.
Tool discovery information and cited sources are retained. Current account eligibility, cost, endorsement and assessment permission are not confirmed.
The following discovery information is retained; currentness and complete eligibility remain unverified.
Use from Microsoft 365, Teams or the mobile Copilot app while logged in with UofG credentials.
Not stated.
University-approved Copilot Chat with enterprise data protection for University data.
University of Glasgow identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as its University-approved Generative AI platform and the only AI service approved for University data. It is available from Microsoft 365, Teams and the mobile app when logged in with UofG credentials and enterprise data protection.
Official source ↗fd643676207edaa067f40f29865aa980c50bc209929a51ae8cab24cffcfc6d6f
Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.
Other records · Page update
Loading revision…
Other records · Record maintenance
Loading revision…
Other records · Record maintenance
Loading revision…
8
Scope: General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1
It is important to note that using any form of AI or other computational aids in your university coursework, study, exams, or research without acknowledging that input counts as academic misconduct.Evidence locator: Quick Guidance for Students
Scope: General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1It is important to recognise that the use of GenAI in assessment should not, in all cases, be treated as plagiarism. Rather we should carefully consider how we design assessment to ensure that students can demonstrate skills beyond purely knowledge recall.Evidence locator: How can I adapt assessment to deal with generative AI?
Scope: General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Confidential or sensitive information (including, for example, IP) belonging to the University or any third party should not be put into AI tools.Evidence locator: Using other AI services
Scope: General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Avoid uploading confidential or sensitive information to an AI tool (this includes research data and peer review content).Evidence locator: Step 9
Scope: General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Microsoft Copilot Chat is a Generative AI tool that uses the same large language models as Open AI's ChatGPT, but with added security. It is the only AI service approved for use with University data.Evidence locator: The University-approved Generative AI platform
Scope: General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1There is therefore one overriding principle, which applies to all staff, students, and researchers at the University: any use of generative AI tools must be accompanied by critical analysis and oversight on the part of the user.Evidence locator: Generative AI Guidance for Researchers
Scope: General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Where AI tools form part of your research design or methods, the tool kit within your discipline, or are a subject of your research, your use of them as a researcher should be covered by relevant ethical approval and data protection processes.Evidence locator: Generative AI Guidance for Researchers
Scope: General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Consequently, rather than seek to prohibit your use of these tools, we want to support you in learning how to use them effectively, ethically, critically, and transparently.Evidence locator: What is the University of Glasgow's position on AI?
These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.
cl-university-of-glasgow-microsoft-copilot-339 · excluded_pending_review
General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
官网确认University data许可及大学账户要求，但独立工具对象的全字段/具体用户资格未逐项确认。
Record historyScope: General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1University of Glasgow identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as its University-approved Generative AI platform and the only AI service approved for University data. It is available from Microsoft 365, Teams and the mobile app when logged in with UofG credentials and enterprise data protection.Localized display only
University of Glasgow identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as its University-approved Generative AI platform and the only AI service approved for University data. It is available from Microsoft 365, Teams and the mobile app when logged in with UofG credentials and enterprise data protection.
claim-uog-reg32-ai-produced-content · historical_only
General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
旧表述省略新版关键限定 unacknowledged，与2026–27条例不符。
Record historyScope: General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1All work submitted by students for assessment is accepted on the understanding that it is the student's own effort. This means students' work should not contain content that has been produced by another person, website, software or Artificial intelligence (AI) tool (except where AI use is explicitly permitted).Evidence locator: 32.1 Introduction
claim-uog-reg32-ai-generated-answers · historical_only
General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
旧版一概禁止与新版以考核指示为边界的条文不同。
Record historyScope: General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Using any website or generative artificial intelligence (AI) software that generates answers or references is prohibited. In some Schools, AI tools may be used in some circumstances and for specific purposes, but students must not misuse AI tools outwith specific assessment instructions. Any use of AI must be referenced in the work for transparency.Evidence locator: 32.3 Generative Artificial Intelligence/Ghost writing
claim-uog-schools-local-ai-levels · historical_only
General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
旧三档框架不能直接代替新两情景与课程具体要求。
Record historyScope: General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Schools are advised by central UofG policy to first decide locally on which of 3 levels of AI are allowable in their courses: not at all; under certain circumstances as outlined by the School; or without restriction (though it must always be acknowledged where used).Evidence locator: What we can do for your students
claim-uog-assessment-guidance-scenarios · historical_only
General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
原记录称三情景，现行官网明确两情景。
Record historyScope: General support for AI use does not authorize an assessment. Four old Regulation 32/three-scenario Claims are excluded from current conclusions; 2026–27 two-scenario and unacknowledged-content proposals remain pending below. Research guidance and PGR checklist have separate audiences. IT data approval is not assessment permission. No current exam rule is inferred from general student support.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1The purpose of this guidance is to help you understand the University's policy on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in relation to assessment practice. It outlines three scenarios that detail how GenAI can be used in assessment.Evidence locator: Introduction to GenAI Guidance at the University
8 official URLs; 9 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
www.gla.ac.uk
University official source
gla.ac.uk
Artificial Intelligence - Info for Staff · 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
c5e3f1330f9e51f81d5d8230316172b173c211a89d2c245215c53cbcdadc3b45
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
www.gla.ac.uk
University official source
gla.ac.uk
GenAI for PGRs Checklist · 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
5819d22ad20725ecca4c32b513a6281e9080fe10417db5481cf5ed2007b557c6
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
www.gla.ac.uk
University official source
gla.ac.uk
Generative AI Guidance for Researchers - University of Glasgow · 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
deb3bed4773dd4c37f31ab98db96e3303a26a12077e5418477dcb33fc53129ac
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
www.gla.ac.uk
University official source
gla.ac.uk
How can I adapt assessment to deal with GenAI? · 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
4f7cc9de635d75b7f50fcb54e91d39692f54bbf1501e23c5dd4463a112abb5b6
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
www.gla.ac.uk
University official source
gla.ac.uk
Learning & Teaching - GenAI Guidance - University of Glasgow · 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
bf70fcc33ddcf66d601c3c6816bd9c4c69c4b0b68dab3876b965ef22ba425627
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
www.gla.ac.uk
University official source
gla.ac.uk
MyGlasgow - IT - 365 - Copilot - guidance · 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
9cb739458f4ca0b919f497cd58f760f7028cc334b3dab326df960086fc43789c
University of Glasgow - MyGlasgow - IT - 365 - Copilot - guidance · 2026-07-15T22:58:43.896Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
fd643676207edaa067f40f29865aa980c50bc209929a51ae8cab24cffcfc6d6f
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
www.gla.ac.uk
University official source
gla.ac.uk
Plagiarism & Academic Integrity Code · 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
b7688dc589908531dbc4834858d94c486a298d26459ef94d0dbcf140f8bcd977
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
www.gla.ac.uk
University official source
gla.ac.uk
University of Glasgow - Artificial Intelligence - Info for Students · 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
fbe160c7e8c4720f978e5751563a0bf76f60aff1317cca27621a403cb0ea1c3b
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Explore
4 records
Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.
Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.
The retained student record supports effective, ethical, critical and transparent AI use generally. That support does not establish permission for a particular assessment; old scenario rules remain excluded.
View evidence →The student record says unacknowledged AI or computational help in university work counts as misconduct. Acknowledgement is necessary context, not blanket permission to use AI.
View evidence →IT guidance says confidential or sensitive university or third-party information should not enter AI tools. The PGR checklist separately cautions against research data and peer-review material.
View evidence →The IT record identifies Copilot Chat for university data when using UofG credentials. This is a scoped data-security record; individual eligibility and assessment use remain separate.
View evidence →No retained current-conclusion Claim establishes a Glasgow exam-use rule here. The old Regulation32 and three-scenario statements are historical/pending, not substitutes for the assessment brief.
View evidence →Research guidance records critical oversight and relevant ethics/data-protection processes. The PGR checklist has a separate audience; full current-source verification remains incomplete.
View evidence →The retained acknowledgement rule addresses undisclosed assistance. It does not itself establish investigative steps, penalties or appeal deadlines, and old Regulation32 conclusions remain excluded.
View evidence →Assessment-design guidance encourages demonstrating skills beyond recall and says AI use is not always plagiarism. It does not remove assessment-specific restrictions or approve a new scenario policy.
View evidence →Copilot university-data approval depends on the university-account context and security conditions. It is not approval for every data category, service mode or examination.
View evidence →
