Change log

University of Glasgow

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 13, 2026Last changedMay 13, 2026Claims12Sources8

University page Public JSON

University of Glasgow currently has 12 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 13, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

11 # University of Glasgow AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Regulation 32 states that assessed student work should not contain content produced by another person, website, software, or AI tool except where AI use is explicitly permitted.
3+Evidence (en, b7688dc58990): All work submitted by students for assessment is accepted on the understanding that it is the student's own effort. This means students' work should not contain content that has been produced by another person, website, software or Artificial intelligence (AI) tool (except where AI use is explicitly permitted).
4+security_review: University of Glasgow IT guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as the only AI service approved for use with University data and says users must be logged in with UofG credentials for approved use.
5+Evidence (en, 9cb739458f4c): Microsoft Copilot Chat is a Generative AI tool that uses the same large language models as Open AI's ChatGPT, but with added security. It is the only AI service approved for use with University data.
6+academic_integrity: Regulation 32 says use of websites or generative AI software that generates answers or references is prohibited, while some Schools may allow AI tools for specific purposes and any AI use must be referenced.
7+Evidence (en, b7688dc58990): Using any website or generative artificial intelligence (AI) software that generates answers or references is prohibited. In some Schools, AI tools may be used in some circumstances and for specific purposes, but students must not misuse AI tools outwith specific assessment instructions. Any use of AI must be referenced in the work for transparency.
8+research: University of Glasgow researcher guidance states that any use of generative AI tools by staff, students, and researchers must be accompanied by critical analysis and oversight by the user.
9+Evidence (en, deb3bed4773d): There is therefore one overriding principle, which applies to all staff, students, and researchers at the University: any use of generative AI tools must be accompanied by critical analysis and oversight on the part of the user.
10+academic_integrity: University of Glasgow student guidance says using AI or other computational aids in university work without acknowledging the input counts as academic misconduct.
11+Evidence (en, fbe160c7e8c4): It is important to note that using any form of AI or other computational aids in your university coursework, study, exams, or research without acknowledging that input counts as academic misconduct.
12+privacy: University of Glasgow IT guidance says confidential or sensitive information belonging to the university or a third party should not be put into AI tools.
13+Evidence (en, 9cb739458f4c): Confidential or sensitive information (including, for example, IP) belonging to the University or any third party should not be put into AI tools.
14+research: University of Glasgow researcher guidance says AI tools used as part of research design, methods, disciplinary toolkit, or research subject should be covered by relevant ethical approval and data protection processes.
15+Evidence (en, deb3bed4773d): Where AI tools form part of your research design or methods, the tool kit within your discipline, or are a subject of your research, your use of them as a researcher should be covered by relevant ethical approval and data protection processes.
16+ai_tool_treatment: University of Glasgow student guidance says the university does not seek to prohibit student AI-tool use generally and instead supports effective, ethical, critical, and transparent use.
17+Evidence (en, fbe160c7e8c4): Consequently, rather than seek to prohibit your use of these tools, we want to support you in learning how to use them effectively, ethically, critically, and transparently.
18+teaching: University of Glasgow staff guidance says Schools are advised by central policy to decide locally whether AI is allowed not at all, under specified circumstances, or without restriction with acknowledgement.
19+Evidence (en, c5e3f1330f9e): Schools are advised by central UofG policy to first decide locally on which of 3 levels of AI are allowable in their courses: not at all; under certain circumstances as outlined by the School; or without restriction (though it must always be acknowledged where used).
20+privacy: University of Glasgow's PGR GenAI checklist advises PGR students to avoid uploading confidential or sensitive information, including research data and peer review content, to AI tools.
21+Evidence (en, 5819d22ad207): Avoid uploading confidential or sensitive information to an AI tool (this includes research data and peer review content).

Claim changes

12 claim records

academic_integrity

Regulation 32 states that assessed student work should not contain content produced by another person, website, software, or AI tool except where AI use is explicitly permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

University of Glasgow IT guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as the only AI service approved for use with University data and says users must be logged in with UofG credentials for approved use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Regulation 32 says use of websites or generative AI software that generates answers or references is prohibited, while some Schools may allow AI tools for specific purposes and any AI use must be referenced.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

research

University of Glasgow researcher guidance states that any use of generative AI tools by staff, students, and researchers must be accompanied by critical analysis and oversight by the user.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Glasgow student guidance says using AI or other computational aids in university work without acknowledging the input counts as academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

University of Glasgow IT guidance says confidential or sensitive information belonging to the university or a third party should not be put into AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

research

University of Glasgow researcher guidance says AI tools used as part of research design, methods, disciplinary toolkit, or research subject should be covered by relevant ethical approval and data protection processes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Glasgow student guidance says the university does not seek to prohibit student AI-tool use generally and instead supports effective, ethical, critical, and transparent use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

University of Glasgow staff guidance says Schools are advised by central policy to decide locally whether AI is allowed not at all, under specified circumstances, or without restriction with acknowledgement.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

University of Glasgow's PGR GenAI checklist advises PGR students to avoid uploading confidential or sensitive information, including research data and peer review content, to AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

University of Glasgow's GenAI assessment guidance is intended to explain university policy on GenAI tools in assessment practice and outlines three assessment-use scenarios.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

University of Glasgow assessment-design guidance says GenAI use in assessment should not always be treated as plagiarism and encourages assessment design that lets students demonstrate skills beyond knowledge recall.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesen