University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Bahasa
ENZHFRPLMS

Glasgow, United Kingdom

University of Glasgow

PenarafanQS World University Rankings 2026: 79Updated19 Jul 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Tuntutan disemak

13 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Glasgow in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan97%

Nilai ternormalisasi: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot Chat","description":"University-approved Copilot Chat with enterprise data protection for University data.","howToObtain":"Use from Microsoft 365, Teams or the mobile Copilot app while logged in with UofG credentials.","costToUser":"Not stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Terakhir diperiksa
15 Jul 2026
Terkini diubah
15 Jul 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
University of Glasgow identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as its University-approved Generative AI platform and the only AI service approved for University data. It is available from Microsoft 365, Teams and the mobile app when logged in with UofG credentials and enterprise data protection.

Paparan setempat only

University of Glasgow identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as its University-approved Generative AI platform and the only AI service approved for University data. It is available from Microsoft 365, Teams and the mobile app when logged in with UofG credentials and enterprise data protection.

Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
fd643676…
Diperoleh
15 Jul 2026

Academic Integrity

Regulation 32 states that assessed student work should not contain content produced by another person, website, software, or AI tool except where AI use is explicitly permitted.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan96%

Nilai ternormalisasi: assessed_work_no_ai_generated_content_except_explicit_permission

Terakhir diperiksa
13 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
13 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
All work submitted by students for assessment is accepted on the understanding that it is the student's own effort. This means students' work should not contain content that has been produced by another person, website, software or Artificial intelligence (AI) tool (except where AI use is explicitly permitted).
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
b7688dc5…
Diperoleh
13 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
32.1 Introduction

Security Review

University of Glasgow IT guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as the only AI service approved for use with University data and says users must be logged in with UofG credentials for approved use.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan96%

Nilai ternormalisasi: copilot_chat_only_ai_service_approved_for_university_data

Terakhir diperiksa
13 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
13 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Microsoft Copilot Chat is a Generative AI tool that uses the same large language models as Open AI's ChatGPT, but with added security. It is the only AI service approved for use with University data.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
9cb73945…
Diperoleh
13 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
The University-approved Generative AI platform

Academic Integrity

Regulation 32 says use of websites or generative AI software that generates answers or references is prohibited, while some Schools may allow AI tools for specific purposes and any AI use must be referenced.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%

Nilai ternormalisasi: generated_answers_references_prohibited_specific_school_exceptions_referenced

Terakhir diperiksa
13 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
13 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Using any website or generative artificial intelligence (AI) software that generates answers or references is prohibited. In some Schools, AI tools may be used in some circumstances and for specific purposes, but students must not misuse AI tools outwith specific assessment instructions. Any use of AI must be referenced in the work for transparency.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
b7688dc5…
Diperoleh
13 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
32.3 Generative Artificial Intelligence/Ghost writing

Penyelidikan

University of Glasgow researcher guidance states that any use of generative AI tools by staff, students, and researchers must be accompanied by critical analysis and oversight by the user.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%

Nilai ternormalisasi: genai_research_use_requires_critical_analysis_oversight

Terakhir diperiksa
13 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
13 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
There is therefore one overriding principle, which applies to all staff, students, and researchers at the University: any use of generative AI tools must be accompanied by critical analysis and oversight on the part of the user.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
deb3bed4…
Diperoleh
13 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Generative AI Guidance for Researchers

Academic Integrity

University of Glasgow student guidance says using AI or other computational aids in university work without acknowledging the input counts as academic misconduct.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%

Nilai ternormalisasi: ai_use_without_acknowledgement_academic_misconduct

Terakhir diperiksa
13 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
13 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
It is important to note that using any form of AI or other computational aids in your university coursework, study, exams, or research without acknowledging that input counts as academic misconduct.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
fbe160c7…
Diperoleh
13 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Quick Guidance for Students

Privasi

University of Glasgow IT guidance says confidential or sensitive information belonging to the university or a third party should not be put into AI tools.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%

Nilai ternormalisasi: confidential_sensitive_information_not_into_ai_tools

Terakhir diperiksa
13 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
13 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Confidential or sensitive information (including, for example, IP) belonging to the University or any third party should not be put into AI tools.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
9cb73945…
Diperoleh
13 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Using other AI services

Penyelidikan

University of Glasgow researcher guidance says AI tools used as part of research design, methods, disciplinary toolkit, or research subject should be covered by relevant ethical approval and data protection processes.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%

Nilai ternormalisasi: research_ai_methods_subject_require_ethics_data_protection_processes

Terakhir diperiksa
13 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
13 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Where AI tools form part of your research design or methods, the tool kit within your discipline, or are a subject of your research, your use of them as a researcher should be covered by relevant ethical approval and data protection processes.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
deb3bed4…
Diperoleh
13 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Generative AI Guidance for Researchers

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Glasgow student guidance says the university does not seek to prohibit student AI-tool use generally and instead supports effective, ethical, critical, and transparent use.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan92%

Nilai ternormalisasi: student_genai_use_supported_with_ethics_transparency

Terakhir diperiksa
13 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
13 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Consequently, rather than seek to prohibit your use of these tools, we want to support you in learning how to use them effectively, ethically, critically, and transparently.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
fbe160c7…
Diperoleh
13 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
What is the University of Glasgow's position on AI?

Pengajaran

University of Glasgow staff guidance says Schools are advised by central policy to decide locally whether AI is allowed not at all, under specified circumstances, or without restriction with acknowledgement.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan90%

Nilai ternormalisasi: schools_decide_local_ai_allowed_levels

Terakhir diperiksa
13 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
13 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Schools are advised by central UofG policy to first decide locally on which of 3 levels of AI are allowable in their courses: not at all; under certain circumstances as outlined by the School; or without restriction (though it must always be acknowledged where used).
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
c5e3f133…
Diperoleh
13 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
What we can do for your students

Privasi

University of Glasgow's PGR GenAI checklist advises PGR students to avoid uploading confidential or sensitive information, including research data and peer review content, to AI tools.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan90%

Nilai ternormalisasi: pgrs_avoid_confidential_sensitive_research_peer_review_content_ai_tools

Terakhir diperiksa
13 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
13 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Avoid uploading confidential or sensitive information to an AI tool (this includes research data and peer review content).
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
5819d22a…
Diperoleh
13 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Step 9

Pengajaran

University of Glasgow's GenAI assessment guidance is intended to explain university policy on GenAI tools in assessment practice and outlines three assessment-use scenarios.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan89%

Nilai ternormalisasi: genai_assessment_guidance_three_scenarios

Terakhir diperiksa
13 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
13 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
The purpose of this guidance is to help you understand the University's policy on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in relation to assessment practice. It outlines three scenarios that detail how GenAI can be used in assessment.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
bf70fcc3…
Diperoleh
13 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Introduction to GenAI Guidance at the University

Pengajaran

University of Glasgow assessment-design guidance says GenAI use in assessment should not always be treated as plagiarism and encourages assessment design that lets students demonstrate skills beyond knowledge recall.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan86%

Nilai ternormalisasi: assessment_design_consider_genai_beyond_plagiarism

Terakhir diperiksa
13 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
13 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
It is important to recognise that the use of GenAI in assessment should not, in all cases, be treated as plagiarism. Rather we should carefully consider how we design assessment to ensure that students can demonstrate skills beyond purely knowledge recall.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
4f7cc9de…
Diperoleh
13 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
How can I adapt assessment to deal with generative AI?

Source record

Sumber rasmi

9 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Semakagent reviewedKeyakinan97%Snapshot statusTidak diterbitkanJSONJSON awam

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Glasgow AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-glasgow

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Buka log perubahan