Perubahan keluaran dan kesegaran sumber

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

Stanford University Communications says its AI guidelines for marketing and communications complement existing university policy, and if they conflict with the Administrative Guide, the Administrative Guide controls.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UNSW College says students may use AI for an assessment only when the instructions in the Course Outline permit its use.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

A University of Salento course catalogue page for Digital Accounting e Auditing lists ChatGPT and Power BI as applications of artificial intelligence supporting teaching for that course.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UWM-hosted Acta Neophilologica author guidance permits GenAI use for grammar, language, or style improvement, requires manuscript disclosure of any GenAI use with tool and purpose, and says reviewers and editors should not share confidential manuscript content with public GenAI tools.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UFS announced that it will discontinue the use of AI detection software across all faculties and academic activities from 1 July 2026.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The same USPN fraud provisions say students who used AI may be referred to the disciplinary commission, after prior information about the risks and detection means.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

An official University of Algarve 2024-25 Market Studies course sheet states that, for that course, fraud, plagiarism, or improper use of Artificial Intelligence is handled under paragraph 15 of UAlg's Assessment Regulations, and the instructor may require an additional test if there is doubt. This is course-level assessment-integrity evidence, not a general AI policy for all UAlg courses.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

University of Zilina treats undisclosed GenAI use, false information about the extent of GenAI use, and generated references to non-existent literature as disciplinary offenses or ethical-rule violations under its student disciplinary order and ethical code.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

Lyon 2 SPS guidance says AI should not do assessed work in place of the student; AI assistance may be possible only when it respects university ethics and the specific instructions for the exam or assignment.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

For the University of Udine Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline, generative AI tools are described as usable for limited support such as grammar/spelling correction, technical-term translation, and orienting summaries, not as a substitute for the student's own thesis work.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

University of Wyoming Academic Affairs maintains an Artificial Intelligence Committee page with current AI resources and updates, including links to syllabus recommendations, AI use guidance, and UW Libraries AI Support.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UVM's approved AI tools page says approved AI applications are approved by data risk level, and a tool approved for one risk level is not approved for higher-risk data.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

Harvard Medical School responsible AI guidance says users should verify outputs, uphold academic integrity, be transparent about acceptable use, and cite AI contributions appropriately in research and academic work.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

King Saud University's assessment policy says the university supports using generative AI tools in education while emphasizing knowledge, skills, and awareness needed to regulate use and understand AI-generated information or data.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

Ohio State guidance says instructors who permit AI should provide clear and precise parameters about tools, features, assignments, activities, and allowable use.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

Trinity College Dublin says specific uses of GenAI in an assessment must be disclosed, properly acknowledged, and referenced; students should explain what, when, and how they used GenAI.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UCSB guidance says instructors using AI to identify patterns in student work by uploading that work should obtain student permission and use only campus-approved AI platforms.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UNC-Chapel Hill says faculty should clearly explain when and how AI tools are used in assessment evaluation, including what comes from AI and what comes from instructor judgment.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UNC Charlotte OneIT's AI security checklist instructs users not to enter confidential or legally restricted data, including FERPA, HIPAA, PCI, or Level 3 data, into an AI tool.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

Rector Measure R 567 states that AI outputs are only input material for the author; the author is responsible for using, critically examining, and verifying those outputs, and the author of the student work is the student, not the AI tool.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UTSA's faculty generative AI guide identifies Microsoft Copilot as the only UTSA-approved AI tool in that guide, citing commercial data protection, and separately cautions users to avoid sharing private data to any LLM.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UToledo's Academic dishonesty policy lists representing the words, ideas, or information of an artificial intelligence program as one's own without proper documentation as an example of academic dishonesty, and says faculty are expected to tell students what materials and procedures, including artificial intelligence programs, are authorized.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

For academic materials, the guidelines say use of generative AI must be explicitly declared with the tool, version, and purpose; not declaring AI use is described as a violation of academic integrity rules.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UNH Provost syllabus guidance recommends that instructors explicitly tell students whether automated writing tools and AI tools are allowed in a course, and if allowed, specify how and when they may be used.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

University of Tulsa's McFarlin Library Generative AI guide points students to AI citation guidance, explains why disclosure is encouraged, and says best practice is to check with the professor before using generative-AI tools.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

URI ITS preliminary responsible-AI standards direct users to follow URI data classification guidance, avoid entering private or restricted data into public AI tools, and be cautious that data may be transmitted to third-party servers.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

University of Regina CTL guidance says Turnitin is the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool, the AI-detection report is not conclusive proof of academic misconduct, and instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for AI detection.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

University of Tabuk's official policies-and-regulations page lists data, privacy, and security policies as adjacent governance context; the verified official-source search did not identify a public university-wide AI or generative-AI policy item.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

University of Florida AI guidance says users should not assume AI detection tools are reliable proof of misconduct.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

University of Mississippi CETL guidance warns instructors that AI detection tools are unreliable and that AI detection software not protected by FERPA may violate student privacy or intellectual property rights.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The Imtezaaj Urdu Research Journal plagiarism policy says manuscripts are checked with HEC Pakistan-recommended software and manual review, with Turnitin similarity thresholds; this is adjacent academic-integrity source context and not AI-specific guidance.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UMKC does not recommend using AI detection tools as the single piece of evidence to support an academic integrity violation.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UNR strongly advises users not to share sensitive, confidential, or regulated data with AI tools, because tool data-sharing practices may compromise confidentiality.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The University of Murcia library AI page gives AI citation guidance, including describing AI use in methodology, including the prompt and relevant response fragment, citing reliable sources, and checking the citation style.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

Official discovery for University of Naples Parthenope did not identify an AI-specific university policy source; the official Code of Ethics and Conduct is staged only as adjacent conduct context and should not be read as AI-specific guidance.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The reviewed official University of Lagos sources located AI-related news and training pages and adjacent institutional policy pages, but did not identify a university-wide AI or generative-AI policy source.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The University of Louisville Delphi Center says current AI detection tools are unreliable, raise data privacy, FERPA, and student-consent risks, and should never be the sole basis for an academic integrity decision.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UNE's HDR generative AI guidance says higher degree research candidates are required to consider ethical, critical, and creative uses of generative AI and to ensure proper citation of content generated by AI tools and sources they use.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

In the absence of a verified official AI-specific policy source, University of Nairobi Library pages provide adjacent academic-integrity context: plagiarism penalties are listed and Turnitin is identified as the preferred similarity checker.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

Emory Responsible AI guidance says users should review AI-generated content before adopting it in clinical, administrative, or organizational settings.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

Leiden University states that ChatGPT is not supported because data security and privacy are not guaranteed.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The University of Auckland says all courses and programmes must implement the Two-Lane Approach in assessment design by 2027 unless a faculty specifies otherwise.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The University of Edinburgh says using an AI agent within Learn or any university learning or assessment platform requiring login is not permitted.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

University of Queensland says course coordinators provide guidance in course profiles defining appropriate AI use for each assessment task.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The University of Sheffield tells students that GenAI outputs should not be used as sources for assessment and should never be cited as if they were sources.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UBC says students must not be required to sign up for or use ChatGPT 5 with an account.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UC Davis Health says users should consult their supervisor and the UC Davis Health Analytics Oversight Committee before using a generative AI tool.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

University of Nottingham says each assessment task will indicate whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

University of Toronto graduate students must clearly describe and cite any generative AI tools used in thesis research or writing.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

University of Wollongong tells students to acknowledge generative AI use where appropriate.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

University of York says students must sign into Gemini with University credentials to ensure data protection.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

Utrecht University says AI tools should be allow-listed according to an AI assessment framework.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The University of Deusto has an institutional Artificial Intelligence Commission responsible for defining and coordinating the university's AI strategy, promoting training, establishing good practices, and supporting adoption by the university community.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UHK tells students using AI tools to observe personal-data protection principles, avoid misuse of UHK or partner-owned information, and recommends not entering personal data or non-public information into external AI tools unless consent/legal basis and provider terms support it.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The University of Denver Office of Teaching and Learning advises faculty not to rely on AI-checking software to confirm suspected academic dishonesty.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

University of Ibadan's official Information Technology and Media Policy includes an eLearning section that expects lecturers to deploy part of coursework online and use Moodle-based tools for learning activities and online continuous assessment; this is source context and not an AI-specific policy claim.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The University of Balamand Ethical Use of Information Technology Policy applies to every member of the UOB community and says data mining on campus networks must follow ethical guidelines, respect user privacy, and receive proper approvals when researchers use university resources.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

University of Idaho OIT guidance says agentic AI tools should not receive credentials to university systems, should not be installed on systems with moderate- or high-risk data access, and should be tested in a sandboxed workflow.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

University of Colombo requires students and staff to remain responsible for work involving AI and to review, fact-check, and edit AI-generated content before using it in academic or administrative work.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The University of Ioannina Library and Information Center offers a Greek-language learning object on academically appropriate AI use for literature-review work, including selecting AI tools, evaluating outputs, using outputs, and citing AI sources.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

Panjab University's plagiarism policy lists preventive measures including originality declarations for relevant submissions, electronic-file submission for plagiarism checks, plagiarism-detection software, and plagiarism-check certificates for dissertations and theses.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

SIMATS's research promotion policy is an official general research-ethics source that aims to support transparent, socially responsible, and ethical research; this checked source is not an AI-specific policy or generative-AI guidance source.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UTHM's plagiarism prevention regulations apply to students, former students, staff, former staff, and relevant current or former university community members, and define plagiarism to include submitting or publishing all or part of work generated by generative artificial intelligence as one's own work.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

Universite Paris-Pantheon-Assas's Legal Summer School on generative AI and legal practice says the training covers limits and risks of the technology and responsible-AI practices.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The UNIMAS Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities 2025/2026 student handbook frames good AI practice as using AI as a support tool, checking AI responses against academic sources, using AI to sharpen critical thinking, and recognizing that AI responses may be inaccurate or unsuitable.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The same Taif University page says the AI guiding manual focuses on general principles for using AI to support education and research quality, protect academic integrity and data, and guide universities on internal policies, optimal use, digital security, and digital skills.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The University of Arkansas Libraries AI and Academic Integrity guide says students are expected to cite anything that is not their original work, including text generated by artificial intelligence.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UMS's student AI guide tells students to use AI to support learning, not to replace their own effort, critical thinking, and work.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

UAB's practical AI guidance says UAB-related official university activities should use only UAB-approved AI tools, and that even free AI tools should be approved before use for UAB work.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

The Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences requires manuscript AI-use disclosure at submission and bars reviewers from using AI tools to generate review reports while stating that editors must not rely on AI for editorial decisions.

This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.

Authors submitting to New Educational Approaches must transparently disclose use of AI tools such as large language models or chatbots for generating or editing part of an article in a separate AI-use statement before the references.