Universiti mana yang menyebut pendedahan AI?

Azure AI is listed in UChicago’s approved/restricted table under these data and purpose conditions: Approved up to SRDS low protection level.. Only for non-sensitive information General Use Payment/support label: Enterprise Supported. This listing does not establish coursework or examination permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

BoxAI is listed in UChicago’s approved/restricted table under these data and purpose conditions: Approved up to SRDS high protection level.. Can be used for sensitive information with IRB approval. General Use Payment/support label: Enterprise Supported. This listing does not establish coursework or examination permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT 3.5 is listed in UChicago’s approved/restricted table under these data and purpose conditions: Approved for data that is made publicly available by its source.. Only for non-sensitive information General Use Payment/support label: Free. This listing does not establish coursework or examination permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Peking University lists 北大问学 (Beida Wenxue) as an AI-assisted teaching and learning service for its faculty and students. Its listing does not establish permission to use AI-generated work in coursework, examinations or degree assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

On 27 June 2025, PKU’s Computing Center announced locally deployed 小北智学 (Xiaobei Zhixue) for faculty and students. Campus-card login permits joining public courses and interacting with an AI tutor. Instructors need whitelist approval to create courses and upload materials. Access does not grant assessment permission.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PKU’s digital-education directory lists 汉苑知库. The listing identifies an institutional service or resource; it does not itself establish universal student eligibility, fee-free access or permission for assessed work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Adobe Firefly has the stated Cornell access and data conditions; its listing does not authorize coursework or examinations. Adobe licence required; contact Hub/local IT to confirm entitlement.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Cornell AI Platform has the stated Cornell access and data conditions; its listing does not authorize coursework or examinations. Limited pilot collaborators; contact Innovation Hub. Moderate Risk and below per tool entry.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot Basic has the stated Cornell access and data conditions; its listing does not authorize coursework or examinations. Eligible faculty/staff/students aged 18+; use Cornell authentication. Only Low Risk data; public search has limited privacy.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNSW's student guidance lists six Levels of AI Assistance for Term 3 2026, Semester 2 2026 and Hexamester 5 2026: No Assistance, Simple Editing Assistance, Planning or Design Assistance, Assistance with Attribution, Generative AI Software-based Assessments, and Not Applicable. For Hexamester 6 2026 and Summer Term 2027, the page specifies three AI Assessment Modes: Can't Use AI, Can Use AI and Must Use AI. Students should use the framework for their teaching period and check each assessment's instructions.

Rekod bukti: 13. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The retained Staff Teaching Gateway evidence describes categories of permitted AI use to support assessment design. Current student guidance distinguishes the six Levels of AI Assistance for Term 3, Semester 2 and Hexamester 5 2026 from three AI Assessment Modes for Hexamester 6 2026 and Summer Term 2027.

Rekod bukti: 10. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At UNSW, the unauthorised or unacknowledged use of AI in assessments is classified as cheating and considered student misconduct under the Code of Conduct and Values.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT Edu is institutionally available under its stated account, audience, cost and data conditions. This does not establish permission to use it in coursework or examinations.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Gemini for Google Workspace is institutionally available under its stated account, audience, cost and data conditions. This does not establish permission to use it in coursework or examinations.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Grammarly Pro is listed by CETLI with stated access and data conditions. Its availability is not coursework or examination permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT in HKU GenAI App is listed by HKU for the specified institutional or eligibility-based service. Access conditions apply and do not establish coursework or examination permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

GPT Image in HKU GenAI App is listed by HKU for the specified institutional or eligibility-based service. Access conditions apply and do not establish coursework or examination permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

DeepSeek in HKU GenAI App is listed by HKU for the specified institutional or eligibility-based service. Access conditions apply and do not establish coursework or examination permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Columbia University has a university-wide Generative AI Policy from the Office of the Provost governing use by staff, faculty, students, and researchers, covering information security, data privacy, copyright, academic integrity, and bias.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Under Columbia Law School's 2026–2027 Default Academic Policy on Student Use of AI (§9.1), use of AI during any examination is prohibited except where advance permission is granted in writing by the course instructor in the course syllabus and/or examination instructions; where not authorized, every word of an examination answer must be produced by the student without AI assistance (irrespective of whether proctored or take-home, online or handwritten), and students are strictly forbidden from inputting current examination questions, prompts, or fact patterns into an AI tool.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Columbia Law School’s 2026–2027 Sections8–11 are defaults. Instructors may adopt alternative course or assignment policies in writing, at minimum in the initial syllabus, with advance notice to all students; absent an alternative the Policy applies.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AWS Bedrock via Harvard API Platform is available through Harvard's API Platform for eligible users. The platform offers self-service AI API access, including pay-as-you-go or limited-access credit-redemption options; some individual APIs have limited eligibility stated in their documentation. API/developer services are approved up to Level 3 confidential data. Account access is separate from course, research-use and feature-specific approval.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini API via Harvard API Platform is available through Harvard's API Platform for eligible users. The platform offers self-service AI API access, including pay-as-you-go or limited-access credit-redemption options; some individual APIs have limited eligibility stated in their documentation. API/developer services are approved up to Level 3 confidential data. Account access is separate from course, research-use and feature-specific approval.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Harvard AI Sandbox is a free institutional multi-model service for the School/user groups listed on its service page. It is approved up to Level 3 confidential data and states that input data will not train vendor models. HGSE access to the Sandbox for course-content uploads is through individual courses; HMS access/training conditions are School-specific. Access does not grant assessment permission.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ITSO describes Gemini Enterprise EDU access for both subscribed staff and students, including programme/course-sponsored student licences.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ITSO offers an OpenAI-based chatbot integration for HKUST Drupal websites. Interested colleagues should contact ITSO; no general student-access or coursework permission is established.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The HKUST Generative AI API is a cloud-hosted institutional service advertised to staff and students. Consult the official API guide for onboarding and pricing; this does not authorize assignment submission or data upload.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Users must not use AI to collect, use, store and/or disclose personal information without the express consent of the individual(s).

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students retain Intellectual Property ownership of their assignments even after submission for assessment; staff are not permitted to upload student work to an AI platform without express student consent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Using AI-generated content when not permitted and claiming authorship without acknowledgment constitutes a breach of academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students may only use GenAI for assessed work (assignments, exams, projects, theses) if expressly permitted by their instructor, supervisor, or program.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

All uses of GenAI at UBC must uphold academic integrity and adhere to the academic misconduct regulations in the UBC Okanagan and Vancouver calendars.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Copilot Chat (Basic) is available to eligible UBC students, faculty and staff through institutional Microsoft 365. M365 Copilot (Premium), launched October 15, 2026, is a paid departmental subscription for eligible faculty and staff; students retain Basic access. Prompts and responses are not used to train Microsoft foundation models. Separately, CTLT guidance limits what instructors can require students to share with Copilot for Organizations in a course to Standard U1 Low Risk information. All use remains subject to authorized-purpose, privacy and security requirements; tool access does not grant assessment permission.

Rekod bukti: 12. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Princeton's Generative AI Tools Use Policy (last updated August 2026) governs Princeton administrative and operational information, including student, financial and HR information; it expressly excludes information used for research, academic or instructional purposes. Under it, only University-licensed generative AI tools should be used with University Information classified as Internal or Confidential, publicly available generative AI tools may not be used with such information, and even University-licensed tools should not be used with Restricted information. It is not a blanket rule covering all student coursework or research data.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Princeton's Rights, Rules, Responsibilities (2.4) states that generative AI is not a source; where an instructor permits generative AI, students must disclose its use rather than cite or acknowledge it. Disclosure of permitted use is therefore required, not merely recommended, while whether AI may be used at all is set by the course or department. Scholarly Integrity guidance says failure to disclose, even in a course where AI is permitted, is a scholarly integrity violation, and offers a disclosure template.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Princeton's Rights, Rules, Responsibilities states that students must adhere to course and departmental generative AI policies, and that inappropriate uses on work submitted for an academic requirement - directly copying output, representing AI output as their own (including rewording or paraphrasing it), exceeding the instructor's parameters, or failing to disclose use (including use for rewording, paraphrasing or editing) - constitute academic integrity violations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(1)–(2) and §2(5), instructors should determine the scope of permitted and prohibited AI use and reporting requirements according to course nature and should clearly state and communicate their policies in course syllabi, whereas students must review and comply with the instructor's syllabus policies and must report their AI use in the prescribed manner when required.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §3(2), §3(4), and §3(5), researchers must review AI outputs and cross-validate them against literature, experiments, and expert judgment; must take care to prevent leakage of sensitive research information, should not unnecessarily enter or share research data or confidential information with AI tools, and must strictly observe research security laws; and should record and preserve the AI usage process (prompts, versions, model names, scope) to the extent possible for reproducibility.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §1 sets general ethical principles: members should share and acknowledge AI use to the extent possible (§1(1)), should verify facts and sources (§1(2)), must comply with copyright, privacy, and information security laws and University rules and ensure inputs do not include personal or rights-infringing content (§1(3)), should make diligent efforts to mitigate bias (§1(4)), and must recognize full personal responsibility for submitted AI-assisted outputs (§1(6)).

Rekod bukti: 5. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CUHK leaves pedagogical AI rules to course teacher discretion. For example, Chung Chi College General Education courses (GECC3130/4130, AY2026/27) adopt Approach 2 ('Use only with prior permission'), where GenAI is prohibited for drafting written assignments but permitted for spelling and grammar checking, subject to approval by the Senate Committee on General Education (university-wide full student guide rules remain unverified behind ADFS SSO).

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At CUHK, improper or unauthorized use of AI tools in learning activities and assessments constitutes academic dishonesty (including plagiarism or unauthorized third-party assistance) under Senate policy (effective from AY2025-26, updated July 2026), subject to penalties ranging from zero marks to demerits, suspension, or termination of studies, adjudicated by the course-offering faculty/college or the Faculty of Medicine Fitness to Practice (FTP) Committee.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Penalties for academic dishonesty involving AI tools at CUHK may include zero marks on the assessment, marking down of overall course grade, a demerit recorded on academic transcript, or course failure (e.g. assignments with VeriGuide AWD AI Index > 25% under Approach 2 in GECC3130/4130 may receive a failing grade), and for severe offences, suspension or termination of studies under Senate procedures (effective from AY2025-26, updated July 2026).

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Manchester does not ban generative AI. The university's position is that when used appropriately, AI tools have the potential to enhance teaching and learning, and can support inclusivity and accessibility.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Manchester has adopted five core principles for AI use: transparency, accountability, competence, responsible use, and respect. All staff and students using or developing AI are personally responsible for adhering to these.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University members must apply standard data protection rules to AI tools; under Senate Policy DocID 79331 §2.3.1, staff members who use AI in Teaching and Learning activities must exclusively use the University-provided Microsoft 365 Copilot service when handling student-identifiable or confidential data, and under §2.2.1(c) students must not upload University copyright materials to external AI.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini is provided to all members of The University of Tokyo with ECCS Cloud Email accounts under institutional data protection; coursework use is governed by instructor assignment settings on UTOL.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Historical March2024 interim service notice (not a current comprehensive service inventory): Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is provided to all members of The University of Tokyo with UTokyo Accounts with commercial data protection; coursework use is governed by instructor assignment settings on UTOL.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UTokyo states it is unacceptable to present AI-generated text as one's own when submitting class assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Adobe Firefly is available through U-M enterprise Adobe licensing to eligible faculty, staff, and students at no added individual cost. This institutional availability is not blanket permission for coursework, examinations, or sensitive-data uploads.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini is offered through U-M Google services for eligible faculty, staff, and students; sponsored affiliates, alumni, and retirees are excluded. Service use is subject to ITS terms and per-service data restrictions, not universal assignment permission.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

U-M GPT Toolkit is an ITS-provided advanced generative AI service with access through its self-service API gateway. Use remains subject to U-M terms, data permissions, and course rules.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Under the University of Toronto Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters (effective July 1, 2025), it is an offence for a student knowingly to use or possess an unauthorized aid or obtain unauthorized assistance in connection with any form of academic work. If an instructor has specified that no outside assistance is permitted on an assignment, the University would typically consider the student's use of generative AI to be use of an unauthorized aid. The Office of Academic Integrity scenario page gives the same example but still shows pre-2025 Code wording and is interpretive rather than the governing text.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Toronto teaching guidance (CTSI) now names Cogniti as the preferred tool for teaching and learning, embedded in Quercus and free for every student, and Microsoft Copilot Chat as the easiest general-purpose starting point available to everyone at U of T. Tools in the AI Kitchen are vetted and may be used with institutional data up to Level 3. Some licensed tools require a paid subscription not covered by the University. Tool availability does not authorize AI use in a given assessment.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Scopus AI is not in the central AI Kitchen directory; the UTSC Centre for Teaching and Learning lists it as an approved tool available in protected mode with UTORid login, integrated into the Scopus database. It is a library research-database feature, not a general assessment permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Northwestern offers instructors three illustrative approaches to course AI rules: Open, Conditional (express instructor authorization), and Closed. Actual permissions depend on the course and assignment.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Northwestern students, faculty and staff have access to institutionally authenticated Microsoft Copilot Chat, subject to institutional data-use limits and separate course/assessment instructions.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot Chat is Northwestern's primary general-use AI tool, accessible to students, faculty, and staff with their Northwestern account. Microsoft 365 Copilot Premium requires an additional paid license for eligible faculty and staff; tool access does not grant coursework permission.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Edinburgh does not ban the use of generative AI by students, though its use is restricted for much assessed work and governed by course-level guidance.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At the University of Edinburgh, presenting AI outputs as your own original work, machine-translating assessed work to English, submitting AI content without acknowledgment, and using AI agents within university learning platforms constitute academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 5. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At the University of Edinburgh, staff must be transparent about generative AI assistance, never claim AI output as their own original work, and always verify accuracy and appropriateness.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCLA's AI use guide states that Anthropic has been reviewed and approved at P2 levels, while its October 2026 campus tools comparison lists direct Anthropic products as 'Coming soon'; a current individual license or coursework authorization is not established.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCLA provides institutionally protected Gemini access to active students, faculty and staff at no additional cost under current tool-specific data-classification limits. Workspace-integrated features have separate rollout conditions.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCLA provides Microsoft Copilot Chat to active students, faculty and staff without extra licensing cost through authorized UCLA accounts, subject to data-protection and coursework rules.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Whenever AI is allowed or required in an assessment, students must follow task instructions/restrictions, document the type of AI and its contribution, and provide written acknowledgement of use and extent. When necessary, cite and reference using the closest source types in the required style.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Using AI in a way not permitted in an assessment or failing to acknowledge its use correctly breaches assessment conditions under Student Academic Integrity Procedure V4.1 §4.7.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Monash's AI responsible use principles establish five institutional pillars: community benefit, education and research excellence; fairness; transparency; integrity and accountability; and data security and privacy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At the University of Melbourne, using GenAI tools on an assessment task that does not permit them, or using them in preparation without acknowledgement, constitutes academic misconduct under cl. 4.13 of the Student Academic Integrity Policy (MPF1310).

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AILA is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: self_hosted_system.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SparkAI is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: self_hosted_system.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The UC Berkeley Academic Senate recommends that all faculty include a clear statement on their syllabus about course expectations regarding the use of Google Gemini or any other generative AI tool for course-related work. In the absence of such a statement, students may be more likely to use these technologies inappropriately.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The UC Berkeley Academic Senate provides three sample syllabus statement frameworks for faculty: 'Full AI' (GenAI required), 'Some AI' (limited permitted use with restrictions), and 'No AI' (all GenAI use prohibited). Faculty should modify these to fit their course requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The UC Berkeley Academic Senate recommends that for assignments where GenAI is not permitted, instructors should adopt enforcement mechanisms such as in-person proctored exams, an additional oral exam component, or a written statement of academic integrity, since no validated GenAI detection tools exist.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

OpenAI ChatGPT Edu is available to all current Stanford faculty, staff, students, and postdocs with an active SUNet ID at no cost during the university pilot through August 2027. Access requires submitting an activation request form and logging in via Stanford single sign-on (SSO). ChatGPT Edu is approved for Low Risk and High Risk non-PHI data, and is approved for Protected Health Information (PHI) under Stanford's Business Associate Agreement (BAA) and Data Risk Assessment (DRA). Free pilot access is separate from paid higher tiers. Students must follow the applicable school, course and task rules; institutional access is not assessment permission.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Anthropic Claude for Education is available to all current Stanford faculty, staff, students, and postdocs with an active SUNet ID at no cost during the university pilot through August 2027. Access requires submitting an activation request form and logging in via Stanford SSO. Claude for Education is approved for Low Risk and High Risk non-PHI data; Protected Health Information (PHI) is NOT approved. Free pilot access is separate from paid higher tiers. Students must follow the applicable school, course and task rules; institutional access is not assessment permission.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini Enterprise is available to all current Stanford faculty, staff, students, and postdocs with an active SUNet ID at no cost during the university pilot through August 2027. Gemini Enterprise activates automatically on first sign-in through its University homepage using a SUNet ID; no request form is needed. Gemini Enterprise is approved for Low Risk and High Risk non-PHI data, and is approved for Protected Health Information (PHI) under Stanford's Google BAA and DRA. Free pilot access is separate from paid higher tiers. Students must follow the applicable school, course and task rules; institutional access is not assessment permission.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Staff setting summative assessment must: declare whether/how students can use AI; review assessment design for alignment with permitted AI use; ensure equality of baseline AI tool provision where authorised; specify declaration forms for student AI use; only identify suspected unauthorised AI use through marking or university-endorsed detection tools (the public page says none had received endorsement at its last update); and handle misconduct under usual disciplinary regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MPLS guidance for DPhil and MSc by Research summative assessment requires a statement on GenAI use in the final thesis for submissions from Trinity Term 2026. The statement goes immediately after the abstract and covers compliance, uses and referencing. This is MPLS guidance, not proof of an identical rule in every division.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students undertaking summative assessment must: complete assessment in line with the AI use declaration for each assignment; acknowledge their AI use via a formal declaration in the prescribed format; and understand that submitting work breaching AI specifications constitutes cheating and may constitute plagiarism, handled under usual disciplinary regulations.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In Caltech's Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) division, students may use generative AI tools only in ways explicitly allowed by the course instructor in the course materials. Any usage not specifically allowed should be assumed to be disallowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Caltech HSS generative AI policy applies to all assignments including major papers, exams, discussion board posts, reflections, and problem sets.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Caltech HSS students are expected to follow specific course guidance for documenting any permitted use of generative AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The ME faculty recommends web Microsoft Copilot and states students can sign in with their TU Delft credentials; recommendation and access do not establish blanket task permission or an institution-wide endorsement.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ME guidance uses a “Yes, unless” rule of thumb for unsupervised work, subject to written course restrictions and the student’s own reasoning/writing responsibilities. Check the course statement; this is not a university-wide default or an exam permission.

Rekod bukti: 5. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Where the ME instructor limits AI, students must disclose use for work contributing to a grade using the selected acknowledgement format. End/appendix placement is a recommendation and excluded from word count. Not acknowledging restricted use could be fraud, not automatically a finding.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Primo Research Assistant is listed for National Tsing Hua University - NTHU in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Scopus AI is listed for National Tsing Hua University - NTHU in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Web of Science Research Assistant is listed for National Tsing Hua University - NTHU in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Auckland's Assessment of Courses Procedures state that AI use in assessment tasks may only be restricted when the task is a controlled assessment, identified as Lane 1; AI may be used without restriction in other assessment tasks, identified as Lane 2.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Auckland's Assessment of Courses Procedures require courses to use the two-lane nomenclature, including telling students which assessments align with Lane 1 or Lane 2, and require courses and programmes to implement the two-lane approach in assessment design by 2027.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Auckland's student AI advice states that AI has no agency, treats the student prompting an AI tool as the author, and says students are ultimately responsible for work submitted for assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Gemini is listed for Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NotebookLM is listed for Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The three categories are guidance for communicating assessment expectations. Assessment briefs take precedence; staff may specify additional conditions, and individual assistive-technology exemptions must be clarified.

Rekod bukti: 9. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCL defines academic misconduct in the context of GenAI as gaining an unfair advantage over other students; there is no single list of fair and unfair uses as it depends on the assessment category.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCL generally permits language and writing review that does not determine substantive content, subject to the assessment brief and assessed-language exceptions. CLIE Modern Foreign Language modules prohibit third-party or software language and writing review.

Rekod bukti: 7. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Claude for Education is listed for Dartmouth College in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Dartmouth Chat is listed for Dartmouth College in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot with commercial data protection is listed for Dartmouth College in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

aiaiapps is listed for EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne in an official teaching tools source as a collection of crystallized prompts developed by CEDE for teachers to facilitate the generation of quizzes, exercises, hints, and image descriptions. It is designed primarily for instructors and teaching staff to support course design; student use in assessments is not authorized by this tool listing.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

EPFL teaching guidance lists EPFL Chatbot as an AI-powered chatbot and semantic search of EPFL academic content that can suggest relevant video lectures and related exercises. Open Graph Search to sign in to Chat with Graph Search; course-specific AI tutors are deployed within participating courses by instructors. Institutional tool listing does not establish permission to use AI in assessments; students must not use AI during exams or assessments unless explicitly allowed.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

EPFL's studying guide states that assessment material not constituting the student's personal and original contribution must be recognizable as such under LEX 1.3.3 Article 4. It says the use of AI tools should be disclosed in a statement and directs students to check their course's specific AI policy or ask the instructor how to formulate it.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students are responsible for the content of work they submit. Performance assessments must be conducted independently and personally; GenAI may serve a supplementary role but not replace student efforts.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lecturers determine whether and how GenAI may be used in their courses and for respective assessments. Teaching materials created with GenAI must be subjected to quality control by the lecturer.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Violations of GenAI guidelines such as use of unauthorised aids or non-disclosure of their use are subject to disciplinary action under existing performance assessment rules and the declaration of originality.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NTU AI Learning Assistant (NALA) is described in NTU’s 6 April 2026 university announcement. Educators build and deploy course tutors; availability depends on the applicable course. This does not grant general assessment permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NTU research policy states that GenAI use beyond basic spelling and grammar checks should be acknowledged and cited, identifying the tool’s full name and version, purpose and use in research proposals, manuscripts and scholarly works.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NTU states that not citing or acknowledging the use of generative AI could be considered plagiarism (a form of research misconduct), especially if GenAI was used to generate ideas or for literature reviews.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The university’s public news account of its AI Education Guiding Principles reports: Tsinghua University prohibits students from directly copying or mechanically paraphrasing AI-generated text, code, or other output and submitting it as academic coursework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The university’s public news account of its AI Education Guiding Principles reports: Tsinghua University requires teachers and students to disclose their use of AI and AI-generated content in accordance with regulations, as part of the 'compliance and integrity' principle.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The university’s public news account of its AI Education Guiding Principles reports: Tsinghua University advises instructors to determine how AI should be used according to course objectives, clearly explain AI usage norms to students at the start of each course, and remain responsible for AI-generated teaching materials.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Claude for Education is listed for University of Pittsburgh in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini is listed for University of Pittsburgh in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PittGPT is listed for University of Pittsburgh in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Adobe Express is listed for Arizona State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Arizona State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini for Education is listed for Arizona State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Fudan's formal rule on AI tools in undergraduate theses (adopted by the Academic Affairs Office on 24 September 2024, trial) allows AI use only with the supervisor's consent and only where AI output does not affect assessment of the student's own innovative ability, in four areas: literature search and management (verifying references), suggesting chart types and auxiliary charting (not generating or altering original data or key research figures), coding and method screening where the method is not the thesis's innovation (all code and methods must be reviewed and tested by the author), and reference formatting (with checking). This rule is specific to undergraduate theses; it is not a rule for all courses or for graduate theses.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The same Fudan undergraduate-thesis rule (Article 4) prohibits AI in six areas: research design and data analysis; generating or altering original data (unless AI itself is the research topic); generating or altering original result images and key illustrations (unless a reproducible AI method is part of the design and explained in the methods); directly generating thesis text or acknowledgements, including AI language polishing and translation; use of AI by defence committee members or reviewers to evaluate the thesis; and any AI use or upload for theses involving confidential content.

Rekod bukti: 5. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

When AI tools are used in a Fudan undergraduate thesis, the thesis commitment form must disclose the tool name and version, time and specific purpose of use, the content or suggestions the AI produced, and the parts of the thesis where it was used; students must keep the relevant pre-AI materials for inspection by the supervisor or reviewers. The author bears final responsibility and AI cannot be listed as an author.

Rekod bukti: 5. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Johns Hopkins guidance describes potential instructional uses of generative AI tools, including course-material generation and adaptive personalized feedback.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Johns Hopkins IT policies prohibit entering non-public proprietary Hopkins data—including clinical data, financial records, and business records—into unapproved third-party AI tools. Instructors should consider FERPA guidelines before submitting student work to AI tools or utilizing Zoom AI Companion, ensuring proper removal of personally identifiable information. In healthcare education, instructors should consider HIPAA implications, and use or disclosure of health information in generative AI must be made only with JH-approved vendors where appropriate agreements offering data protections are in place. HopGPT is approved for sensitive data (including PHI and PII) under institutional stewardship, subject to required approvals: IRB approval is required for non-clinical research cases, and SIP approval is required for clinical research cases or uses involving PHI/PII.

Rekod bukti: 5. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Engineering for Professionals (EP) implements a course-level color classification system for generative AI use: Red (GenAI use is prohibited, including drafting, editing and revision, unless the instructor or applicable course instructions explicitly state otherwise); Yellow (Moderate GenAI use is permitted with restrictions to support learning, and all use must be disclosed according to course expectations); and Green (Liberal GenAI use is permitted throughout the workflow, with expectations for transparency and accountability). Every EP course must have a course-level color designation; Yellow courses must also include assignment-level labels for all assessments and activities, while Red and Green courses need not apply categories at the assignment level. This policy applies strictly to EP courses and does not establish a blanket university-wide permission or exam authorization.

Rekod bukti: 5. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At King's College London, inappropriate use of generative AI without attribution is considered academic misconduct and can result in penalties ranging from formal warnings to expulsion.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

King's College London does not require students to cite generative AI as an authoritative source in the reference list, but it requires students to acknowledge any use of generative AI tools in coursework by including a declaration statement with their references. Unless the assessment brief gives other wording, students append either a declaration that no part of the submission was generated by AI software (English grammar and spell checking is consistent with this statement) or a declaration that parts of the submission have AI contributions within the acceptable use specified in the brief, naming the tools and how they were used.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

King's Academic Misconduct Policy states that using generative AI tools to produce output that is then copied as part of a submission is not appropriate, that any work submitted must genuinely demonstrate the student's own work, skills and knowledge and follow the assessment guidelines, and that generative AI writing programmes are third-party technologies to be used only in accordance with College guidance. The King's guidance adds that submitting AI-generated text as one's own without written departmental permission is considered misconduct (third-party involvement or text manipulation) where it gives undue advantage or interferes with assessment of the student's own understanding. A written permission or acknowledgement does not by itself make substantive AI content creation acceptable.

Rekod bukti: 5. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MIT does not permit Medium Risk data in publicly available GenAI tools. High Risk MIT information must not be used with any GenAI tool, including MIT enterprise tools; report an existing high-risk disclosure to [email protected] immediately. Public tools are not recommended for Low Risk MIT data.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MIT guidance requires GenAI use to comply with applicable law, Institute policies, Information Protection guidelines, WISP, and applicable DLCI policies. The linked IS&T page still mentions EO 14110; that revoked order is not presented here as a current legal obligation.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MIT Libraries advises citing or acknowledging AI contributions in academic papers and consulting the applicable school, class, and publication policies. This is citation guidance, not a universal assessment-use permission or a new university-wide mandatory disclosure rule.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

McGill's Provost-endorsed principles state that instructors remain responsible for comporting themselves according to the highest standards of academic integrity in their use of generative AI tools. Instructors must be explicit in course outlines about the expectations for use of generative AI tools and may set limits on their use in assessment tasks.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

McGill recommends that instructors explain to students in their course outline what the appropriate use or non-use is of generative AI tools in the context of that course. The use or non-use of these tools should align with the learning outcomes associated with the course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

McGill's Code of Student Conduct and Disciplinary Procedures (current version effective November 12, 2025) states that no student may use generative AI in an assessment in a manner not authorized by the relevant instructor or supervisor, or that violates the course's AI requirements (Article 25(b)), and that using any tool, including generative AI, that has been disallowed in the course outline or written assessment instructions is cheating (Article 26(f)). AI-detection software is not sufficient by itself to substantiate an allegation under Article 25. Permission is therefore set by the instructor, supervisor and course, not university-wide.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

DALL-E via Microsoft Copilot is listed for Technical University of Denmark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot for the web is listed for Technical University of Denmark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Scite AI is listed for Technical University of Denmark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini is listed for The Ohio State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for The Ohio State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ohio State responsible-use guidance says students should use GenAI tools for coursework only with the explicit permission of each instructor, and only in the ways allowed by that instructor.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Sydney's current student guidance (last updated 2 June 2026) says students can use AI in open (unsupervised) assessments, where educators guide the appropriate types of use and AI use must be acknowledged, but generally cannot use AI in secure (supervised) assessments unless the unit coordinator has given express permission in the unit outline. Each unit outline has a 'Use of AI' column showing, per assessment, AI prohibited, AI allowed, AI limited, or not applicable. This replaces the earlier Semester 1 2025 transition wording.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Sydney guidance states that misusing AI can breach the Academic Integrity Policy, with examples including submitting AI-generated work without appropriate acknowledgment, using AI where it has been prohibited in a secure assessment such as a secure exam, and inputting University teaching or course materials, other students' content, external partners' intellectual property or any person's personal or health information. Citing non-existent references because AI output was not verified is not acceptable and risks an academic integrity breach.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

If University of Sydney students use AI in assessments they must acknowledge it, including generative AI translation, paraphrasing or referencing tools; tools used only for word processing or basic spelling and grammar correction need not be acknowledged. Where permitted by the unit outline, the statement must say that AI tools were used and give the tool's name and version, the publisher, the URL and a brief description of how it was used; unit coordinators may add requirements such as a log of AI inputs and outputs.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

A student using any unacknowledged content generated by artificial intelligence within a summative assessment as though it is their own work constitutes academic misconduct, unless explicitly stated otherwise in the assessment brief.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini is included in Cambridge’s University Google Workspace core apps for staff and students. University-account access is distinct from permitted coursework, assessment and research data use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google NotebookLM is included in Cambridge’s University Google Workspace core apps for staff and students. University-account access is distinct from permitted coursework, assessment and research data use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yonsei’s May 2024 guideline asks students to clearly cite generative AI use; the August 2025 instructor guideline requires instructors to specify permissible course uses and choose and announce appropriate disclosure or prompt-record submission methods.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yonsei students should follow the instructor’s announced syllabus/course AI-use rules; the August 2025 instructor guideline also addresses permitted and prohibited exam contexts and disclosure when use is allowed.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The2025 instructor guideline assigns the course instructor the choice of prohibition, limited uses or broader uses, announced in syllabus and class. Example syllabus texts are options, not universal student permission.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Adelaide University's Academic Integrity Policy treats inappropriate use of AI that subverts an assignment or gives unfair academic advantage as an example of academic misconduct, including submitting AI-produced work as the student's own or using AI-generated information without acknowledgement.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Adelaide University's Authorship Procedure states that generative AI can be used to improve readability and clarity in publications, but must not be considered or listed as an author and its use must be disclosed transparently.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance says graduate research students' use of generative AI must be transparent and responsible, including discussing use with a supervisor, keeping records, and acknowledging AI use in thesis acknowledgements, presentations, and publications.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Emory University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Emory Responsible AI guidance says public-facing AI platforms create disclosure risks for Sensitive Information and directs users to use Emory-approved secure AI tools when handling such information.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Emory Responsible AI guidance says students must review course syllabi, program handbooks, and faculty expectations regarding AI use because instructors may specify whether tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, or other generative technologies are permitted for assignments and under what conditions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Gemini is listed for Keio University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NotebookLM is listed for Keio University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Keio University says students need to clearly indicate when reports or similar assignments are created using generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KTH tells students that generative AI use in graded assignments and exams should follow the course-specific information, and that the teacher's course rule takes precedence over general guidance.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KTH staff guidance says that, according to the Faculty Council recommendation, each course at KTH must include course-specific generative AI information in Canvas and the course memo.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KTH student guidance says course-specific generative AI information usually follows one of four approaches: no use, only specific assignments, allowed with guidelines, or free use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for McMaster University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

McMaster's teaching and learning generative AI guidelines say undergraduate and graduate course outlines should state acceptable and unacceptable generative AI use, and students should seek clarification and written confirmation if no syllabus statement is included.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

McMaster's student generative AI coursework tip sheet tells students not to use generative AI unless a course syllabus or professor explicitly allows it, and to disclose and cite AI-generated content when allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NUS policy states that submitting AI-generated work without acknowledging AI use constitutes academic dishonesty and plagiarism, punishable under university disciplinary processes assuming the case can be made.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NUS policy recommends that instructors should be transparent about where and how they deploy AI in NUS courses, particularly when generating content, acting as virtual tutors, or aiding assessment feedback and grading.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NUS policy sets the default assumption that AI tool use is permitted for unsupervised (take-home) assessments with due acknowledgement; if an assessment forbids AI for pedagogical reasons, crucial aspects of that assessment should be conducted in person and under instructor supervision.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for Stockholm University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for Stockholm University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Stockholm University's AI resources page says employees signed in to Microsoft 365 with a university account have data protection for Copilot, but it also says information at confidentiality level 3 or 4 should not be entered into Copilot.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT API is listed for Tel Aviv University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT EDU is listed for Tel Aviv University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Copilot 365 is listed for Tel Aviv University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

U of A GenAI is listed for The University of Arizona in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Zoom AI Companion is listed for The University of Arizona in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Arizona student AI guidance tells students they can use AI for assignments only if the instructor says it is OK, and says unpermitted use could violate the Code of Academic Integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At UQ, the use of AI outputs without attribution, and contrary to any direction by teaching staff, is a form of plagiarism and constitutes academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UQ Library advises coursework students to acknowledge AI use, including summarising, brainstorming, planning and editing. Assessment instructions and discipline-specific practices determine the required form and relevance of disclosure; students must check each task and course profile.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Queensland says course coordinators provide guidance in course profiles defining appropriate AI use for each assessment task.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The [genIA] ethics guide says practical AI use should clearly define what is allowed, ask for declaration and citation of tool use when appropriate, verify student understanding and original contribution, and avoid entering sensitive information into external services.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UdeC's [genIA] ethics page presents institutional guidelines and interactive tools for deciding how to incorporate generative AI in teaching and research while safeguarding transparency, authorship, privacy, and equity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The [genIA] teacher annex presents three orienting institutional template options for course or assignment instructions: generative AI allowed with conditions, restricted by stages, or prohibited except with explicit authorization.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCSB-managed AI platform on AWS Bedrock is listed for University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

GitHub Copilot is listed for University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google AI Pro for Education is listed for University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

24/7 AI Tutoring App is listed for University of Pretoria in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AI eLearning Support Bot is listed for University of Pretoria in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

clickUP AI Design Assistant is listed for University of Pretoria in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UVM's Code of Academic Integrity says course expectations may vary by instructor and students must understand expectations for each assignment and course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UVM's faculty AI guidance says there is not a mandated one-size-fits-all classroom AI approach and tells faculty to clearly communicate how their AI stance shapes course policies and assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UVM's student AI guidance tells students that the key course-context question is what the instructor has said about AI use, and that students should check syllabi and assignment instructions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for University of Wyoming in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Wyoming Regulation 2-114 says submissions generated in whole or in part by an Artificial Intelligence-based application without attribution to the application will be treated as plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UW Libraries AI Support guidance says users should cite AI tools and AI-generated outputs when quoting, paraphrasing, or incorporating AI-generated ideas into their own work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Zilina prohibits employees and students from entering sensitive data into publicly available GenAI tools, including non-public university data, non-public study materials, test assignments, intellectual-property-protected materials, personal data without explicit written consent, preliminary research results, and trade-secret data of partners.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For seminar, semester, and final theses, University of Zilina students must clearly state whether and to what extent they used GenAI tools, including the tool name/version, a brief use description, and prompts in an appendix.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Zilina prohibits students from submitting work generated by GenAI in substantial or full scope without their own creative contribution, and requires students to respect instructor restrictions on GenAI use in a course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT Business is listed for Utah State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365 is listed for Utah State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Utah State University's AI Use & Compliance guidance says AI-generated content must be reviewed for accuracy, bias, and copyright compliance before use in coursework, research, or administrative communications.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yale academic integrity guidance treats inserting AI-generated text into an assignment without proper attribution as an academic integrity violation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yale expects faculty to give clear instructions on permitted AI use and attribution, and expects students to follow instructor guidelines for coursework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yale states that instructors have authority within each course to determine whether and how students may use AI on assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Boston University student guidance tells students to disclose GenAI use and states that submitting GenAI-generated or GenAI-assisted output without attribution is plagiarism that an instructor will treat as academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Boston University student guidance says instructors have broad discretion to set GenAI rules within each course, and students are responsible for complying with those instructions and should consult the course GenAI policy or ask the instructor before assuming GenAI use is allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Boston University faculty and staff guidance says academic and administrative GenAI users should retain human oversight, evaluate and verify generated content, and disclose GenAI use in materials, documents, or publications.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine medical students in the University and College Programs, submitted or presented content must be the student's own work and not the product of generative AI or other individuals.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Case Western Reserve University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CWRU Provost classroom guidance gives faculty members discretion over the extent to which students may use AI tools in their courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Duke student-facing AI guidance says whether a student may use AI in coursework depends on instructor permission; unauthorized generative AI use is considered academic misconduct under the Duke Community Standard.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Duke CTL guidance tells instructors to update syllabi with clear guidance on generative AI use and says instructors may define how, if, and when generative AI may be used in their courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Duke CTL assignment-design guidance says AI assignments should be accompanied by course and assignment-specific AI policies, with the primary consideration being whether AI use helps students achieve course learning goals.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Imperial provides dAIsy as its institutional multi-model generative-AI platform. Basic access is available to eligible staff and students to create Personal Agents; Developer access with shared agents is restricted to approved staff, and direct LLM API access is not currently provided. Platform access does not constitute coursework permission.

Rekod bukti: 5. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Individual Imperial departments may allow or prohibit generative AI for specific assessments; students must follow the assessment brief and local instructions. The dAIsy Use Policy complements existing university policies and does not replace them; university policy prevails where there is a conflict.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Imperial Library guidance advises students to acknowledge generative AI use in assessed work and outlines recommended elements. When dAIsy is permitted for assessed work, its Use Policy requires students to acknowledge AI use and maintain transparency. Specific requirements and formats are determined by departments, courses, or assessment briefs.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For IP Paris M1/M2 students in 2026–27, AI use in any examination is prohibited unless the instructor explicitly authorizes it in their instructions; unauthorized use constitutes fraud. Outside examinations, AI may support information searches, knowledge deepening or reasoning checks with systematic, precise, detailed disclosure, subject to explicit instructor bans stated in course instructions and plagiarism restrictions.

Rekod bukti: 5. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For IP Paris M1/M2 students in 2026–27, permitted AI use in examinations must be declared according to academic citation rules; non-examination AI support use must be systematically, precisely and fully disclosed. Citation alone does not authorize an otherwise forbidden examination or reproduction of generated content beyond properly cited short excerpts.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For IP Paris 2026–27 Masters, reproducing AI-generated text, code or other output beyond short excerpts appropriately cited is treated as plagiarism. Instructors may explicitly ban AI use in a given task, submission or entire course unit.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KIT's SCC KI-Toolbox is available to KIT employees, KIT students from April 2026, and guests/partners after completing the required self-study course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KIT's public German guidelines frame generative AI as a responsible and transparent-use decision aid for KIT, while stating that existing internal rules remain unaffected and take precedence.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KIT ZML says its KI-Policy and form-generator tools are not official or mandatory KIT requirements; final rules for coursework remain with the relevant faculty and instructor.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

풀리캠퍼스 다국어 AI 코스웨어 서비스 is listed for Korea University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Korea University tells learners to disclose the AI tool name, timing, and scope of use, distinguish their own work from AI contributions, and cite AI-generated content according to the required format.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Korea University instructs instructors to decide course AI-use policies based on course purpose, teaching method, and assignment nature, and to state the policy in the syllabus.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kyushu University's basic stance says students should check in advance whether use of generative AI output is permitted for papers or works, and if permitted, should clearly indicate AI use or AI quotation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kyushu University's basic stance says course instructors may set generative AI use rules for individual classes according to each program or course objective, and should indicate those rules to students, such as in the syllabus.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kyushu University's teacher-facing guidance says that when generative AI use is allowed, instructors should direct students to state quoted AI output, the AI service name, and version, and may request prompts and outputs.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Under the Economics Faculty rules, a student who uses AI tools for work must explicitly declare that use and identify the AI model, the parts of the work where AI was used, and the purposes and methods of use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Economics Faculty rules allow each teacher, within a discipline, to require detailed prompts or restrict AI-tool use up to a full ban, with restrictions recorded in the discipline's rating system and communicated by the first class.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Economics Faculty rules place responsibility on students for correctness of facts, wording, citations, links, and interpretation of AI-assisted results, and treat unchecked use of AI results as an academic-ethics violation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

National Taiwan University guidance says it takes a positive and constructive view of AI tools, encourages teachers to adjust course planning and learning assessment, and says students should understand AI-tool limitations for future learning.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

National Taiwan University guidance recommends that instructors clarify AI-use principles and rules early in the course, preferably in the syllabus, including which activities and assignments may or may not use AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

National Taiwan University guidance says students using ChatGPT for assignments or reports should clearly label AI-generated content, fact-check it, and comply with academic ethics and academic-integrity requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NMBU's generative AI guidelines require students to clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used, and to account for AI use in assignments or other work submitted for assessment or compulsory activity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs are permitted in accordance with the guidelines, while individual course descriptions may state that AI-based programs are not permitted for exams or other assessed work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs will normally not be permitted in written examinations on campus; for take-home exams, students must follow the AI-use specifications in the exam paper and course description.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Pusan National University's AI ethics charter/guidelines state that students may use AI as a supplemental learning or research aid, but should not undermine academic integrity and should disclose the source and scope when using generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Pusan National University's AI utilization guideline tells instructors to clearly announce in the syllabus or early in the course whether AI tools may be used, the permitted scope, and evaluation criteria.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Pusan National University's AI utilization guideline says instructors should communicate permitted or prohibited AI use for assessments, and it warns against deciding a student's grade solely from an AI plagiarism or AI-detection tool result.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

LibreChat is listed for Queen's University at Kingston in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot with Single Sign-On is listed for Queen's University at Kingston in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Queen's common course policies state that course outlines will include a statement indicating whether generative AI tools are permitted in a course and under what conditions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Teachers are primarily responsible for AI-supported teaching design. They must observe applicable educational rules, specify scenarios and risks, provide testing/validation reports and filing when necessary, and explain course AI scope and AI-generated-content citation formats to students; SJTU may pursue responsibility for unregistered or risky tools.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students must follow the AI-use rules specified for each course and comply with teaching plans, intellectual-property requirements and academic integrity. SJTU’s separate teaching-center guide offers teacher-facing examples; it is not itself a university-wide disciplinary offence list.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SJTU’s2025 trial framework classifies uses as prohibited, limited, encouraged or open; students must follow each course’s AI rules. Teachers publish scope and citation formats through syllabus/class/grading rules. Categories are not permission for every assignment or exam.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for The University of Newcastle, Australia (UON) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For assessments, UON's GenAI teaching, learning and assessment policy says students should follow teaching-staff directions about GenAI use and appropriately disclose and reference GenAI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UON's GenAI teaching, learning and assessment policy says use of GenAI in assessment does not automatically constitute academic misconduct, but may do so where lecturers or course coordinators have explicitly prohibited it.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Student academic-integrity guidance says a full disclosure of GenAI-produced content should always be acknowledged, and passing off that content as one's own work counts as academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The PGR guidance permits students to use generative AI in thesis writing, provided the use is consistent with the guidance and properly declared, and warns that exceeding the guidance risks breaching the Academic Misconduct Policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Assessment guidance says that when GenAI use is allowed, students may be asked to provide full disclosure using an Acknowledge, Describe, Evidence template, while noting that some schools may use a different process.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Tennessee system AI policy says course-related communications must inform students that unpermitted AI use is a form of academic misconduct subject to the campus student code of conduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Tennessee system AI policy, which includes UT Knoxville, expects course faculty or staff to communicate permitted AI uses for a course and says students are responsible for following those course-specific AI requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UTK Writing Center guidance tells students that when an instructor allows GenAI for writing assignments, they should use it to assist rather than replace their writing process and should document and describe the use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CITEP/UBA presents La Brújul-IA as teaching guidance that offers conceptual keys and concrete strategies for critical, situated integration of AI in higher-education teaching.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The CITEP/UBA guidance frames ethical AI use as distinguishing legitimate support from improper appropriation and includes source attribution and recognition of AI co-creation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The CITEP/UBA guidance says AI use in education should consider personal-data protection and digital security, noting that not all AI tools safeguard entered information.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For final documents submitted for evaluation at Unifesp or sent for publication, the generative-AI guidelines require an explicit declaration about the use of generative AI tools, including how the tool was used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Unifesp's Resolution 17/2025 establishes guidelines for use of generative artificial intelligence in research and postgraduate work, with the stated aim of responsible and transparent use in scientific and academic production.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Unifesp states that researchers are responsible for critically reviewing texts, results, code, or images produced by generative-AI systems for correctness, coherence, originality, citation/reference compliance, and intellectual-property respect.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Basel AI citation guidelines state that AI tools must always be cited like other tools and sources, and that student papers without complete attribution may be seen as attempted plagiarism or cheating.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

OpenAI (ChatGPT with LibreChat) is listed for University of Basel in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Basel AI citation guidelines say AI-supported tools may only be used in a supporting role for work submitted for credit, with students retaining a controlling role and responsibility for their own work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Rocky in Canvas is listed for University of California, Davis in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The UC Davis School of Medicine policy says medical students may not use generative AI to directly author submitted assignments or generate answers for closed-book assessments unless faculty or course leadership gives written permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UC Davis guidance tells students to confirm with instructors before using AI in coursework and not to use AI to complete assignments unless explicitly permitted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chat AI (Academic Cloud) is listed for University of Göttingen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Göttingen AI ethics and law guidance tells users not to enter personal data into AI applications unless it has first been securely and completely anonymized, and says students may not be required by lecturers to use or register for such systems in courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For unsupervised examinations, University of Göttingen guidance says AI models should generally be permissible aids, but use of AI tools must be transparent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TerpAI is listed for University of Maryland, College Park in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For coursework, UMD tells students to assume GenAI use for assignments and assessments is not allowed unless the syllabus or assignment instructions specify otherwise.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UMD strongly encourages instructors to establish course-specific policies defining appropriate and inappropriate GenAI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For students, unless course objectives or explicit instructor authorization allow it, UNamur proscribes delegating reflective analysis to generative AI, submitting work entirely or mostly generated by AI, and using copied, paraphrased, translated, or AI-generated material without indicating the source.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For students, unless course objectives or explicit instructor authorization allow it, UNamur says they cannot introduce non-anonymized or non-pseudonymized personal data into prompts addressed to generative-AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For students, UNamur allows some generative-AI uses without referencing when they are not contrary to course objectives, including brainstorming or organizing ideas without content creation, translation or summarization for comprehension, and short language improvement of text written by the student.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Regina policy OPS-080-050 says all University use of generative AI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations; the policy primarily addresses governance and operations uses by employees.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Southern California in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini is listed for University of Southern California in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Southern California in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Szeged student guidance says students using AI for assignments or other coursework must disclose the AI tool, purpose, method, and extent of use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Szeged student guidance says AI may be used as an auxiliary tool but cannot replace students' own work; submitting an entirely AI-made work as one's own is treated as a serious academic ethics violation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Szeged has an official 2025 framework for regulated and transparent AI use in education, with guidance published for instructors and students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Vilnius University AI guidelines treat undisclosed use of a generative AI model in academic work as academic dishonesty.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Vilnius University's AI guidelines state that use of generative AI models in research, written work, applications, and similar work must be clearly indicated.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Vilnius University Business School guidelines allow students to use AI tools in academic works, while requiring disclosure and treating failure to specify AI use and provide a transcript in annexes as academic dishonesty.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

VU Amsterdam's framework says the lecturer or examiner indicates in the study guide, syllabus, or Canvas whether and how use of generative AI is allowed for a course, with course learning objectives remaining leading.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

VU Amsterdam's research guidance says GenAI use in research must meet scientific-research standards, take existing VU policies on ownership, scientific integrity, privacy, personal data, and knowledge security into account, and be transparent about which parts of research used GenAI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Wageningen University Examining Board rules treat AI-created ready-made assignment content as an irregularity that may lead to suspicion of fraud unless AI use is explicitly allowed in the assignment description and adequately documented.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

WUR's student GenAI rules tell students to check the course guide for whether and how GenAI is permitted; if the guide has no information, using GenAI to generate assignment content is not allowed and may be irregularity or fraud, including for theses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

WUR's student GenAI rules say students are never allowed to submit work entirely generated by GenAI as their own or fabricate research data, and they must be transparent about GenAI's role in submitted work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

GitHub Copilot is listed for York University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

YU AURA is listed for York University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for York University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aalto University guidance says AI-based technologies are allowed as support for teaching and learning unless the course teacher instructs otherwise, and the teacher may set course- or task-specific restrictions when learning objectives require them.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aalto University guidance says teachers who restrict AI use must give clear limitations connected to assessment criteria, and teachers may only require student work to be submitted through systems approved by Aalto University.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aalto student guidance says students should contact the course teacher if AI use is unclear, mark AI-generated content in their text, and not present AI-generated content as their own.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ADA University's Honor Code treats violating exam, test, and assignment rules, accepting unauthorized help, and using someone else's intellectual work without proper credit as unacceptable behavior.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ADA University's Student Assessment Regulations say assignments are to be designed and conducted to minimize plagiarism and cheating risk, including contract cheating, and that students are to receive clear instructions on avoiding academic-integrity breaches.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ADA University's Student Assessment Regulations require submitted take-home exams to include a signed and dated academic-integrity declaration confirming the work is the student's own and that all sources used were acknowledged.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ABU's Research Policy is described as university-wide for research practice and defines plagiarism as research ethical misconduct; this is adjacent research-integrity context and not AI-specific guidance.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Official ABU news pages say university leaders discussed updating teaching and learning policy for AI transparency/accountability and later stated that ABU had put strategies in place for use of AI in teaching and learning; the pages do not publish the full strategy or student-use rules.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

An official ABU conference news page reports a keynote statement that tools like ChatGPT can complete assignments instantly and challenge assessment and originality, but it does not state an ABU rule permitting or prohibiting student AI-tool use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Bologna citation guidance says substantial GenAI contributions in teaching and research should be acknowledged and declared, with the statement identifying tools or models, date or period of use, modes of use, and where the tool was used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Under the University of Bologna GenAI policy, students are responsible for checking permitted uses, following teaching staff instructions, verifying GenAI output, acknowledging original sources, and being able to explain work produced with GenAI support.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For GenAI use in assessed student work such as dissertation structure, dissertation writing, or programming code, University of Bologna guidance says the uses comply with policy principles only with active supervision, critical thinking, accountability for results, citation where required, and checking with the teacher whether the use is permitted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

American University guidance says students are responsible for course AI policies in syllabi, and misuse of AI or use without permission or disclosure may constitute an Academic Integrity Code violation.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

American University publishes responsible-use guidance for AI tools that applies general principles of transparency, accountability, human oversight, data protection, privacy, teaching, research, staff, and student use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

American University research guidance says researchers should be transparent about AI use, verify AI-generated content against trusted sources, protect data privacy, and not list AI systems as co-authors.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AUS policy says students must acknowledge generative AI tool use in submitted course-credit material, including the tool name and version number.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AUTH's GenAI principles say use by members of the academic community should align with existing internal regulations, preserve academic integrity, and be explicitly declared when requested.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AUTH guidance encourages teaching staff to state clearly the GenAI-use policy adopted for a course, include it in the course outline, and modify it by assignment when needed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AUTH student guidance says course teams define the GenAI policy for each course or assignment, and examples distinguish potentially permitted learning-support uses from uses such as submitting generated content as-is or using GenAI during an exam.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Auburn student-facing academic-integrity guidance tells students to review the syllabus and ask the instructor before using AI on coursework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Auburn Graduate School guidance says graduate-student AI use in research and writing must be disclosed and approved by the student's advisory committee.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Auburn guidance says instructional faculty may encourage or restrict student AI use in courses and should give students clear expectations and disciplinary-consequence awareness.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bilkent advises students to check course syllabi and instructors for whether and how GenAI tools may be used in specific courses or assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bilkent's GenAI guideline says students should attribute AI-generated content and should not submit AI-generated content without proper attribution.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bilkent's GenAI guideline tells students not to use GenAI when a professor has not explicitly allowed it in the course syllabus.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Dalhousie's course syllabus guide says syllabi should include a statement about instructor expectations around generative AI and large language models such as ChatGPT.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Dalhousie's CLT course design guidance tells instructors concerned about student generative AI use in coursework to talk with students about what they can and cannot use it for and how to use it appropriately.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

A Dalhousie CLT generative AI teaching handout says current academic integrity policy already covers generative AI use because students complete assignments on their own and must acknowledge sources of information or ideas that are not their own.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

bwGPT is listed for Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Tübingen presents its generative-AI guideline for teaching and research as representing the university's stance, focused on critical-reflective, transparent, and responsible handling of generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Tübingen guideline says that when generative AI is used in research, study, administration, or science communication, the procedure should be documented and made transparently visible in the relevant format.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Flinders states that students are responsible for using AI consistently with University, course, topic, assessment, and academic integrity requirements, including acknowledging generative AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Flinders' student academic integrity page states that misusing AI tools includes using tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or DALL-E without topic coordinator permission and without appropriate acknowledgement or citations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Flinders provides staff with AI assessment scale template instructions that range from no AI permitted through prompted, assisted, task-completion, and full AI use, with acknowledgement expectations attached to permitted use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for Ghent University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For assignments completed at home from academic year 2024-2025, Ghent University student guidance permits responsible use of generative AI tools and says individual teachers can still prohibit use for a specific subject.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ghent University teaching guidance says responsible GenAI use is always permitted unless a lecturer explicitly prohibits it for parts of an assignment that take place in a controlled environment, and it cautions that detection tools are unreliable.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Hiroshima University tells course and thesis supervisors to judge whether generative AI may be used in classes or assignments and explain that decision to students through syllabi, guidance, or similar channels.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be told that using AI output as-is may amount to copyright infringement or plagiarism, and that any use or quoted output should be made clear in reports and similar assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Hiroshima University's basic policy frames student use of generative AI in coursework around students identifying problems and considering solutions themselves, while users understand AI's mechanisms, benefits, risks, and changing literacy requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

IIT Delhi's GenAI guidelines call for full disclosure of any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools, including noting AI-created images, tables, data visualizations, or significant text sections.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

IIT Delhi's committee holds that outright restriction of GenAI tools is neither enforceable nor desirable and recommends that each course instructor develop their own plagiarism policy governing AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Course-level plagiarism policies are expected to set differentiated consequences for AI misuse while rewarding honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Perplexity Pro is listed for Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IITM) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For IIT Madras BS Degree program assignments, including any course or OPPE, the Honour Code says students are expected to produce original work based on individual understanding, and using LLMs such as ChatGPT or Gemini to generate any portion of code is considered plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The IIT Madras BS Degree Honour Code applies to participation in the IIT Madras BS Degree program and says participants must agree to the Honour Code and any additional course- or program-specific terms posted on study.iitm.ac.in/ds.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Jouf University says its University Council approved adding an "Artificial Intelligence" course as a basic course in the study plans for all students, starting in academic year 1447 AH.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Jouf University says the adopted AI course gives special attention to ethical and social aspects, including algorithmic bias, privacy, data protection, and legal and regulatory challenges linked to AI technologies.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Jouf University's adopted AI course is described as covering machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, and computer vision through interactive lectures, dynamic discussions, and real case studies.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Vice-Rectorate orientation guidelines say teachers are responsible for deciding which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form, and that the scope and form of use should be stated in the course description before the course starts.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For assessed writing, University of Graz guidance says AI use should be transparent: students should label and document AI use and follow the AI guidelines of the relevant course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Graz does not set a blanket prohibition on AI technologies for writing assignments; lecturers decide for each course which text-generating AI systems may be used and how.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Khon Kaen University's Graduate School states that failure to disclose AI use in a thesis or independent study is regarded as a violation of academic ethics and may be subject to penalties under relevant regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Khon Kaen University's Graduate School states that AI is only a supporting tool for thesis or independent study work, and students who use AI must specify the type and content of the AI use in the thesis or independent study report.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Khon Kaen University's Graduate School classifies proofreading, grammar or spelling correction, readability rephrasing without altering core content, and translation for comprehension or cross-language communication as low-risk acceptable AI uses in thesis or independent study preparation, provided the use is disclosed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KU Leuven student guidance says students remain fully responsible for what they submit and must ensure assignments allow teaching staff to assess their acquired competences.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KU Leuven student guidance says clear misuse of GenAI, where output is largely generated by GenAI and the student is not transparent about tool use, can be considered an irregularity under Article 84 of the Education and Examination Regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KU Leuven teaching guidance expects teaching staff to clearly inform students whether GenAI may be used for assignments and expects students to be transparent about GenAI use so assessment can be fair and correct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lehigh's human-subjects research guidance says use of AI to analyze or process data must be disclosed to participants during consent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lehigh says students are expected to follow instructor-set course rules and university academic integrity rules when using generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lehigh advises instructors to give students clear guidance on how generative AI tools may be used in coursework and research.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Macquarie student guidance categorises assessment tasks as Open or Observed: Open tasks allow generative AI with acknowledgement and student responsibility, while Observed tasks may restrict or prohibit AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Macquarie's research guidance says researchers using generative AI should mitigate sensitive-data risks, keep oversight and control, critically review outputs, and disclose or acknowledge generative AI use in research.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Macquarie Library referencing guidance says students who use generative AI in assessments should clearly state how they used it and fact-check AI responses against reliable sources.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MSU guidelines say students may use generative AI tools for coursework or research activities only when the instructor or research advisor explicitly permits that use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MSU expects instructors to include course-specific generative AI guidance in every syllabus, including whether AI use is permitted, the contexts in which it may be used, and expected acknowledgment or citation practices.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MSU guidelines say integration of generative AI into research outputs, manuscripts, artistic endeavors, and grant applications must be disclosed according to relevant guidance or policies, and that intentional and substantial AI uses should be disclosed when no stated guidance exists.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Middlesex guidance tells students to consult their module tutor before using AI for studies or assignments and says submitting AI-generated work as their own is a breach of academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Middlesex states that generative AI tools may be used in assessments only as specified by the module leader, and allowed use requires written acknowledgment, extent of use, generation details including prompts, and citation or referencing where generated material is not adapted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Middlesex guidance says assessment criteria should make clear when and how students can use AI for each assessment, and how to acknowledge AI use appropriately.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Oregon State University Student Community Standards states that misuse of GenAI on an assignment could violate the university's Academic Integrity Policy, including plagiarism, cheating, or fabrication.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Oregon State University strongly encourages instructors to include a syllabus statement about whether and how students should engage with GenAI in their course learning and assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Oregon State University tells students that faculty may set course-specific AI expectations and that students must follow the specific expectations for each course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Scite is listed for Purdue University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should determine and tell students when AI use is authorized or unauthorized; authorization is determined at the course level.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should include specific syllabus guidance on allowable AI-tool use, learning-process use, detection approaches, and potential consequences.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

QUB Chatbot is listed for Queen's University Belfast in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Queen's assessment guidance says students who misuse AI will be subject to the University's academic misconduct regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Queen's responsible AI research guidance expects material AI use in research to be clearly documented and acknowledged, with researchers validating AI-generated content.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

RMIT academic integrity guidance says students cannot use AI to complete or contribute to an assessment task unless specifically allowed, pass off unreferenced AI-produced ideas as their own, or submit AI-produced content they cannot understand or explain.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

RMIT assessment guidance tells students to review and fact-check AI outputs and acknowledge AI tools when those tools contribute ideas, text, images, or other content to assessment work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

RMIT says whether students may use AI in assessments depends on their course and Course Coordinator instructions, and students should check with the Course Coordinator if unsure.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Royal Holloway academic misconduct regulations list requesting or engaging an artificial intelligence tool to write or rewrite work for unfair advantage, and presenting AI-generated content as one’s own unless authorised and acknowledged, as examples of assessment offences.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance for postgraduate researchers says AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose, or other academic content, and that researchers are responsible for every output they submit.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Royal Holloway requires students to include declaration statements for generative AI use or non-use, and says a list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Rutgers Academic Integrity Policy 10.2.13 applies to all schools and academic units and says students must ensure submitted course, research, or other academic work is their own and created without impermissible technologies, materials, or collaborations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Rutgers OIT guidance says AI use in academic settings typically varies by discipline, course, or instructor; students should not consider AI tools permissible for coursework unless instructors clearly state or communicate permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Rutgers teaching guidance recommends clear and transparent course policies around generative AI, class discussion of those policies and rationales, and, when GenAI is permissible, student disclosure and reflection on use plus submission of prompts and outputs.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Sapienza's final-paper originality declaration requires students who used AI, automatic translators, grammar checkers, or data-analysis software to transparently declare the tool function and specific use, and says AI was not used to generate substantial content or automate any section.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Sapienza CAD Psychology undergraduate final papers, generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini may be used as drafting support only with careful, transparent use and personal critical revision by the student.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Sapienza CAD Psychology undergraduate final papers, the guidance treats uses such as relying on AI for bibliographic discovery, unverified citations, article summaries, critical analysis, delegated writing, automatic responses to supervisor feedback, data manipulation, fake results, or uncited AI content as illicit.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Shenzhen University guidance says serious violations of instructor AI-use rules, concealment, presenting AI-generated content as original work, or failing required disclosure/marking can affect course grades and may be handled under academic misconduct rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Shenzhen University guidance says course instructors should tell students whether AI technologies are permitted in coursework, papers, assessments, exams, and the permitted scope.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Shenzhen University guidance says researchers using AI technology in research activities should disclose the AI tool name, version, parameter settings, use, and verification process in appropriate parts of the work and follow publisher rules during publication.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SFU guidance says AI detectors cannot be used for grading decisions or academic misconduct investigations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SFU tells students that use of generative AI for coursework depends on instructor permission, and students should not assume it is permitted when guidance is unclear or absent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

When an SFU instructor permits generative AI use, SFU tells students to cite or disclose that use appropriately as part of academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

OpenClassrooms AI courses via SORBONNE.AI is listed for Sorbonne University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SCAI Education is listed for Sorbonne University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules state that assessment documents must be the student's or assessed group's personal work, AI use is refused unless explicitly authorized, and authorized AI use should mention the source.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Swansea University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Swansea University's AI assessment policy says staff and students are not permitted to present work completed by AI applications as their own without acknowledgement.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Swansea University's student AI guidance says AI-generated work submitted for assessment when not expressly authorised and declared could be investigated for academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Tampere University tells students to openly and transparently acknowledge AI use in assignments, coursework, or theses and to describe how AI was used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Tampere University's academic ethics guideline treats presenting AI-produced work as one's own without proper mention as academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Tampere University generally permits students to use generative AI applications to support learning and assignment completion, while allowing teachers to set course or assignment principles.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TUM ProLehre guidance states that instructors have broad pedagogical discretion when deciding whether and how AI is used in their courses, and that related rules should be didactically grounded and communicated transparently to students. In student guidance for written coursework (Hausarbeiten, essays, and assessed written work), ProLehre establishes that students are authorized to use AI tools only when AI use is explicitly permitted for that specific assessment.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TUM ProLehre student guidance specifies that generative AI tools may be used for written coursework, term papers, essays, and theses only when AI tool use is explicitly permitted for that specific assessment by the instructor or module specifications. Where no statement regarding AI use is made in the assignment or module handbook, students are strongly advised to ask the instructor in advance; using AI without permission may be treated as attempted deception under APSO § 22 or comparable regulations. When authorized, transparent documentation of tool use and prompts is commonly required, and students retain full personal responsibility for submitted work.

Rekod bukti: 4. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In the APSO reading version as amended by the12th amending statute, §22(1) says attempting to influence an examination result through deception or unauthorized aids leads to a failing grade. Suitable software may check unacknowledged text or sources, while the examiner determines whether deception occurred. Under §22(2), disruption may lead to exclusion from that examination and a failing grade. In serious or repeated deception or disruption cases, the examination committee may exclude the student from further examinations in the degree program, with final failure of the degree examination (§22(3)). Under §24(6), an examination failed because of §22 deception or disruption may be retaken only once. These are general examination provisions, not a separate AI-specific sanction schedule.

Rekod bukti: 5. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aqueduct API is listed for Technische Universität Wien in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Open WebUI Chat is listed for Technische Universität Wien in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Wien's student guidance says ChatGPT and other large language models must be documented as aids in written work, AI-used passages must be marked, and undisclosed generative-AI use in student work is treated as equivalent to plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Warwick's student-facing guidance says students are required to state whether AI was used in the submission process and explain why, where, and how it was used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Warwick's student-facing guidance says students may use AI only within requirements set out in assessment briefs and course handbooks, which may restrict or prohibit AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Warwick's AI in research guidance says researchers are responsible for misconduct-type practices involving AI, including improper handling of information or use of another person's ideas, even if such practices occur inadvertently through an AI tool.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In education, Science Tokyo's guideline says the university does not totally restrict learners' use of generative AI; the permitted degree of use, including whether it is banned, is left to course objectives, course content, and instructor teaching and assessment policies, and students should follow instructor instructions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For courses, Science Tokyo's guideline asks instructors to teach students about generative AI limitations, consider assessment methods, and promptly reflect a course AI-use policy in the syllabus when the policy can be clearly stated.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UAEU prohibits student use of GenAI in specified assessment contexts unless the course instructor states otherwise.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UAEU tells students that information gained from GenAI should be checked against recognized sources and that those sources should be cited.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UAEU states that students must complete a training session as part of orientation to comply with the GenAI policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says that if a student used AI tools at any stage of thesis writing, the student is required to explicitly declare the tool, version if available, date, and nature of use in a methodological note.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says students should not insert automatically generated scientific text into the thesis, replace bibliographic research with AI, or use AI-generated text without critical and personal reworking.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says non-compliance with its AI-use indications is treated as comparable to plagiarism and may lead to disciplinary sanctions under the university regulation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MS Copilot for Education is listed for Universitat de Barcelona in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UB's good-practices document recommends that students clearly declare generative AI use when relevant and frames transparent, responsible AI use as a commitment to academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UB's good-practices document says it is important for instructors to clarify at the beginning of each course what role generative AI may have, where it is permitted or not permitted, and under what conditions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The guidance states that if active use of an AI tool in a course requires registration with personal data, that use must be voluntary because GDPR must be observed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The central guidance recommends that instructors formulate clear course guidelines governing generative AI use and discuss them with students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Universität Konstanz has public central AI-in-teaching guidance, but the collected official sources should be treated as guidance and resource pages rather than a staged canonical finding of a formal university-wide binding AI policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Copilot Chat is listed for Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Wooflash is listed for Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCLouvain's student guidance frames generative AI use in academic work around responsibility, authenticity, and transparency, while telling students to check course-specific rules before using AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UGA's AI reference framework says students using generative AI must mention the use of generative AI and its name, identify the parts generated by or with AI, and cite sources correctly to avoid plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UGA's AI reference framework says use of tools mobilizing AI is prohibited by principle for knowledge assessment unless explicitly authorized, with study regulations and assessment modalities specifying the AI-use framework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UGA's AI reference framework says researchers using generative AI must verify whether generated ideas come from existing sources, add appropriate references, mention the use and name of the generative AI, and identify parts generated by or with AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Université Lumière Lyon 2's règlement intérieur prohibits using an artificial-intelligence tool in university work without explicit mention, and prohibits presenting AI-generated content as personal human work, under disciplinary proceedings.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lyon 2 SPS guidance says AI should not do assessed work in place of the student; AI assistance may be possible only when it respects university ethics and the specific instructions for the exam or assignment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lyon 2 SPS guidance recommends that instructors explicitly state expected conditions for student work, including obligations, permissions, recommendations, prohibitions, whether generative AI may be used, and how any use should be signaled.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Université PSL's Règlement de la scolarité for 2026-2027 (adopted by the Board on 25 June 2026, replacing the June 2025 version with the same AI wording) states that, where an instructor authorises AI-based tools such as ChatGPT, their use must be explicitly disclosed like any source citation, and failure to disclose AI use is treated as plagiarism and sanctioned as such; a disciplinary procedure may follow, with sanctions up to exclusion (not automatic exclusion). The 2026 version applies to programmes operated directly by PSL (such as the Collège Sciences, Humanités et Société and the Paris School of AI); member institutions apply their own regulations, so it does not set course permissions across ENS, Dauphine, Mines Paris and other members.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Research-integrity guidance published by the Université Paris Dauphine-PSL library recommends that researchers who use generative AI state the tool, its version and the context of use, and notes that prompts and results may also be documented. This is library guidance for researchers at a PSL member institution, not a PSL-wide mandatory rule.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PSL's Charte du doctorat (June 2026, section 2.7) sets general recommendations on generative AI for doctoral candidates, some of which are mandatory. Generative AI is not prohibited in doctoral research, but its uses must be transparent, declared and critically assessed, and the candidate remains fully responsible for AI-obtained content. Candidates must insert a dated, signed 'Déclaration doctorale d'intégrité scientifique' (one to two pages) at the start of the thesis, stating which generative AI tools were used, for which tasks, their benefits, limits and risks, and any mitigation. Member institutions may set stricter rules, which prevail.

Rekod bukti: 5. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCD's Academic Integrity Policy says AI-generated content may not be submitted without explicit permission and attribution, and that generative AI outputs must be used critically, ethically, cited, and acknowledged.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University College Dublin publishes University Management Team-approved AI Governance Principles for institutional AI use, including human oversight, fairness, transparency, compliance, ethical design, AI literacy, stakeholder engagement, and risk assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCD Teaching and Learning assessment guidance advises educators to be transparent with students about permitted AI use and to apply more robust approaches for high-stakes graded assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UiBchat is listed for University of Bergen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot for web is listed for University of Bergen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Bergen states that software, including AI tools, should be referenced when it affects results, analyses, or findings presented in academic work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Calgary in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For graduate studies, the Faculty of Graduate Studies guidelines say students should obtain written, unambiguous authorization before planned GenAI use in graduate work, and students must disclose GenAI use in graduate study work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Calgary teaching-and-learning guidance supports the use of generative AI in teaching and learning, while saying individual educators and instructors should decide if and how it is incorporated and clearly communicate student expectations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCR's student-facing AI announcement says students should discuss generative-AI expectations with professors, use AI to assist or enhance rather than replace original work, avoid generating entire deliverables, and cite AI-generated content or data when used.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCR XCITE advises instructors to discuss when AI may be used in coursework and how it should be cited, and its sample syllabus language treats uncited AI use as a potential academic-integrity issue.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCR's public generative-AI guidance for instructional settings places course-level use decisions with the Instructor of Record rather than setting one universal student-use rule in the evidence reviewed here.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NaviGator Chat is listed for University of Florida in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Florida in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UF guidance presents AI-Permitted, Some AI, and No AI as general course-level approaches for instructors to communicate generative AI expectations in syllabi or assignment instructions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, sensitive data such as personal data must not be disclosed to a public AI tool that does not guarantee confidentiality.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, a formal declaration of generative AI use is required for all bachelor's, master's, or doctoral work and for academic assessment or production leading to a degree or official title.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNIGE formally expects full transparency about AI tool use in academic work through appropriate citation rules, with possible description of the methodology used with AI support.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Regulation 32 says use of websites or generative AI software that generates answers or references is prohibited, while some Schools may allow AI tools for specific purposes and any AI use must be referenced.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Glasgow student guidance says using AI or other computational aids in university work without acknowledging the input counts as academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Glasgow student guidance says the university does not seek to prohibit student AI-tool use generally and instead supports effective, ethical, critical, and transparent use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Gothenburg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not prohibit generative AI in education; teachers and examiners decide whether, when, and how it may be used in coursework and examinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Gothenburg student guidance says generative-AI guidelines vary between courses, programmes, departments, and faculties, and that teachers and examiners are responsible for communicating those guidelines to students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CurreChat is listed for University of Helsinki in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Helsinki student guidance treats prohibited use of large language models, or failing to report their use as instructed, as cheating; the cheating and plagiarism guidance also lists presenting AI-generated text or solutions as one's own as plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Helsinki research guidance supports responsible and critical use of GenAI in research, but says researchers are responsible for outputs, should verify them, describe substantial GenAI use, and must not list GenAI as a co-author.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UIC College of Medicine policy states that students are expected to draft submitted assignments on their own; AI may assist with idea generation and editing, but AI directly authoring a response is considered a violation of academic integrity and professionalism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UIC College of Medicine policy prohibits students from generating patient care notes with AI applications except EHR-supported applications explicitly permitted by course leadership, and says protected health information should never be entered into outside generative AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UIC CATE recommends that instructors develop and include an AI usage policy in their syllabus after sharing their stance on AI writing tools in the course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

M365 Copilot Premium is listed for University of Missouri, Kansas City in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UMKC recommends that instructors include a policy in all syllabi about the use and misuse of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UMKC Libraries' ChatGPT student guide tells students to check with their instructor before using ChatGPT and provides citation guidance when ChatGPT is allowed in an academic assignment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT is listed for University of Rome "Tor Vergata" in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Corporate and Business Strategy course page states that using generative AI, including ChatGPT, without prior professor consent is considered plagiarism in that course context.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Tor Vergata's Economics area library says its staff provides training and assistance for integrating AI tools into research processes while maintaining academic integrity and correct citation; this is an area-library service source, not a university-wide AI policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For 2026 NSFC applications submitted through USTC, the university notice says applicants who use generative AI to track research trends or collect and organize references must manually verify the truth and accuracy of generated information and references, take responsibility for generated content, and fully and truthfully declare AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For smart-course projects under USTC's 2026 undergraduate teaching-project guide, completion standards include at least two online teaching cycles and mandatory AI learning or teaching support plus knowledge-graph functions, with two additional optional digital or AI functions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

USTC's 2026 undergraduate teaching-project guide encourages new-course projects to integrate AI technologies with core professional competencies and to include AI application techniques, cases, and practical training in lectures and practice teaching.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of St Andrews in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

St Andrews GenAI information policy says University information classified as internal, confidential, or strictly confidential must not be input into publicly available generative AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

St Andrews Good Academic Practice policy treats presenting AI output as a student's own work without acknowledgement as unauthorised use of AI, except where an assessment specifically permits or encourages such tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UT Austin AI detection guidance prohibits third-party AI detection software from being used to evaluate student work or assignments unless a university contract or purchase order is in place.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UT Austin CTL teaching-policy guidance says using generative AI tools to create course-assignment responses in a way the instructor does not accept may be considered academic dishonesty by the university.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UT Austin classroom guidance recommends that instructors requiring generative AI understand and abide by UT acceptable-use guidance, identify syllabus policies clearly, and submit specific software requirements through the University Co-Op.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UToledo's Academic dishonesty policy lists representing the words, ideas, or information of an artificial intelligence program as one's own without proper documentation as an example of academic dishonesty, and says faculty are expected to tell students what materials and procedures, including artificial intelligence programs, are authorized.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UToledo's Simple Syllabus guidance says the AI Tool Usage section is required and private, and instructors must select or enter a statement explaining how generative AI tools may be used, limited, or prohibited in the course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Within the University of Toledo College of Law default rule, generative AI may be used for research-like search, grammar correction, and other functions attendant to completing an assignment, but may not compose submitted assignment text and may not be used for any exam purpose unless an instructor deviates in writing with notice.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UVA Provost guidance says that if an assignment involves students uploading original work into a GenAI tool, instructors must provide alternative ways to complete the assignment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UVA guidance says students who use AI in completing an assignment should clearly indicate the tool used, how it was used, prompts used, and, when appropriate, fact-checking efforts.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UVA guidance says instructors should make explicit in syllabi and assignment descriptions which GenAI uses are permitted or prohibited, and that using GenAI in ways prohibited by the instructor may violate the Honor Code.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Waterloo AVPA guidance on Applying UW Principles of AI Enablement to Teaching and Learning states that GenAI use must consider data security, prohibiting uploading student work or course materials to insecure AI tools, and specifying that student information such as identification or grades is subject to Policy 46 (Information Management) and must not be uploaded to AI tools that do not meet institutional security requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Waterloo's Academic Integrity page says instructors should state whether AI tools such as ChatGPT are allowed for assignments, tests, or exams, and that students who do not follow those instructor rules are subject to Policy 71 academic-misconduct processes.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Waterloo's graduate-student GenAI guidance says graduate students should not submit GenAI-produced work for course assignments without explicit course-instructor permission or instruction.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini is listed for University of York in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of York in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google NotebookLM is listed for University of York in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yeshiva University's undergraduate academic integrity policy treats unsanctioned use of Generative AI or Assistive AI as a potential academic integrity violation and tells students to assume generative-capable platforms are prohibited unless allowed for the course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yeshiva University's undergraduate policy permits faculty to allow Generative AI in courses or assessments if they specify in writing how it may be used; content produced using Generative AI must be cited according to the relevant subject conventions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yeshiva University's faculty and staff AI acceptable use policy says individuals using Generative AI in research must be transparent about its use and researchers must avoid uploading unpublished research data or Internal or Restricted Information into Generative AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Zhejiang University names and promotes the “浙大先生” intelligent-agent platform for learning, research and campus services. Institutional announcements do not by themselves establish permission to use AI for a particular assessment, or current eligibility for all students; consult the applicable course rules and current service access conditions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For submissions to Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, AI and LLM systems cannot be manuscript authors or co-authors. Authors retain responsibility for AI-assisted content, must disclose substantive generative-AI use explicitly and in detail in the manuscript, and follow the journal’s permitted-use and prohibited-use conditions. This journal-specific policy is not a university-wide coursework or thesis rule.

Rekod bukti: 6. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

JZUS manuscript authors must disclose substantive GenAI use explicitly and in detail, retain human responsibility and never list AI as author. The journal limits permitted assistance and prohibits AI-generated original contributions or fabricated data/images. This is a journal policy, not campus coursework permission.

Rekod bukti: 6. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aarhus University student guidance says students who use GAI in an exam project must submit a declaration naming the applications and explaining how they were used, and unchanged GAI output used in an exam project must be cited like other secondary-source quotations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aarhus University student guidance says the main rule is that students are allowed to use GAI unless their academic regulations or the course catalogue explicitly state that GAI is not allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AU Educate guidance for teaching staff says that from fall 2024 students are allowed to use GAI in all AU exams unless academic regulations or the course description explicitly state that they may not, and it advises teachers to read those rules for their courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Åbo Akademi University's Open University teacher guidance says teachers cannot require students to use AI to complete an assignment because AI requires registration on an external service.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Åbo Akademi University's research data guidance says researchers are responsible for their own work, should check all AI-produced results, and should be transparent about AI-tool use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Åbo Akademi University's Open University teacher guidance says students in courses should be informed about the principles and disadvantages of AI or language-model use, and teachers should make clear what applies in each specific course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Adam Mickiewicz University has Rector order 426/2023/2024 setting rules for student use of AI systems in education, including theses and coursework/assessment work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For classroom/course work, AMU recommends that the course coordinator choose the appropriate level of AI-use control based on the syllabus, and that the instructor inform students about permission or prohibition at the first class.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AMU classroom guidance says that, in course contexts where permission or marking is required, use of generative AI tools without permission or without appropriate marking is treated in the same way as plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Open WebUI is listed for Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Freiburg research policy says researchers should disclose which AI systems they used and clearly label those systems' contributions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University Library Freiburg guidance tells students that AI tool use in academic contexts should be made transparent, they should ask instructors what extent of AI use is permitted, and AI tool output must be checked consistently.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AAU's AI instructions allow students to use AI tools for self-learning, initial project and research ideas, and text or data analysis, but prohibit submitting AI outputs as-is, generating complete or nearly complete assignment/project answers without being able to explain them, or using tools that lead to cheating or breach academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AAU's AI instructions require students to document AI use by explicitly identifying the tool used and where and how it was used in assignments, research, and projects, while observing intellectual-property rights.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AAU's AI instructions allow faculty members to use AI tools for educational content, learning activities, rubrics, and student-performance analysis, while requiring the faculty member to remain the course's primary scientific source and not rely fully on generated outputs without review.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ashoka University's Academic Integrity Policy applies to students doing coursework, research, thesis work, partner-university coursework, study-related internships or placements, and work with University Centers; it expects original work, source acknowledgement, independent assignment completion where applicable, and honesty during examinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In the Ashoka University course catalogue entry for Economy, Politics and Society (FC-0412-5), the course-level AI/ML policy discourages use of machine-learning tools such as ChatGPT in that class and asks students who use such a tool to declare its use and specify the extent of use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ashoka University's public Academic Integrity Policy page gives general academic-integrity and citation guidance, including mandatory academic-integrity workshop language, but the extracted public page text did not contain AI-specific, ChatGPT, or generative-AI rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For ACU coursework students, unauthorized or undisclosed use of generative AI, paraphrasing or translation tools is listed as academic misconduct unless use is authorized in the assessment requirements and properly acknowledged.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ACU research guidance says HDR candidates should declare GenAI use for thesis copyediting/proofreading, discuss intended research use with supervisors, record and acknowledge tool usage and prompts, and should not input sensitive or confidential information into GenAI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ACU Library guidance tells students that GenAI may be permitted in some contexts, but assessment use should be clearly authorized and acknowledged, and final work should reflect the student's own analysis and understanding.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bar-Ilan University guidance requires students to declare whether they used generative AI tools in an assignment and to explain the specific contribution made by GenAI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bar-Ilan University guidance leaves whether and how students may use generative AI tools to instructor discretion; if an instructor has not explicitly prohibited use, use is permitted by default when the student explicitly discloses all use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bar-Ilan University guidance instructs users not to disclose personal or sensitive information to generative AI platforms and says generative AI tools must adhere to Bar-Ilan data security guidelines.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

iBIT is listed for Beijing Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

智教通 (Zhijiaotong) is listed for Beijing Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Beijing Institute of Technology Graduate School says 2026 graduate program plans should add public foundational AI courses for all graduate students, with students required to take the appropriate tier according to program training requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Beijing Jiaotong University's 2023-2024 undergraduate teaching quality report says the university opened liberal-arts/science-track AI general courses and aimed for AI course coverage for the 2024 undergraduate cohort, except where programs already include AI courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For the Zhan Tianyou College-related 2024 undergraduate training model described in the report, BJTU required majors in the information ability module to add AI-specialized courses categorized as AI foundation, AI expansion, and AI frontier courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

BJTU's undergraduate teaching quality report says the university developed AI-enabled course pilots using large-model technologies around knowledge graphs, 24-hour intelligent learning companions, AI teaching assistants, and AI mentors, with experience to be promoted across the university.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bournemouth University academic-offences guidance lists using artificial intelligence software to write all or part of an assignment and claiming the work as your own as an example of an academic offence.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bournemouth University student guidance says using generative AI when writing coursework is not, by itself, an academic offence, while directing students to use the resource responsibly and appropriately.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bournemouth University's 6H taught-awards policy defines academic offences as attempts to gain unfair advantage in assessment by deception or fraudulent means and frames academic integrity around responsibility for one's own work, acknowledging others' work, honest reporting, and avoiding unfair advantage.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

VUT requires users to properly state when a result was achieved using generative AI, including the extent of use, and warns that incorrect or undisclosed use may be treated as an ethical violation such as ghost-writing or contract-cheating.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For creative activity, VUT supports generative-AI use by academic and research staff, but says employees must state which tools were used and the extent of use when creating scientific or artistic outputs.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For operational-administrative work, VUT supports employee use of generative AI and says employees may use it to perform work duties, while stating which tools were used and the extent of use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Brown Provost guidance says any unapproved use of AI to complete assignments would be covered by Brown’s Academic Code and Graduate Student Edition Academic Code.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Brown University Provost guidance says the University is not prescribing specific AI policies, and that faculty should give clear, unambiguous information about what AI use is and is not allowed in their courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Brown Sheridan Center guidance says instructors should be explicit with students about expectations for generative AI use, including how students should, might, or cannot engage with it.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For thesis work, Chalmers says AI tools may be permitted, but students are required to take full responsibility and make AI-tool use clear and transparent, including how and to what extent the tools were used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chalmers Library's student guidance connects AI use to plagiarism or ghostwriting risk and says students need to be fully transparent, describe what they did, and cite the AI tool used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chalmers Library's student guidance says whether and how AI tools may be used in examinations is decided for each course by the coordinator and examiner, so students should ask at the beginning of each course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chang Gung University student guidance tells students to follow course AI-use rules, clearly mark AI use when permitted, avoid directly copying AI-generated content, and not use AI in exams unless specifically allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chang Gung University teacher guidance advises instructors to state AI-use rules in syllabi, choose whether AI use is fully open, conditionally open, or prohibited, and explain scope, marking requirements, and grading criteria.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chang Gung University researcher guidance treats AI as a supporting tool, says core arguments and innovative results should be written by researchers, and calls for clear disclosure and verification of AI-generated content.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CDU requires students and employees to be transparent about and disclose GenAI use, with academic integrity guidance applying to students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CDU's academic integrity guidance identifies inappropriate or unsanctioned GenAI use as academic misconduct and says CDU will not tolerate misrepresenting AI-generated content as a student's own work or failing to disclose AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For HDR studies, CDU guidance says GenAI may assist but should not replace a candidate's original intellectual contribution, GenAI use should be clearly acknowledged, and supervisors or external examiners should not use GenAI to critique or assess candidate work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

China Medical University's Academic Affairs generative AI teaching guidance asks instructors to communicate with students about course-specific ways and limits for using generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

China Medical University's Academic Affairs guidance tells teachers and students to consider academic-ethics concerns before using generative AI and to avoid plagiarism and copyright violations in assignments, exams, and research papers.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

China Medical University's R&D reference guidance frames generative AI as a research-assistance tool and says researchers should verify AI-generated content, understand related policies, disclose use where required, and remain responsible for research outputs.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chonnam's generative-AI writing assignment guideline tells instructors to state in the syllabus whether generative AI is allowed and, when allowed, to explain scope, misconduct criteria, the ethics pledge, and checklist use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chonnam's generative-AI writing assignment guideline identifies improper AI uses that can constitute misconduct, including submitting copied AI output without attribution, patchworking AI output without attribution, using AI to create or spread false information or experiences, infringing copyright or intellectual property, and using AI in a class where it is fully prohibited.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chonnam's generative-AI writing assignment guideline cautions learners that information entered into generative AI may be stored on servers and used to improve performance, so they should be careful about security and information leakage.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChulaGENIE is listed for Chulalongkorn University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chulalongkorn guidance says users who use AI tools in a task should cite and clearly state the scope of use; concealing AI-tool use is treated as an ethical violation that may be penalized under relevant rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For teaching and assessment, Chulalongkorn guidance says instructors should understand selected AI tools, define course-level scope and directions for use, and adjust evaluation when AI use is allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chungnam National University's learner guide states that not following syllabus or instructor-agreed generative-AI criteria, or inappropriate AI use, may be regarded as cheating; examples include presenting AI answers as one's own, failing to disclose AI use, or using AI in a class where it is fully prohibited.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chungnam National University's learner guidance says learners should follow instructor-provided generative-AI criteria, use AI as a learning support tool, verify AI outputs against reliable sources, and clearly mark the source, generation method, and scope of AI-generated materials.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chungnam National University's instructor guidance says that when generative AI is used in class, instructors should state its purpose and scope in the syllabus, explain correct use and standards for cheating or plagiarism, and guide students to cite AI-generated outputs.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy says use of generative AI tools must align with the usage policy for specific assignments as defined in the syllabus or communicated by the instructor.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy includes unauthorized use of AI-generated content, including paraphrased AI-generated content without citing AI as the source, as an example of plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CUNY's AI Academic Hub advises faculty to guide AI use with clarity by establishing responsible AI engagement in coursework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Comillas states that using AI to create complete works or relevant parts without citing the source or tool, or without express permission in the assignment description, will be considered plagiarism under the university's general regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Comillas permits students to use AI as a reference tool when the use is acknowledged and cited, and directs students to check each course guide and consult the instructor for activity-specific rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Comillas says teachers who incorporate AI tools in their courses should ensure that the conditions for use are clearly established in the course guide.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Concordia's CTL GenAI FAQ says the university does not currently have an official policy regarding the use of GenAI, and explains that GenAI has not officially been adopted by the university so its use cannot be required in coursework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Concordia CTL encourages faculty to clearly state their position on GenAI use in courses, including in the syllabus and in class, and provides adaptable sample statements for encouraged, limited, or prohibited use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Concordia Student Success guidance tells students not to assume GenAI is allowed if an instructor does not mention it, and says permitted use of generative tools for academic work must be cited.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

DLSU's generative AI policy says faculty and students must provide a written disclosure statement when generative AI is used in producing material, presentations, or submissions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Starting Term 1, 2025-2026, DLSU's policy says every course must include a dedicated Generative AI Use Policy section in the syllabus, including usage policy levels for grading components and a concise rationale.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

DLSU's policy treats prohibited generative AI use and failure to disclose generative AI use as generative AI-related academic dishonesty, while also stating that AI detector results cannot be the sole basis for establishing such dishonesty.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy allows authors to use AI tools supportively, but requires substantive AI use to be disclosed in an AI Declaration Statement and states that AI tools may not be listed as authors or co-authors.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNDIP Library guidance tells students that submitted assignments remain their own responsibility, and that using AI software without acknowledgement is treated seriously under academic misconduct procedures.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNDIP Library guidance says AI use in data analysis, writing, or draft preparation should be explicitly disclosed in publications, and AI-generated results should be manually reverified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Durham Common Awards page says its AI policy requires students to paste a completed AI declaration into summative assignments before submission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Durham Common Awards guidance says some limited uses of generative AI do not count as academic misconduct if work remains the student's own, AI use is acknowledged where required, and caution is demonstrated.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Durham staff may choose whether and how to use GenAI in teaching, but must be open and transparent about this and operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ECU's academic-misconduct guidance states that plagiarism includes unacknowledged use of a generative artificial intelligence tool such as ChatGPT.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ECU Library guidance says students who use generative AI as a study or research tool must acknowledge that use in their assessment, and that not giving credit to GenAI tools counts as plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ECU provides student-facing generative-AI learning support that covers responsible use, learning, academic integrity, prompt strategies, attribution, drop-ins, and workshops.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Effat University's library AI guide says using generative-AI text without proper citation is considered plagiarism according to Effat University, while policies for using and crediting AI tools may vary by class.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Effat University's library AI guide warns that generative-AI tools can produce inaccurate or false citations and advises users to verify citations for accuracy and credit the underlying source rather than the AI tool when citing sourced information.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Effat University's library AI guide advises users who decide to use ChatGPT or other AI technology for writing to be transparent with teachers and publishers and comply with applicable policies.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ewha's class-stage AI-use guidance says course guidance may state that copying generative-AI outputs directly into assignments or exams, fabricating or spreading false information with generative AI, infringing copyright with generative AI, or otherwise harming academic truthfulness and trust may be considered misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ewha's class-stage AI-use guidance cautions that AI-detection programs can be used to check whether assignments used generative AI, but that such tools are not yet perfect and ethical use should be discussed with students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ewha's class-stage AI-use guidance presents course-level generative-AI use as something instructors may define by explaining whether and how AI use is allowed and by asking students to disclose how they used generative AI in assignments.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FIU's Center for the Advancement of Teaching advises instructors to clearly define acceptable AI use in course expectations and syllabus policy, including which tools are permitted and how they may or may not be used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

An official FIU Syllabi sample AI-use PDF includes sample academic integrity language stating that AI-generated content without proper attribution or authorization is another form of plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FIU Libraries' AI guide tells students who want to use AI in a course to ask their professor for that professor's individual AI-use policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HAWKI is listed for Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FAU guidance says instructors are responsible for clear AI-use rules in teaching activities, especially exams, and that students must disclose generative AI use according to the relevant course rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FAU's AI-in-teaching guidance says examiners must individually determine and announce whether and how AI-supported aids may be used, and students must disclose the aids used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

GJU's AI principles permit AI tools for research support such as data analysis and research model development, require researchers to disclose AI tool use, and prohibit using AI tools to produce complete research papers, fabricate data, generate non-original literature reviews, or create content not based on genuine research effort.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

GJU's AI principles permit students to use AI tools for learning-supportive activities such as preliminary research, analysis, idea generation, writing improvement, and summarizing academic sources, provided that the use is disclosed; the principles prohibit using AI to fully prepare projects or theses without the student's actual contribution.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

GJU's AI principles require disclosure of AI tool use in academic and research tasks and say sensitive data should not be entered into AI tools without consent from the relevant authorities and individuals concerned.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AI-ToolLab Chatbot (LobeChat) is listed for Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AI-ToolLab Transcription (Whisper-WebUI) is listed for Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Goethe University Frankfurt's teacher-facing assessment guidance recommends defining clear rules for AI use, making AI use transparent, and using AI detection software only as supporting evidence rather than as the sole basis for proof.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Griffith's academic integrity page states that uncited content created using generative artificial intelligence software is conduct that always constitutes Academic Misconduct, and that representing AI-generated assessment content as a student's own work is Academic Misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Griffith's student generative AI guidance warns that many open or public tools do not guarantee confidentiality and advises users not to enter personal information, information about others, or course materials such as assessment tasks or marking rubrics.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Griffith's student-facing generative AI guidance says students may use generative AI for self-study without citation, but for assessment tasks they must acknowledge its use and include a short declaration if they use it while completing the task.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

星火科研助手 (Spark Research Assistant) is listed for Harbin Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Harbin Institute of Technology's Graduate School continued an AI-enabled graduate education reform and course-construction initiative covering AI integration into graduate teaching models, systems, methods, approaches, evaluation, and student development.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Harbin Institute of Technology's Undergraduate School announced an AI-enabled teaching reform project that encourages AI-supported course scenarios, personalized student learning, and AI-enabled talent cultivation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

When generative AI is used to assist with grading submitted assignments, Hokkaido University's notes warn faculty not to enter students' personal or private information because entered data may be stored and output to other users.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For student use, Hokkaido University's notes say students preparing reports and other assignments should follow the instructor's guidance and instructions regarding generative AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For faculty use, Hokkaido University's notes say instructors should explain in advance whether generative AI is permitted in class and how it is restricted, and should consider grading fairness when students use it in assignments or practical learning.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HKBU GenAI Platform is listed for Hong Kong Baptist University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HKBU student academic-integrity guidance treats copying AI-generated output without acknowledging that use as improper use of generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HKBU presents four generative-AI teaching and learning principles: AI-Empowering, AI-Critical, AI-Ethical, and building and sustaining human uniqueness.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HKMU's student generative-AI guidelines say inappropriate AI use, including use without proper acknowledgment or in violation of course guidelines, will be treated as academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HKMU's student generative-AI guidelines require students completing assignments to submit an OLE declaration indicating whether generative-AI tools were used and, if used, which tool was used and how it contributed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HKMU's AI@HKMU position statement frames ChatGPT and similar tools as supplements to coursework and says ChatGPT should not be relied upon solely to complete assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HSE University requires students to disclose use of generative AI in written academic work, including the parts prepared with AI, the purpose and method of use, model name or source, and an effectiveness evaluation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HSE University states that there is no university-wide prohibition on student use of AI, and students may use generative models in academic work when they follow disclosure requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HSE University says an instructor may prohibit the use of generative models during assessment elements if the prohibition is stated in the course syllabus.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

IE University's admissions integrity policy welcomes AI such as ChatGPT in the admissions process when candidates clearly identify AI-generated content, use quotation marks, and include sources and details.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

A 2025-26 IE Humanities syllabus states that, for that course, ChatGPT or any other AI platform or tool is strictly prohibited for generating ideas or content, except spelling or grammar checking.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

This crawl found official IE University AI-related sources for admissions, institutional AI positioning, and one course-level syllabus, but did not locate a public central enrolled-student generative-AI policy page in official-domain searches.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Illinois Tech's Academic Affairs guidance ties permitted use of generative AI or other outside resources to each course's learning objectives and syllabus expectations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Illinois Tech's Center for Learning Innovation asks faculty to provide clear syllabus expectations for AI use and provides suggested syllabus language for no, some, and significant AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Illinois Tech's suggested AI and assessment syllabus language says AI-assisted grading support should be explicitly stated in assignment instructions when such tools are used, with final grading oversight retained by the instructor.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FITB guidance says declaration of AI use for coursework outputs is mandatory rather than optional, and undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FITB guidance states that, by default, using AI during exams, quizzes, or other evaluations is academic cheating and can be sanctioned unless the instructor allows or recommends AI use for a particular part of a course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FITB guidance says instructors need to set AI-use policies for their courses and communicate them at the start of the course; when AI use is allowed, permission should be clear and explicit, with boundaries and transparency.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Iowa State research guidance warns that users cannot assume GenAI tools comply with HIPAA, FERPA, and similar confidentiality rules, and says uploading information to a public AI tool is equivalent to releasing it publicly.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Iowa State Student Conduct guidance says suspected AI-generated coursework referrals will be reviewed similarly to other forms of academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Iowa State CELT describes AI teaching resources for instructors, including GenAI syllabus considerations and a Canvas page on use of GenAI in Iowa State courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Istanbul University Press policy says authors should disclose details of any AI used in content creation in the appropriate part of the work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

An Istanbul University EBS syllabus for 'Yapay Zeka Araclari Kullanimi' states that the course aims to help students use AI tools consciously, ethically, and effectively.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

An Istanbul University EBS syllabus for 'Sahne Sanatlarinda Yapay Zeka Uygulamalari II' includes generative AI, verification, bias, hallucination analysis, copyright, student data/privacy, institutional policy, and risk management as course content.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

JGU library guidance says the university is generally open to AI tools, but instructors or institutes may decide whether tools are allowed for a given assessment, and allowed use should be disclosed as an aid.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

JGU library guidance warns AI-tool users to check legal and privacy conditions, avoid disclosing private or sensitive data, and consider server location, publisher restrictions, rights, and upload permissions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

JGU's digital teaching guidance encourages integrating AI literacy and transparent use of AI into teaching and, where appropriate, assessment design.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students may not submit content generated with generative AI as their own without disclosure, and using AI in exams, assignments, or academic assessments is treated as cheating unless the course instructor permits it.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Faculty members must state the course AI-use policy in the course description, including whether AI use is allowed for assignments, projects, and activities and how use should be disclosed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

King Saud University's 2025 Student Learning Assessment Policy supports use of generative AI tools in service of the educational process while emphasizing original submitted work, disclosure of AI use, and faculty authority to permit or prohibit generative AI use by assignment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure defines unacceptable use of generative AI as presenting AI-generated content as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except when the assessment brief explicitly permits it.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kingston University's AG2 guidance says that if generative AI is used as part of the editorial process, the student must acknowledge that use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure says contributions by artificial intelligence tools must be properly acknowledged.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kyoto University tells students to follow the generative AI use policy set by the course instructor or research supervisor for coursework, reports, and thesis writing.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kyoto University tells students to record and, when required, disclose how they used generative AI beyond wording revisions, and warns that using AI output in their own work may be judged misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kyoto University expects instructors to state their generative AI use policy to students and, for courses focused on basic knowledge or skills, to preserve grading fairness through checks such as written or oral examinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

La Trobe University policy says staff, students, contractors, honorary and adjunct staff must not disclose University information into publicly accessible or open-source AI systems.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

La Trobe MyLaTrobe guidance says that when a subject allows AI use in an assessment, students need to submit an AI Acknowledgement, with the LMS indicating whether AI is permitted and what type of use is allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

La Trobe student guidance says AI rules may vary by school, subject, or task, and students should check with lecturers and acknowledge AI-generated content when they use it.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For the TDDC93/TDDC88/725G64 courses, the course policy says use of generative AI tools is permitted in 2025, while students remain responsible for submitted content.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Linköping University announced a strategic decision to implement an action plan for AI-ready education, including programme review, teacher skills development, AI ambassadors, and examination-design review for unauthorized AI use.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

An official Studieinfo syllabus page states that Linköping University has produced a guide for teachers and students on generative AI in education, and tells students that clarity about where and how generative AI has been used is important.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lund University Education Board approved regulatory guidelines for first and second-cycle education (effective 15 August 2026) requiring course syllabi to clearly specify assessed learning outcomes in an AI-available environment, and mandating that any course restrictions or reporting requirements for generative AI be explicitly and consistently communicated to all students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lund University's student guidance says students who want to use GenAI for a compulsory assignment or examination must check whether it is permitted and how to report its use; presenting GenAI-generated work as one's own may be treated as cheating.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lund University's GenAI Q&A says generative AI tools are permissible in education when teachers believe they contribute to or facilitate learning, with teachers responsible for informing students about course or programme rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For education, Maastricht University says permitted GenAI uses are clearly defined at activity, course/module, study programme, and faculty levels.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For research output, Maastricht University says substantial GenAI use should be communicated transparently and referenced appropriately by researchers.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For operations, Maastricht University says GenAI tools are never used to process personal or organisation-sensitive data unless transparency and applicable safeguards are in place.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Mahidol University states that students must use Generative AI responsibly, avoid uses that may violate academic integrity, and clearly cite information or content derived from Generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Mahidol University's GenAI policy permits researchers to use Generative AI as a research tool, while requiring them to clearly identify the role of Generative AI in the research process and transparently report its use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Mahidol graduate-level thesis, thematic paper, and independent-study writing, the Faculty of Graduate Studies states that advisors may allow student AI use, but not for generating or drafting main content, analysis, research results, or main conclusions, and both advisor and student must disclose AI usage transparently.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.