Universiti mana yang menyebut pendedahan AI?

UNSW uses a Levels of AI Assistance framework with six categories for assessments: No Assistance, Simple Editing Assistance, Planning or Design Assistance, Assistance with Attribution, Generative AI Software-based Assessments, and Not Applicable.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNSW defines six high-level categories for permitted AI use in assessments: No Assistance, Simple Editing Assistance, Planning/Design Assistance, Assistance with Attribution, Generative AI Software-based Assessments, and Not Applicable.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At UNSW, the unauthorised or unacknowledged use of AI in assessments is classified as cheating and considered student misconduct under the Code of Conduct and Values.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ANU prohibits using AI to collect, use, store, or disclose personal information without express consent from the individual(s).

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students retain IP ownership of their assignments at ANU; staff may not upload student work to AI platforms without express student consent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At ANU, using AI-generated content when not permitted and claiming authorship without acknowledgment constitutes a breach of academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Cornell's committee report recommends three policy approaches for generative AI use: prohibit GAI where it interferes with foundational learning, allow with attribution where it supports higher-level thinking, and encourage use where it enables exploration and creative thinking.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Cornell recommends that faculty clearly communicate their generative AI policies in their syllabus, in assignment instructions, and verbally in class to support student learning and reduce academic integrity violations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Cornell's committee report recommends that the Code of Academic Integrity be updated with clear and explicit language on the use of generative AI, indicating that individual faculty have authority to determine when AI use is prohibited, attributed, or encouraged.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Primo Research Assistant is listed for National Tsing Hua University - NTHU in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Scopus AI is listed for National Tsing Hua University - NTHU in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Web of Science Research Assistant is listed for National Tsing Hua University - NTHU in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Auckland's Assessment of Courses Procedures state that AI use in assessment tasks may only be restricted when the task is a controlled assessment, identified as Lane 1; AI may be used without restriction in other assessment tasks, identified as Lane 2.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Auckland's Assessment of Courses Procedures require courses to use the two-lane nomenclature, including telling students which assessments align with Lane 1 or Lane 2, and require courses and programmes to implement the two-lane approach in assessment design by 2027.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Auckland's student AI advice states that AI has no agency, treats the student prompting an AI tool as the author, and says students are ultimately responsible for work submitted for assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Pennsylvania in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Penn requires all community members (educators, staff, researchers, and students) to be transparent about the use of AI and to disclose when a work product was created wholly or partially using an AI tool.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Users of AI at Penn are accountable for AI-generated content and should validate its accuracy with trusted first-party sources, being wary of misinformation or hallucinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Claude for Education is listed for Dartmouth College in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Dartmouth Chat is listed for Dartmouth College in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot with commercial data protection is listed for Dartmouth College in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Claude for Education is listed for University of Pittsburgh in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini is listed for University of Pittsburgh in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PittGPT is listed for University of Pittsburgh in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Adobe Express is listed for Arizona State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Arizona State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini for Education is listed for Arizona State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Stanford's BCA issued guidance on generative AI use, and the Office of Community Standards recommends that instructors give advance notice to students when using AI detection software.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Stanford Graduate School of Business (GSB) MBA and MSx courses, instructors may not ban student use of AI tools for take-home coursework, including assignments and exams. Instructors may choose whether to allow AI for in-class work. For PhD and undergraduate courses, GSB follows the university-wide Generative AI Policy Guidance from the Office of Community Standards.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Stanford School of Medicine MD and MSPA programs have a formal AI policy: students may use AI for learning, clarification, and grammar/style editing unless contrary to assignment instructions. AI use for closed-book exams or assignments where internet is restricted is prohibited unless explicitly authorized by faculty. Students are responsible for all AI-generated content they submit, must disclose and cite substantial AI contributions, and violations may result in disciplinary action.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

DALL-E via Microsoft Copilot is listed for Technical University of Denmark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot for the web is listed for Technical University of Denmark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Scite AI is listed for Technical University of Denmark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The UC Berkeley Academic Senate recommends that all faculty include a clear statement on their syllabus about course expectations regarding the use of Google Gemini or any other generative AI tool for course-related work. In the absence of such a statement, students may be more likely to use these technologies inappropriately.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The UC Berkeley Academic Senate provides three sample syllabus statement frameworks for faculty: 'Full AI' (GenAI required), 'Some AI' (limited permitted use with restrictions), and 'No AI' (all GenAI use prohibited). Faculty should modify these to fit their course requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The UC Berkeley Academic Senate recommends that for assignments where GenAI is not permitted, instructors should adopt enforcement mechanisms such as in-person proctored exams, an additional oral exam component, or a written statement of academic integrity, since no validated GenAI detection tools exist.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Adelaide University's Academic Integrity Policy treats inappropriate use of AI that subverts an assignment or gives unfair academic advantage as an example of academic misconduct, including submitting AI-produced work as the student's own or using AI-generated information without acknowledgement.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Adelaide University's Authorship Procedure states that generative AI can be used to improve readability and clarity in publications, but must not be considered or listed as an author and its use must be disclosed transparently.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance says graduate research students' use of generative AI must be transparent and responsible, including discussing use with a supervisor, keeping records, and acknowledging AI use in thesis acknowledgements, presentations, and publications.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Emory University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Emory Responsible AI guidance says public-facing AI platforms create disclosure risks for Sensitive Information and directs users to use Emory-approved secure AI tools when handling such information.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Emory Responsible AI guidance says students must review course syllabi, program handbooks, and faculty expectations regarding AI use because instructors may specify whether tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, or other generative technologies are permitted for assignments and under what conditions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Gemini is listed for Keio University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NotebookLM is listed for Keio University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Keio University says students need to clearly indicate when reports or similar assignments are created using generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KTH tells students that generative AI use in graded assignments and exams should follow the course-specific information, and that the teacher's course rule takes precedence over general guidance.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KTH staff guidance says that, according to the Faculty Council recommendation, each course at KTH must include course-specific generative AI information in Canvas and the course memo.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KTH student guidance says course-specific generative AI information usually follows one of four approaches: no use, only specific assignments, allowed with guidelines, or free use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for McMaster University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

McMaster's teaching and learning generative AI guidelines say undergraduate and graduate course outlines should state acceptable and unacceptable generative AI use, and students should seek clarification and written confirmation if no syllabus statement is included.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

McMaster's student generative AI coursework tip sheet tells students not to use generative AI unless a course syllabus or professor explicitly allows it, and to disclose and cite AI-generated content when allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SNU's AI Guidelines require transparent disclosure of AI use, fact and source verification, copyright/privacy/information security compliance, bias correction, and awareness of accountability.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SNU Library cites COPE's position that AI tools cannot be listed as authors because they cannot take responsibility for research results and lack legal personality.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SNU Library cites COPE requiring authors to clearly disclose in their methods section which AI tools were used and how, covering manuscript writing, image creation, and data analysis.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for Stockholm University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for Stockholm University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Stockholm University's AI resources page says employees signed in to Microsoft 365 with a university account have data protection for Copilot, but it also says information at confidentiality level 3 or 4 should not be entered into Copilot.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT API is listed for Tel Aviv University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT EDU is listed for Tel Aviv University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Copilot 365 is listed for Tel Aviv University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CUHK requires students to declare in each assignment that they have read and understood the University's policy on AI use, complied with course teacher instructions on AI tools, and consent to AI content detection software review.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CUHK defines four approaches to AI use in courses: (1) prohibit all use, (2) use only with prior permission, (3) use only with explicit acknowledgement, and (4) free use without acknowledgement requirement.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CUHK penalties for academic dishonesty involving AI tools may include reviewable/permanent demerits, failure grade, suspension, lowering degree classification, and termination of studies.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

U of A GenAI is listed for The University of Arizona in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Zoom AI Companion is listed for The University of Arizona in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Arizona student AI guidance tells students they can use AI for assignments only if the instructor says it is OK, and says unpermitted use could violate the Code of Academic Integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Manchester does not ban generative AI. The university's position is that when used appropriately, AI tools have the potential to enhance teaching and learning, and can support inclusivity and accessibility.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Manchester has adopted five core principles for AI use: transparency, accountability, competence, responsible use, and respect. All staff and students using or developing AI are personally responsible for adhering to these.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students at Manchester must cite or acknowledge the outputs of generative AI tools when they use them in their work, including quoting, summarising, paraphrasing, editing, translating, data processing, re-writing, and idea generation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Sydney Academic Integrity Policy 2022 states students may only use assistance, including automated writing tools, if the unit of study outline expressly permits it, and must acknowledge assistance provided when preparing submitted work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Sydney guidance states that misusing generative AI can breach the Academic Integrity Policy 2022, with examples including using AI in assessments where prohibited, submitting AI-generated work without acknowledgment, and inputting University teaching materials or personal information into AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Sydney states that students who use AI in assessments are required to acknowledge it, including any tools that use generative AI such as translation tools, paraphrasing tools or referencing tools; failing to provide acknowledgement can lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy 2022.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The [genIA] ethics guide says practical AI use should clearly define what is allowed, ask for declaration and citation of tool use when appropriate, verify student understanding and original contribution, and avoid entering sensitive information into external services.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UdeC's [genIA] ethics page presents institutional guidelines and interactive tools for deciding how to incorporate generative AI in teaching and research while safeguarding transparency, authorship, privacy, and equity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The [genIA] teacher annex presents three orienting institutional template options for course or assignment instructions: generative AI allowed with conditions, restricted by stages, or prohibited except with explicit authorization.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCSB-managed AI platform on AWS Bedrock is listed for University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

GitHub Copilot is listed for University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google AI Pro for Education is listed for University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Staff setting summative assessment must: declare whether/how students can use AI; review assessment design for alignment with permitted AI use; ensure equality of baseline AI tool provision where authorised; specify declaration forms for student AI use; only identify suspected unauthorised AI use through marking or university-endorsed detection tools (none currently endorsed); and handle misconduct under usual disciplinary regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Oxford requires postgraduate research students to include a statement on their use of generative AI in their final thesis submission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students undertaking summative assessment must: complete assessment in line with the AI use declaration for each assignment; acknowledge their AI use via a formal declaration in the prescribed format; and understand that submitting work breaching AI specifications constitutes cheating and may constitute plagiarism, handled under usual disciplinary regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

24/7 AI Tutoring App is listed for University of Pretoria in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AI eLearning Support Bot is listed for University of Pretoria in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

clickUP AI Design Assistant is listed for University of Pretoria in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UVM's Code of Academic Integrity says course expectations may vary by instructor and students must understand expectations for each assignment and course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UVM's faculty AI guidance says there is not a mandated one-size-fits-all classroom AI approach and tells faculty to clearly communicate how their AI stance shapes course policies and assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UVM's student AI guidance tells students that the key course-context question is what the instructor has said about AI use, and that students should check syllabi and assignment instructions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for University of Wyoming in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Wyoming Regulation 2-114 says submissions generated in whole or in part by an Artificial Intelligence-based application without attribution to the application will be treated as plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UW Libraries AI Support guidance says users should cite AI tools and AI-generated outputs when quoting, paraphrasing, or incorporating AI-generated ideas into their own work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Zilina prohibits employees and students from entering sensitive data into publicly available GenAI tools, including non-public university data, non-public study materials, test assignments, intellectual-property-protected materials, personal data without explicit written consent, preliminary research results, and trade-secret data of partners.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For seminar, semester, and final theses, University of Zilina students must clearly state whether and to what extent they used GenAI tools, including the tool name/version, a brief use description, and prompts in an appendix.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Zilina prohibits students from submitting work generated by GenAI in substantial or full scope without their own creative contribution, and requires students to respect instructor restrictions on GenAI use in a course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT Business is listed for Utah State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365 is listed for Utah State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Utah State University's AI Use & Compliance guidance says AI-generated content must be reviewed for accuracy, bias, and copyright compliance before use in coursework, research, or administrative communications.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Boston University student guidance tells students to disclose GenAI use and states that submitting GenAI-generated or GenAI-assisted output without attribution is plagiarism that an instructor will treat as academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Boston University student guidance says instructors have broad discretion to set GenAI rules within each course, and students are responsible for complying with those instructions and should consult the course GenAI policy or ask the instructor before assuming GenAI use is allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Boston University faculty and staff guidance says academic and administrative GenAI users should retain human oversight, evaluate and verify generated content, and disclose GenAI use in materials, documents, or publications.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine medical students in the University and College Programs, submitted or presented content must be the student's own work and not the product of generative AI or other individuals.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Case Western Reserve University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CWRU Provost classroom guidance gives faculty members discretion over the extent to which students may use AI tools in their courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Duke student-facing AI guidance says whether a student may use AI in coursework depends on instructor permission; unauthorized generative AI use is considered academic misconduct under the Duke Community Standard.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Duke CTL guidance tells instructors to update syllabi with clear guidance on generative AI use and says instructors may define how, if, and when generative AI may be used in their courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Duke CTL assignment-design guidance says AI assignments should be accompanied by course and assignment-specific AI policies, with the primary consideration being whether AI use helps students achieve course learning goals.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HGSE (Harvard Graduate School of Education) school-level policy: Unless otherwise specified by the instructor, using generative AI to create all or part of an assignment (e.g., paper, memo, presentation, short response) and submitting it as one's own work violates the HGSE Academic Integrity Policy. Permissible uses include seeking clarification on concepts, brainstorming ideas, or generating scenarios that help contextualize learning.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HGSE (Harvard Graduate School of Education) school-level policy: For any permitted use of generative AI tools, students must acknowledge and document that use in their assignment submission by explaining what tool(s) were used, prompts provided, and how the output was integrated into the work. Direct citations must use proper citation format.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HGSE (Harvard Graduate School of Education) school-level policy: It is forbidden to make personal recordings of any course meetings, with or without AI tool integrations. Uploading substantial course content is only allowable through the Harvard-approved AI Sandbox.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KIT's SCC KI-Toolbox is available to KIT employees, KIT students from April 2026, and guests/partners after completing the required self-study course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KIT's public German guidelines frame generative AI as a responsible and transparent-use decision aid for KIT, while stating that existing internal rules remain unaffected and take precedence.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KIT ZML says its KI-Policy and form-generator tools are not official or mandatory KIT requirements; final rules for coursework remain with the relevant faculty and instructor.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

풀리캠퍼스 다국어 AI 코스웨어 서비스 is listed for Korea University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Korea University tells learners to disclose the AI tool name, timing, and scope of use, distinguish their own work from AI contributions, and cite AI-generated content according to the required format.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Korea University instructs instructors to decide course AI-use policies based on course purpose, teaching method, and assignment nature, and to state the policy in the syllabus.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kyushu University's basic stance says students should check in advance whether use of generative AI output is permitted for papers or works, and if permitted, should clearly indicate AI use or AI quotation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kyushu University's basic stance says course instructors may set generative AI use rules for individual classes according to each program or course objective, and should indicate those rules to students, such as in the syllabus.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kyushu University's teacher-facing guidance says that when generative AI use is allowed, instructors should direct students to state quoted AI output, the AI service name, and version, and may request prompts and outputs.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Under the Economics Faculty rules, a student who uses AI tools for work must explicitly declare that use and identify the AI model, the parts of the work where AI was used, and the purposes and methods of use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Economics Faculty rules allow each teacher, within a discipline, to require detailed prompts or restrict AI-tool use up to a full ban, with restrictions recorded in the discipline's rating system and communicated by the first class.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Economics Faculty rules place responsibility on students for correctness of facts, wording, citations, links, and interpretation of AI-assisted results, and treat unchecked use of AI results as an academic-ethics violation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

National Taiwan University guidance says it takes a positive and constructive view of AI tools, encourages teachers to adjust course planning and learning assessment, and says students should understand AI-tool limitations for future learning.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

National Taiwan University guidance recommends that instructors clarify AI-use principles and rules early in the course, preferably in the syllabus, including which activities and assignments may or may not use AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

National Taiwan University guidance says students using ChatGPT for assignments or reports should clearly label AI-generated content, fact-check it, and comply with academic ethics and academic-integrity requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NMBU's generative AI guidelines require students to clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used, and to account for AI use in assignments or other work submitted for assessment or compulsory activity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs are permitted in accordance with the guidelines, while individual course descriptions may state that AI-based programs are not permitted for exams or other assessed work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs will normally not be permitted in written examinations on campus; for take-home exams, students must follow the AI-use specifications in the exam paper and course description.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Pusan National University's AI ethics charter/guidelines state that students may use AI as a supplemental learning or research aid, but should not undermine academic integrity and should disclose the source and scope when using generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Pusan National University's AI utilization guideline tells instructors to clearly announce in the syllabus or early in the course whether AI tools may be used, the permitted scope, and evaluation criteria.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Pusan National University's AI utilization guideline says instructors should communicate permitted or prohibited AI use for assessments, and it warns against deciding a student's grade solely from an AI plagiarism or AI-detection tool result.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

LibreChat is listed for Queen's University at Kingston in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot with Single Sign-On is listed for Queen's University at Kingston in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Queen's common course policies state that course outlines will include a statement indicating whether generative AI tools are permitted in a course and under what conditions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ohio State responsible-use guidance says students should use GenAI tools for coursework only with the explicit permission of each instructor, and only in the ways allowed by that instructor.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ohio State Arts and Sciences guidance quotes the OSU Committee on Academic Misconduct policy that generative AI tools should not be used to complete course assignments unless the course instructor specifically authorizes their use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ohio State teaching guidance recommends that instructors establish expectations for academic integrity and AI use early, include university academic-integrity policies in the syllabus, and communicate course-specific GenAI expectations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for The University of Newcastle, Australia (UON) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For assessments, UON's GenAI teaching, learning and assessment policy says students should follow teaching-staff directions about GenAI use and appropriately disclose and reference GenAI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UON's GenAI teaching, learning and assessment policy says use of GenAI in assessment does not automatically constitute academic misconduct, but may do so where lecturers or course coordinators have explicitly prohibited it.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UQ course profiles must clearly state if, when, and how AI (including Machine Translation) is allowed. Two options exist: Option 1 prohibits AI in in-person assessment; Option 2 permits AI use with mandatory referencing.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At UQ, the use of AI outputs without attribution, and contrary to any direction by teaching staff, is a form of plagiarism and constitutes academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UQ says students must acknowledge where they used AI in assessment, including direct quotes or paraphrases of AI-generated content and use of AI tools for summarising, brainstorming, planning, editing, or proofreading.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Student academic-integrity guidance says a full disclosure of GenAI-produced content should always be acknowledged, and passing off that content as one's own work counts as academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The PGR guidance permits students to use generative AI in thesis writing, provided the use is consistent with the guidance and properly declared, and warns that exceeding the guidance risks breaching the Academic Misconduct Policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Assessment guidance says that when GenAI use is allowed, students may be asked to provide full disclosure using an Acknowledge, Describe, Evidence template, while noting that some schools may use a different process.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Tennessee system AI policy says course-related communications must inform students that unpermitted AI use is a form of academic misconduct subject to the campus student code of conduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Tennessee system AI policy, which includes UT Knoxville, expects course faculty or staff to communicate permitted AI uses for a course and says students are responsible for following those course-specific AI requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UTK Writing Center guidance tells students that when an instructor allows GenAI for writing assignments, they should use it to assist rather than replace their writing process and should document and describe the use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CITEP/UBA presents La Brújul-IA as teaching guidance that offers conceptual keys and concrete strategies for critical, situated integration of AI in higher-education teaching.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The CITEP/UBA guidance frames ethical AI use as distinguishing legitimate support from improper appropriation and includes source attribution and recognition of AI co-creation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The CITEP/UBA guidance says AI use in education should consider personal-data protection and digital security, noting that not all AI tools safeguard entered information.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For final documents submitted for evaluation at Unifesp or sent for publication, the generative-AI guidelines require an explicit declaration about the use of generative AI tools, including how the tool was used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Unifesp's Resolution 17/2025 establishes guidelines for use of generative artificial intelligence in research and postgraduate work, with the stated aim of responsible and transparent use in scientific and academic production.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Unifesp states that researchers are responsible for critically reviewing texts, results, code, or images produced by generative-AI systems for correctness, coherence, originality, citation/reference compliance, and intellectual-property respect.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Basel AI citation guidelines state that AI tools must always be cited like other tools and sources, and that student papers without complete attribution may be seen as attempted plagiarism or cheating.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

OpenAI (ChatGPT with LibreChat) is listed for University of Basel in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Basel AI citation guidelines say AI-supported tools may only be used in a supporting role for work submitted for credit, with students retaining a controlling role and responsibility for their own work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Rocky in Canvas is listed for University of California, Davis in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The UC Davis School of Medicine policy says medical students may not use generative AI to directly author submitted assignments or generate answers for closed-book assessments unless faculty or course leadership gives written permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UC Davis guidance tells students to confirm with instructors before using AI in coursework and not to use AI to complete assignments unless explicitly permitted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chat AI (Academic Cloud) is listed for University of Göttingen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Göttingen AI ethics and law guidance tells users not to enter personal data into AI applications unless it has first been securely and completely anonymized, and says students may not be required by lecturers to use or register for such systems in courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For unsupervised examinations, University of Göttingen guidance says AI models should generally be permissible aids, but use of AI tools must be transparent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TerpAI is listed for University of Maryland, College Park in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For coursework, UMD tells students to assume GenAI use for assignments and assessments is not allowed unless the syllabus or assignment instructions specify otherwise.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UMD strongly encourages instructors to establish course-specific policies defining appropriate and inappropriate GenAI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For students, unless course objectives or explicit instructor authorization allow it, UNamur proscribes delegating reflective analysis to generative AI, submitting work entirely or mostly generated by AI, and using copied, paraphrased, translated, or AI-generated material without indicating the source.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For students, unless course objectives or explicit instructor authorization allow it, UNamur says they cannot introduce non-anonymized or non-pseudonymized personal data into prompts addressed to generative-AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For students, UNamur allows some generative-AI uses without referencing when they are not contrary to course objectives, including brainstorming or organizing ideas without content creation, translation or summarization for comprehension, and short language improvement of text written by the student.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Regina policy OPS-080-050 says all University use of generative AI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations; the policy primarily addresses governance and operations uses by employees.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Southern California in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini is listed for University of Southern California in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Southern California in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Szeged student guidance says students using AI for assignments or other coursework must disclose the AI tool, purpose, method, and extent of use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Szeged student guidance says AI may be used as an auxiliary tool but cannot replace students' own work; submitting an entirely AI-made work as one's own is treated as a serious academic ethics violation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Szeged has an official 2025 framework for regulated and transparent AI use in education, with guidance published for instructors and students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Vilnius University AI guidelines treat undisclosed use of a generative AI model in academic work as academic dishonesty.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Vilnius University's AI guidelines state that use of generative AI models in research, written work, applications, and similar work must be clearly indicated.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Vilnius University Business School guidelines allow students to use AI tools in academic works, while requiring disclosure and treating failure to specify AI use and provide a transcript in annexes as academic dishonesty.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

VU Amsterdam's framework says the lecturer or examiner indicates in the study guide, syllabus, or Canvas whether and how use of generative AI is allowed for a course, with course learning objectives remaining leading.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

VU Amsterdam's research guidance says GenAI use in research must meet scientific-research standards, take existing VU policies on ownership, scientific integrity, privacy, personal data, and knowledge security into account, and be transparent about which parts of research used GenAI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Wageningen University Examining Board rules treat AI-created ready-made assignment content as an irregularity that may lead to suspicion of fraud unless AI use is explicitly allowed in the assignment description and adequately documented.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

WUR's student GenAI rules tell students to check the course guide for whether and how GenAI is permitted; if the guide has no information, using GenAI to generate assignment content is not allowed and may be irregularity or fraud, including for theses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

WUR's student GenAI rules say students are never allowed to submit work entirely generated by GenAI as their own or fabricate research data, and they must be transparent about GenAI's role in submitted work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

GitHub Copilot is listed for York University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

YU AURA is listed for York University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for York University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aalto University guidance says AI-based technologies are allowed as support for teaching and learning unless the course teacher instructs otherwise, and the teacher may set course- or task-specific restrictions when learning objectives require them.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aalto University guidance says teachers who restrict AI use must give clear limitations connected to assessment criteria, and teachers may only require student work to be submitted through systems approved by Aalto University.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aalto student guidance says students should contact the course teacher if AI use is unclear, mark AI-generated content in their text, and not present AI-generated content as their own.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ADA University's Honor Code treats violating exam, test, and assignment rules, accepting unauthorized help, and using someone else's intellectual work without proper credit as unacceptable behavior.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ADA University's Student Assessment Regulations say assignments are to be designed and conducted to minimize plagiarism and cheating risk, including contract cheating, and that students are to receive clear instructions on avoiding academic-integrity breaches.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ADA University's Student Assessment Regulations require submitted take-home exams to include a signed and dated academic-integrity declaration confirming the work is the student's own and that all sources used were acknowledged.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ABU's Research Policy is described as university-wide for research practice and defines plagiarism as research ethical misconduct; this is adjacent research-integrity context and not AI-specific guidance.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Official ABU news pages say university leaders discussed updating teaching and learning policy for AI transparency/accountability and later stated that ABU had put strategies in place for use of AI in teaching and learning; the pages do not publish the full strategy or student-use rules.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

An official ABU conference news page reports a keynote statement that tools like ChatGPT can complete assignments instantly and challenge assessment and originality, but it does not state an ABU rule permitting or prohibiting student AI-tool use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Bologna citation guidance says substantial GenAI contributions in teaching and research should be acknowledged and declared, with the statement identifying tools or models, date or period of use, modes of use, and where the tool was used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Under the University of Bologna GenAI policy, students are responsible for checking permitted uses, following teaching staff instructions, verifying GenAI output, acknowledging original sources, and being able to explain work produced with GenAI support.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For GenAI use in assessed student work such as dissertation structure, dissertation writing, or programming code, University of Bologna guidance says the uses comply with policy principles only with active supervision, critical thinking, accountability for results, citation where required, and checking with the teacher whether the use is permitted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

American University guidance says students are responsible for course AI policies in syllabi, and misuse of AI or use without permission or disclosure may constitute an Academic Integrity Code violation.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

American University publishes responsible-use guidance for AI tools that applies general principles of transparency, accountability, human oversight, data protection, privacy, teaching, research, staff, and student use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

American University research guidance says researchers should be transparent about AI use, verify AI-generated content against trusted sources, protect data privacy, and not list AI systems as co-authors.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AUS policy says students must acknowledge generative AI tool use in submitted course-credit material, including the tool name and version number.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AUTH's GenAI principles say use by members of the academic community should align with existing internal regulations, preserve academic integrity, and be explicitly declared when requested.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AUTH guidance encourages teaching staff to state clearly the GenAI-use policy adopted for a course, include it in the course outline, and modify it by assignment when needed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AUTH student guidance says course teams define the GenAI policy for each course or assignment, and examples distinguish potentially permitted learning-support uses from uses such as submitting generated content as-is or using GenAI during an exam.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Auburn student-facing academic-integrity guidance tells students to review the syllabus and ask the instructor before using AI on coursework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Auburn Graduate School guidance says graduate-student AI use in research and writing must be disclosed and approved by the student's advisory committee.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Auburn guidance says instructional faculty may encourage or restrict student AI use in courses and should give students clear expectations and disciplinary-consequence awareness.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bilkent advises students to check course syllabi and instructors for whether and how GenAI tools may be used in specific courses or assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bilkent's GenAI guideline says students should attribute AI-generated content and should not submit AI-generated content without proper attribution.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bilkent's GenAI guideline tells students not to use GenAI when a professor has not explicitly allowed it in the course syllabus.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In Caltech's Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) division, students may use generative AI tools only in ways explicitly allowed by the course instructor in the course materials. Any usage not specifically allowed should be assumed to be disallowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Caltech HSS generative AI policy applies to all assignments including major papers, exams, discussion board posts, reflections, and problem sets.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Caltech HSS students are expected to follow specific course guidance for documenting any permitted use of generative AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Columbia Business School requires students to disclose to faculty their use of generative AI platforms and the manner of use in coursework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Teachers College provides five example syllabus statements ranging from no AI use permitted to generally permitted with attribution, allowing instructors to choose their stance.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Teachers College example syllabus statements require citations or disclosure detailing specific AI tools and models used when AI use is permitted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Dalhousie's course syllabus guide says syllabi should include a statement about instructor expectations around generative AI and large language models such as ChatGPT.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Dalhousie's CLT course design guidance tells instructors concerned about student generative AI use in coursework to talk with students about what they can and cannot use it for and how to use it appropriately.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

A Dalhousie CLT generative AI teaching handout says current academic integrity policy already covers generative AI use because students complete assignments on their own and must acknowledge sources of information or ideas that are not their own.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lecturers determine whether and how GenAI may be used in their courses and for respective assessments. Teaching materials created with GenAI must be subjected to quality control by the lecturer.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Violations of GenAI guidelines such as use of unauthorised aids or non-disclosure of their use are subject to disciplinary action under existing performance assessment rules and the declaration of originality.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students must refrain from disclosing copyrighted, private, or confidential information to commercial GenAI clients unless expressly permitted, and must respect privacy and copyright of content they work with.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Flinders states that students are responsible for using AI consistently with University, course, topic, assessment, and academic integrity requirements, including acknowledging generative AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Flinders' student academic integrity page states that misusing AI tools includes using tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or DALL-E without topic coordinator permission and without appropriate acknowledgement or citations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Flinders provides staff with AI assessment scale template instructions that range from no AI permitted through prompted, assisted, task-completion, and full AI use, with acknowledgement expectations attached to permitted use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for Ghent University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For assignments completed at home from academic year 2024-2025, Ghent University student guidance permits responsible use of generative AI tools and says individual teachers can still prohibit use for a specific subject.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ghent University teaching guidance says responsible GenAI use is always permitted unless a lecturer explicitly prohibits it for parts of an assignment that take place in a controlled environment, and it cautions that detection tools are unreliable.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Hiroshima University tells course and thesis supervisors to judge whether generative AI may be used in classes or assignments and explain that decision to students through syllabi, guidance, or similar channels.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be told that using AI output as-is may amount to copyright infringement or plagiarism, and that any use or quoted output should be made clear in reports and similar assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Hiroshima University's basic policy frames student use of generative AI in coursework around students identifying problems and considering solutions themselves, while users understand AI's mechanisms, benefits, risks, and changing literacy requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Perplexity Pro is listed for Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IITM) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For IIT Madras BS Degree program assignments, including any course or OPPE, the Honour Code says students are expected to produce original work based on individual understanding, and using LLMs such as ChatGPT or Gemini to generate any portion of code is considered plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The IIT Madras BS Degree Honour Code applies to participation in the IIT Madras BS Degree program and says participants must agree to the Honour Code and any additional course- or program-specific terms posted on study.iitm.ac.in/ds.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Jouf University says its University Council approved adding an "Artificial Intelligence" course as a basic course in the study plans for all students, starting in academic year 1447 AH.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Jouf University says the adopted AI course gives special attention to ethical and social aspects, including algorithmic bias, privacy, data protection, and legal and regulatory challenges linked to AI technologies.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Jouf University's adopted AI course is described as covering machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, and computer vision through interactive lectures, dynamic discussions, and real case studies.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Vice-Rectorate orientation guidelines say teachers are responsible for deciding which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form, and that the scope and form of use should be stated in the course description before the course starts.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For assessed writing, University of Graz guidance says AI use should be transparent: students should label and document AI use and follow the AI guidelines of the relevant course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Graz does not set a blanket prohibition on AI technologies for writing assignments; lecturers decide for each course which text-generating AI systems may be used and how.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Khon Kaen University's Graduate School states that failure to disclose AI use in a thesis or independent study is regarded as a violation of academic ethics and may be subject to penalties under relevant regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Khon Kaen University's Graduate School states that AI is only a supporting tool for thesis or independent study work, and students who use AI must specify the type and content of the AI use in the thesis or independent study report.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Khon Kaen University's Graduate School classifies proofreading, grammar or spelling correction, readability rephrasing without altering core content, and translation for comprehension or cross-language communication as low-risk acceptable AI uses in thesis or independent study preparation, provided the use is disclosed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KU Leuven student guidance says students remain fully responsible for what they submit and must ensure assignments allow teaching staff to assess their acquired competences.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KU Leuven student guidance says clear misuse of GenAI, where output is largely generated by GenAI and the student is not transparent about tool use, can be considered an irregularity under Article 84 of the Education and Examination Regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KU Leuven teaching guidance expects teaching staff to clearly inform students whether GenAI may be used for assignments and expects students to be transparent about GenAI use so assessment can be fair and correct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lehigh's human-subjects research guidance says use of AI to analyze or process data must be disclosed to participants during consent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lehigh says students are expected to follow instructor-set course rules and university academic integrity rules when using generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lehigh advises instructors to give students clear guidance on how generative AI tools may be used in coursework and research.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Macquarie student guidance categorises assessment tasks as Open or Observed: Open tasks allow generative AI with acknowledgement and student responsibility, while Observed tasks may restrict or prohibit AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Macquarie's research guidance says researchers using generative AI should mitigate sensitive-data risks, keep oversight and control, critically review outputs, and disclose or acknowledge generative AI use in research.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Macquarie Library referencing guidance says students who use generative AI in assessments should clearly state how they used it and fact-check AI responses against reliable sources.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MSU guidelines say students may use generative AI tools for coursework or research activities only when the instructor or research advisor explicitly permits that use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MSU expects instructors to include course-specific generative AI guidance in every syllabus, including whether AI use is permitted, the contexts in which it may be used, and expected acknowledgment or citation practices.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MSU guidelines say integration of generative AI into research outputs, manuscripts, artistic endeavors, and grant applications must be disclosed according to relevant guidance or policies, and that intentional and substantial AI uses should be disclosed when no stated guidance exists.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Middlesex guidance tells students to consult their module tutor before using AI for studies or assignments and says submitting AI-generated work as their own is a breach of academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Middlesex states that generative AI tools may be used in assessments only as specified by the module leader, and allowed use requires written acknowledgment, extent of use, generation details including prompts, and citation or referencing where generated material is not adapted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Middlesex guidance says assessment criteria should make clear when and how students can use AI for each assessment, and how to acknowledge AI use appropriately.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NUS policy states that representing AI output as one's own work without acknowledgement is plagiarism; students who submit AI-generated work without acknowledging its use can be sanctioned for academic dishonesty.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NUS states that instructors should be transparent about where and how they deploy AI in courses, including for generating content, virtual tutoring, and assessment feedback.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NUS policy sets the default assumption that AI tool use is permitted for unsupervised (take-home) assessments, provided use is duly acknowledged; assessments forbidding AI must be conducted in-person and instructor-supervised.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Oregon State University Student Community Standards states that misuse of GenAI on an assignment could violate the university's Academic Integrity Policy, including plagiarism, cheating, or fabrication.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Oregon State University strongly encourages instructors to include a syllabus statement about whether and how students should engage with GenAI in their course learning and assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Oregon State University tells students that faculty may set course-specific AI expectations and that students must follow the specific expectations for each course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Princeton University requires students to disclose the use of generative AI when permitted by the instructor, rather than cite or acknowledge the use, since generative AI is an algorithm rather than a source (Rights, Rules, Responsibilities section 2.4.7).

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Princeton University states that inappropriate uses of generative AI on any work submitted to fulfill an academic requirement, including directly copying the output, representing output as the student's own, exceeding instructor parameters, or failing to disclose its use, would constitute violations of academic integrity (Rights, Rules, Responsibilities section 2.4.6).

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Princeton University states that the decision to allow, limit, or prohibit generative AI in a course or in undergraduate independent work remains with the faculty; faculty members have the discretion to set their own generative AI policy for their courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Scite is listed for Purdue University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should determine and tell students when AI use is authorized or unauthorized; authorization is determined at the course level.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should include specific syllabus guidance on allowable AI-tool use, learning-process use, detection approaches, and potential consequences.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

QUB Chatbot is listed for Queen's University Belfast in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Queen's assessment guidance says students who misuse AI will be subject to the University's academic misconduct regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Queen's responsible AI research guidance expects material AI use in research to be clearly documented and acknowledged, with researchers validating AI-generated content.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

RMIT academic integrity guidance says students cannot use AI to complete or contribute to an assessment task unless specifically allowed, pass off unreferenced AI-produced ideas as their own, or submit AI-produced content they cannot understand or explain.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

RMIT assessment guidance tells students to review and fact-check AI outputs and acknowledge AI tools when those tools contribute ideas, text, images, or other content to assessment work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

RMIT says whether students may use AI in assessments depends on their course and Course Coordinator instructions, and students should check with the Course Coordinator if unsure.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Royal Holloway academic misconduct regulations list requesting or engaging an artificial intelligence tool to write or rewrite work for unfair advantage, and presenting AI-generated content as one’s own unless authorised and acknowledged, as examples of assessment offences.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance for postgraduate researchers says AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose, or other academic content, and that researchers are responsible for every output they submit.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Royal Holloway requires students to include declaration statements for generative AI use or non-use, and says a list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Rutgers Academic Integrity Policy 10.2.13 applies to all schools and academic units and says students must ensure submitted course, research, or other academic work is their own and created without impermissible technologies, materials, or collaborations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Rutgers OIT guidance says AI use in academic settings typically varies by discipline, course, or instructor; students should not consider AI tools permissible for coursework unless instructors clearly state or communicate permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Rutgers teaching guidance recommends clear and transparent course policies around generative AI, class discussion of those policies and rationales, and, when GenAI is permissible, student disclosure and reflection on use plus submission of prompts and outputs.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Sapienza's final-paper originality declaration requires students who used AI, automatic translators, grammar checkers, or data-analysis software to transparently declare the tool function and specific use, and says AI was not used to generate substantial content or automate any section.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Sapienza CAD Psychology undergraduate final papers, generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini may be used as drafting support only with careful, transparent use and personal critical revision by the student.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Sapienza CAD Psychology undergraduate final papers, the guidance treats uses such as relying on AI for bibliographic discovery, unverified citations, article summaries, critical analysis, delegated writing, automatic responses to supervisor feedback, data manipulation, fake results, or uncited AI content as illicit.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Shenzhen University guidance says serious violations of instructor AI-use rules, concealment, presenting AI-generated content as original work, or failing required disclosure/marking can affect course grades and may be handled under academic misconduct rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Shenzhen University guidance says course instructors should tell students whether AI technologies are permitted in coursework, papers, assessments, exams, and the permitted scope.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Shenzhen University guidance says researchers using AI technology in research activities should disclose the AI tool name, version, parameter settings, use, and verification process in appropriate parts of the work and follow publisher rules during publication.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SFU guidance says AI detectors cannot be used for grading decisions or academic misconduct investigations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SFU tells students that use of generative AI for coursework depends on instructor permission, and students should not assume it is permitted when guidance is unclear or absent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

When an SFU instructor permits generative AI use, SFU tells students to cite or disclose that use appropriately as part of academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

OpenClassrooms AI courses via SORBONNE.AI is listed for Sorbonne University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SCAI Education is listed for Sorbonne University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules state that assessment documents must be the student's or assessed group's personal work, AI use is refused unless explicitly authorized, and authorized AI use should mention the source.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Swansea University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Swansea University's AI assessment policy says staff and students are not permitted to present work completed by AI applications as their own without acknowledgement.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Swansea University's student AI guidance says AI-generated work submitted for assessment when not expressly authorised and declared could be investigated for academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Tampere University tells students to openly and transparently acknowledge AI use in assignments, coursework, or theses and to describe how AI was used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Tampere University's academic ethics guideline treats presenting AI-produced work as one's own without proper mention as academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Tampere University generally permits students to use generative AI applications to support learning and assignment completion, while allowing teachers to set course or assignment principles.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aqueduct API is listed for Technische Universität Wien in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Open WebUI Chat is listed for Technische Universität Wien in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Wien's student guidance says ChatGPT and other large language models must be documented as aids in written work, AI-used passages must be marked, and undisclosed generative-AI use in student work is treated as equivalent to plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At the University of Melbourne, using GenAI tools to produce work submitted for assessment without acknowledgement constitutes academic misconduct under cl. 4.13 of the Student Academic Integrity Policy (MPF1310).

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Melbourne students must appropriately cite any use of GenAI tools in the preparation of assessment submissions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At the University of Melbourne, generative AI tools can only be used in research outputs where the material generated or substantially altered by these tools is acknowledged according to the University's policy and the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Warwick's student-facing guidance says students are required to state whether AI was used in the submission process and explain why, where, and how it was used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Warwick's student-facing guidance says students may use AI only within requirements set out in assessment briefs and course handbooks, which may restrict or prohibit AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Warwick's AI in research guidance says researchers are responsible for misconduct-type practices involving AI, including improper handling of information or use of another person's ideas, even if such practices occur inadvertently through an AI tool.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UAEU prohibits student use of GenAI in specified assessment contexts unless the course instructor states otherwise.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UAEU tells students that information gained from GenAI should be checked against recognized sources and that those sources should be cited.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UAEU states that students must complete a training session as part of orientation to comply with the GenAI policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says that if a student used AI tools at any stage of thesis writing, the student is required to explicitly declare the tool, version if available, date, and nature of use in a methodological note.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says students should not insert automatically generated scientific text into the thesis, replace bibliographic research with AI, or use AI-generated text without critical and personal reworking.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says non-compliance with its AI-use indications is treated as comparable to plagiarism and may lead to disciplinary sanctions under the university regulation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MS Copilot for Education is listed for Universitat de Barcelona in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UB's good-practices document recommends that students clearly declare generative AI use when relevant and frames transparent, responsible AI use as a commitment to academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UB's good-practices document says it is important for instructors to clarify at the beginning of each course what role generative AI may have, where it is permitted or not permitted, and under what conditions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The guidance states that if active use of an AI tool in a course requires registration with personal data, that use must be voluntary because GDPR must be observed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The central guidance recommends that instructors formulate clear course guidelines governing generative AI use and discuss them with students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Universität Konstanz has public central AI-in-teaching guidance, but the collected official sources should be treated as guidance and resource pages rather than a staged canonical finding of a formal university-wide binding AI policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UGA's AI reference framework says students using generative AI must mention the use of generative AI and its name, identify the parts generated by or with AI, and cite sources correctly to avoid plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UGA's AI reference framework says use of tools mobilizing AI is prohibited by principle for knowledge assessment unless explicitly authorized, with study regulations and assessment modalities specifying the AI-use framework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UGA's AI reference framework says researchers using generative AI must verify whether generated ideas come from existing sources, add appropriate references, mention the use and name of the generative AI, and identify parts generated by or with AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Université Lumière Lyon 2's règlement intérieur prohibits using an artificial-intelligence tool in university work without explicit mention, and prohibits presenting AI-generated content as personal human work, under disciplinary proceedings.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lyon 2 SPS guidance says AI should not do assessed work in place of the student; AI assistance may be possible only when it respects university ethics and the specific instructions for the exam or assignment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lyon 2 SPS guidance recommends that instructors explicitly state expected conditions for student work, including obligations, permissions, recommendations, prohibitions, whether generative AI may be used, and how any use should be signaled.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCD's Academic Integrity Policy says AI-generated content may not be submitted without explicit permission and attribution, and that generative AI outputs must be used critically, ethically, cited, and acknowledged.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University College Dublin publishes University Management Team-approved AI Governance Principles for institutional AI use, including human oversight, fairness, transparency, compliance, ethical design, AI literacy, stakeholder engagement, and risk assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCD Teaching and Learning assessment guidance advises educators to be transparent with students about permitted AI use and to apply more robust approaches for high-stakes graded assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UiBchat is listed for University of Bergen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot for web is listed for University of Bergen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Bergen states that software, including AI tools, should be referenced when it affects results, analyses, or findings presented in academic work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Calgary in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For graduate studies, the Faculty of Graduate Studies guidelines say students should obtain written, unambiguous authorization before planned GenAI use in graduate work, and students must disclose GenAI use in graduate study work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Calgary teaching-and-learning guidance supports the use of generative AI in teaching and learning, while saying individual educators and instructors should decide if and how it is incorporated and clearly communicate student expectations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCR's student-facing AI announcement says students should discuss generative-AI expectations with professors, use AI to assist or enhance rather than replace original work, avoid generating entire deliverables, and cite AI-generated content or data when used.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCR XCITE advises instructors to discuss when AI may be used in coursework and how it should be cited, and its sample syllabus language treats uncited AI use as a potential academic-integrity issue.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCR's public generative-AI guidance for instructional settings places course-level use decisions with the Instructor of Record rather than setting one universal student-use rule in the evidence reviewed here.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NaviGator Chat is listed for University of Florida in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Florida in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UF guidance presents AI-Permitted, Some AI, and No AI as general course-level approaches for instructors to communicate generative AI expectations in syllabi or assignment instructions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, sensitive data such as personal data must not be disclosed to a public AI tool that does not guarantee confidentiality.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, a formal declaration of generative AI use is required for all bachelor's, master's, or doctoral work and for academic assessment or production leading to a degree or official title.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNIGE formally expects full transparency about AI tool use in academic work through appropriate citation rules, with possible description of the methodology used with AI support.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Regulation 32 says use of websites or generative AI software that generates answers or references is prohibited, while some Schools may allow AI tools for specific purposes and any AI use must be referenced.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Glasgow student guidance says using AI or other computational aids in university work without acknowledging the input counts as academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Glasgow student guidance says the university does not seek to prohibit student AI-tool use generally and instead supports effective, ethical, critical, and transparent use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Gothenburg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not prohibit generative AI in education; teachers and examiners decide whether, when, and how it may be used in coursework and examinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Gothenburg student guidance says generative-AI guidelines vary between courses, programmes, departments, and faculties, and that teachers and examiners are responsible for communicating those guidelines to students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CurreChat is listed for University of Helsinki in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Helsinki student guidance treats prohibited use of large language models, or failing to report their use as instructed, as cheating; the cheating and plagiarism guidance also lists presenting AI-generated text or solutions as one's own as plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Helsinki research guidance supports responsible and critical use of GenAI in research, but says researchers are responsible for outputs, should verify them, describe substantial GenAI use, and must not list GenAI as a co-author.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UIC College of Medicine policy states that students are expected to draft submitted assignments on their own; AI may assist with idea generation and editing, but AI directly authoring a response is considered a violation of academic integrity and professionalism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UIC College of Medicine policy prohibits students from generating patient care notes with AI applications except EHR-supported applications explicitly permitted by course leadership, and says protected health information should never be entered into outside generative AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UIC CATE recommends that instructors develop and include an AI usage policy in their syllabus after sharing their stance on AI writing tools in the course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

M365 Copilot Premium is listed for University of Missouri, Kansas City in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UMKC recommends that instructors include a policy in all syllabi about the use and misuse of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UMKC Libraries' ChatGPT student guide tells students to check with their instructor before using ChatGPT and provides citation guidance when ChatGPT is allowed in an academic assignment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT is listed for University of Rome "Tor Vergata" in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Corporate and Business Strategy course page states that using generative AI, including ChatGPT, without prior professor consent is considered plagiarism in that course context.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Tor Vergata's Economics area library says its staff provides training and assistance for integrating AI tools into research processes while maintaining academic integrity and correct citation; this is an area-library service source, not a university-wide AI policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For 2026 NSFC applications submitted through USTC, the university notice says applicants who use generative AI to track research trends or collect and organize references must manually verify the truth and accuracy of generated information and references, take responsibility for generated content, and fully and truthfully declare AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For smart-course projects under USTC's 2026 undergraduate teaching-project guide, completion standards include at least two online teaching cycles and mandatory AI learning or teaching support plus knowledge-graph functions, with two additional optional digital or AI functions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

USTC's 2026 undergraduate teaching-project guide encourages new-course projects to integrate AI technologies with core professional competencies and to include AI application techniques, cases, and practical training in lectures and practice teaching.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of St Andrews in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

St Andrews GenAI information policy says University information classified as internal, confidential, or strictly confidential must not be input into publicly available generative AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

St Andrews Good Academic Practice policy treats presenting AI output as a student's own work without acknowledgement as unauthorised use of AI, except where an assessment specifically permits or encourages such tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UT Austin AI detection guidance prohibits third-party AI detection software from being used to evaluate student work or assignments unless a university contract or purchase order is in place.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UT Austin CTL teaching-policy guidance says using generative AI tools to create course-assignment responses in a way the instructor does not accept may be considered academic dishonesty by the university.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UT Austin classroom guidance recommends that instructors requiring generative AI understand and abide by UT acceptable-use guidance, identify syllabus policies clearly, and submit specific software requirements through the University Co-Op.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UToledo's Academic dishonesty policy lists representing the words, ideas, or information of an artificial intelligence program as one's own without proper documentation as an example of academic dishonesty, and says faculty are expected to tell students what materials and procedures, including artificial intelligence programs, are authorized.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UToledo's Simple Syllabus guidance says the AI Tool Usage section is required and private, and instructors must select or enter a statement explaining how generative AI tools may be used, limited, or prohibited in the course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Within the University of Toledo College of Law default rule, generative AI may be used for research-like search, grammar correction, and other functions attendant to completing an assignment, but may not compose submitted assignment text and may not be used for any exam purpose unless an instructor deviates in writing with notice.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Toronto considers use of generative AI tools on marked assessments without instructor permission to be use of an unauthorized aid under the Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Contact North Teacher’s Assistant Pro is listed for University of Toronto in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Toronto recommends that instructors include a statement on their syllabus that informs students about expectations with respect to the use of AI, and provides sample syllabus statements for instructors to use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UVA Provost guidance says that if an assignment involves students uploading original work into a GenAI tool, instructors must provide alternative ways to complete the assignment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UVA guidance says students who use AI in completing an assignment should clearly indicate the tool used, how it was used, prompts used, and, when appropriate, fact-checking efforts.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UVA guidance says instructors should make explicit in syllabi and assignment descriptions which GenAI uses are permitted or prohibited, and that using GenAI in ways prohibited by the instructor may violate the Honor Code.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini is listed for University of York in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of York in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google NotebookLM is listed for University of York in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yale academic integrity guidance treats inserting AI-generated text into an assignment without proper attribution as an academic integrity violation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yale expects faculty to give clear instructions on permitted AI use and attribution, and expects students to follow instructor guidelines for coursework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yale states that instructors have authority within each course to determine whether and how students may use AI on assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yeshiva University's undergraduate academic integrity policy treats unsanctioned use of Generative AI or Assistive AI as a potential academic integrity violation and tells students to assume generative-capable platforms are prohibited unless allowed for the course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yeshiva University's undergraduate policy permits faculty to allow Generative AI in courses or assessments if they specify in writing how it may be used; content produced using Generative AI must be cited according to the relevant subject conventions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yeshiva University's faculty and staff AI acceptable use policy says individuals using Generative AI in research must be transparent about its use and researchers must avoid uploading unpublished research data or Internal or Restricted Information into Generative AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aarhus University student guidance says students who use GAI in an exam project must submit a declaration naming the applications and explaining how they were used, and unchanged GAI output used in an exam project must be cited like other secondary-source quotations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aarhus University student guidance says the main rule is that students are allowed to use GAI unless their academic regulations or the course catalogue explicitly state that GAI is not allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AU Educate guidance for teaching staff says that from fall 2024 students are allowed to use GAI in all AU exams unless academic regulations or the course description explicitly state that they may not, and it advises teachers to read those rules for their courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Åbo Akademi University's Open University teacher guidance says teachers cannot require students to use AI to complete an assignment because AI requires registration on an external service.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Åbo Akademi University's research data guidance says researchers are responsible for their own work, should check all AI-produced results, and should be transparent about AI-tool use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Åbo Akademi University's Open University teacher guidance says students in courses should be informed about the principles and disadvantages of AI or language-model use, and teachers should make clear what applies in each specific course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Adam Mickiewicz University has Rector order 426/2023/2024 setting rules for student use of AI systems in education, including theses and coursework/assessment work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For classroom/course work, AMU recommends that the course coordinator choose the appropriate level of AI-use control based on the syllabus, and that the instructor inform students about permission or prohibition at the first class.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AMU classroom guidance says that, in course contexts where permission or marking is required, use of generative AI tools without permission or without appropriate marking is treated in the same way as plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Open WebUI is listed for Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Freiburg research policy says researchers should disclose which AI systems they used and clearly label those systems' contributions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University Library Freiburg guidance tells students that AI tool use in academic contexts should be made transparent, they should ask instructors what extent of AI use is permitted, and AI tool output must be checked consistently.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AAU's AI instructions allow students to use AI tools for self-learning, initial project and research ideas, and text or data analysis, but prohibit submitting AI outputs as-is, generating complete or nearly complete assignment/project answers without being able to explain them, or using tools that lead to cheating or breach academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AAU's AI instructions require students to document AI use by explicitly identifying the tool used and where and how it was used in assignments, research, and projects, while observing intellectual-property rights.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AAU's AI instructions allow faculty members to use AI tools for educational content, learning activities, rubrics, and student-performance analysis, while requiring the faculty member to remain the course's primary scientific source and not rely fully on generated outputs without review.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ashoka University's Academic Integrity Policy applies to students doing coursework, research, thesis work, partner-university coursework, study-related internships or placements, and work with University Centers; it expects original work, source acknowledgement, independent assignment completion where applicable, and honesty during examinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In the Ashoka University course catalogue entry for Economy, Politics and Society (FC-0412-5), the course-level AI/ML policy discourages use of machine-learning tools such as ChatGPT in that class and asks students who use such a tool to declare its use and specify the extent of use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ashoka University's public Academic Integrity Policy page gives general academic-integrity and citation guidance, including mandatory academic-integrity workshop language, but the extracted public page text did not contain AI-specific, ChatGPT, or generative-AI rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For ACU coursework students, unauthorized or undisclosed use of generative AI, paraphrasing or translation tools is listed as academic misconduct unless use is authorized in the assessment requirements and properly acknowledged.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ACU research guidance says HDR candidates should declare GenAI use for thesis copyediting/proofreading, discuss intended research use with supervisors, record and acknowledge tool usage and prompts, and should not input sensitive or confidential information into GenAI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ACU Library guidance tells students that GenAI may be permitted in some contexts, but assessment use should be clearly authorized and acknowledged, and final work should reflect the student's own analysis and understanding.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bar-Ilan University guidance requires students to declare whether they used generative AI tools in an assignment and to explain the specific contribution made by GenAI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bar-Ilan University guidance leaves whether and how students may use generative AI tools to instructor discretion; if an instructor has not explicitly prohibited use, use is permitted by default when the student explicitly discloses all use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bar-Ilan University guidance instructs users not to disclose personal or sensitive information to generative AI platforms and says generative AI tools must adhere to Bar-Ilan data security guidelines.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

iBIT is listed for Beijing Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

智教通 (Zhijiaotong) is listed for Beijing Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Beijing Institute of Technology Graduate School says 2026 graduate program plans should add public foundational AI courses for all graduate students, with students required to take the appropriate tier according to program training requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Beijing Jiaotong University's 2023-2024 undergraduate teaching quality report says the university opened liberal-arts/science-track AI general courses and aimed for AI course coverage for the 2024 undergraduate cohort, except where programs already include AI courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For the Zhan Tianyou College-related 2024 undergraduate training model described in the report, BJTU required majors in the information ability module to add AI-specialized courses categorized as AI foundation, AI expansion, and AI frontier courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

BJTU's undergraduate teaching quality report says the university developed AI-enabled course pilots using large-model technologies around knowledge graphs, 24-hour intelligent learning companions, AI teaching assistants, and AI mentors, with experience to be promoted across the university.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bournemouth University academic-offences guidance lists using artificial intelligence software to write all or part of an assignment and claiming the work as your own as an example of an academic offence.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bournemouth University student guidance says using generative AI when writing coursework is not, by itself, an academic offence, while directing students to use the resource responsibly and appropriately.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bournemouth University's 6H taught-awards policy defines academic offences as attempts to gain unfair advantage in assessment by deception or fraudulent means and frames academic integrity around responsibility for one's own work, acknowledging others' work, honest reporting, and avoiding unfair advantage.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

VUT requires users to properly state when a result was achieved using generative AI, including the extent of use, and warns that incorrect or undisclosed use may be treated as an ethical violation such as ghost-writing or contract-cheating.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For creative activity, VUT supports generative-AI use by academic and research staff, but says employees must state which tools were used and the extent of use when creating scientific or artistic outputs.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For operational-administrative work, VUT supports employee use of generative AI and says employees may use it to perform work duties, while stating which tools were used and the extent of use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Brown Provost guidance says any unapproved use of AI to complete assignments would be covered by Brown’s Academic Code and Graduate Student Edition Academic Code.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Brown University Provost guidance says the University is not prescribing specific AI policies, and that faculty should give clear, unambiguous information about what AI use is and is not allowed in their courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Brown Sheridan Center guidance says instructors should be explicit with students about expectations for generative AI use, including how students should, might, or cannot engage with it.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For thesis work, Chalmers says AI tools may be permitted, but students are required to take full responsibility and make AI-tool use clear and transparent, including how and to what extent the tools were used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chalmers Library's student guidance connects AI use to plagiarism or ghostwriting risk and says students need to be fully transparent, describe what they did, and cite the AI tool used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chalmers Library's student guidance says whether and how AI tools may be used in examinations is decided for each course by the coordinator and examiner, so students should ask at the beginning of each course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chang Gung University student guidance tells students to follow course AI-use rules, clearly mark AI use when permitted, avoid directly copying AI-generated content, and not use AI in exams unless specifically allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chang Gung University teacher guidance advises instructors to state AI-use rules in syllabi, choose whether AI use is fully open, conditionally open, or prohibited, and explain scope, marking requirements, and grading criteria.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chang Gung University researcher guidance treats AI as a supporting tool, says core arguments and innovative results should be written by researchers, and calls for clear disclosure and verification of AI-generated content.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CDU requires students and employees to be transparent about and disclose GenAI use, with academic integrity guidance applying to students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CDU's academic integrity guidance identifies inappropriate or unsanctioned GenAI use as academic misconduct and says CDU will not tolerate misrepresenting AI-generated content as a student's own work or failing to disclose AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For HDR studies, CDU guidance says GenAI may assist but should not replace a candidate's original intellectual contribution, GenAI use should be clearly acknowledged, and supervisors or external examiners should not use GenAI to critique or assess candidate work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

China Medical University's Academic Affairs generative AI teaching guidance asks instructors to communicate with students about course-specific ways and limits for using generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

China Medical University's Academic Affairs guidance tells teachers and students to consider academic-ethics concerns before using generative AI and to avoid plagiarism and copyright violations in assignments, exams, and research papers.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

China Medical University's R&D reference guidance frames generative AI as a research-assistance tool and says researchers should verify AI-generated content, understand related policies, disclose use where required, and remain responsible for research outputs.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chonnam's generative-AI writing assignment guideline tells instructors to state in the syllabus whether generative AI is allowed and, when allowed, to explain scope, misconduct criteria, the ethics pledge, and checklist use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chonnam's generative-AI writing assignment guideline identifies improper AI uses that can constitute misconduct, including submitting copied AI output without attribution, patchworking AI output without attribution, using AI to create or spread false information or experiences, infringing copyright or intellectual property, and using AI in a class where it is fully prohibited.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chonnam's generative-AI writing assignment guideline cautions learners that information entered into generative AI may be stored on servers and used to improve performance, so they should be careful about security and information leakage.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChulaGENIE is listed for Chulalongkorn University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chulalongkorn guidance says users who use AI tools in a task should cite and clearly state the scope of use; concealing AI-tool use is treated as an ethical violation that may be penalized under relevant rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For teaching and assessment, Chulalongkorn guidance says instructors should understand selected AI tools, define course-level scope and directions for use, and adjust evaluation when AI use is allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chungnam National University's learner guide states that not following syllabus or instructor-agreed generative-AI criteria, or inappropriate AI use, may be regarded as cheating; examples include presenting AI answers as one's own, failing to disclose AI use, or using AI in a class where it is fully prohibited.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chungnam National University's learner guidance says learners should follow instructor-provided generative-AI criteria, use AI as a learning support tool, verify AI outputs against reliable sources, and clearly mark the source, generation method, and scope of AI-generated materials.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chungnam National University's instructor guidance says that when generative AI is used in class, instructors should state its purpose and scope in the syllabus, explain correct use and standards for cheating or plagiarism, and guide students to cite AI-generated outputs.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy says use of generative AI tools must align with the usage policy for specific assignments as defined in the syllabus or communicated by the instructor.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy includes unauthorized use of AI-generated content, including paraphrased AI-generated content without citing AI as the source, as an example of plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CUNY's AI Academic Hub advises faculty to guide AI use with clarity by establishing responsible AI engagement in coursework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Comillas states that using AI to create complete works or relevant parts without citing the source or tool, or without express permission in the assignment description, will be considered plagiarism under the university's general regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Comillas permits students to use AI as a reference tool when the use is acknowledged and cited, and directs students to check each course guide and consult the instructor for activity-specific rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Comillas says teachers who incorporate AI tools in their courses should ensure that the conditions for use are clearly established in the course guide.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Concordia's CTL GenAI FAQ says the university does not currently have an official policy regarding the use of GenAI, and explains that GenAI has not officially been adopted by the university so its use cannot be required in coursework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Concordia CTL encourages faculty to clearly state their position on GenAI use in courses, including in the syllabus and in class, and provides adaptable sample statements for encouraged, limited, or prohibited use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Concordia Student Success guidance tells students not to assume GenAI is allowed if an instructor does not mention it, and says permitted use of generative tools for academic work must be cited.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

DLSU's generative AI policy says faculty and students must provide a written disclosure statement when generative AI is used in producing material, presentations, or submissions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Starting Term 1, 2025-2026, DLSU's policy says every course must include a dedicated Generative AI Use Policy section in the syllabus, including usage policy levels for grading components and a concise rationale.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

DLSU's policy treats prohibited generative AI use and failure to disclose generative AI use as generative AI-related academic dishonesty, while also stating that AI detector results cannot be the sole basis for establishing such dishonesty.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy allows authors to use AI tools supportively, but requires substantive AI use to be disclosed in an AI Declaration Statement and states that AI tools may not be listed as authors or co-authors.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNDIP Library guidance tells students that submitted assignments remain their own responsibility, and that using AI software without acknowledgement is treated seriously under academic misconduct procedures.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNDIP Library guidance says AI use in data analysis, writing, or draft preparation should be explicitly disclosed in publications, and AI-generated results should be manually reverified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Durham Common Awards page says its AI policy requires students to paste a completed AI declaration into summative assignments before submission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Durham Common Awards guidance says some limited uses of generative AI do not count as academic misconduct if work remains the student's own, AI use is acknowledged where required, and caution is demonstrated.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Durham staff may choose whether and how to use GenAI in teaching, but must be open and transparent about this and operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Tübingen presents its generative-AI guideline for teaching and research as representing the university's stance, focused on critical-reflective, transparent, and responsible handling of generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Tübingen guideline says that when generative AI is used in research, study, administration, or science communication, the procedure should be documented and made transparently visible in the relevant format.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Tübingen download area says its model declaration must be adapted before distribution to students, with the faculty, department, or teacher choosing either a no-generative-AI-use option or a marking-duty option when AI use is allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ECU's academic-misconduct guidance states that plagiarism includes unacknowledged use of a generative artificial intelligence tool such as ChatGPT.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ECU Library guidance says students who use generative AI as a study or research tool must acknowledge that use in their assessment, and that not giving credit to GenAI tools counts as plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ECU provides student-facing generative-AI learning support that covers responsible use, learning, academic integrity, prompt strategies, attribution, drop-ins, and workshops.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Effat University's library AI guide says using generative-AI text without proper citation is considered plagiarism according to Effat University, while policies for using and crediting AI tools may vary by class.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Effat University's library AI guide warns that generative-AI tools can produce inaccurate or false citations and advises users to verify citations for accuracy and credit the underlying source rather than the AI tool when citing sourced information.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Effat University's library AI guide advises users who decide to use ChatGPT or other AI technology for writing to be transparent with teachers and publishers and comply with applicable policies.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

EPFL requires students to disclose the use of AI tools in assessment work. EPFL rules (Lex 1.3.3, Article 4) require that all assessment material that is not the student's personal and original contribution must be recognizable as such.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

EPFL recommends that teachers make explicit to students what AI use is not legitimate in a course and what rules accompany AI tool use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

EPFL considers the use of AI-generated content in assignments without proper attribution as AI plagiarism. Tools that detect AI-generated content are not admissible as stand-alone evidence of AI plagiarism due to high risk of false positives.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ewha's class-stage AI-use guidance says course guidance may state that copying generative-AI outputs directly into assignments or exams, fabricating or spreading false information with generative AI, infringing copyright with generative AI, or otherwise harming academic truthfulness and trust may be considered misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ewha's class-stage AI-use guidance cautions that AI-detection programs can be used to check whether assignments used generative AI, but that such tools are not yet perfect and ethical use should be discussed with students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ewha's class-stage AI-use guidance presents course-level generative-AI use as something instructors may define by explaining whether and how AI use is allowed and by asking students to disclose how they used generative AI in assignments.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FIU's Center for the Advancement of Teaching advises instructors to clearly define acceptable AI use in course expectations and syllabus policy, including which tools are permitted and how they may or may not be used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

An official FIU Syllabi sample AI-use PDF includes sample academic integrity language stating that AI-generated content without proper attribution or authorization is another form of plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FIU Libraries' AI guide tells students who want to use AI in a course to ask their professor for that professor's individual AI-use policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HAWKI is listed for Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FAU guidance says instructors are responsible for clear AI-use rules in teaching activities, especially exams, and that students must disclose generative AI use according to the relevant course rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FAU's AI-in-teaching guidance says examiners must individually determine and announce whether and how AI-supported aids may be used, and students must disclose the aids used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

GJU's AI principles permit AI tools for research support such as data analysis and research model development, require researchers to disclose AI tool use, and prohibit using AI tools to produce complete research papers, fabricate data, generate non-original literature reviews, or create content not based on genuine research effort.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

GJU's AI principles permit students to use AI tools for learning-supportive activities such as preliminary research, analysis, idea generation, writing improvement, and summarizing academic sources, provided that the use is disclosed; the principles prohibit using AI to fully prepare projects or theses without the student's actual contribution.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

GJU's AI principles require disclosure of AI tool use in academic and research tasks and say sensitive data should not be entered into AI tools without consent from the relevant authorities and individuals concerned.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AI-ToolLab Chatbot (LobeChat) is listed for Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AI-ToolLab Transcription (Whisper-WebUI) is listed for Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Goethe University Frankfurt's teacher-facing assessment guidance recommends defining clear rules for AI use, making AI use transparent, and using AI detection software only as supporting evidence rather than as the sole basis for proof.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Griffith's academic integrity page states that uncited content created using generative artificial intelligence software is conduct that always constitutes Academic Misconduct, and that representing AI-generated assessment content as a student's own work is Academic Misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Griffith's student generative AI guidance warns that many open or public tools do not guarantee confidentiality and advises users not to enter personal information, information about others, or course materials such as assessment tasks or marking rubrics.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Griffith's student-facing generative AI guidance says students may use generative AI for self-study without citation, but for assessment tasks they must acknowledge its use and include a short declaration if they use it while completing the task.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

星火科研助手 (Spark Research Assistant) is listed for Harbin Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Harbin Institute of Technology's Graduate School continued an AI-enabled graduate education reform and course-construction initiative covering AI integration into graduate teaching models, systems, methods, approaches, evaluation, and student development.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Harbin Institute of Technology's Undergraduate School announced an AI-enabled teaching reform project that encourages AI-supported course scenarios, personalized student learning, and AI-enabled talent cultivation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

When generative AI is used to assist with grading submitted assignments, Hokkaido University's notes warn faculty not to enter students' personal or private information because entered data may be stored and output to other users.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For student use, Hokkaido University's notes say students preparing reports and other assignments should follow the instructor's guidance and instructions regarding generative AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For faculty use, Hokkaido University's notes say instructors should explain in advance whether generative AI is permitted in class and how it is restricted, and should consider grading fairness when students use it in assignments or practical learning.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HKBU GenAI Platform is listed for Hong Kong Baptist University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HKBU student academic-integrity guidance treats copying AI-generated output without acknowledging that use as improper use of generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HKBU presents four generative-AI teaching and learning principles: AI-Empowering, AI-Critical, AI-Ethical, and building and sustaining human uniqueness.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HKMU's student generative-AI guidelines say inappropriate AI use, including use without proper acknowledgment or in violation of course guidelines, will be treated as academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HKMU's student generative-AI guidelines require students completing assignments to submit an OLE declaration indicating whether generative-AI tools were used and, if used, which tool was used and how it contributed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HKMU's AI@HKMU position statement frames ChatGPT and similar tools as supplements to coursework and says ChatGPT should not be relied upon solely to complete assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HSE University requires students to disclose use of generative AI in written academic work, including the parts prepared with AI, the purpose and method of use, model name or source, and an effectiveness evaluation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HSE University states that there is no university-wide prohibition on student use of AI, and students may use generative models in academic work when they follow disclosure requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HSE University says an instructor may prohibit the use of generative models during assessment elements if the prohibition is stated in the course syllabus.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

IE University's admissions integrity policy welcomes AI such as ChatGPT in the admissions process when candidates clearly identify AI-generated content, use quotation marks, and include sources and details.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

A 2025-26 IE Humanities syllabus states that, for that course, ChatGPT or any other AI platform or tool is strictly prohibited for generating ideas or content, except spelling or grammar checking.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

This crawl found official IE University AI-related sources for admissions, institutional AI positioning, and one course-level syllabus, but did not locate a public central enrolled-student generative-AI policy page in official-domain searches.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Illinois Tech's Academic Affairs guidance ties permitted use of generative AI or other outside resources to each course's learning objectives and syllabus expectations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Illinois Tech's Center for Learning Innovation asks faculty to provide clear syllabus expectations for AI use and provides suggested syllabus language for no, some, and significant AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Illinois Tech's suggested AI and assessment syllabus language says AI-assisted grading support should be explicitly stated in assignment instructions when such tools are used, with final grading oversight retained by the instructor.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Individual departments at Imperial may allow or prohibit the use of generative AI for specific assessments. Local (team/department/faculty) instructions take precedence over university-wide guidance. Students should check their department's current policy on using and disclosing generative AI in academic work and follow their module leader's instructions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students should include a statement acknowledging their use of generative AI tools for all assessed work, specifying the tool name and version, publisher, URL, a brief description of how it was used, and confirmation that the work is their own. Further requirements such as prompts used, date of output, the output obtained, and how it was modified may also be required by individual departments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Users of Imperial's dAIsy platform must not upload third-party content they are not permitted to share. Reuse of AI outputs must comply with licensing and academic citation norms. When communicating externally, dAIsy outputs must not be presented as Imperial's position without approval.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Institut Polytechnique de Paris's 2025-2026 Master programs academic regulations prohibit the use of generative AI in assessments for those programs unless explicitly authorized by the instructor in written instructions. Unauthorized use constitutes academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Le règlement des études 2025-2026 des masters de l'Institut Polytechnique de Paris interdit l'utilisation de l'intelligence artificielle générative dans les évaluations de ces programmes, sauf autorisation explicite de l'enseignant dans ses consignes écrites. Tout manquement est considéré comme une fraude.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Under Institut Polytechnique de Paris's 2025-2026 Master programs academic regulations, when generative AI use is explicitly permitted by an instructor, students must clearly acknowledge its use in accordance with standard citation practices.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FITB guidance says declaration of AI use for coursework outputs is mandatory rather than optional, and undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FITB guidance states that, by default, using AI during exams, quizzes, or other evaluations is academic cheating and can be sanctioned unless the instructor allows or recommends AI use for a particular part of a course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FITB guidance says instructors need to set AI-use policies for their courses and communicate them at the start of the course; when AI use is allowed, permission should be clear and explicit, with boundaries and transparency.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Iowa State research guidance warns that users cannot assume GenAI tools comply with HIPAA, FERPA, and similar confidentiality rules, and says uploading information to a public AI tool is equivalent to releasing it publicly.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Iowa State Student Conduct guidance says suspected AI-generated coursework referrals will be reviewed similarly to other forms of academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Iowa State CELT describes AI teaching resources for instructors, including GenAI syllabus considerations and a Canvas page on use of GenAI in Iowa State courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Istanbul University Press policy says authors should disclose details of any AI used in content creation in the appropriate part of the work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

An Istanbul University EBS syllabus for 'Yapay Zeka Araclari Kullanimi' states that the course aims to help students use AI tools consciously, ethically, and effectively.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

An Istanbul University EBS syllabus for 'Sahne Sanatlarinda Yapay Zeka Uygulamalari II' includes generative AI, verification, bias, hallucination analysis, copyright, student data/privacy, institutional policy, and risk management as course content.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

JGU library guidance says the university is generally open to AI tools, but instructors or institutes may decide whether tools are allowed for a given assessment, and allowed use should be disclosed as an aid.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

JGU library guidance warns AI-tool users to check legal and privacy conditions, avoid disclosing private or sensitive data, and consider server location, publisher restrictions, rights, and upload permissions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

JGU's digital teaching guidance encourages integrating AI literacy and transparent use of AI into teaching and, where appropriate, assessment design.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students may not submit content generated with generative AI as their own without disclosure, and using AI in exams, assignments, or academic assessments is treated as cheating unless the course instructor permits it.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Faculty members must state the course AI-use policy in the course description, including whether AI use is allowed for assignments, projects, and activities and how use should be disclosed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

King Saud University's 2025 Student Learning Assessment Policy supports use of generative AI tools in service of the educational process while emphasizing original submitted work, disclosure of AI use, and faculty authority to permit or prohibit generative AI use by assignment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At King's College London, inappropriate use of generative AI without attribution is considered academic misconduct and can result in penalties ranging from formal warnings to expulsion.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

King's College London does not require students to reference generative AI as an authoritative source in the reference list, but does require explicit acknowledgement of AI tool use in coursework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

King's College London permits doctoral students to use generative AI tools in their thesis writing processes for assistive purposes such as clarifying writing, provided use is declared and consistent with guidance.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure defines unacceptable use of generative AI as presenting AI-generated content as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except when the assessment brief explicitly permits it.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kingston University's AG2 guidance says that if generative AI is used as part of the editorial process, the student must acknowledge that use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure says contributions by artificial intelligence tools must be properly acknowledged.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kyoto University tells students to follow the generative AI use policy set by the course instructor or research supervisor for coursework, reports, and thesis writing.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kyoto University tells students to record and, when required, disclose how they used generative AI beyond wording revisions, and warns that using AI output in their own work may be judged misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kyoto University expects instructors to state their generative AI use policy to students and, for courses focused on basic knowledge or skills, to preserve grading fairness through checks such as written or oral examinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

La Trobe University policy says staff, students, contractors, honorary and adjunct staff must not disclose University information into publicly accessible or open-source AI systems.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

La Trobe MyLaTrobe guidance says that when a subject allows AI use in an assessment, students need to submit an AI Acknowledgement, with the LMS indicating whether AI is permitted and what type of use is allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

La Trobe student guidance says AI rules may vary by school, subject, or task, and students should check with lecturers and acknowledge AI-generated content when they use it.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For the TDDC93/TDDC88/725G64 courses, the course policy says use of generative AI tools is permitted in 2025, while students remain responsible for submitted content.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Linköping University announced a strategic decision to implement an action plan for AI-ready education, including programme review, teacher skills development, AI ambassadors, and examination-design review for unauthorized AI use.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

An official Studieinfo syllabus page states that Linköping University has produced a guide for teachers and students on generative AI in education, and tells students that clarity about where and how generative AI has been used is important.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For education, Maastricht University says permitted GenAI uses are clearly defined at activity, course/module, study programme, and faculty levels.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For research output, Maastricht University says substantial GenAI use should be communicated transparently and referenced appropriately by researchers.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For operations, Maastricht University says GenAI tools are never used to process personal or organisation-sensitive data unless transparency and applicable safeguards are in place.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Mahidol University states that students must use Generative AI responsibly, avoid uses that may violate academic integrity, and clearly cite information or content derived from Generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Mahidol University's GenAI policy permits researchers to use Generative AI as a research tool, while requiring them to clearly identify the role of Generative AI in the research process and transparently report its use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Mahidol graduate-level thesis, thematic paper, and independent-study writing, the Faculty of Graduate Studies states that advisors may allow student AI use, but not for generating or drafting main content, analysis, research results, or main conclusions, and both advisor and student must disclose AI usage transparently.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

When allowed or required to use AI in an assessment, students must follow all instructions and restrictions on its use, clearly document the type of AI used and how it contributed, and provide written acknowledgment of the use of AI and its extent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Using AI in a way not permitted in an assessment, or failing to acknowledge its use correctly, may breach assessment conditions under the Student Academic Integrity Procedure.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Monash's AI responsible use principles include community benefit, education and research excellence, fairness, transparency, integrity and accountability, and data security and privacy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Nanjing University undergraduate guidance prohibits using generative-AI tools to write key content in papers, assignments, reports, or works.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For listed allowed-use contexts, Nanjing University undergraduate guidance permits generative-AI tool use only after written signed or electronically signed consent from the course instructor or thesis/project supervisor.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For undergraduate thesis or project use of AI, Nanjing University guidance requires advance written application and a dedicated AI-use statement page when submitting the work.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Nankai University's undergraduate AI tool norm permits students, with course teacher or supervisor consent and where core assessment or innovation is not affected, to use AI tools for literature search and management, grammar and formatting support with marked generated content, chart production from real data, and code assistance subject to author review and testing.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Nankai University's undergraduate AI tool norm says students should clearly explain and mark specific AI-generated content in coursework, graduation theses or designs, and lab reports, and should keep complete AI tool use records such as prompts, outputs, and selected use for checking.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Nankai University's undergraduate AI tool norm states that the university will provide an AIGC detection tool for teaching units to check AI tool use in coursework, graduation theses or designs, and lab reports, with results for teacher and supervisor reference; students who violate the norm may receive lower course or thesis grades, lose defense eligibility, or be handled under academic misconduct rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NTU states that the use of generative AI beyond basic spelling and grammar checks should be acknowledged and cited in research outputs, publications, and presentations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NTU states that not citing or acknowledging the use of generative AI could be considered plagiarism (a form of research misconduct), especially if GenAI was used to generate ideas or for literature reviews.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NTU requires students to disclose the use of AI tools in their submissions and to always refer to their module's AI use policy for specific expectations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

National Central University stated that, from academic year 112, courses would incorporate ChatGPT, including freshman English, calculus, the AI credit program, cultural technology course groups, and specialized courses across colleges.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

National Central University stated that, to reduce plagiarism and academic-integrity issues from AI tool use, it would continue regulation and education on disclosure, citation, and use of AI tools in thesis or program writing.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

National Central University's Computer Center announcement advised that generative AI use should avoid disclosing non-public official information or personal private information and should not completely trust generated information.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NSYSU's student generative AI guidance says students may not use generative AI tools for plagiarism or ghostwriting, cheating on exams, or privacy disclosure.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NSYSU's student guidance says students using generative AI tools should observe academic ethics and properly cite or explain the motivation, scope, sources, and AI-generated portions when teacher permission allows AI-assisted learning.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NSYSU's student academic integrity guidelines include cheating through unauthorized aids, tools, or electronic devices in coursework, assignments, or examinations when instructor consent has not been given.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Northeastern Policy 125 says faculty or staff seeking to use an AI system in University Operations or covered outside professional activities must provide required attribution, check AI outputs for accuracy and appropriateness, and validate anti-bias testing when the system processes personal information or affects legal rights or physical safety.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Northeastern teaching and learning standards say instructors should clearly communicate permitted generative AI uses to students in the syllabus, assignment guidelines, and verbally in class.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Northeastern's student AI guide advises students to check each syllabus, ask professors when an AI policy is unclear, use AI as a study partner rather than a substitute for their own thinking, and avoid using AI when assignment guidelines direct independent work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Northwestern Polytechnical University reported that its graduate education digital transformation uses AI+ course construction and an AI+ knowledge graph course-learning model.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Northwestern Polytechnical University's Computer School reported a college-level teaching reform seminar on large models and agents, including plans to deepen AI-enabled teaching reform.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

A reviewed official Northwestern Polytechnical University Higher Education Research Center page surfaced ChatGPT and academic-integrity content as research/practice material rather than a central university policy source.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

GPT NTNU is listed for Norwegian University of Science And Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Norwegian University of Science And Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NTNU provides an official teaching and assessment AI guidance page for instructors, with links to resources on talking with students about AI and exams with AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Oxford Brookes student guidance states that students are required to declare which AI tools they used and how they used them in Moodle, then paste the emailed receipt into an appendix at the end of the assignment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Oxford Brookes describes its university-wide position on generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment as a progressive embrace-and-adapt approach, with module leaders having discretion to advise on AI use in module assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Oxford Brookes guidance for schools, programmes, and modules says GenAI principles can be applied across disciplines and should be discussed at programme, course, and module level, with modules addressing equity and academic rigour and programmes advised to develop GenAI literacy and authentic assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AyudantIA is listed for Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (UC) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UC's academic-integrity guidance says instructors should clearly and transparently determine permitted and prohibited uses of generative AI, and treats unauthorized AI use in a course as an academic-integrity violation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UC guidance asks instructors to register and publish in Canvas the specific course or discipline agreements and limits for using AI systems and applications.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PUCV's academic-integrity policy states that use of AI tools such as ChatGPT without adequate citation is considered plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PUCV teaching-development guidance says course syllabi and virtual classrooms should establish correct AI tool use in advance and specify which tools are authorized for the course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PUCV teaching-development guidance says syllabi and virtual classrooms should establish norms, restrictions, and prohibitions for AI tools during assessment instances.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PMU's CCES Journal publication policies permit authors to use AI tools for research assistance, data analysis, language editing, and formatting, while requiring transparent disclosure and keeping authors responsible for the work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PMU's CCES Journal publication policies state that AI systems or tools may not be listed as authors and that undisclosed or inappropriate AI use may lead to rejection or corrective action.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PMU's IT policy states that IT resources are primarily for university work and that PMU may monitor IT resource use and disclose necessary information for law, regulation, or government requests.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Rice Honor Council's AI policy page says using AI software to generate ideas and passing them off as one's own is plagiarism; it also says course-specific AI policies may supersede the Honor Council's general AI policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Rice University's Responsible AI student guidance says use of AI tools for coursework is allowed only when the instructor explicitly permits it, and students should check the syllabus or ask the professor before using AI on assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Rice Office of the Provost guidance urges faculty to include a syllabus section stating their course stance on AI use and the extent of allowed use; it also notes Honor Council guidance that LLM use must be cited.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The English Seminar's AI guidelines require written coursework to use the seminar's declaration of authenticity, require GPT-created text passages to be marked, prohibit inserting whole GPT-created paragraphs, and state that unmarked use of GPT-generated text counts as an attempt to cheat.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Geography Institute's AI guidelines say students may use AI-supported tools for topic development and language improvement, but AI-generated subject content, figures, and tables must be marked; otherwise this is treated as an attempt to cheat.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

RUB's ZfW FAQ says generative AI tools can be used at RUB in research, teaching, and study, but that use can be restricted or tied to disclosure requirements in certain contexts such as written examinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Saarland University guidance says unauthorized use of generative AI in coursework or examinations, or failure to document it when required, is deception and may invalidate coursework or examinations and, in serious cases, lead to loss of examination entitlement.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Saarland University guidance says using generative AI as an aid for coursework and examinations is generally allowed, but instructors or examiners may restrict it to certain functions or prohibit it entirely.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Saarland University guidance says explicit documentation of generative AI use is generally not required beyond the declaration of independent work, but examiners may set transparent written documentation requirements in advance.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Sabancı University's student academic integrity handbook states that submitting text generated by text-generating AI applications such as ChatGPT in place of assignments students are supposed to write themselves violates the six principles of academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Sabancı University's student academic integrity handbook says students can include text generated by applications such as ChatGPT in assignments if the instructor accepts it and the text is cited and referenced using the APA method for AI-generated text.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Sabancı University Information Center guidance says that if students use generative AI, they need to disclose which tool or tools they used and how they used them.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Sejong University's 2026 AI usage guideline tells students that if they use AI for learning or assignments, they must transparently disclose the fact of AI use, such as through footnotes, citations, or reference details.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Sejong University's 2026 AI usage guideline tells students not to enter sensitive personal information into AI systems and not to upload undisclosed research data or internal assignment materials because of leakage risk.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Sejong University's 2026 AI usage guideline says faculty and students should agree in advance on the principles and scope of AI use in classes or assessments, with course-specific rules communicated in the syllabus or first class.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SCUT Graduate School announced a trial AI general and practice online course for all 2025 graduate students, including part-time graduate students and international students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SCUT's 2025 AI-enabled undergraduate teaching pilot call identified course agents, knowledge graphs, 24-hour intelligent learning companions, AI teaching assistants, intelligent grading, resource search, classroom assistants, preparation support, teaching management, digital humans, and internationalization as possible construction scenarios.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The SCUT undergraduate AI-enabled teaching pilot notice says the university would support pilot-course teams with AI technical guidance, teacher training and exchange activities, funding, production fees paid by the university, and priority teaching-assistant allocation during pilot delivery.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Southeast University's Graduate School opened 2026 school-level applications for AI-enabled graduate education projects in three categories: AI+ graduate courses, AI-enabled graduate teaching reform research projects, and AI-enabled graduate education application scenarios.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For AI+ graduate course project applications, the Graduate School notice says proposed course content must comply with national laws, policies, correct orientation requirements, confidentiality restrictions, and intellectual property requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

An official Southeast University repost reports that Vice President Jin Shi said the university built an AI-MUST curriculum system covering all majors and revised course syllabi to add AI literacy and technical-support objectives.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SUSTech's CS114 Introduction to Generative Artificial Intelligence course specification is course-level curriculum material that says the course covers generative AI history, principles, deployment, interdisciplinary applications, and ethical, security, and privacy discussions; it is not an institutional AI-use policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SUSTech's CS114 course calendar includes lessons on GAI privacy and security, GAI ethics, AI hallucination in large models, GAI-assisted programming, and AI agent engineering; this is course-level curriculum evidence rather than an institutional AI-use policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

A 2026 SUSTech Library embedded AI-literacy teaching page reports that a library session for the Intelligent Ocean Exploration course introduced AI hallucination, algorithmic bias, AI academic writing norms, citation-labeling guidance, and AI academic application boundaries; this is course-session evidence rather than institutional policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For suspected inappropriate generative AI use, Syracuse University's Academic Integrity Policy says an incident report cannot rely only on AI detection results and must explain course- and assignment-specific AI rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Syracuse University's Academic Integrity Policy says permitted AI use may vary by course or assignment, and treats inappropriate AI use as a failure to do one's own work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Syracuse Academic Affairs tells instructors to choose one of three AI syllabus statements and says suspected AI academic-integrity cases will not be investigated unless the syllabus contains one of those statements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TalTech tells lecturers to explain acceptable AI-based software use in assessment, teaching, learning, and homework, and course-level permission or prohibition should be specified in the extended syllabus.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TalTech says substantive AI output must be cited or described as a method, and learners remain responsible for accuracy, quality, analysis results, and references.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TalTech researcher guidance says AI-created texts and analyses should be clearly indicated and documented, and AI must not replace the researcher's critical thinking or act as a hidden author.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Texas A&M guidance says generative AI users must acknowledge nontrivial AI-generated content and avoid plagiarism, while faculty should provide clear course instructions about permissible AI uses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Texas A&M presents AI Use Categories as a starting point for student-instructor conversation, not as a one-size-fits-all policy or replacement for instructor judgment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Texas A&M CTE syllabus guidance recommends a hybrid approach that establishes clear course or assignment expectations for generative AI use, reinforces that AI use in coursework is governed by the Aggie Honor Code, and provides faculty support guidance.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AUC's AI statement says community members should clearly acknowledge AI tool use, and that claiming AI material as one's own is plagiarism and violates AUC academic integrity policies.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AUC's AI statement says a course instructor may authorize students to use AI tools in coursework, and in that case should provide written context and purpose for the allowed use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AUC faculty AI resources advise faculty to clarify acceptable and unacceptable AI usage in their courses and discuss AI with students early and before major assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

LSE states that making generative AI tools available does not endorse unrestricted use, and users should check their specific course, programme, or department policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

LSE requires departments or course convenors to classify authorised generative AI use in assessment as no authorised use, limited authorised use, or full authorised use, and to communicate the position to students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For 2025/26, LSE requested departments to add assessment safeguards, including observed assessment methods, to help assure degree integrity and prevent unfair competitive advantage from generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UTokyo states it is unacceptable to present AI-generated text as one's own when submitting class assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UTokyo advises faculty to test their own assignments with generative AI tools to understand how well AI can complete them, and use this understanding to inform assessment design.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UTokyo requires instructors to clearly state their AI stance per class/assignment, and when allowing AI use, to explain risks: information leakage, data concentration, copyright concerns, and potential bias.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For UWA coursework assessments, AI tools may only be used where the Unit Coordinator explicitly permits them; permitted use must be cited, referenced, and clearly acknowledged.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UWA askUWA guidance tells students to reference all AI-generated content used in assessments and says they may be asked to show the AI tools and prompts used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UWA research-writing guidance states that AI and other machine-learning language models cannot be authors, and authors should transparently disclose when and how they used them.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Tilly is listed for Tilburg University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences exams, tests, and assignments, Tilburg University states that AI use is not permitted unless a lecturer explicitly states otherwise.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Tilburg University's TSHD fraud guidance includes submitting work that is partially generated by AI without permission among examples of fraud-related conduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In education, Science Tokyo's guideline says the university does not totally restrict learners' use of generative AI; the permitted degree of use, including whether it is banned, is left to course objectives, course content, and instructor teaching and assessment policies, and students should follow instructor instructions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For courses, Science Tokyo's guideline asks instructors to teach students about generative AI limitations, consider assessment methods, and promptly reflect a course AI-use policy in the syllabus when the policy can be clearly stated.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For research papers, Science Tokyo's guideline says journal views on generative AI use differ and individual handling is needed, including cases where the fact of use should be disclosed; it also says researchers are responsible for text and content they use in their papers.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Trinity Library guidance says GenAI use as a functional tool in academic work must be acknowledged in an Appendix or Methods section, with minimum details including the system name and version, publisher, URL and context of use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Trinity's research guidance says researchers remain responsible for scientific output, should cite GenAI usage in outputs, and should attend to privacy, confidentiality and intellectual-property issues when sharing sensitive information with AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Trinity College Dublin says specific uses of GenAI in an assessment must be disclosed, properly acknowledged, and referenced; students should explain what, when, and how they used GenAI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.