Policy presence
University of Arkansas Fayetteville has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Fayetteville, United States
University of Arkansas Fayetteville
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
University of Arkansas Fayetteville has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of Arkansas Fayetteville has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Arkansas Fayetteville has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
University of Arkansas Fayetteville has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of Arkansas Fayetteville has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Arkansas Fayetteville has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Teaching guidance
University of Arkansas Fayetteville has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of Arkansas Fayetteville has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
University of Arkansas Fayetteville has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
AI tools
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
The University of Arkansas Libraries AI and Academic Integrity guide says students must receive instructor permission in advance before using generative AI technology to complete academic work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students need instructor permission before using generative AI for academic work
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Students must receive permission in advance to use any generative AI technology in completing academic work from their instructor.
Teaching
The University of Arkansas Academic Initiatives and Integrity faculty resources page says faculty have discretion over student use of generative AI in their courses and provides approved syllabus statement options for prohibited, restricted, and unrestricted use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: faculty discretion with approved syllabus language options for AI use
Bukti asal
Evidence 1UARK faculty have discretion over whether generative artificial intelligence tools (e.g., ChatGPT) can be used by students in their courses. Faculty are encouraged to communicate clear expectations regarding how these resources can be used in their courses, if at all.
Ai Tool Treatment
A January 2026 University of Arkansas advisory lists Copilot Chat, Copilot for Microsoft 365, OpenAI ChatGPT Edu, Google Gemini, and Google NotebookLM as approved AI tools available for campus use, with some tools requiring licenses.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: approved AI tools include Copilot Chat, Copilot for Microsoft 365, OpenAI ChatGPT Edu, Google Gemini, and Google NotebookLM
Bukti asal
Evidence 1The following AI tools are approved and available now for campus use: Copilot Chat; Copilot for Microsoft 365; OpenAI ChatGPT Edu; Google Gemini; Google NotebookLM.
Academic Integrity
The University of Arkansas Libraries AI and Academic Integrity guide says students are expected to cite anything that is not their original work, including text generated by artificial intelligence.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: AI-generated text should be cited when it is not original work
Bukti asal
Evidence 1To avoid plagiarizing, students are expected to provide citations for anything that is not their original work. This includes text generated by artificial intelligence.
Source Status
A January 2026 University of Arkansas campus advisory says employees and students must adhere to the university's acceptable-use guidelines for artificial intelligence, covering ethical and responsible use, teaching and learning, research, and allowable AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: campus advisory identifies AI acceptable-use guidelines for employees and students
Bukti asal
Evidence 1All employees and students must adhere to the guidelines for acceptable use of artificial intelligence. These guidelines were developed by AI working groups, which are composed of staff and faculty from units across campus.
Security Review
The University of Arkansas advisory says employees or students who want to use an AI tool that is not approved need to complete a tool exception request form.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unapproved AI tools require a tool exception request
Bukti asal
Evidence 1If an employee or student would like to use an AI tool that isn't approved, this tool exception request form will need to be completed.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
3 source attribution
Academic Integrity Resources
honesty.uark.edu
AI and Academic Integrity - Research Guides
libguides.uark.edu
More AI Tools and Resources Approved and Available for Campus
news.uark.edu