Kuching, Malaysia

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS)

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Tuntutan disemak

3 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

The UNIMAS Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities 2025/2026 student handbook says AI does not replace lecturers, lecture notes, or main academic references, and warns students not to copy directly from AI answers, submit AI answers as their own work without citation, or use AI to cheat in exams or assignments.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan90%

Nilai ternormalisasi: faculty_scoped_ai_integrity_limits

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
13.3 Limitasi: a. AI tidak boleh menggantikan pensyarah, nota kuliah, atau rujukan akademik utama. b. Elakkan plagiat dengan tidak menyalin secara terus daripada jawapan AI. 13.4 Integriti Akademik: a. Plagiat ialah kesalahan akademik yang serius. Jangan serahkan jawapan AI sebagai hasil kerja sendiri tanpa menyatakan rujukan. b. Tidak menggunakan AI untuk menipu dalam peperiksaan atau tugasan.

Paparan setempat only

Sections 13.3 and 13.4 say AI does not replace lecturers, notes, or main academic references; students should avoid plagiarism, not submit AI answers as their own without citation, and not use AI to cheat in exams or assignments.

Pengajaran

The UNIMAS Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities 2025/2026 student handbook frames good AI practice as using AI as a support tool, checking AI responses against academic sources, using AI to sharpen critical thinking, and recognizing that AI responses may be inaccurate or unsuitable.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan87%

Nilai ternormalisasi: faculty_scoped_ai_good_practice

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
13.2 Amalan Baik: a. Menggunakan AI sebagai alat sokongan, bukan untuk menggantikan usaha sendiri. b. Menyemak jawapan atau maklumat daripada AI dengan sumber rujukan akademik. c. Menggunakan AI untuk mengasah pemikiran kritis, bukan menyalin jawapan bulat-bulat. d. Mengetahui bahawa jawapan AI mungkin tidak sentiasa tepat atau sesuai.

Paparan setempat only

Section 13.2 frames good practice as support use, academic-source checking, critical thinking, avoiding direct copying, and recognizing that AI answers may be inaccurate or unsuitable.

Ai Tool Treatment

The UNIMAS Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities 2025/2026 student handbook says students may use AI to support learning through note summaries, language checking, additional references, subject understanding, interactive exercises, data analysis, project planning, and report writing.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan86%

Nilai ternormalisasi: faculty_scoped_ai_support_allowed

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
13.1 Tujuan Penggunaan AI: a. Membantu pembelajaran dengan membuat ringkasan nota, menyemak bahasa dan memberi rujukan tambahan. b. Meningkatkan pemahaman subjek melalui soalan, latihan dan aktiviti interaktif. c. Menyokong tugasan seperti analisis data, perancangan projek, dan penulisan laporan.

Paparan setempat only

Section 13.1 says AI may support learning through summaries, language checks, additional references, understanding, interactive exercises, data analysis, project planning, and report writing.

Source record

Sumber rasmi

1 source

Record information, JSON & citation
Semakagent reviewedKeyakinan90%Snapshot statusTidak diterbitkanJSONJSON awam

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 23, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universiti-malaysia-sarawak-unimas

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Buka log perubahan