Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 17, 2026.

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 17, 2026. Discovery context: International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) is listed as QS 2026 rank =613.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/international-islamic-university-malaysia-iium.json. The entity-level confidence is 96%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Privacy claims.
  • Evidence includes Research claims.
  • Evidence includes Other policy claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources1

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence80%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Coursework

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence82%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence82%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence82%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence82%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

IIUM permits AI tools to support learning and research when use is declared and ethically compliant, and treats undisclosed or unapproved AI-generated assignments, theses, or exam responses as academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: declared_ethical_use_allowed_undisclosed_generated_work_misconduct

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Policy 6.1: AI tools may be used to support learning and research, provided such use is declared and ethically compliant. Policy 6.2: Use of AI to generate assignments, theses, or exam responses without disclosure or approval constitutes academic misconduct.

Privacy

IIUM's AI policy requires AI systems to comply with Malaysia's PDPA 2010, restricts sharing data with third-party AI platforms without consent and proper agreements, and requires AI-training data to be anonymized and securely stored.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: pdpa_consent_agreements_anonymized_secure_training_data

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Policy 8.1: All AI systems must comply with the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) 2010. Policy 8.2: Data shall not be shared with third-party AI platforms without consent and proper agreements. Policy 8.3: Data used for AI training must be anonymized and securely stored.

Research

IIUM's AI policy says research involving AI requires prior ethics approval, AI-generated publication content must be acknowledged, and AI research must comply with IIUM ethics, data, and IP policies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: ai_research_prior_ethics_approval_publication_acknowledgement

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Policy 7.1: Research involving AI must receive prior ethics approval. Policy 7.2: AI-generated content in publications must be acknowledged. Policy 7.3: Researchers developing AI must ensure transparency, explainability, and fairness.

Other

IIUM's AI policy applies across IIUM kulliyyahs, institutes, centres, administrative departments, and AI-related collaborations, projects, or partnerships; CTAIS is the lead coordinating body for implementation, monitoring, and review.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: institution_wide_ai_policy_and_ctais_governance

Original evidence

Evidence 1
This policy applies to all kulliyyahs, institutes, centres, and administrative departments within IIUM, as well as any collaborations, projects, or partnerships that involve AI research, applications, or decision-making systems.

Original evidence

Evidence 2
The Centre for Tawhidic Artificial Intelligence Studies (CTAIS) shall serve as the lead coordinating body responsible for implementing, monitoring, and periodically reviewing this policy.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

1 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities