Policy presence
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 17, 2026.
v1 public contract
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 17, 2026. Discovery context: International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) is listed as QS 2026 rank =613.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/international-islamic-university-malaysia-iium.json. The entity-level confidence is 96%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: declared_ethical_use_allowed_undisclosed_generated_work_misconduct
Original evidence
Evidence 1Policy 6.1: AI tools may be used to support learning and research, provided such use is declared and ethically compliant. Policy 6.2: Use of AI to generate assignments, theses, or exam responses without disclosure or approval constitutes academic misconduct.
Privacy
Normalized value: pdpa_consent_agreements_anonymized_secure_training_data
Original evidence
Evidence 1Policy 8.1: All AI systems must comply with the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) 2010. Policy 8.2: Data shall not be shared with third-party AI platforms without consent and proper agreements. Policy 8.3: Data used for AI training must be anonymized and securely stored.
Research
Normalized value: ai_research_prior_ethics_approval_publication_acknowledgement
Original evidence
Evidence 1Policy 7.1: Research involving AI must receive prior ethics approval. Policy 7.2: AI-generated content in publications must be acknowledged. Policy 7.3: Researchers developing AI must ensure transparency, explainability, and fairness.
Other
Normalized value: institution_wide_ai_policy_and_ctais_governance
Original evidence
Evidence 1This policy applies to all kulliyyahs, institutes, centres, and administrative departments within IIUM, as well as any collaborations, projects, or partnerships that involve AI research, applications, or decision-making systems.
Original evidence
Evidence 2The Centre for Tawhidic Artificial Intelligence Studies (CTAIS) shall serve as the lead coordinating body responsible for implementing, monitoring, and periodically reviewing this policy.
Teaching
Normalized value: mandatory_responsible_ai_training_and_legal_vetting
Original evidence
Evidence 1Training on responsible AI use shall be mandatory for academic and administrative staff involved in AI-related activities.
Original evidence
Evidence 2Policy 11.1: All AI-related agreements must be vetted by the IIUM Legal Office.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
1 source attribution
centre.iium.edu.my
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.