Change log

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM). Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: IIUM permits AI tools to support learning and research when use is declared and ethically compliant, and treats undisclosed or unapproved AI-generated assignments, theses, or exam responses as academic misconduct.
3+Evidence (en, 6c866ff83303): Policy 6.1: AI tools may be used to support learning and research, provided such use is declared and ethically compliant. Policy 6.2: Use of AI to generate assignments, theses, or exam responses without disclosure or approval constitutes academic misconduct.
4+privacy: IIUM's AI policy requires AI systems to comply with Malaysia's PDPA 2010, restricts sharing data with third-party AI platforms without consent and proper agreements, and requires AI-training data to be anonymized and securely stored.
5+Evidence (en, 6c866ff83303): Policy 8.1: All AI systems must comply with the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) 2010. Policy 8.2: Data shall not be shared with third-party AI platforms without consent and proper agreements. Policy 8.3: Data used for AI training must be anonymized and securely stored.
6+research: IIUM's AI policy says research involving AI requires prior ethics approval, AI-generated publication content must be acknowledged, and AI research must comply with IIUM ethics, data, and IP policies.
7+Evidence (en, 6c866ff83303): Policy 7.1: Research involving AI must receive prior ethics approval. Policy 7.2: AI-generated content in publications must be acknowledged. Policy 7.3: Researchers developing AI must ensure transparency, explainability, and fairness.
8+other: IIUM's AI policy applies across IIUM kulliyyahs, institutes, centres, administrative departments, and AI-related collaborations, projects, or partnerships; CTAIS is the lead coordinating body for implementation, monitoring, and review.
9+Evidence (en, 6c866ff83303): This policy applies to all kulliyyahs, institutes, centres, and administrative departments within IIUM, as well as any collaborations, projects, or partnerships that involve AI research, applications, or decision-making systems.
10+teaching: IIUM's AI policy makes responsible-AI professional development mandatory for academic and administrative staff involved in AI-related activities or using AI, and requires AI-related agreements to be vetted by the IIUM Legal Office.
11+Evidence (en, 6c866ff83303): Training on responsible AI use shall be mandatory for academic and administrative staff involved in AI-related activities.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

5 claim records

academic_integrity

IIUM permits AI tools to support learning and research when use is declared and ethically compliant, and treats undisclosed or unapproved AI-generated assignments, theses, or exam responses as academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

IIUM's AI policy requires AI systems to comply with Malaysia's PDPA 2010, restricts sharing data with third-party AI platforms without consent and proper agreements, and requires AI-training data to be anonymized and securely stored.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

research

IIUM's AI policy says research involving AI requires prior ethics approval, AI-generated publication content must be acknowledged, and AI research must comply with IIUM ethics, data, and IP policies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

other

IIUM's AI policy applies across IIUM kulliyyahs, institutes, centres, administrative departments, and AI-related collaborations, projects, or partnerships; CTAIS is the lead coordinating body for implementation, monitoring, and review.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence2Languagesen

teaching

IIUM's AI policy makes responsible-AI professional development mandatory for academic and administrative staff involved in AI-related activities or using AI, and requires AI-related agreements to be vetted by the IIUM Legal Office.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence2Languagesen

Source snapshots

1 source attribution