academic_integrity
IIUM permits AI tools to support learning and research when use is declared and ethically compliant, and treats undisclosed or unapproved AI-generated assignments, theses, or exam responses as academic misconduct.
变更日志
本站历史:0 次发布记录。
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
当前收录 5 条主张、1 个官方来源。
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
本站历史中暂无已记录的更新。
本站不提供法律或学术诚信建议;除链接指向大学官方页面的来源外,本站内容不代表大学官方声明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
仅展示已记录且 Claim ID 精确匹配的文字对照。
本站历史中暂无已记录的更新。
本站历史:0 次发布记录。
当前条款记录:5 条。
IIUM permits AI tools to support learning and research when use is declared and ethically compliant, and treats undisclosed or unapproved AI-generated assignments, theses, or exam responses as academic misconduct.
IIUM's AI policy requires AI systems to comply with Malaysia's PDPA 2010, restricts sharing data with third-party AI platforms without consent and proper agreements, and requires AI-training data to be anonymized and securely stored.
IIUM's AI policy says research involving AI requires prior ethics approval, AI-generated publication content must be acknowledged, and AI research must comply with IIUM ethics, data, and IP policies.
IIUM's AI policy applies across IIUM kulliyyahs, institutes, centres, administrative departments, and AI-related collaborations, projects, or partnerships; CTAIS is the lead coordinating body for implementation, monitoring, and review.
IIUM's AI policy makes responsible-AI professional development mandatory for academic and administrative staff involved in AI-related activities or using AI, and requires AI-related agreements to be vetted by the IIUM Legal Office.
官方来源记录:1 条。
official_policy_page 本站检查时间 2026年5月17日 13:25