Policy presence
Universiti Malaya (UM) has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Universiti Malaya (UM) is listed as QS 2026 rank =58. Universiti Malaya (UM) has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
v1 public contract
Universiti Malaya (UM) is listed as QS 2026 rank =58. Universiti Malaya (UM) has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
Universiti Malaya (UM) has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Universiti Malaya (UM) has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Universiti Malaya (UM) has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Universiti Malaya (UM) has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Universiti Malaya (UM) has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Universiti Malaya (UM) has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Universiti Malaya (UM) has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Universiti Malaya (UM) has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Universiti Malaya (UM) has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
Normalized value: policy_applies_to_staff_students_teaching_learning_and_research_work
Original evidence
Evidence 1The policy applies to all academic staff and students at Universiti Malaya across all modes of teaching and learning, including: Coursework and assignments Research projects and dissertations Final year projects and theses Online or blended learning activities
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: ai_support_tool_student_original_contribution_required
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI should support learning rather than replace a student’s own thinking or analysis. Students remain responsible for ensuring that all submitted work reflects their own understanding and intellectual contribution.
Teaching
Normalized value: lecturer_specified_ai_use_levels_0_to_4
Original evidence
Evidence 1Lecturers will specify the level of AI use permitted for each assignment or assessment. These may include: Level 0 – No AI use: AI tools are not permitted. Level 1 – Minimal use: Basic tools such as grammar or spelling checkers may be allowed. Level 2 – Limited use: AI may assist with idea generation or concept clarification. Level 3 – Open use: AI may support learning and content development with proper declaration. Level 4 – Integrated use: AI may be required as part of the assessment activity.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: student_ai_declaration_required_non_disclosure_may_be_misconduct
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students are required to: Declare any AI tools used in their assignments or assessments Explain how the AI tool was used (e.g., brainstorming, summarising, or analysis) Provide logs or evidence of AI usage if requested by the lecturer Failure to disclose AI use may be considered academic misconduct.
Privacy
Normalized value: no_confidential_materials_to_public_ai_without_permission
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students should be cautious when using public AI platforms such as generative AI tools. Information submitted to these platforms may not remain confidential. Students must not upload confidential academic materials, research data, or university documents to public AI platforms without permission from their lecturer or supervisor.
Privacy
Normalized value: ai_policy_addresses_data_privacy_and_algorithmic_bias_risks
Original evidence
Evidence 1To increase awareness of ethical risks, copyright issues, data security (including data privacy), and the potential for algorithmic bias in the use of AI.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
3 source attribution
spm.um.edu.my
spm.um.edu.my
ias.um.edu.my
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.