Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Last checked May 12, 2026

Universiti Malaya (UM)

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Can I use AI for my coursework?Conditions and evidence gaps Do I need to disclose AI use?Conditions and evidence gaps Can I upload sensitive data?Conditions and evidence gaps Which tools can I access?Conditions and evidence gaps

Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautions Record updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Conditions and evidence gaps

Lecturers set the AI-use level for each assessment, from no AI to integrated AI; submitted work must reflect students’ understanding.

Official source ↗

Exams

Conditions and evidence gaps

The permitted AI level is task-specific; the recorded levels do not grant blanket examination access.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Conditions and evidence gaps

Students must declare AI tools used in assignments or assessments; non-disclosure may be academic misconduct.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Conditions and evidence gaps

Do not upload confidential academic material, research data or university documents to public AI platforms without permission.

Official source ↗

Institutional tools

Conditions and evidence gaps

The current reviewed Claims do not identify an institutionally available AI service or its access terms.

Official source ↗

Research and publication

Conditions and evidence gaps

Research projects, dissertations and theses fall within the policy’s scope; confidential research data must not be uploaded without permission.

Official source ↗

Academic integrity

Conditions and evidence gaps

AI is a learning aid, not a substitute for the student’s intellectual contribution; required AI declarations must be made.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Conditions and evidence gaps

Lecturers specify the permitted AI-use level for each assignment or assessment.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Conditions and evidence gaps

The current reviewed Claims do not specify an AI security-review or procurement procedure.

Official source ↗

Do

Check the lecturer’s AI-use level for this task.
Site advice
Check the lecturer’s AI-use level for this task.
Scope
The AI policy covers teaching and learning, including assessed work and research projects; lecturers specify the AI level for each task.
Universiti Malaya guidance says lecturers specify the permitted level of AI use for each assignment or assessment, using levels from no AI use through integrated AI use.
Original evidence and scope
Universiti Malaya guidance says lecturers specify the permitted level of AI use for each assignment or assessment, using levels from no AI use through integrated AI use.
claim-um-ai-permitted-levels
Lecturers will specify the level of AI use permitted for each assignment or assessment. These may include: Level 0 – No AI use: AI tools are not permitted. Level 1 – Minimal use: Basic tools such as grammar or spelling checkers may be allowed. Level 2 – Limited use: AI may assist with idea generation or concept clarification. Level 3 – Open use: AI may support learning and content development with proper declaration. Level 4 – Integrated use: AI may be required as part of the assessment activity.
Levels of AI Use in Coursework
Official university source ↗
Declare AI tools used in assignments or assessments.
Requirement in this scope
Declare AI tools used in assignments or assessments.
Scope
The AI policy covers teaching and learning, including assessed work and research projects; lecturers specify the AI level for each task.
Universiti Malaya guidance requires students to declare AI tools used in assignments or assessments and says failure to disclose AI use may be considered academic misconduct.
Original evidence and scope
Universiti Malaya guidance requires students to declare AI tools used in assignments or assessments and says failure to disclose AI use may be considered academic misconduct.
claim-um-ai-declaration-misconduct
Students are required to: Declare any AI tools used in their assignments or assessments Explain how the AI tool was used (e.g., brainstorming, summarising, or analysis) Provide logs or evidence of AI usage if requested by the lecturer Failure to disclose AI use may be considered academic misconduct.
Declaration of AI Use
Official university source ↗
Ensure the submission reflects your understanding and contribution.
Source guidance
Ensure the submission reflects your understanding and contribution.
Scope
The AI policy covers teaching and learning, including assessed work and research projects; lecturers specify the AI level for each task.
Universiti Malaya student guidance frames AI as a learning support tool and says students remain responsible for ensuring submitted work reflects their own understanding and intellectual contribution.
Original evidence and scope
Universiti Malaya student guidance frames AI as a learning support tool and says students remain responsible for ensuring submitted work reflects their own understanding and intellectual contribution.
claim-um-ai-learning-support-originality
AI should support learning rather than replace a student’s own thinking or analysis. Students remain responsible for ensuring that all submitted work reflects their own understanding and intellectual contribution.
How Students May Use AI
Official university source ↗

Don’t

Do not upload confidential academic or research materials to public AI platforms without permission from your lecturer or supervisor.
Requirement in this scope
Do not upload confidential academic or research materials to public AI platforms without permission from your lecturer or supervisor.
Scope
The AI policy covers teaching and learning, including assessed work and research projects; lecturers specify the AI level for each task.
Universiti Malaya guidance warns students not to upload confidential academic materials, research data, or university documents to public AI platforms without permission.
Original evidence and scope
Universiti Malaya guidance warns students not to upload confidential academic materials, research data, or university documents to public AI platforms without permission.
claim-um-ai-public-platform-confidentiality
Students should be cautious when using public AI platforms such as generative AI tools. Information submitted to these platforms may not remain confidential. Students must not upload confidential academic materials, research data, or university documents to public AI platforms without permission from their lecturer or supervisor.
Protecting Intellectual Property and Confidential Information
Official university source ↗
Do not leave required AI use undeclared.
Requirement in this scope
Do not leave required AI use undeclared.
Scope
The AI policy covers teaching and learning, including assessed work and research projects; lecturers specify the AI level for each task.
Universiti Malaya guidance requires students to declare AI tools used in assignments or assessments and says failure to disclose AI use may be considered academic misconduct.
Original evidence and scope
Universiti Malaya guidance requires students to declare AI tools used in assignments or assessments and says failure to disclose AI use may be considered academic misconduct.
claim-um-ai-declaration-misconduct
Students are required to: Declare any AI tools used in their assignments or assessments Explain how the AI tool was used (e.g., brainstorming, summarising, or analysis) Provide logs or evidence of AI usage if requested by the lecturer Failure to disclose AI use may be considered academic misconduct.
Declaration of AI Use
Official university source ↗
Do not apply one assignment’s AI level to another.
Site advice
Do not apply one assignment’s AI level to another.
Scope
The AI policy covers teaching and learning, including assessed work and research projects; lecturers specify the AI level for each task.
Universiti Malaya guidance says lecturers specify the permitted level of AI use for each assignment or assessment, using levels from no AI use through integrated AI use.
Original evidence and scope
Universiti Malaya guidance says lecturers specify the permitted level of AI use for each assignment or assessment, using levels from no AI use through integrated AI use.
claim-um-ai-permitted-levels
Lecturers will specify the level of AI use permitted for each assignment or assessment. These may include: Level 0 – No AI use: AI tools are not permitted. Level 1 – Minimal use: Basic tools such as grammar or spelling checkers may be allowed. Level 2 – Limited use: AI may assist with idea generation or concept clarification. Level 3 – Open use: AI may support learning and content development with proper declaration. Level 4 – Integrated use: AI may be required as part of the assessment activity.
Levels of AI Use in Coursework
Official university source ↗

AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

AI tools & access

No source-backed tool record has been established for this university yet. This does not mean AI tools are unavailable or prohibited.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 3

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

Records cover only part of this period, starting 2026-10-25.

2026-10-27Page update
Other records · Page update
View revision
Loading revision…
2026-10-25Record maintenance
Other records · Record maintenance
View revision
Loading revision…
2026-10-25Record maintenance
Other records · Record maintenance
View revision
Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

Official sources

3 official URLs; 3 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Teaching and Learning

spm.um.edu.my

University official source

spm.um.edu.my

Hash and captured version

Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Teaching and Learning · 2026-05-12T14:06:45.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

f601f6ad12a9694acccb64b64de9e4a15203b9dec8fc826ab3bf4e26c79d159b

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Teaching and Learning

spm.um.edu.my

University official source

spm.um.edu.my

Hash and captured version

Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Teaching and Learning · 2026-05-12T14:06:40.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

b25698e162e477192bed50f2c30759844718e30b5c690354f50d64032cde5281

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Universiti Malaya Academic Policy on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Guidelines on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence

ias.um.edu.my

University official source

ias.um.edu.my

Hash and captured version

Universiti Malaya Academic Policy on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Guidelines on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence · 2026-05-12T14:06:55.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

fa1acc518625d174f544265f4e84cab4283d40d501ac1ec9efc590d4a9c7941a

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state: agent_reviewed
Analysis review state: machine_candidate
Record revision: public-release-20260924-002
Dataset release: public-release-20260924-002
Correction published: 2026-09-24T23:31:02.306Z
Student snapshot: Not published

Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

Institution-wide evidence audit remains PARTIAL. Supplementary quotations are not independently verified by this presentation release.
Current JSON and MCP retain the previous public Claim set. Local candidate corrections and held decisions remain private and pending review.
Source excerpts retain their declared capture limitations. Original official HTTP/PDF bytes were not verified by this release.
Institutional semantic audit remains PARTIAL. Student-facing display is derived from existing published Claims; no new institutional tool record, source verification or strong snapshot approval.

Current reviewed JSON

Questions students ask

Can I use AI for my coursework?

Lecturers set the AI-use level for each assessment, from no AI to integrated AI; submitted work must reflect students’ understanding.

View evidence →

Do I need to disclose AI use?

Students must declare AI tools used in assignments or assessments; non-disclosure may be academic misconduct.

View evidence →

Can I upload sensitive data?

Do not upload confidential academic material, research data or university documents to public AI platforms without permission.

View evidence →

Which tools can I access?