Skudai, Malaysia

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

6 reviewed claims

Source Status

UTM CDex lists both Malay and English versions of the generative AI teaching-and-learning guideline on its policy/handbook/procedure/guidelines page.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: UTM CDex lists the GenAI teaching-and-learning guideline in both Malay and English.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
7. GARIS PANDUAN PENGGUNAAN KECERDASAN BUATAN GENERATIF DALAM PENGAJARAN DAN PEMBELAJARAN UTM (TERKINI) 8. GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING UTM

Localized display only

The UTM CDex guidelines page lists both the Malay and English GenAI teaching-and-learning guideline entries.

Source Status

UTM's guideline applies to all undergraduate and postgraduate academic programmes that intend to use generative AI, and it was approved by the University Senate and effective from 27 March 2024.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: Applies to all undergraduate and postgraduate academic programmes; effective 27 March 2024.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Nama Garis Panduan : Garis Panduan Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan Generatif dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran UTM Nombor Garis Panduan : Pekeliling Akademik Bil.3/2024 Diluluskan Oleh : Mesyuarat Senat Universiti Bil.6/2023/2024 Tarikh Kuat kuasa : 27 Mac 2024 I. Garis Panduan ini terpakai kepada semua program akademik sama ada pra siswazah atau pasca siswazah di UTM, meliputi pengajian perdana dan usahasama, sama ada sepenuh masa atau separuh masa yang ingin menggunakan kecerdasan buatan generatif (KBG) dalam program masing-masing.

Localized display only

The guideline is an Academic Circular 3/2024 approved by the University Senate and applies to undergraduate and postgraduate programmes that intend to use generative AI.

Academic Integrity

UTM requires GAI use in assignments and works to be listed with developer information, tool name, version, access date, and URL when available; undisclosed use can be treated as plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: GAI use must be disclosed and cited in assignments and works; undisclosed use can count as plagiarism.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
2.3.3 Penggunaan KBG perlu disenaraikan dalam tugasan dan hasil karya bagi aktiviti P&P yang mengandungi maklumat pembangun peralatan, nama peralatan, versi peralatan, tarikh akses, serta pautan URL (jika ada) berdasarkan format berikut: 2.3.7 Sebarang penulisan dan hasil karya dalam aktiviti P&P yang tidak menyatakan penggunaan KBG (jika ada) boleh dikategorikan sebagai plagiat sebagaimana Peraturan Akademik Universiti.

Localized display only

GAI use must be listed in assignments and works with developer, tool, version, access date, and URL when available; undisclosed use can be treated as plagiarism.

Teaching

UTM requires academic staff to clearly state GAI use in course assessments, and prioritizes continuous assessments that demonstrate deep mastery.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: Academic staff should disclose GAI use in assessments; continuous assessments demonstrating deep mastery are prioritized.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
2.2.2.1 Kaedah pentaksiran berterusan bagi mempamerkan penguasaan mendalam perlu diutamakan seperti demonstrasi, pembentangan, perbahasan, temuduga dan pentaksiran lain yang bersesuaian kerana aplikasi KBG boleh menyebabkan hasil tugasan akademik yang disediakan oleh pelajar tidak mempamerkan penguasaan sebenar pelajar. 2.2.3 Staf akademik perlu menyatakan dengan jelas penggunaan KBG dalam pentaksiran kursus kepada pelajar selari dengan garis panduan Universiti.

Localized display only

UTM prioritizes continuous assessments that show deep mastery and requires academic staff to clearly disclose GAI use in course assessments.

Research

UTM says GAI services beyond proofreading tools must be explicitly stated, and GAI tools cannot be listed as co-authors.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: GAI use beyond proofreading tools must be disclosed; GAI tools cannot be co-authors.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
2.4.2 Penggunaan perkhidmatan dan peralatan KBG selain Perkara 2.4.1 perlu dinyatakan secara jelas. 2.4.3 Peralatan KBG tidak boleh disenaraikan sebagai penulis bersama dalam sesuatu penerbitan kerana ianya tidak boleh dipertanggungjawabkan bagi kandungan dan dapatan yang dilaporkan.

Localized display only

GAI services beyond proofreading tools must be explicitly disclosed, and GAI tools cannot be listed as co-authors.

Privacy

UTM says reliable GAI tools should have data privacy management and protection systems and be safe to use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: Reliable GAI tools should have data privacy management and protection systems.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
2.4.6.2 Mempunyai sistem pengurusan serta perlindungan privasi data dan selamat digunakan.

Localized display only

Reliable GAI tools should have data privacy management and protection systems and be safe to use.

Source record

Official sources

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence97%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universiti Teknologi Malaysia AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 14, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universiti-teknologi-malaysia

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log