Change log

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+12-0
11 # Universiti Teknologi Malaysia AI policy record
2+source_status: UTM CDex lists both Malay and English versions of the generative AI teaching-and-learning guideline on its policy/handbook/procedure/guidelines page.
3+Evidence (en, 0187f2f33f0f): 7. GARIS PANDUAN PENGGUNAAN KECERDASAN BUATAN GENERATIF DALAM PENGAJARAN DAN PEMBELAJARAN UTM (TERKINI) 8. GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING UTM
4+source_status: UTM's guideline applies to all undergraduate and postgraduate academic programmes that intend to use generative AI, and it was approved by the University Senate and effective from 27 March 2024.
5+Evidence (ms, d2947f2329fc): Nama Garis Panduan : Garis Panduan Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan Generatif dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran UTM Nombor Garis Panduan : Pekeliling Akademik Bil.3/2024 Diluluskan Oleh : Mesyuarat Senat Universiti Bil.6/2023/2024 Tarikh Kuat kuasa : 27 Mac 2024 I. Garis Panduan ini terpakai kepada semua program akademik sama ada pra siswazah atau pasca siswazah di UTM, meliputi pengajian perdana dan usahasama, sama ada sepenuh masa atau separuh masa yang ingin menggunakan kecerdasan buatan generatif (KBG) dalam program masing-masing.
6+academic_integrity: UTM requires GAI use in assignments and works to be listed with developer information, tool name, version, access date, and URL when available; undisclosed use can be treated as plagiarism.
7+Evidence (ms, d2947f2329fc): 2.3.3 Penggunaan KBG perlu disenaraikan dalam tugasan dan hasil karya bagi aktiviti P&P yang mengandungi maklumat pembangun peralatan, nama peralatan, versi peralatan, tarikh akses, serta pautan URL (jika ada) berdasarkan format berikut: 2.3.7 Sebarang penulisan dan hasil karya dalam aktiviti P&P yang tidak menyatakan penggunaan KBG (jika ada) boleh dikategorikan sebagai plagiat sebagaimana Peraturan Akademik Universiti.
8+teaching: UTM requires academic staff to clearly state GAI use in course assessments, and prioritizes continuous assessments that demonstrate deep mastery.
9+Evidence (ms, d2947f2329fc): 2.2.2.1 Kaedah pentaksiran berterusan bagi mempamerkan penguasaan mendalam perlu diutamakan seperti demonstrasi, pembentangan, perbahasan, temuduga dan pentaksiran lain yang bersesuaian kerana aplikasi KBG boleh menyebabkan hasil tugasan akademik yang disediakan oleh pelajar tidak mempamerkan penguasaan sebenar pelajar. 2.2.3 Staf akademik perlu menyatakan dengan jelas penggunaan KBG dalam pentaksiran kursus kepada pelajar selari dengan garis panduan Universiti.
10+research: UTM says GAI services beyond proofreading tools must be explicitly stated, and GAI tools cannot be listed as co-authors.
11+Evidence (ms, d2947f2329fc): 2.4.2 Penggunaan perkhidmatan dan peralatan KBG selain Perkara 2.4.1 perlu dinyatakan secara jelas. 2.4.3 Peralatan KBG tidak boleh disenaraikan sebagai penulis bersama dalam sesuatu penerbitan kerana ianya tidak boleh dipertanggungjawabkan bagi kandungan dan dapatan yang dilaporkan.
12+privacy: UTM says reliable GAI tools should have data privacy management and protection systems and be safe to use.
13+Evidence (ms, d2947f2329fc): 2.4.6.2 Mempunyai sistem pengurusan serta perlindungan privasi data dan selamat digunakan.

Claim changes

6 claim records

research

UTM says GAI services beyond proofreading tools must be explicitly stated, and GAI tools cannot be listed as co-authors.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesms

privacy

UTM says reliable GAI tools should have data privacy management and protection systems and be safe to use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesms

source_status

UTM CDex lists both Malay and English versions of the generative AI teaching-and-learning guideline on its policy/handbook/procedure/guidelines page.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

UTM's guideline applies to all undergraduate and postgraduate academic programmes that intend to use generative AI, and it was approved by the University Senate and effective from 27 March 2024.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesms

academic_integrity

UTM requires GAI use in assignments and works to be listed with developer information, tool name, version, access date, and URL when available; undisclosed use can be treated as plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesms

teaching

UTM requires academic staff to clearly state GAI use in course assessments, and prioritizes continuous assessments that demonstrate deep mastery.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesms

Source snapshots

2 source attributions

POLICY:HANDBOOK:PROCEDURE:GUIDELINES | UTM CDex

official_guidance checked May 14, 2026

Snapshot hash
0187f2f33f0f9ee7483d6089e4b89b6e5d3036f8ff217e149a828fe38cf24a79