Kuching, Malaysia

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS)

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

3 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

The UNIMAS Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities 2025/2026 student handbook says AI does not replace lecturers, lecture notes, or main academic references, and warns students not to copy directly from AI answers, submit AI answers as their own work without citation, or use AI to cheat in exams or assignments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: faculty_scoped_ai_integrity_limits

Original evidence

Evidence 1
13.3 Limitasi: a. AI tidak boleh menggantikan pensyarah, nota kuliah, atau rujukan akademik utama. b. Elakkan plagiat dengan tidak menyalin secara terus daripada jawapan AI. 13.4 Integriti Akademik: a. Plagiat ialah kesalahan akademik yang serius. Jangan serahkan jawapan AI sebagai hasil kerja sendiri tanpa menyatakan rujukan. b. Tidak menggunakan AI untuk menipu dalam peperiksaan atau tugasan.

Localized display only

Sections 13.3 and 13.4 say AI does not replace lecturers, notes, or main academic references; students should avoid plagiarism, not submit AI answers as their own without citation, and not use AI to cheat in exams or assignments.

Teaching

The UNIMAS Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities 2025/2026 student handbook frames good AI practice as using AI as a support tool, checking AI responses against academic sources, using AI to sharpen critical thinking, and recognizing that AI responses may be inaccurate or unsuitable.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%

Normalized value: faculty_scoped_ai_good_practice

Original evidence

Evidence 1
13.2 Amalan Baik: a. Menggunakan AI sebagai alat sokongan, bukan untuk menggantikan usaha sendiri. b. Menyemak jawapan atau maklumat daripada AI dengan sumber rujukan akademik. c. Menggunakan AI untuk mengasah pemikiran kritis, bukan menyalin jawapan bulat-bulat. d. Mengetahui bahawa jawapan AI mungkin tidak sentiasa tepat atau sesuai.

Localized display only

Section 13.2 frames good practice as support use, academic-source checking, critical thinking, avoiding direct copying, and recognizing that AI answers may be inaccurate or unsuitable.

Ai Tool Treatment

The UNIMAS Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities 2025/2026 student handbook says students may use AI to support learning through note summaries, language checking, additional references, subject understanding, interactive exercises, data analysis, project planning, and report writing.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: faculty_scoped_ai_support_allowed

Original evidence

Evidence 1
13.1 Tujuan Penggunaan AI: a. Membantu pembelajaran dengan membuat ringkasan nota, menyemak bahasa dan memberi rujukan tambahan. b. Meningkatkan pemahaman subjek melalui soalan, latihan dan aktiviti interaktif. c. Menyokong tugasan seperti analisis data, perancangan projek, dan penulisan laporan.

Localized display only

Section 13.1 says AI may support learning through summaries, language checks, additional references, understanding, interactive exercises, data analysis, project planning, and report writing.

Source record

Official sources

1 source

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence90%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 23, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universiti-malaysia-sarawak-unimas

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log