University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Bahasa
ENZHFRPLMS

Barcelona, Spain

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

PenarafanQS World University Rankings 2026: 172Updated15 Mei 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Tuntutan disemak

5 reviewed claims

Penyelidikan

The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan96%

Nilai ternormalisasi: UAB Publications Service AI policy restricts AI authorship and requires disclosure in articles

Terakhir diperiksa
15 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
15 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
The IA cannot be listed as author or co-author of an article. AI should not be used to generate hypotheses, interpret data or formulate conclusions without the supervision and validation of the authors. Failure to disclose the use of AI in the article is considered academic misconduct and may result in rejection of the proposal or retraction of the published article.

Paparan setempat only

The UAB Publications Service policy restricts AI authorship, requires author supervision/validation, and treats nondisclosure as academic misconduct for articles.

Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
5fde6088…
Diperoleh
15 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Sections: Unaccepted uses; Disclosure

Academic Integrity

UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%

Nilai ternormalisasi: UAB AI guide treats AI as a tool/source, not an academic author

Terakhir diperiksa
15 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
15 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
La IA no pot tenir autoria acadèmica o legal. La IA és una eina, no un subjecte amb intencionalitat ni responsabilitat. L’autoria correspon a la persona que utilitza la IA i decideix què n’incorpora. A la citació, s’indica l’eina com a font, no com a autor.

Paparan setempat only

UAB Libraries says AI is a tool rather than an author, and that the person using AI remains responsible for what is incorporated.

Bahasa sumber
ca
Hash petikan
fdd1ca36…
Diperoleh
15 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Section: Autoria i atribucio de la IA

Privasi

UAB Libraries' responsible-use guidance for AI says privacy and data security require reviewing service terms, avoiding leakage of institutional information, and ensuring compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%

Nilai ternormalisasi: UAB AI guide includes privacy, institutional data leakage, and GDPR cautions

Terakhir diperiksa
15 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
15 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Privacitat i seguretat de les dades. La IA es basa principalment en dades obertes d’internet, però també en informació derivada de l’ús de les pròpies eines. Cal: revisar els termes d’ús dels serveis; evitar la filtració d’informació institucional; garantir el compliment del RGPD i altres normatives.

Paparan setempat only

The UAB guide says AI privacy/data security requires checking service terms, avoiding institutional-information leaks, and complying with GDPR.

Bahasa sumber
ca
Hash petikan
bfc2aa9f…
Diperoleh
15 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Section: Privacitat i seguretat de les dades

Pengajaran

UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%

Nilai ternormalisasi: UAB has official AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, framed as provisional and reflective

Terakhir diperiksa
15 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
15 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Aquest document n’és un primer resultat provisional. Un cop constituït el grup de treball amb professorat de diferents centres, s’ha elaborat aquest document, que serà un document viu, perquè la tecnologia a la qual es refereix evoluciona gairebé a temps real i convindrà anar-lo actualitzant regularment.

Paparan setempat only

The UAB positioning document is framed as a provisional, living document that will need regular updates.

Bahasa sumber
ca
Hash petikan
a8a5baaf…
Diperoleh
15 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Section: Presentacio

Pengajaran

In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan92%

Nilai ternormalisasi: UAB teaching guidance recommends rethinking assessments around AI-generated output

Terakhir diperiksa
15 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
15 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
La irrupció de ChatGPT i altres eines similars obliga a replantejar allò que es demana que provi o evidenciï cada estudiant. En general, tot allò que la màquina pot fer bé i de pressa no hauria de formar part de la proposta avaluativa, perquè s’estaria avaluant, en realitat, una producció artificial.

Paparan setempat only

UAB's teaching guidance says ChatGPT-like tools require rethinking what assessments ask students to evidence.

Bahasa sumber
ca
Hash petikan
a8a5baaf…
Diperoleh
15 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Section: Impacte de la IA en la docencia i l'avaluacio

Source record

Sumber rasmi

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Semakagent reviewedKeyakinan96%Snapshot statusTidak diterbitkanJSONJSON awam

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 15, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universitat-autonoma-de-barcelona

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Buka log perubahan