University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Bahasa
ENZHFRPL

Log perubahan

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenTerakhir diperiksa15 Mei 2026Terkini diubah15 Mei 2026Tuntutan5Sumber4Rekod keluaran0
Halaman universitiJSON awamLaporan bulananIndeks universiti

Ringkasan perubahan

Kesegaran rekod awam semasa dan keadaan semakan.

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 15 Mei 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Halaman ini menggabungkan semua perbezaan pelepasan awam untuk Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Snapshot pelepasan individu kekal boleh diakses dari URL khusus pelepasan mereka.

Belum ada baris perbezaan dasar antara pelepasan yang direkodkan untuk universiti ini. Halaman masih menjejak tuntutan disokong sumber semasa, atribusi rasmi sumber, keadaan semakan, kesegaran sumber, dan JSON awam untuk penemuan dan petikan.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Tuntutan diekstrak baharu adalah penambahan penjejak dan tidak semestinya diterbitkan baru-baru ini oleh universiti. Perubahan snapshot sumber menunjukkan perubahan hesh untuk URL sumber yang sama dan bukan merupakan perubahan dasar secara langsung.

Kategori perbezaan

Klasifikasi semantik untuk perbezaan keluaran ini.

Teks dasar0Diekstrak baharu0Bukti0Snapshot sumber0Teks sumber0Sumber ditambah0Sumber dialih keluar0

Perbezaan pelepasan gabungan

Perbezaan penjejak bersatu dijana daripada semua snapshot pelepasan awam untuk universiti ini.

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona combined release perbezaan

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona AI policy record
2+research: The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.
3+Evidence (en, 5fde60887f65): The IA cannot be listed as author or co-author of an article. AI should not be used to generate hypotheses, interpret data or formulate conclusions without the supervision and validation of the authors. Failure to disclose the use of AI in the article is considered academic misconduct and may result in rejection of the proposal or retraction of the published article.
4+academic_integrity: UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.
5+Evidence (ca, fdd1ca365044): La IA no pot tenir autoria acadèmica o legal. La IA és una eina, no un subjecte amb intencionalitat ni responsabilitat. L’autoria correspon a la persona que utilitza la IA i decideix què n’incorpora. A la citació, s’indica l’eina com a font, no com a autor.
6+privacy: UAB Libraries' responsible-use guidance for AI says privacy and data security require reviewing service terms, avoiding leakage of institutional information, and ensuring compliance with GDPR and other regulations.
7+Evidence (ca, bfc2aa9fcfd4): Privacitat i seguretat de les dades. La IA es basa principalment en dades obertes d’internet, però també en informació derivada de l’ús de les pròpies eines. Cal: revisar els termes d’ús dels serveis; evitar la filtració d’informació institucional; garantir el compliment del RGPD i altres normatives.
8+teaching: UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.
9+Evidence (ca, a8a5baaf7729): Aquest document n’és un primer resultat provisional. Un cop constituït el grup de treball amb professorat de diferents centres, s’ha elaborat aquest document, que serà un document viu, perquè la tecnologia a la qual es refereix evoluciona gairebé a temps real i convindrà anar-lo actualitzant regularment.
10+teaching: In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.
11+Evidence (ca, a8a5baaf7729): La irrupció de ChatGPT i altres eines similars obliga a replantejar allò que es demana que provi o evidenciï cada estudiant. En general, tot allò que la màquina pot fer bé i de pressa no hauria de formar part de la proposta avaluativa, perquè s’estaria avaluant, en realitat, una producció artificial.

Sejarah keluaran

0 public release diffs

Perubahan tuntutan

5 rekod Tuntut

research

The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan96%Bukti1Bahasaen

academic_integrity

UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%Bukti1Bahasaca

privacy

UAB Libraries' responsible-use guidance for AI says privacy and data security require reviewing service terms, avoiding leakage of institutional information, and ensuring compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti1Bahasaca

teaching

UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%Bukti1Bahasaca

teaching

In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan92%Bukti1Bahasaca

Snapshot sumber

4 source attributions

Aspectes etics i deontologics - Intel.ligencia Artificial - Biblioteques UAB

official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 Mei 2026, 4:05 PG

Serpihan snapshot
bfc2aa9fcfd416bd38f40f642253d09a9f185be1d5f7ec7d9c726548dbb549a5

Autoria i atribucio - Intel.ligencia Artificial - Biblioteques UAB

official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 Mei 2026, 4:05 PG

Serpihan snapshot
fdd1ca365044265f546fba769665d67e05c7052587032c6383b83d4a475c5489

Policy on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in articles

official_policy_page Tracker checked at 15 Mei 2026, 4:05 PG

Serpihan snapshot
5fde60887f6565ec3cba57ed9387a0b2fe3cac323a67f90e535b98d3fbcab7b5