Change log

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona AI policy record
2+research: The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.
3+Evidence (en, 5fde60887f65): The IA cannot be listed as author or co-author of an article. AI should not be used to generate hypotheses, interpret data or formulate conclusions without the supervision and validation of the authors. Failure to disclose the use of AI in the article is considered academic misconduct and may result in rejection of the proposal or retraction of the published article.
4+academic_integrity: UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.
5+Evidence (ca, fdd1ca365044): La IA no pot tenir autoria acadèmica o legal. La IA és una eina, no un subjecte amb intencionalitat ni responsabilitat. L’autoria correspon a la persona que utilitza la IA i decideix què n’incorpora. A la citació, s’indica l’eina com a font, no com a autor.
6+privacy: UAB Libraries' responsible-use guidance for AI says privacy and data security require reviewing service terms, avoiding leakage of institutional information, and ensuring compliance with GDPR and other regulations.
7+Evidence (ca, bfc2aa9fcfd4): Privacitat i seguretat de les dades. La IA es basa principalment en dades obertes d’internet, però també en informació derivada de l’ús de les pròpies eines. Cal: revisar els termes d’ús dels serveis; evitar la filtració d’informació institucional; garantir el compliment del RGPD i altres normatives.
8+teaching: UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.
9+Evidence (ca, a8a5baaf7729): Aquest document n’és un primer resultat provisional. Un cop constituït el grup de treball amb professorat de diferents centres, s’ha elaborat aquest document, que serà un document viu, perquè la tecnologia a la qual es refereix evoluciona gairebé a temps real i convindrà anar-lo actualitzant regularment.
10+teaching: In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.
11+Evidence (ca, a8a5baaf7729): La irrupció de ChatGPT i altres eines similars obliga a replantejar allò que es demana que provi o evidenciï cada estudiant. En general, tot allò que la màquina pot fer bé i de pressa no hauria de formar part de la proposta avaluativa, perquè s’estaria avaluant, en realitat, una producció artificial.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

5 claim records

research

The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesca

privacy

UAB Libraries' responsible-use guidance for AI says privacy and data security require reviewing service terms, avoiding leakage of institutional information, and ensuring compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesca

teaching

UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesca

teaching

In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesca

Source snapshots

4 source attributions

Aspectes etics i deontologics - Intel.ligencia Artificial - Biblioteques UAB

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 4:05 AM

Snapshot hash
bfc2aa9fcfd416bd38f40f642253d09a9f185be1d5f7ec7d9c726548dbb549a5

Autoria i atribucio - Intel.ligencia Artificial - Biblioteques UAB

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 4:05 AM

Snapshot hash
fdd1ca365044265f546fba769665d67e05c7052587032c6383b83d4a475c5489

Policy on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in articles

official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 4:05 AM

Snapshot hash
5fde60887f6565ec3cba57ed9387a0b2fe3cac323a67f90e535b98d3fbcab7b5