Wijzigingslogboek

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldLaatst gecontroleerd15 mei 2026Laatst gewijzigd15 mei 2026Claims5Bronnen4Releaseregistraties0

Universiteitspagina Openbaar JSON Maandrapport Universiteitsindex

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 15 mei 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.

Er zijn nog geen beleidverschillen tussen releases geregistreerd voor deze universiteit. De pagina houdt nog steeds bij welke bronnen onderbouwing bieden, officiële bronaanwijzingen, de beoordelingsstatus, de actualiteit van bronnen en openbare JSON voor ontdekking en citatie.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.

Beleidstekst0Zojuist geëxtraheerd0Bewijs0Bronsnapshots0Bron tekst0Bron toegevoegd0Bron verwijderd0

11 # Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona AI policy record
2+research: The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.
3+Evidence (en, 5fde60887f65): The IA cannot be listed as author or co-author of an article. AI should not be used to generate hypotheses, interpret data or formulate conclusions without the supervision and validation of the authors. Failure to disclose the use of AI in the article is considered academic misconduct and may result in rejection of the proposal or retraction of the published article.
4+academic_integrity: UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.
5+Evidence (ca, fdd1ca365044): La IA no pot tenir autoria acadèmica o legal. La IA és una eina, no un subjecte amb intencionalitat ni responsabilitat. L’autoria correspon a la persona que utilitza la IA i decideix què n’incorpora. A la citació, s’indica l’eina com a font, no com a autor.
6+privacy: UAB Libraries' responsible-use guidance for AI says privacy and data security require reviewing service terms, avoiding leakage of institutional information, and ensuring compliance with GDPR and other regulations.
7+Evidence (ca, bfc2aa9fcfd4): Privacitat i seguretat de les dades. La IA es basa principalment en dades obertes d’internet, però també en informació derivada de l’ús de les pròpies eines. Cal: revisar els termes d’ús dels serveis; evitar la filtració d’informació institucional; garantir el compliment del RGPD i altres normatives.
8+teaching: UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.
9+Evidence (ca, a8a5baaf7729): Aquest document n’és un primer resultat provisional. Un cop constituït el grup de treball amb professorat de diferents centres, s’ha elaborat aquest document, que serà un document viu, perquè la tecnologia a la qual es refereix evoluciona gairebé a temps real i convindrà anar-lo actualitzant regularment.
10+teaching: In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.
11+Evidence (ca, a8a5baaf7729): La irrupció de ChatGPT i altres eines similars obliga a replantejar allò que es demana que provi o evidenciï cada estudiant. En general, tot allò que la màquina pot fer bé i de pressa no hauria de formar part de la proposta avaluativa, perquè s’estaria avaluant, en realitat, una producció artificial.

Geschiedenis releases

0 public release diffs

Aanpassingen claimen

5 Claimen registers

research

The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%Bewijs1Talenen

academic_integrity

UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%Bewijs1Talenca

privacy

UAB Libraries' responsible-use guidance for AI says privacy and data security require reviewing service terms, avoiding leakage of institutional information, and ensuring compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%Bewijs1Talenca

teaching

UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen93%Bewijs1Talenca

teaching

In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen92%Bewijs1Talenca

Bronsnapshots

4 source attributions

Aspectes etics i deontologics - Intel.ligencia Artificial - Biblioteques UAB

official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 mei 2026, 04:05

Bron-URL: https://bibguies.uab.cat/ia/us-responsable
Snapshot-hash: bfc2aa9fcfd416bd38f40f642253d09a9f185be1d5f7ec7d9c726548dbb549a5

Autoria i atribucio - Intel.ligencia Artificial - Biblioteques UAB

official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 mei 2026, 04:05

Bron-URL: https://bibguies.uab.cat/ia/autoria-atribucio
Snapshot-hash: fdd1ca365044265f546fba769665d67e05c7052587032c6383b83d4a475c5489

Policy on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in articles

official_policy_page Tracker checked at 15 mei 2026, 04:05

Bron-URL: https://publicacions.uab.cat/en/journals/ai-policy
Snapshot-hash: 5fde60887f6565ec3cba57ed9387a0b2fe3cac323a67f90e535b98d3fbcab7b5

Posicionament de la UAB respecte als usos de la IA en docencia

official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 mei 2026, 04:05

Bron-URL: https://bibguies.uab.cat/ia/posicionament-uab-docencia
Snapshot-hash: a8a5baaf772955d0fbaebf7841971aed8a0b1e15ad8e8a5c9c2cfccf4ba9a68d

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Samenvatting wijzigingen

Diff-categorieën

Gecombineerd releasediff