Barcelona, Spain

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Zrecenzowane twierdzenia

5 reviewed claims

Badania

The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność96%

Wartość znormalizowana: UAB Publications Service AI policy restricts AI authorship and requires disclosure in articles

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
The IA cannot be listed as author or co-author of an article. AI should not be used to generate hypotheses, interpret data or formulate conclusions without the supervision and validation of the authors. Failure to disclose the use of AI in the article is considered academic misconduct and may result in rejection of the proposal or retraction of the published article.

Widok lokalny only

The UAB Publications Service policy restricts AI authorship, requires author supervision/validation, and treats nondisclosure as academic misconduct for articles.

Academic Integrity

UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność95%

Wartość znormalizowana: UAB AI guide treats AI as a tool/source, not an academic author

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
La IA no pot tenir autoria acadèmica o legal. La IA és una eina, no un subjecte amb intencionalitat ni responsabilitat. L’autoria correspon a la persona que utilitza la IA i decideix què n’incorpora. A la citació, s’indica l’eina com a font, no com a autor.

Widok lokalny only

UAB Libraries says AI is a tool rather than an author, and that the person using AI remains responsible for what is incorporated.

Prywatność

UAB Libraries' responsible-use guidance for AI says privacy and data security require reviewing service terms, avoiding leakage of institutional information, and ensuring compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%

Wartość znormalizowana: UAB AI guide includes privacy, institutional data leakage, and GDPR cautions

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Privacitat i seguretat de les dades. La IA es basa principalment en dades obertes d’internet, però també en informació derivada de l’ús de les pròpies eines. Cal: revisar els termes d’ús dels serveis; evitar la filtració d’informació institucional; garantir el compliment del RGPD i altres normatives.

Widok lokalny only

The UAB guide says AI privacy/data security requires checking service terms, avoiding institutional-information leaks, and complying with GDPR.

Nauczanie

UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność93%

Wartość znormalizowana: UAB has official AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, framed as provisional and reflective

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Aquest document n’és un primer resultat provisional. Un cop constituït el grup de treball amb professorat de diferents centres, s’ha elaborat aquest document, que serà un document viu, perquè la tecnologia a la qual es refereix evoluciona gairebé a temps real i convindrà anar-lo actualitzant regularment.

Widok lokalny only

The UAB positioning document is framed as a provisional, living document that will need regular updates.

Nauczanie

In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność92%

Wartość znormalizowana: UAB teaching guidance recommends rethinking assessments around AI-generated output

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
La irrupció de ChatGPT i altres eines similars obliga a replantejar allò que es demana que provi o evidenciï cada estudiant. En general, tot allò que la màquina pot fer bé i de pressa no hauria de formar part de la proposta avaluativa, perquè s’estaria avaluant, en realitat, una producció artificial.

Widok lokalny only

UAB's teaching guidance says ChatGPT-like tools require rethinking what assessments ask students to evidence.

Source record

Oficjalne źródła

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Recenzjaagent reviewedPewność96%Snapshot statusNieopublikowaneJSONPubliczne JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 15, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universitat-autonoma-de-barcelona

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Otwórz dziennik zmian