Policy presence
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
València, Spain
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia is listed as QS 2026 rank 422. Universitat Politecnica de Valencia has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia is listed as QS 2026 rank 422. Universitat Politecnica de Valencia has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Universitat Politecnica de Valencia as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universitat-politecnica-de-valencia.json. The entity-level confidence is 85%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
The UPV-hosted PoliPapers journal policy says improper, undeclared, or deceptive AI use may be treated as an ethical violation leading to clarification requests, manuscript rejection, or article retraction.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: journal-scope AI misuse consequences
Original evidence
Evidence 1El uso indebido, no declarado o enganoso de herramientas de IA podra considerarse una violacion etica y podra dar lugar a: Solicitud de aclaraciones o correcciones. Rechazo del manuscrito. Retraccion del articulo si ya ha sido publicado.
Localized display only
Improper, undeclared, or deceptive AI use may be considered an ethical violation and may lead to clarification, rejection, or retraction.
Research
The UPV-hosted PoliPapers journal policy permits authors to use generative AI for technical support tasks, but says authors should declare AI use and that AI tools cannot be listed as authors or coauthors.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: journal-scope AI author disclosure
Original evidence
Evidence 1Los autores pueden utilizar herramientas de IA generativa ... siempre que el contenido final sea revisado y validado por los autores humanos responsables. Se debe declarar haber utilizado herramientas de IA.
Localized display only
Authors may use generative AI for support tasks if human authors review and validate the final content, and AI use should be declared.
Privacy
The UPV-hosted PoliPapers journal policy says AI use in evaluation may support verification of texts and data, but full content should not be shared with AI tools, and AI use should respect text confidentiality and personal data principles.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: journal-scope AI confidentiality limits
Original evidence
Evidence 1Durante el proceso de evaluacion cientifica se podra utilizar la IA como soporte para la verificacion de los textos y datos, siempre y cuando no se compartan integramente todo el contenido con una herramienta de IA.
Localized display only
During scientific evaluation, AI may support verification of text and data, provided full content is not shared with an AI tool.
Teaching
UPV's VPEC described 2026 training sessions on generative AI applied to university teaching, including prompt engineering, persistent agents, and AI-supported teaching-guide generation.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: guidance-scoped teaching training
Original evidence
Evidence 1El miercoles 4 de marzo 2026 imparti el primer bloque de sesiones 2026 sobre Inteligencia Artificial Generativa aplicada a la docencia.
Localized display only
On March 4, 2026, the source says the first 2026 session block covered generative AI applied to teaching.
Teaching
The VPEC source says the sessions analyzed use of AI to align learning outcomes with ANECA standards and university regulations when generating university teaching guides.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai-supported teaching guide alignment
Original evidence
Evidence 1Generacion de Guias Docentes Universitarias con IA: analizamos como utilizar la IA para alinear los resultados de aprendizaje con los estandares de ANECA y la normativa universitaria.
Localized display only
The source says the sessions analyzed using AI to align learning outcomes with ANECA standards and university regulations in teaching guides.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
Integrando la IA Generativa en la Docencia Universitaria: de la Ingenieria de Prompts a las Guias Docentes
upv.es
Politica de uso de Inteligencia Artificial
polipapers.upv.es
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.