Policy presence
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Barcelona, Spain
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona is listed as QS 2026 rank 172. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona is listed as QS 2026 rank 172. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 15, 2026 and last changed on May 15, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universitat-autonoma-de-barcelona.json. The entity-level confidence is 96%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Academic integrity
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Named AI services
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Teaching guidance
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 3 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Research
The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: UAB Publications Service AI policy restricts AI authorship and requires disclosure in articles
Original evidence
Evidence 1The IA cannot be listed as author or co-author of an article. AI should not be used to generate hypotheses, interpret data or formulate conclusions without the supervision and validation of the authors. Failure to disclose the use of AI in the article is considered academic misconduct and may result in rejection of the proposal or retraction of the published article.
Localized display only
The UAB Publications Service policy restricts AI authorship, requires author supervision/validation, and treats nondisclosure as academic misconduct for articles.
Academic Integrity
UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: UAB AI guide treats AI as a tool/source, not an academic author
Original evidence
Evidence 1La IA no pot tenir autoria acadèmica o legal. La IA és una eina, no un subjecte amb intencionalitat ni responsabilitat. L’autoria correspon a la persona que utilitza la IA i decideix què n’incorpora. A la citació, s’indica l’eina com a font, no com a autor.
Localized display only
UAB Libraries says AI is a tool rather than an author, and that the person using AI remains responsible for what is incorporated.
Privacy
UAB Libraries' responsible-use guidance for AI says privacy and data security require reviewing service terms, avoiding leakage of institutional information, and ensuring compliance with GDPR and other regulations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: UAB AI guide includes privacy, institutional data leakage, and GDPR cautions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Privacitat i seguretat de les dades. La IA es basa principalment en dades obertes d’internet, però també en informació derivada de l’ús de les pròpies eines. Cal: revisar els termes d’ús dels serveis; evitar la filtració d’informació institucional; garantir el compliment del RGPD i altres normatives.
Localized display only
The UAB guide says AI privacy/data security requires checking service terms, avoiding institutional-information leaks, and complying with GDPR.
Teaching
UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: UAB has official AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, framed as provisional and reflective
Original evidence
Evidence 1Aquest document n’és un primer resultat provisional. Un cop constituït el grup de treball amb professorat de diferents centres, s’ha elaborat aquest document, que serà un document viu, perquè la tecnologia a la qual es refereix evoluciona gairebé a temps real i convindrà anar-lo actualitzant regularment.
Localized display only
The UAB positioning document is framed as a provisional, living document that will need regular updates.
Teaching
In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: UAB teaching guidance recommends rethinking assessments around AI-generated output
Original evidence
Evidence 1La irrupció de ChatGPT i altres eines similars obliga a replantejar allò que es demana que provi o evidenciï cada estudiant. En general, tot allò que la màquina pot fer bé i de pressa no hauria de formar part de la proposta avaluativa, perquè s’estaria avaluant, en realitat, una producció artificial.
Localized display only
UAB's teaching guidance says ChatGPT-like tools require rethinking what assessments ask students to evidence.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
Aspectes etics i deontologics - Intel.ligencia Artificial - Biblioteques UAB
bibguies.uab.cat
Autoria i atribucio - Intel.ligencia Artificial - Biblioteques UAB
bibguies.uab.cat
Policy on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in articles
publicacions.uab.cat
Posicionament de la UAB respecte als usos de la IA en docencia
bibguies.uab.cat
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.