University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Barcelona, Spain

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Last checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%
Public JSONChange logMonthly reportCitation rulesDataset accessAnalysis JSONSubmit correction
Public JSONCitation rules
More tools

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources4Source languageca, enPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universitat-autonoma-de-barcelona.json

Policy profile

Analysis JSONAnalysis review
Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence80%

Privacy and data entry

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-uab-003

Academic integrity

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence2Sources2
Claim claim-uab-005Claim claim-uab-004

Approved tools

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-uab-003

Named AI services

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence2Sources2
Claim claim-uab-003Claim claim-uab-002

Teaching guidance

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence2Sources1
Claim claim-uab-001Claim claim-uab-002

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Tools directory
Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Research

The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: UAB Publications Service AI policy restricts AI authorship and requires disclosure in articles

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The IA cannot be listed as author or co-author of an article. AI should not be used to generate hypotheses, interpret data or formulate conclusions without the supervision and validation of the authors. Failure to disclose the use of AI in the article is considered academic misconduct and may result in rejection of the proposal or retraction of the published article.

Localized display only

The UAB Publications Service policy restricts AI authorship, requires author supervision/validation, and treats nondisclosure as academic misconduct for articles.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
5fde60887f6565ec3cba57ed9387a0b2fe3cac323a67f90e535b98d3fbcab7b5
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Sections: Unaccepted uses; Disclosure

Academic Integrity

UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: UAB AI guide treats AI as a tool/source, not an academic author

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
La IA no pot tenir autoria acadèmica o legal. La IA és una eina, no un subjecte amb intencionalitat ni responsabilitat. L’autoria correspon a la persona que utilitza la IA i decideix què n’incorpora. A la citació, s’indica l’eina com a font, no com a autor.

Localized display only

UAB Libraries says AI is a tool rather than an author, and that the person using AI remains responsible for what is incorporated.

Source language
ca
Snapshot hash
fdd1ca365044265f546fba769665d67e05c7052587032c6383b83d4a475c5489
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Autoria i atribucio de la IA

Privacy

UAB Libraries' responsible-use guidance for AI says privacy and data security require reviewing service terms, avoiding leakage of institutional information, and ensuring compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: UAB AI guide includes privacy, institutional data leakage, and GDPR cautions

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Privacitat i seguretat de les dades. La IA es basa principalment en dades obertes d’internet, però també en informació derivada de l’ús de les pròpies eines. Cal: revisar els termes d’ús dels serveis; evitar la filtració d’informació institucional; garantir el compliment del RGPD i altres normatives.

Localized display only

The UAB guide says AI privacy/data security requires checking service terms, avoiding institutional-information leaks, and complying with GDPR.

Source language
ca
Snapshot hash
bfc2aa9fcfd416bd38f40f642253d09a9f185be1d5f7ec7d9c726548dbb549a5
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Privacitat i seguretat de les dades

Teaching

UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: UAB has official AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, framed as provisional and reflective

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Aquest document n’és un primer resultat provisional. Un cop constituït el grup de treball amb professorat de diferents centres, s’ha elaborat aquest document, que serà un document viu, perquè la tecnologia a la qual es refereix evoluciona gairebé a temps real i convindrà anar-lo actualitzant regularment.

Localized display only

The UAB positioning document is framed as a provisional, living document that will need regular updates.

Source language
ca
Snapshot hash
a8a5baaf772955d0fbaebf7841971aed8a0b1e15ad8e8a5c9c2cfccf4ba9a68d
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Presentacio

Teaching

In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: UAB teaching guidance recommends rethinking assessments around AI-generated output

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
La irrupció de ChatGPT i altres eines similars obliga a replantejar allò que es demana que provi o evidenciï cada estudiant. En general, tot allò que la màquina pot fer bé i de pressa no hauria de formar part de la proposta avaluativa, perquè s’estaria avaluant, en realitat, una producció artificial.

Localized display only

UAB's teaching guidance says ChatGPT-like tools require rethinking what assessments ask students to evidence.

Source language
ca
Snapshot hash
a8a5baaf772955d0fbaebf7841971aed8a0b1e15ad8e8a5c9c2cfccf4ba9a68d
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Impacte de la IA en la docencia i l'avaluacio

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

4 source attribution

Aspectes etics i deontologics - Intel.ligencia Artificial - Biblioteques UAB

bibguies.uab.cat

Snapshot hash
bfc2aa9fcfd416bd38f40f642253d09a9f185be1d5f7ec7d9c726548dbb549a5

Change log

Last checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Open contribution pathsReview workflow
Back to universities