University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Bahasa
ENZHFRPLMS

Toulouse, France

Université Toulouse 1 Capitole

PenarafanQS World University Rankings 2026: 1001-1200Updated31 Mei 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Tuntutan disemak

6 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

For Toulouse Law School students, the AI guidelines permit study-support uses such as summaries, explanations, plans, practice QCMs, and reformulation, but say AI must not be used to fabricate all or part of graded work and list generation of exam papers, homework, case comments, or dissertations as prohibited uses.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%

Nilai ternormalisasi: law_school_students_may_use_ai_for_study_support_not_to_generate_graded_work

Terakhir diperiksa
31 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
31 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Les etudiants peuvent utiliser des outils d'IA pour : resumer un cours, un arret ou un article ; proposer des explications complementaires ; generer des plans, pistes d'argumentation ou exemples.

Paparan setempat only

Students may use AI tools for summaries, additional explanations, plans, argument ideas, or examples.

Bahasa sumber
Français (fr)
Hash petikan
997957a1…
Diperoleh
31 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Annexe IA pour les etudiants, 2.1 Usages autorises

Bukti asal

Bukti 2
L'IA ne doit pas etre utilisee pour fabriquer en tout ou partie des travaux notes (cas pratiques, dissertations, commentaires d'arret, rapport de stages, memoires).

Paparan setempat only

AI must not be used to fabricate all or part of graded work such as case exercises, dissertations, case comments, internship reports, or theses.

Bahasa sumber
Français (fr)
Hash petikan
997957a1…
Diperoleh
31 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Annexe IA pour les etudiants, 2.2 Conditions d'usage

Ai Tool Treatment

For Toulouse Law School teaching, training, and assessment activities, the AI guidelines say AI use by a student or teacher must be declared when it contributes to work that is submitted, published, or evaluated.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%

Nilai ternormalisasi: law_school_ai_use_declared_when_contributing_to_submitted_published_or_evaluated_work

Terakhir diperiksa
31 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
31 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Tout usage de l'IA par un etudiant ou par un enseignant doit etre declare, lorsque celui-ci contribue a un travail remis, publie ou evalue.

Paparan setempat only

AI use by students or teachers must be declared when it contributes to submitted, published, or evaluated work.

Bahasa sumber
Français (fr)
Hash petikan
997957a1…
Diperoleh
31 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Section 3.1 Information

Pengajaran

The Toulouse Law School guidelines say homework may be corrected for pedagogical purposes but should not count toward continuous-assessment grades except where AI use itself is evaluated; in that case students must explain their method, describe AI use, and correct or analyze results.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%

Nilai ternormalisasi: homework_not_counted_for_continuous_assessment_unless_ai_use_itself_evaluated

Terakhir diperiksa
31 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
31 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Les devoirs maison peuvent etre corriges a des fins pedagogiques, mais ne doivent pas compter dans la note de controle continu sauf cas particulier ou l'usage de l'IA est lui-meme evalue.

Paparan setempat only

Homework may be corrected pedagogically, but should not count toward continuous-assessment grades unless AI use itself is evaluated.

Bahasa sumber
Français (fr)
Hash petikan
997957a1…
Diperoleh
31 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Section 3.2 Controle continu

Privasi

The Toulouse Law School AI guidelines strongly discourage using institutional professional email addresses with commercial, foreign, or paid AI services; they invite users to use personal/dedicated accounts or university-secured AI tools, and prohibit depositing sensitive documents on external AI systems.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%

Nilai ternormalisasi: avoid_institutional_email_for_commercial_ai_use_secure_or_personal_accounts_no_sensitive_documents_external_ai

Terakhir diperiksa
31 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
31 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Il est fortement deconseille d'utiliser l'adresse professionnelle institutionnelle pour interroger des IA commerciales, etrangeres ou payantes.

Paparan setempat only

The source strongly discourages using institutional professional email addresses to query commercial, foreign, or paid AI tools.

Bahasa sumber
Français (fr)
Hash petikan
997957a1…
Diperoleh
31 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Section 4.1 Adresses professionnelles

Bukti asal

Bukti 2
Aucun document contenant des donnees sensibles (copies d'etudiants, identifiants, releves, travaux non publics) ne doit etre depose sur une IA externe.

Paparan setempat only

No document containing sensitive data should be deposited on an external AI system.

Bahasa sumber
Français (fr)
Hash petikan
997957a1…
Diperoleh
31 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Section 4.3 Protection des donnees

Source Status

An official Toulouse Law School page and PDF publish AI guidelines for law teaching; the source scopes the institutional AI-use framework to activities of teaching, training, and assessment within the Ecole de Droit de Toulouse, not to all Universite Toulouse Capitole programs.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%

Nilai ternormalisasi: official_law_school_ai_guidelines_scoped_to_ecole_de_droit

Terakhir diperiksa
31 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
31 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
La presente charte fixe le cadre institutionnel d'utilisation de l'IA dans les activites d'enseignement, de formation et d'evaluation au sein de l'Ecole de Droit de Toulouse.

Paparan setempat only

The charter sets the institutional AI-use framework for teaching, training, and assessment within Toulouse Law School.

Bahasa sumber
Français (fr)
Hash petikan
e50b42cc…
Diperoleh
31 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Page introduction

Bukti asal

Bukti 2
L'IA constitue un outil puissant, dont l'usage doit cependant reposer sur des principes de responsabilite, d'ethique, de transparence et de rigueur academique.

Paparan setempat only

The PDF frames AI use around responsibility, ethics, transparency, and academic rigor.

Bahasa sumber
Français (fr)
Hash petikan
997957a1…
Diperoleh
31 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Section 1, Preambule

Source Status

The UT Capitole library maintains an official public page for teacher-researchers titled 'Enseigner dans le Superieur a l'ere des intelligences artificielles generatives,' describing an infographic intended to support informed use of generative-AI tools for learning quality.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan86%

Nilai ternormalisasi: official_library_teaching_resource_for_iag

Terakhir diperiksa
31 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
31 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Cette infographie vise a accompagner les enseignants dans une utilisation eclairee de ces outils au service de la qualite des apprentissages.

Paparan setempat only

The infographic is intended to support teachers in informed use of generative-AI tools for learning quality.

Bahasa sumber
Français (fr)
Hash petikan
a750cc5b…
Diperoleh
31 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Page body

Source record

Sumber rasmi

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Semakagent reviewedKeyakinan95%Snapshot statusTidak diterbitkanJSONJSON awam

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Université Toulouse 1 Capitole AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 31, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universite-toulouse-1-capitole

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Buka log perubahan