Policy presence
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Toulouse, France
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Named AI services
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole has 3 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
For Toulouse Law School students, the AI guidelines permit study-support uses such as summaries, explanations, plans, practice QCMs, and reformulation, but say AI must not be used to fabricate all or part of graded work and list generation of exam papers, homework, case comments, or dissertations as prohibited uses.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: law_school_students_may_use_ai_for_study_support_not_to_generate_graded_work
原始证据
Evidence 1Les etudiants peuvent utiliser des outils d'IA pour : resumer un cours, un arret ou un article ; proposer des explications complementaires ; generer des plans, pistes d'argumentation ou exemples.
本地化显示 only
Students may use AI tools for summaries, additional explanations, plans, argument ideas, or examples.
原始证据
Evidence 2L'IA ne doit pas etre utilisee pour fabriquer en tout ou partie des travaux notes (cas pratiques, dissertations, commentaires d'arret, rapport de stages, memoires).
本地化显示 only
AI must not be used to fabricate all or part of graded work such as case exercises, dissertations, case comments, internship reports, or theses.
Ai Tool Treatment
For Toulouse Law School teaching, training, and assessment activities, the AI guidelines say AI use by a student or teacher must be declared when it contributes to work that is submitted, published, or evaluated.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: law_school_ai_use_declared_when_contributing_to_submitted_published_or_evaluated_work
原始证据
Evidence 1Tout usage de l'IA par un etudiant ou par un enseignant doit etre declare, lorsque celui-ci contribue a un travail remis, publie ou evalue.
本地化显示 only
AI use by students or teachers must be declared when it contributes to submitted, published, or evaluated work.
Teaching
The Toulouse Law School guidelines say homework may be corrected for pedagogical purposes but should not count toward continuous-assessment grades except where AI use itself is evaluated; in that case students must explain their method, describe AI use, and correct or analyze results.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: homework_not_counted_for_continuous_assessment_unless_ai_use_itself_evaluated
原始证据
Evidence 1Les devoirs maison peuvent etre corriges a des fins pedagogiques, mais ne doivent pas compter dans la note de controle continu sauf cas particulier ou l'usage de l'IA est lui-meme evalue.
本地化显示 only
Homework may be corrected pedagogically, but should not count toward continuous-assessment grades unless AI use itself is evaluated.
Privacy
The Toulouse Law School AI guidelines strongly discourage using institutional professional email addresses with commercial, foreign, or paid AI services; they invite users to use personal/dedicated accounts or university-secured AI tools, and prohibit depositing sensitive documents on external AI systems.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: avoid_institutional_email_for_commercial_ai_use_secure_or_personal_accounts_no_sensitive_documents_external_ai
原始证据
Evidence 1Il est fortement deconseille d'utiliser l'adresse professionnelle institutionnelle pour interroger des IA commerciales, etrangeres ou payantes.
本地化显示 only
The source strongly discourages using institutional professional email addresses to query commercial, foreign, or paid AI tools.
原始证据
Evidence 2Aucun document contenant des donnees sensibles (copies d'etudiants, identifiants, releves, travaux non publics) ne doit etre depose sur une IA externe.
本地化显示 only
No document containing sensitive data should be deposited on an external AI system.
Source Status
An official Toulouse Law School page and PDF publish AI guidelines for law teaching; the source scopes the institutional AI-use framework to activities of teaching, training, and assessment within the Ecole de Droit de Toulouse, not to all Universite Toulouse Capitole programs.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: official_law_school_ai_guidelines_scoped_to_ecole_de_droit
原始证据
Evidence 1La presente charte fixe le cadre institutionnel d'utilisation de l'IA dans les activites d'enseignement, de formation et d'evaluation au sein de l'Ecole de Droit de Toulouse.
本地化显示 only
The charter sets the institutional AI-use framework for teaching, training, and assessment within Toulouse Law School.
原始证据
Evidence 2L'IA constitue un outil puissant, dont l'usage doit cependant reposer sur des principes de responsabilite, d'ethique, de transparence et de rigueur academique.
本地化显示 only
The PDF frames AI use around responsibility, ethics, transparency, and academic rigor.
Source Status
The UT Capitole library maintains an official public page for teacher-researchers titled 'Enseigner dans le Superieur a l'ere des intelligences artificielles generatives,' describing an infographic intended to support informed use of generative-AI tools for learning quality.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: official_library_teaching_resource_for_iag
原始证据
Evidence 1Cette infographie vise a accompagner les enseignants dans une utilisation eclairee de ces outils au service de la qualite des apprentissages.
本地化显示 only
The infographic is intended to support teachers in informed use of generative-AI tools for learning quality.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
3 source attribution
BU - Enseigner dans le Superieur a l'ere des intelligences artificielles generatives
ut-capitole.fr
Lignes directrices pour un bon usage de l'IA generative dans l'enseignement du droit
tls-droit.ut-capitole.fr
Lignes directrices pour un bon usage de l'IA generative dans l'enseignement du droit
tls-droit.ut-capitole.fr