public-release-20260612-001
Dibandingkan dengan public-release-20260526-003.
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole public-release-20260612-001 perbezaan
Membandingkan public-release-20260526-003 dengan public-release-20260612-001.
Log perubahan
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Kesegaran rekod awam semasa dan keadaan semakan.
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 31 Mei 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 6 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
Halaman ini menggabungkan semua perbezaan pelepasan awam untuk Université Toulouse 1 Capitole. Snapshot pelepasan individu kekal boleh diakses dari URL khusus pelepasan mereka.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Tuntutan diekstrak baharu adalah penambahan penjejak dan tidak semestinya diterbitkan baru-baru ini oleh universiti. Perubahan snapshot sumber menunjukkan perubahan hesh untuk URL sumber yang sama dan bukan merupakan perubahan dasar secara langsung.
Klasifikasi semantik untuk perbezaan keluaran ini.
Perbezaan penjejak bersatu dijana daripada semua snapshot pelepasan awam untuk universiti ini.
Membandingkan public-release-20260526-003 dengan public-release-20260612-001.
1 perbezaan pelepasan awam
Dibandingkan dengan public-release-20260526-003.
Membandingkan public-release-20260526-003 dengan public-release-20260612-001.
6 rekod Tuntut
For Toulouse Law School students, the AI guidelines permit study-support uses such as summaries, explanations, plans, practice QCMs, and reformulation, but say AI must not be used to fabricate all or part of graded work and list generation of exam papers, homework, case comments, or dissertations as prohibited uses.
For Toulouse Law School teaching, training, and assessment activities, the AI guidelines say AI use by a student or teacher must be declared when it contributes to work that is submitted, published, or evaluated.
The Toulouse Law School guidelines say homework may be corrected for pedagogical purposes but should not count toward continuous-assessment grades except where AI use itself is evaluated; in that case students must explain their method, describe AI use, and correct or analyze results.
The Toulouse Law School AI guidelines strongly discourage using institutional professional email addresses with commercial, foreign, or paid AI services; they invite users to use personal/dedicated accounts or university-secured AI tools, and prohibit depositing sensitive documents on external AI systems.
An official Toulouse Law School page and PDF publish AI guidelines for law teaching; the source scopes the institutional AI-use framework to activities of teaching, training, and assessment within the Ecole de Droit de Toulouse, not to all Universite Toulouse Capitole programs.
The UT Capitole library maintains an official public page for teacher-researchers titled 'Enseigner dans le Superieur a l'ere des intelligences artificielles generatives,' describing an infographic intended to support informed use of generative-AI tools for learning quality.
3 source attributions
official_guidance Source Last-Modified 10 Apr 2025, 4:24 PTG
official_guidance Tracker checked at 31 Mei 2026, 8:41 PTG
official_pdf Source Last-Modified 12 Dis 2025, 1:52 PTG