public-release-20260612-001
Vergeleken met public-release-20260526-003.
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole public-release-20260612-001 verschil
public-release-20260526-003 vergelijken met public-release-20260612-001.
Wijzigingslogboek
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Huidige actualiteit en beoordelingsstatus van openbare gegevens.
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 31 mei 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 6 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor Université Toulouse 1 Capitole. Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.
Semantische classificatie voor deze release diff.
Geünificeerde trackerdiff gegenereerd vanuit alle openbare releasesnapshots voor deze universiteit.
public-release-20260526-003 vergelijken met public-release-20260612-001.
1 verschil openbare publicatie
Vergeleken met public-release-20260526-003.
public-release-20260526-003 vergelijken met public-release-20260612-001.
6 Claimen registers
For Toulouse Law School students, the AI guidelines permit study-support uses such as summaries, explanations, plans, practice QCMs, and reformulation, but say AI must not be used to fabricate all or part of graded work and list generation of exam papers, homework, case comments, or dissertations as prohibited uses.
For Toulouse Law School teaching, training, and assessment activities, the AI guidelines say AI use by a student or teacher must be declared when it contributes to work that is submitted, published, or evaluated.
The Toulouse Law School guidelines say homework may be corrected for pedagogical purposes but should not count toward continuous-assessment grades except where AI use itself is evaluated; in that case students must explain their method, describe AI use, and correct or analyze results.
The Toulouse Law School AI guidelines strongly discourage using institutional professional email addresses with commercial, foreign, or paid AI services; they invite users to use personal/dedicated accounts or university-secured AI tools, and prohibit depositing sensitive documents on external AI systems.
An official Toulouse Law School page and PDF publish AI guidelines for law teaching; the source scopes the institutional AI-use framework to activities of teaching, training, and assessment within the Ecole de Droit de Toulouse, not to all Universite Toulouse Capitole programs.
The UT Capitole library maintains an official public page for teacher-researchers titled 'Enseigner dans le Superieur a l'ere des intelligences artificielles generatives,' describing an infographic intended to support informed use of generative-AI tools for learning quality.
3 source attributions
official_guidance Source Last-Modified 10 apr 2025, 16:24
official_guidance Tracker checked at 31 mei 2026, 20:41
official_pdf Source Last-Modified 12 dec 2025, 13:52