University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Langue
ENZHFRPL

Journal des modifications

Université Toulouse 1 Capitole

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Révision: Révisé par un agentVérifié pour la dernière fois31 mai 2026Dernière modification31 mai 2026Affirmations6Sources3Dernière versionpublic-release-20260612-001Enregistrements de version1
Page universitaireJSON publicRapport mensuelIndex des universités

Résumé des modifications

Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.

Université Toulouse 1 Capitole currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 31 mai 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 6 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour Université Toulouse 1 Capitole. Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.

Catégories de différences

Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.

Texte de la politique0Récemment extraits6Preuve0Instantanés source0Texte source0Source ajoutée3Source supprimée0

Différentiel de version combinée

Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.

différentiel Université Toulouse 1 Capitole combined release

Comparaison de public-release-20260526-003 avec public-release-20260612-001.

+24-0
11 # Université Toulouse 1 Capitole AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+source_status: The UT Capitole library maintains an official public page for teacher-researchers titled 'Enseigner dans le Superieur a l'ere des intelligences artificielles generatives,' describing an infographic intended to support informed use of generative-AI tools for learning quality.
5+Evidence (fr, a750cc5b7072): Cette infographie vise a accompagner les enseignants dans une utilisation eclairee de ces outils au service de la qualite des apprentissages.
6+Source Last-Modified: 2025-04-10T16:24:07.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+source_status: An official Toulouse Law School page and PDF publish AI guidelines for law teaching; the source scopes the institutional AI-use framework to activities of teaching, training, and assessment within the Ecole de Droit de Toulouse, not to all Universite Toulouse Capitole programs.
10+Evidence (fr, e50b42cc2101): La presente charte fixe le cadre institutionnel d'utilisation de l'IA dans les activites d'enseignement, de formation et d'evaluation au sein de l'Ecole de Droit de Toulouse.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:41:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+teaching: The Toulouse Law School guidelines say homework may be corrected for pedagogical purposes but should not count toward continuous-assessment grades except where AI use itself is evaluated; in that case students must explain their method, describe AI use, and correct or analyze results.
15+Evidence (fr, 997957a112f4): Les devoirs maison peuvent etre corriges a des fins pedagogiques, mais ne doivent pas compter dans la note de controle continu sauf cas particulier ou l'usage de l'IA est lui-meme evalue.
16+Source Last-Modified: 2025-12-12T13:52:06.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+privacy: The Toulouse Law School AI guidelines strongly discourage using institutional professional email addresses with commercial, foreign, or paid AI services; they invite users to use personal/dedicated accounts or university-secured AI tools, and prohibit depositing sensitive documents on external AI systems.
20+Evidence (fr, 997957a112f4): Il est fortement deconseille d'utiliser l'adresse professionnelle institutionnelle pour interroger des IA commerciales, etrangeres ou payantes.
21+Source Last-Modified: 2025-12-12T13:52:06.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+ai_tool_treatment: For Toulouse Law School teaching, training, and assessment activities, the AI guidelines say AI use by a student or teacher must be declared when it contributes to work that is submitted, published, or evaluated.
25+Evidence (fr, 997957a112f4): Tout usage de l'IA par un etudiant ou par un enseignant doit etre declare, lorsque celui-ci contribue a un travail remis, publie ou evalue.
26+Source Last-Modified: 2025-12-12T13:52:06.000Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+academic_integrity: For Toulouse Law School students, the AI guidelines permit study-support uses such as summaries, explanations, plans, practice QCMs, and reformulation, but say AI must not be used to fabricate all or part of graded work and list generation of exam papers, homework, case comments, or dissertations as prohibited uses.
30+Evidence (fr, 997957a112f4): Les etudiants peuvent utiliser des outils d'IA pour : resumer un cours, un arret ou un article ; proposer des explications complementaires ; generer des plans, pistes d'argumentation ou exemples.
31+Source Last-Modified: 2025-12-12T13:52:06.000Z
1432 ## Source attribution added
1533 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
34+Source https://tls-droit.ut-capitole.fr/accueil/presentation/lignes-directrices-pour-un-bon-usage-de-lia-generative-dans-lenseignement-du-droit snapshot e50b42cc2101a044016608739d2ee372f2dfc25552c991b38abd906da5e642a3
35+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:41:00.000Z
1636 ## Source attribution added
1737 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
38+Source https://tls-droit.ut-capitole.fr/medias/fichier/lignes-directrices-pour-un-bon-usage-de-l-ia-dans-l-enseignement-du-droit-2-_1765547526800-pdf?ID_FICHE=105938&INLINE=FALSE snapshot 997957a112f4e94c9f48bdeaf64308275f86a26b4e8c4c492c3bf9b2206a3353
39+Source Last-Modified: 2025-12-12T13:52:06.000Z
1840 ## Source attribution added
1941 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
42+Source https://www.ut-capitole.fr/accueil/bibliotheques/accompagnement-et-formations/enseignants-chercheurs/bu-enseigner-a-lere-des-intelligences-artificielles-generatives snapshot a750cc5b7072fcb68239c4f43899fed16106900eb959b220d939d593574390af
43+Source Last-Modified: 2025-04-10T16:24:07.000Z

Historique des versions

1 diff de publication publique

public-release-20260612-001

Comparé à public-release-20260526-003.

Texte de la politique0Récemment extraits6Instantanés source0Texte source0
Diff de versionDifférences JSON

différentiel Université Toulouse 1 Capitole public-release-20260612-001

Comparaison de public-release-20260526-003 avec public-release-20260612-001.

+24-0
11 # Université Toulouse 1 Capitole AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+source_status: The UT Capitole library maintains an official public page for teacher-researchers titled 'Enseigner dans le Superieur a l'ere des intelligences artificielles generatives,' describing an infographic intended to support informed use of generative-AI tools for learning quality.
5+Evidence (fr, a750cc5b7072): Cette infographie vise a accompagner les enseignants dans une utilisation eclairee de ces outils au service de la qualite des apprentissages.
6+Source Last-Modified: 2025-04-10T16:24:07.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+source_status: An official Toulouse Law School page and PDF publish AI guidelines for law teaching; the source scopes the institutional AI-use framework to activities of teaching, training, and assessment within the Ecole de Droit de Toulouse, not to all Universite Toulouse Capitole programs.
10+Evidence (fr, e50b42cc2101): La presente charte fixe le cadre institutionnel d'utilisation de l'IA dans les activites d'enseignement, de formation et d'evaluation au sein de l'Ecole de Droit de Toulouse.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:41:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+teaching: The Toulouse Law School guidelines say homework may be corrected for pedagogical purposes but should not count toward continuous-assessment grades except where AI use itself is evaluated; in that case students must explain their method, describe AI use, and correct or analyze results.
15+Evidence (fr, 997957a112f4): Les devoirs maison peuvent etre corriges a des fins pedagogiques, mais ne doivent pas compter dans la note de controle continu sauf cas particulier ou l'usage de l'IA est lui-meme evalue.
16+Source Last-Modified: 2025-12-12T13:52:06.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+privacy: The Toulouse Law School AI guidelines strongly discourage using institutional professional email addresses with commercial, foreign, or paid AI services; they invite users to use personal/dedicated accounts or university-secured AI tools, and prohibit depositing sensitive documents on external AI systems.
20+Evidence (fr, 997957a112f4): Il est fortement deconseille d'utiliser l'adresse professionnelle institutionnelle pour interroger des IA commerciales, etrangeres ou payantes.
21+Source Last-Modified: 2025-12-12T13:52:06.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+ai_tool_treatment: For Toulouse Law School teaching, training, and assessment activities, the AI guidelines say AI use by a student or teacher must be declared when it contributes to work that is submitted, published, or evaluated.
25+Evidence (fr, 997957a112f4): Tout usage de l'IA par un etudiant ou par un enseignant doit etre declare, lorsque celui-ci contribue a un travail remis, publie ou evalue.
26+Source Last-Modified: 2025-12-12T13:52:06.000Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+academic_integrity: For Toulouse Law School students, the AI guidelines permit study-support uses such as summaries, explanations, plans, practice QCMs, and reformulation, but say AI must not be used to fabricate all or part of graded work and list generation of exam papers, homework, case comments, or dissertations as prohibited uses.
30+Evidence (fr, 997957a112f4): Les etudiants peuvent utiliser des outils d'IA pour : resumer un cours, un arret ou un article ; proposer des explications complementaires ; generer des plans, pistes d'argumentation ou exemples.
31+Source Last-Modified: 2025-12-12T13:52:06.000Z
1432 ## Source attribution added
1533 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
34+Source https://tls-droit.ut-capitole.fr/accueil/presentation/lignes-directrices-pour-un-bon-usage-de-lia-generative-dans-lenseignement-du-droit snapshot e50b42cc2101a044016608739d2ee372f2dfc25552c991b38abd906da5e642a3
35+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:41:00.000Z
1636 ## Source attribution added
1737 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
38+Source https://tls-droit.ut-capitole.fr/medias/fichier/lignes-directrices-pour-un-bon-usage-de-l-ia-dans-l-enseignement-du-droit-2-_1765547526800-pdf?ID_FICHE=105938&INLINE=FALSE snapshot 997957a112f4e94c9f48bdeaf64308275f86a26b4e8c4c492c3bf9b2206a3353
39+Source Last-Modified: 2025-12-12T13:52:06.000Z
1840 ## Source attribution added
1941 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
42+Source https://www.ut-capitole.fr/accueil/bibliotheques/accompagnement-et-formations/enseignants-chercheurs/bu-enseigner-a-lere-des-intelligences-artificielles-generatives snapshot a750cc5b7072fcb68239c4f43899fed16106900eb959b220d939d593574390af
43+Source Last-Modified: 2025-04-10T16:24:07.000Z

Modifications d'affirmations

6 Affirmation enregistrements

academic_integrity

For Toulouse Law School students, the AI guidelines permit study-support uses such as summaries, explanations, plans, practice QCMs, and reformulation, but say AI must not be used to fabricate all or part of graded work and list generation of exam papers, homework, case comments, or dissertations as prohibited uses.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%Preuve2Languesfr

ai_tool_treatment

For Toulouse Law School teaching, training, and assessment activities, the AI guidelines say AI use by a student or teacher must be declared when it contributes to work that is submitted, published, or evaluated.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%Preuve1Languesfr

teaching

The Toulouse Law School guidelines say homework may be corrected for pedagogical purposes but should not count toward continuous-assessment grades except where AI use itself is evaluated; in that case students must explain their method, describe AI use, and correct or analyze results.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%Preuve1Languesfr

privacy

The Toulouse Law School AI guidelines strongly discourage using institutional professional email addresses with commercial, foreign, or paid AI services; they invite users to use personal/dedicated accounts or university-secured AI tools, and prohibit depositing sensitive documents on external AI systems.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%Preuve2Languesfr

source_status

An official Toulouse Law School page and PDF publish AI guidelines for law teaching; the source scopes the institutional AI-use framework to activities of teaching, training, and assessment within the Ecole de Droit de Toulouse, not to all Universite Toulouse Capitole programs.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%Preuve2Languesfr

source_status

The UT Capitole library maintains an official public page for teacher-researchers titled 'Enseigner dans le Superieur a l'ere des intelligences artificielles generatives,' describing an infographic intended to support informed use of generative-AI tools for learning quality.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance86%Preuve1Languesfr

Instantanés source

3 source attributions