public-release-20260612-001
Compared with public-release-20260526-003.
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole public-release-20260612-001 diff
Comparing public-release-20260526-003 to public-release-20260612-001.
Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 31, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 6 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
This page combines all public release diffs for Université Toulouse 1 Capitole. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Comparing public-release-20260526-003 to public-release-20260612-001.
1 public release diff
Compared with public-release-20260526-003.
Comparing public-release-20260526-003 to public-release-20260612-001.
6 claim records
For Toulouse Law School students, the AI guidelines permit study-support uses such as summaries, explanations, plans, practice QCMs, and reformulation, but say AI must not be used to fabricate all or part of graded work and list generation of exam papers, homework, case comments, or dissertations as prohibited uses.
For Toulouse Law School teaching, training, and assessment activities, the AI guidelines say AI use by a student or teacher must be declared when it contributes to work that is submitted, published, or evaluated.
The Toulouse Law School guidelines say homework may be corrected for pedagogical purposes but should not count toward continuous-assessment grades except where AI use itself is evaluated; in that case students must explain their method, describe AI use, and correct or analyze results.
The Toulouse Law School AI guidelines strongly discourage using institutional professional email addresses with commercial, foreign, or paid AI services; they invite users to use personal/dedicated accounts or university-secured AI tools, and prohibit depositing sensitive documents on external AI systems.
An official Toulouse Law School page and PDF publish AI guidelines for law teaching; the source scopes the institutional AI-use framework to activities of teaching, training, and assessment within the Ecole de Droit de Toulouse, not to all Universite Toulouse Capitole programs.
The UT Capitole library maintains an official public page for teacher-researchers titled 'Enseigner dans le Superieur a l'ere des intelligences artificielles generatives,' describing an infographic intended to support informed use of generative-AI tools for learning quality.
3 source attributions
official_guidance Source Last-Modified Apr 10, 2025, 4:24 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 31, 2026, 8:41 PM
official_pdf Source Last-Modified Dec 12, 2025, 1:52 PM