Policy presence
University of California, Riverside has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Riverside, United States
University of California, Riverside has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
University of California, Riverside has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of California, Riverside has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of California, Riverside has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of California, Riverside has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
University of California, Riverside has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of California, Riverside has 4 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
University of California, Riverside has 4 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
University of California, Riverside has 5 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
University of California, Riverside has 5 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of California, Riverside
University of California, Riverside
9 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: {"tool":"google_gemini","rawToolName":"Google Gemini","description":"UCR provides Gemini through its Google enterprise agreement and UCR Google Workspace suite.","howToObtain":"Use Gemini with a UCR Google Workspace account.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}
Bukti asal
Evidence 1UCR has secured an enterprise agreement with Google to provide protected access to its generative AI platforms Gemini and NotebookLM. Gemini and NotebookLM are now available to students, faculty, and staff through the UCR Google Workspace suite.
Paparan setempat only
UCR has secured an enterprise agreement with Google to provide protected access to its generative AI platforms Gemini and NotebookLM. Gemini and NotebookLM are now available to students, faculty, and staff through the UCR Google Workspace suite.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: {"tool":"google_notebooklm","rawToolName":"Google NotebookLM","description":"UCR provides NotebookLM through its Google enterprise agreement and UCR Google Workspace suite.","howToObtain":"Use NotebookLM with a UCR Google Workspace account.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}
Bukti asal
Evidence 1UCR has secured an enterprise agreement with Google to provide protected access to its generative AI platforms Gemini and NotebookLM. Gemini and NotebookLM are now available to students, faculty, and staff through the UCR Google Workspace suite.
Paparan setempat only
UCR has secured an enterprise agreement with Google to provide protected access to its generative AI platforms Gemini and NotebookLM. Gemini and NotebookLM are now available to students, faculty, and staff through the UCR Google Workspace suite.
Security Review
Normalized value: non-reviewed AI tools limited to public data
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Generative AI tools which have not passed a campus security review may be used with public data only. For all other data classifications, UCR provides access to secure tools including Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot.
Bukti asal
Evidence 2The standard ChatGPT tool (even paid versions) does not meet UCR privacy requirements. As a result, only P1 (Public) data can be used with a non-enterprise version of ChatGPT.
Teaching
Normalized value: beneficial and mission-aligned instructional AI use
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Any use of generative AI in an instructional setting, by instructors or students, should aim to improve the learning experience for students and better position students for academic and post-graduation success.
Bukti asal
Evidence 2The use of generative AI in instructional settings should aim to advance the university's instructional mission. This includes a strong emphasis on equitable access, opportunity, and achievement.
Procurement
Normalized value: ITS lists supported AI tools and allowed data levels
Bukti asal
Evidence 1The AI tools comparison chart lists Tool/Platform, Description, Roles Allowed, Getting Access, Training Resources, Cost, and Allowed Data for tools including The Grove, Gemini, NotebookLM, Google AI Pro, Google AI Studio, Microsoft 365 Copilot, ChatGPT EDU, Vertex AI, and Zoom AI Companion.
Bukti asal
Evidence 2ChatGPT EDU | Generates text, images, and other content in response to user prompts, facilitating natural and interactive communication. | Faculty, Staff, Students | Not available currently, still in negotiations with OpenAI.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: students should follow instructor expectations, keep original work, and cite AI use
Bukti asal
Evidence 1We encourage you to discuss with your professors for specific policies or expectations before engaging in the use of Generative AI resources on academic assignments, papers, tests, etc.
Bukti asal
Evidence 2AI can assist with data analysis, generate ideas, or help structure your thoughts. However, you should not use it to generate essays, assignments, or other deliverables in their entirety.
Bukti asal
Evidence 3If you use AI-generated content or data as part of your research or assignments, ensure that you cite it properly.
Teaching
Normalized value: instructors should set syllabus/class AI-use and citation expectations
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Key points to discuss in your syllabus/ in class: If and when AI may be used to write a portion of homework or any other assignment; How to properly cite the use of any AI.
Bukti asal
Evidence 2Although generative AI may be used like any other source of information that supports your work, it must be properly quoted and cited each time it is used. Failure to properly cite the use of AI in your work will be viewed as a potential academic integrity violation.
Source Status
Normalized value: official instructional guidance found; course-level local authority emphasized
Bukti asal
Evidence 1In instructional settings, this means the Instructor of Record has broad latitude to determine whether and how generative AI may be used, provided this use is consistent with applicable policies and rules governing data security and instruction at UCR.
Bukti asal
Evidence 2We encourage you to discuss with your professors for specific policies or expectations before engaging in the use of Generative AI resources on academic assignments, papers, tests, etc.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: general academic misconduct definitions
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Cheating: Fraud, deceit, or dishonesty in an academic assignment, or using or attempting to use materials, or assisting others in using materials that are prohibited or inappropriate in the context of the academic assignment or capstone in question.
Bukti asal
Evidence 2Plagiarism is the appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit.
Bukti asal
Evidence 3Unauthorized Collaboration: Working with others without the specific permission of the instructor on assignments that will be submitted for a grade.
0 machine or needs-review claim
6 source attribution
conduct.ucr.edu
teaching.ucr.edu
its.ucr.edu
provost.ucr.edu
insideucr.ucr.edu
insideucr.ucr.edu