University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Santa Barbara, United States

University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB)

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: 179UpdatedJul 19, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

14 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

UCSB-managed AI platform on AWS Bedrock is listed for University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"aws_bedrock","rawToolName":"UCSB-managed AI platform on AWS Bedrock","description":"UCSB lists an AI platform on AWS Bedrock as a generative-AI pilot program being tested for future adoption.","howToObtain":"Pilot access details are not stated in the cited annual report.","costToUser":"Not specified by the cited source.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"not_specified"}

Last checked
Jul 16, 2026
Last changed
Jul 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
UCSB launched several generative AI pilot programs aimed at testing secure, scalable tools and gathering insights for future adoption: A UCSB-managed AI platform on AWS Bedrock.

Localized display only

UCSB launched several generative AI pilot programs aimed at testing secure, scalable tools and gathering insights for future adoption: A UCSB-managed AI platform on AWS Bedrock.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
cc63b66a…
Retrieved
Jul 16, 2026

Ai Tool Treatment

GitHub Copilot is listed for University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"github_copilot","rawToolName":"GitHub Copilot","description":"UCSB lists GitHub Copilot as one of several generative-AI pilot programs being tested for future adoption.","howToObtain":"Pilot access details are not stated in the cited annual report.","costToUser":"Not specified by the cited source.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"not_specified"}

Last checked
Jul 16, 2026
Last changed
Jul 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
UCSB launched several generative AI pilot programs aimed at testing secure, scalable tools and gathering insights for future adoption: GitHub Copilot.

Localized display only

UCSB launched several generative AI pilot programs aimed at testing secure, scalable tools and gathering insights for future adoption: GitHub Copilot.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
cc63b66a…
Retrieved
Jul 16, 2026

Ai Tool Treatment

Google AI Pro for Education is listed for University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"google_ai_pro","rawToolName":"Google AI Pro for Education","description":"UCSB lists Google AI Pro for Education as one of several generative-AI pilot programs being tested for future adoption.","howToObtain":"Pilot access details are not stated in the cited annual report.","costToUser":"Not specified by the cited source.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"not_specified"}

Last checked
Jul 16, 2026
Last changed
Jul 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
UCSB launched several generative AI pilot programs aimed at testing secure, scalable tools and gathering insights for future adoption: Google AI Pro for Education.

Localized display only

UCSB launched several generative AI pilot programs aimed at testing secure, scalable tools and gathering insights for future adoption: Google AI Pro for Education.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
cc63b66a…
Retrieved
Jul 16, 2026

Security Review

UCSB's AI technical and security guidance calls for assessing AI third-party applications, consulting the Office of Information Security on AI use cases and implementations, and contacting the Chief Information Security Officer's office for P3/P4 data use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: ai_security_assessment_and_p3_p4_consultation

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Assess the inclusion of AI third-party applications, including privacy policies, certifications, and audit reports. Consult with the Office of Information Security to assist with reviewing the use case and AI implementation. Users who seek to incorporate P3/P4 data should contact the Chief Information Security Officer's office.

Localized display only

The technical guidance directs AI implementation reviewers to assess third-party apps, consult the Office of Information Security, and contact the CISO office for P3/P4 data.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
7c82ec0f…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
AI Technical & Security Guidelines, Vendor Evaluation

Procurement

UCSB CIO implementation guidance says, as a general guideline, AI implementations with expected initial costs over $100,000 or ongoing operating costs over $50,000 should be brought to the IT Council for review and evaluation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: ai_implementation_it_council_review_thresholds

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
As a general guideline, those implementations with expected initial implementation costs of over $100,000, and/or ongoing operating costs of over $50,000, should be brought to the IT Council for review and evaluation.

Localized display only

The implementation guidance gives cost thresholds for bringing AI implementations to UCSB's IT Council for review and evaluation.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
7c82ec0f…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
AI Implementation and Prioritization Guidelines, Evaluation Process

Academic Integrity

UCSB Student Conduct's academic-integrity FAQ says use of artificial-intelligence tools on assignments is at the instructor of record's discretion, and students should check the syllabus and discuss acceptable use with the instructor.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: ai_assignment_use_instructor_discretion

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Using any tool such as an artificial-intelligence program is up to the discretion of the instructor of record. We advise students to review their course syllabus and have a conversation with their instructor of record regarding what is an acceptable or not acceptable use of artificial-intelligence programs in the specific course.

Localized display only

Student Conduct says assignment use of AI tools is determined by the instructor of record and points students to the syllabus and instructor discussion.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
e44a0245…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
FAQ question on artificial-intelligence software allowed for assignments

Privacy

UCSB Information Technology guidance says ChatGPT should be treated as potentially unprotected for personal, confidential, or otherwise sensitive information and should not be used with sensitive or confidential information.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: do_not_use_chatgpt_with_sensitive_or_confidential_information

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
At present, ChatGPT should be used with the assumption that any personal, confidential, or otherwise sensitive information may not be protected. Do not use ChatGPT with sensitive or confidential information, such as student information, health information, financial information, staff information, personally identifiable information (PII), or personnel conduct data.

Localized display only

UCSB IT warns that ChatGPT may not protect personal, confidential, or sensitive information and should not be used with sensitive or confidential information.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
f03e773c…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Data Protection and ChatGPT Use guidance

Other

UCSB's CIO page provides AI-use guidance for members of the campus community engaging with AI for research, teaching, administrative work, and other university-associated functions, with context-dependent application.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: campus_ai_use_guidance

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
These guidelines, developed by the UCSB ITC Subcommittee on AI, are intended to serve as guidance for members of the campus community who engage with AI for research, teaching, administrative work, and other university-associated functions.

Localized display only

UCSB's CIO page frames the guidelines as campus-community guidance for AI use across research, teaching, administrative work, and other university functions.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
7c82ec0f…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Guidelines for AI Use introduction

Academic Integrity

UCSB OTL states that UCSB does not support AI plagiarism-detection software and that the Office of Student Conduct does not accept such tools as sole evidence for academic dishonesty.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: ai_detection_not_supported_not_sole_evidence

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
While AI detection software exists, the UCSB Office of Student Conduct does not accept these tools as sole evidence for academic dishonesty due to their known inaccuracies. UCSB does not support the use of plagiarism detection software.

Localized display only

OTL says AI-detection tools are not accepted as sole academic-dishonesty evidence and says UCSB does not support plagiarism-detection software.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
56204fd5…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Approach to Suspected AI Misuse and AI Plagiarism Detection Software

Source Status

UCSB OTL states that neither UCSB nor the UC system has a formal generative-AI policy for teaching and learning contexts, so instructors may formulate class policies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: no_formal_genai_teaching_learning_policy_stated_by_otl

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Neither UCSB nor the UC system has a formal policy on generative AI in teaching and learning contexts, thereby allowing instructors to formulate their own class policies.

Localized display only

OTL describes the teaching-and-learning policy status as decentralized to instructor class policies rather than a formal UCSB or UC generative-AI teaching policy.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
56204fd5…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Policies for Gen AI in Classes

Ai Tool Treatment

UCSB CIO guidance says units implementing AI tools should make clear when AI tools are used, when AI use is permitted or forbidden, and when individual or campus-unit data is used to train AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: transparency_for_ai_tool_use_and_training_data

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Individuals should be informed when AI-enabled tools are being used. When individuals are permitted or forbidden to use AI tools, or when individual or campus unit data is used to train AI-enabled tools, this should be made clear by the units implementing the AI tools.

Localized display only

The CIO guidance asks implementing units to be transparent about AI-tool use, permissions or prohibitions, and use of individual or unit data for AI training.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
7c82ec0f…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Transparency section

Teaching

The UCSB Writing Program's AI policy encourages critically aware and transparent use of AI writing technology and expects students to maintain academic integrity by acknowledging assistance from these tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: writing_program_transparent_ai_writing_tool_attribution

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Given the expanding role that large language models will undoubtedly play in our students' lives, we encourage highly mediated, critically-aware, and transparent use of AI writing technology. We expect students to maintain academic integrity and honesty while using AI writing technology, acknowledging any and all assistance received from these tools.

Localized display only

The Writing Program encourages transparent, critically aware AI writing-tool use and expects students to acknowledge assistance.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
5c44eec8…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Writing Program AI policy key policy points

Source record

Official sources

7 sources

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Learning

otl.ucsb.edu

Snapshot hash
0b8f2f45…
Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence97%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-california-santa-barbara

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log