Kehadiran dasar
West Virginia University mempunyai tuntutan awam berasaskan sumber 5 s untuk Kehadiran dasar; status analisis deterministik: Tidak jelas.
Morgantown, United States
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists West Virginia University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on 31 Mei 2026 and last changed on 31 Mei 2026. The record contains 8 source-backed claims, including 8 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. The entity-level confidence is 96%.
West Virginia University mempunyai tuntutan awam berasaskan sumber 5 s untuk Kehadiran dasar; status analisis deterministik: Tidak jelas.
West Virginia University mempunyai tuntutan awam berasaskan sumber 2 s untuk Pendedahan AI; status analisis deterministik: Diperlukan.
West Virginia University mempunyai tuntutan awam berasaskan sumber 4 s untuk Kerja kursus; status analisis deterministik: Tertakluk.
West Virginia University mempunyai tuntutan awam berasaskan sumber 4 s untuk Peperiksaan; status analisis deterministik: Tertakluk.
West Virginia University mempunyai tuntutan awam berasaskan sumber 1 untuk Privasi dan input data; status analisis deterministik: Tertakluk.
West Virginia University mempunyai tuntutan awam berasaskan sumber 2 s untuk Jujub akademik; status analisis deterministik: Tertakluk.
West Virginia University mempunyai tuntutan awam berasaskan sumber 2 s untuk Alat yang diluluskan; status analisis deterministik: Tertakluk.
West Virginia University mempunyai tuntutan awam berasaskan sumber 3 s untuk Perkhidmatan AI bernama; status analisis deterministik: Tertakluk.
West Virginia University mempunyai tuntutan awam berasaskan sumber 4 s untuk Panduan pengajaran; status analisis deterministik: Disyorkan.
Tiada tuntutan awam yang disokong sumber mengenai penggunaan AI dalam penyelidikan wujud dalam profil ini.
Rekod penjejak awam semasa tidak mengandungi bukti tuntutan mengenai penggunaan penyelidikan, etika penerbitan, data penyelidikan, geran, atau pematuhan subjek manusia.
West Virginia University mempunyai tuntutan awam berasaskan sumber 1 untuk Keselamatan dan perolehan; status analisis deterministik: Disyorkan.
8 tuntutan awam berasaskan bukti yang disemak
Privasi
Nilai ternormalisasi: do not enter PII confidential or sensitive data into generative AI without IT Purchase Request approval
Bukti asal
Bukti 1Never put personally identifiable information (PII), confidential, or other sensitive data into a generative AI tool unless you have been explicitly approved to do so through the IT Purchase Request process.
Academic Integrity
Nilai ternormalisasi: unauthorized generative AI use treated as unauthorized technological resource use
Bukti asal
Bukti 1Yes, the WVU Policy on Student Academic Integrity prohibits the unauthorized use of technological resources, such as generative AI.
Academic Integrity
Nilai ternormalisasi: students may use AI tools only when instructor allows
Bukti asal
Bukti 1Students can only use artificial intelligence tools when allowed by instructors. Permission to use these tools can vary from program to program, course to course, and assignment to assignment.
Pengajaran
Nilai ternormalisasi: AI tools creating academic content require instructor permission under Faculty Senate syllabus statement
Bukti asal
Bukti 1Artificial intelligence (AI) tools that can create and develop academic content are not allowed unless permission is given by an instructor. Students must receive instructor permission prior to utilizing AI tools.
Lain-lain
Nilai ternormalisasi: administrative generative AI guidance applies to faculty, staff, and students for administrative activities
Bukti asal
Bukti 1These guidelines apply to WVU faculty, staff, and students when engaging in administrative activities and complement existing policies related to the use of technology at WVU.
Perolehan
Nilai ternormalisasi: IT Purchase Request process for AI tools including free software
Bukti asal
Bukti 1Use the IT Purchase Request process to ensure the tool you want to use is secure, including “free” software.
Pengajaran
Nilai ternormalisasi: Faculty Senate optional AI syllabus statements include permissive and restrictive examples
Bukti asal
Bukti 1These syllabus statements are optional. However, if a statement is used, it must appear in the syllabus exactly as it is listed below (unless otherwise indicated). Note: Additional example statements that clearly allow or disallow the use of AI are also provided.
Lain-lain
Nilai ternormalisasi: library citation guide links MLA APA Chicago resources for citing AI
Bukti asal
Bukti 1Citation Styles. Citing AI - MLA style. MLA recommendations for citing generative AI. Citing AI - APA style. This post discusses ongoing APA efforts for using ChatGPT. Citing AI - Chicago style.
0 tuntutan mesin atau perlu-semak
Belum ada bukti peringkat alat diterbitkan untuk rekod ini. Penyebutan alat AI yang luas tidak dikembangkan menjadi kesimpulan alat dinamakan.
4 penisahan sumber
academicintegrity.wvu.edu
libguides.wvu.edu
facultysenate.wvu.edu
it.wvu.edu