Policy presence
University of Texas at San Antonio has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
San Antonio, United States
University of Texas at San Antonio
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
University of Texas at San Antonio has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of Texas at San Antonio has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Texas at San Antonio has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Texas at San Antonio has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of Texas at San Antonio has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of Texas at San Antonio has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Texas at San Antonio has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of Texas at San Antonio has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
UTSA's faculty generative AI guide advises faculty to clearly state in the syllabus and course homepage whether and how AI use is allowed, while recognizing that faculty may choose different course approaches.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Faculty guide advises course-level AI-use expectations in syllabus and course homepage.
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Faculty are responsible for their syllabus and courses. Because faculty may choose different approaches for generative AI, clearly state in the syllabus and the course homepage whether and how you are allowing the use of AI.
Source Status
UTSA Academic Affairs maintains an official Teaching, Learning and Artificial Intelligence page that links separate UT San Antonio-created AI resources for students and faculty.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Official UTSA AI hub links student and faculty AI resources.
Bukti asal
Evidence 1AI resources created by UT San Antonio ... For UT San Antonio Students ... AI Essentials: Guidelines and Approaches ... For UT San Antonio Faculty ... Using Generative AI in Teaching, Learning and Research.
Ai Tool Treatment
UTSA's faculty generative AI guide identifies Microsoft Copilot as the only UTSA-approved AI tool in that guide, citing commercial data protection, and separately cautions users to avoid sharing private data to any LLM.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Microsoft Copilot identified in faculty guide as only UTSA-approved AI tool; avoid private data in any LLM.
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Faculty, staff and students can use the Microsoft CoPilot license to get started with generative AI. This is the only UTSA-approved AI tool because it offers the power of GPT-4 ... with Microsoft’s stringent commercial data protection ... Users should be careful to avoid sharing private data to any LLM.
Academic Integrity
UTSA's faculty guide warns that AI detection tools are imperfect and recommends using established university conduct processes and evidence-based evaluation rather than relying solely on AI-detection results.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: AI detection results should not be the sole basis for academic-integrity handling under the faculty guide.
Bukti asal
Evidence 1AI detection tools ... are inherently imperfect and prone to false positives and false negatives. Relying solely on detection tools can lead to inaccuracies ... To uphold academic integrity, we emphasize following the established processes and guidelines outlined in the university's code of conduct.
Academic Integrity
UTSA Libraries' Artificial Intelligence guide says AI-generated information should be fact-checked and that AI used as a source or content generator needs to be cited in submitted work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: UTSA Libraries AI guide tells users to fact-check AI and cite AI when used as source or content generator.
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Fact-check: AI can generate false information. Verify with additional sources. ... Acknowledgement: If you use AI as a source or as a content generator, it needs to be cited in your work.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
5 source attribution
AI Essentials: Guidelines & Approaches
provost.utsa.edu
Artificial Intelligence: Citing
libguides.utsa.edu
Teaching, Learning and Artificial Intelligence
provost.utsa.edu
Updated for 2025: AI Guide for UT San Antonio Faculty
provost.utsa.edu
Using Generative AI in Teaching, Learning, and Research
provost.utsa.edu