Policy presence
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Dublin, Ireland
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 9 source-backed AI policy claims from 8 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 9 reviewed claims. Last checked May 25, 2026.
v1 public contract
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 9 source-backed AI policy claims from 8 official source attributions, including 9 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 25, 2026. Discovery context: Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin is listed as QS 2026 rank 75.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 25, 2026 and last changed on May 26, 2026. The record contains 9 source-backed claims, including 9 reviewed claims, from 8 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/trinity-college-dublin-the-university-of-dublin.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 4 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 3 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
9 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Normalized value: do_not_input_private_student_or_staff_information
Bukti asal
Evidence 1you are NOT allowed to use private student or staff information as part of your queries or instructions when using GenAI tools
Paparan setempat only
The teaching page says private student or staff information must not be used in GenAI prompts.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: genai_output_as_own_work_is_plagiarism
Bukti asal
Evidence 1If a student generates content from a GenAI tool and submits it as their own work, it is considered plagiarism
Paparan setempat only
The assessment page treats submitting GenAI output as one's own work as plagiarism.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: central_statement_balanced_opportunity_and_risk
Bukti asal
Evidence 1AI and GenAI offer new opportunities for teaching, learning, assessment and research... challenges and risks, including to academic integrity, ethics, privacy
Paparan setempat only
The central statement frames AI/GenAI as both an opportunity and a risk area.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: library_requires_acknowledgement_appendix_methods_minimum_details
Bukti asal
Evidence 1The use of GenAI must be acknowledged in an Appendix or Methods section of any piece of academic work
Paparan setempat only
The Library guide requires acknowledgement of functional GenAI use in academic work.
Research
Normalized value: researchers_responsible_transparent_and_privacy_aware
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Researchers remain ultimately responsible for scientific output. Researchers should use GenAI transparently, i.e. by citing usage in outputs.
Paparan setempat only
The research page emphasizes researcher responsibility and transparent citation of GenAI use.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: GenAI assessment use must be disclosed, acknowledged, referenced, and explained.
Bukti asal
Evidence 1To maintain academic integrity when using GenAI in an assessment, the specific uses of GenAI must be disclosed, properly acknowledged and referenced. Students should explain in detail what, when, and how they used GenAI in their assignment.
Teaching
Normalized value: teaching_use_requires_clear_parameters_access_practice_alignment
Bukti asal
Evidence 1students have equitable access to tools at no additional costs; students are given opportunities to practice using GenAI tools; parameters... are clear
Paparan setempat only
The teaching page says staff should address access, practice opportunities, clear parameters and alignment.
Source Status
Normalized value: genai_policy_under_development
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Policies are currently under development relating to the ethical and appropriate use of generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment
Paparan setempat only
Trinity says GenAI-related teaching, learning and assessment policies are under development.
Security Review
Normalized value: it_services_ai_security_data_protection_considerations
Bukti asal
Evidence 1important considerations to keep in mind, including information security and data protection, when using AI tools such as ChatGPT
Paparan setempat only
IT Services flags information security and data protection considerations for AI tools.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
8 source attribution
tcd.ie
libguides.tcd.ie
tcd.ie
tcd.ie
tcd.ie
tcd.ie
tcd.ie
tcd.ie
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.