Change log

Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 13, 2026Last changedMay 13, 2026Claims8Sources8

University page Public JSON

Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 13, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

11 # Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin AI policy record
2+privacy: Trinity's teaching and learning guidance says private student or staff information must not be used in GenAI queries or instructions.
3+Evidence (en, bda88d18355c): you are NOT allowed to use private student or staff information as part of your queries or instructions when using GenAI tools
4+academic_integrity: Trinity's GenAI assessment guidance states that submitting GenAI-generated content as a student's own work is considered plagiarism.
5+Evidence (en, 1f4fa97613d4): If a student generates content from a GenAI tool and submits it as their own work, it is considered plagiarism
6+ai_tool_treatment: Trinity's College Statement treats AI and GenAI as relevant to teaching, learning, assessment and research while identifying risks including academic integrity, ethics and privacy.
7+Evidence (en, 67b2a1c29ae6): AI and GenAI offer new opportunities for teaching, learning, assessment and research... challenges and risks, including to academic integrity, ethics, privacy
8+academic_integrity: Trinity Library guidance says GenAI use as a functional tool in academic work must be acknowledged in an Appendix or Methods section, with minimum details including the system name and version, publisher, URL and context of use.
9+Evidence (en, 23a950167e55): The use of GenAI must be acknowledged in an Appendix or Methods section of any piece of academic work
10+research: Trinity's research guidance says researchers remain responsible for scientific output, should cite GenAI usage in outputs, and should attend to privacy, confidentiality and intellectual-property issues when sharing sensitive information with AI tools.
11+Evidence (en, f05d1e69e246): Researchers remain ultimately responsible for scientific output. Researchers should use GenAI transparently, i.e. by citing usage in outputs.
12+teaching: Trinity's teaching and learning guidance says staff embedding GenAI should set clear parameters, support prompting practice, align use with learning outcomes, and ensure equitable access at no additional cost.
13+Evidence (en, bda88d18355c): students have equitable access to tools at no additional costs; students are given opportunities to practice using GenAI tools; parameters... are clear
14+source_status: Trinity's Centre for Academic Practice states that policies on ethical and appropriate use of generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment are currently under development.
15+Evidence (en, 21ec9f3f9a22): Policies are currently under development relating to the ethical and appropriate use of generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment
16+security_review: Trinity IT Services says AI tools such as ChatGPT raise information-security and data-protection considerations.
17+Evidence (en, 9181e6c67cfe): important considerations to keep in mind, including information security and data protection, when using AI tools such as ChatGPT

Claim changes

8 claim records

privacy

Trinity's teaching and learning guidance says private student or staff information must not be used in GenAI queries or instructions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Trinity's GenAI assessment guidance states that submitting GenAI-generated content as a student's own work is considered plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

Trinity's College Statement treats AI and GenAI as relevant to teaching, learning, assessment and research while identifying risks including academic integrity, ethics and privacy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Trinity Library guidance says GenAI use as a functional tool in academic work must be acknowledged in an Appendix or Methods section, with minimum details including the system name and version, publisher, URL and context of use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

research

Trinity's research guidance says researchers remain responsible for scientific output, should cite GenAI usage in outputs, and should attend to privacy, confidentiality and intellectual-property issues when sharing sensitive information with AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Trinity's teaching and learning guidance says staff embedding GenAI should set clear parameters, support prompting practice, align use with learning outcomes, and ensure equitable access at no additional cost.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

Trinity's Centre for Academic Practice states that policies on ethical and appropriate use of generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment are currently under development.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

Trinity IT Services says AI tools such as ChatGPT raise information-security and data-protection considerations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%Evidence1Languagesen