Policy presence
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Dublin, Ireland
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin is listed as QS 2026 rank 75. Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 8 source-backed AI policy claim records from 8 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin is listed as QS 2026 rank 75. Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 8 source-backed AI policy claim records from 8 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 13, 2026 and last changed on May 13, 2026. The record contains 8 source-backed claims, including 8 reviewed claims, from 8 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/trinity-college-dublin-the-university-of-dublin.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes Security review claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 3 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
8 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Trinity's teaching and learning guidance says private student or staff information must not be used in GenAI queries or instructions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_input_private_student_or_staff_information
Original evidence
Evidence 1you are NOT allowed to use private student or staff information as part of your queries or instructions when using GenAI tools
Localized display only
The teaching page says private student or staff information must not be used in GenAI prompts.
Academic Integrity
Trinity's GenAI assessment guidance states that submitting GenAI-generated content as a student's own work is considered plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_output_as_own_work_is_plagiarism
Original evidence
Evidence 1If a student generates content from a GenAI tool and submits it as their own work, it is considered plagiarism
Localized display only
The assessment page treats submitting GenAI output as one's own work as plagiarism.
Ai Tool Treatment
Trinity's College Statement treats AI and GenAI as relevant to teaching, learning, assessment and research while identifying risks including academic integrity, ethics and privacy.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: central_statement_balanced_opportunity_and_risk
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI and GenAI offer new opportunities for teaching, learning, assessment and research... challenges and risks, including to academic integrity, ethics, privacy
Localized display only
The central statement frames AI/GenAI as both an opportunity and a risk area.
Academic Integrity
Trinity Library guidance says GenAI use as a functional tool in academic work must be acknowledged in an Appendix or Methods section, with minimum details including the system name and version, publisher, URL and context of use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: library_requires_acknowledgement_appendix_methods_minimum_details
Original evidence
Evidence 1The use of GenAI must be acknowledged in an Appendix or Methods section of any piece of academic work
Localized display only
The Library guide requires acknowledgement of functional GenAI use in academic work.
Research
Trinity's research guidance says researchers remain responsible for scientific output, should cite GenAI usage in outputs, and should attend to privacy, confidentiality and intellectual-property issues when sharing sensitive information with AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: researchers_responsible_transparent_and_privacy_aware
Original evidence
Evidence 1Researchers remain ultimately responsible for scientific output. Researchers should use GenAI transparently, i.e. by citing usage in outputs.
Localized display only
The research page emphasizes researcher responsibility and transparent citation of GenAI use.
Teaching
Trinity's teaching and learning guidance says staff embedding GenAI should set clear parameters, support prompting practice, align use with learning outcomes, and ensure equitable access at no additional cost.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: teaching_use_requires_clear_parameters_access_practice_alignment
Original evidence
Evidence 1students have equitable access to tools at no additional costs; students are given opportunities to practice using GenAI tools; parameters... are clear
Localized display only
The teaching page says staff should address access, practice opportunities, clear parameters and alignment.
Source Status
Trinity's Centre for Academic Practice states that policies on ethical and appropriate use of generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment are currently under development.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_policy_under_development
Original evidence
Evidence 1Policies are currently under development relating to the ethical and appropriate use of generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment
Localized display only
Trinity says GenAI-related teaching, learning and assessment policies are under development.
Security Review
Trinity IT Services says AI tools such as ChatGPT raise information-security and data-protection considerations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: it_services_ai_security_data_protection_considerations
Original evidence
Evidence 1important considerations to keep in mind, including information security and data protection, when using AI tools such as ChatGPT
Localized display only
IT Services flags information security and data protection considerations for AI tools.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
8 source attribution
Academic Integrity Policies & Supports at Trinity
tcd.ie
Acknowledging & Referencing Gen AI - Generative AI - Library Guides at Trinity College Dublin
libguides.tcd.ie
Artificial Intelligence (AI) - IT Services
tcd.ie
College Statement on Artificial Intelligence and Generative AI in Teaching, Learning, Assessment & Research
tcd.ie
Gen AI Hub - Centre for Academic Practice, Trinity Teaching & Learning
tcd.ie
GenAI and Assessment
tcd.ie
GenAI in Research
tcd.ie
Using GenAI in Teaching and Learning
tcd.ie
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.