Policy presence
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Dublin, Ireland
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 4 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 3 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
9 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Trinity's teaching and learning guidance says private student or staff information must not be used in GenAI queries or instructions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_input_private_student_or_staff_information
Original evidence
Evidence 1you are NOT allowed to use private student or staff information as part of your queries or instructions when using GenAI tools
Localized display only
The teaching page says private student or staff information must not be used in GenAI prompts.
Academic Integrity
Trinity's GenAI assessment guidance states that submitting GenAI-generated content as a student's own work is considered plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_output_as_own_work_is_plagiarism
Original evidence
Evidence 1If a student generates content from a GenAI tool and submits it as their own work, it is considered plagiarism
Localized display only
The assessment page treats submitting GenAI output as one's own work as plagiarism.
Ai Tool Treatment
Trinity's College Statement treats AI and GenAI as relevant to teaching, learning, assessment and research while identifying risks including academic integrity, ethics and privacy.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: central_statement_balanced_opportunity_and_risk
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI and GenAI offer new opportunities for teaching, learning, assessment and research... challenges and risks, including to academic integrity, ethics, privacy
Localized display only
The central statement frames AI/GenAI as both an opportunity and a risk area.
Academic Integrity
Trinity Library guidance says GenAI use as a functional tool in academic work must be acknowledged in an Appendix or Methods section, with minimum details including the system name and version, publisher, URL and context of use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: library_requires_acknowledgement_appendix_methods_minimum_details
Original evidence
Evidence 1The use of GenAI must be acknowledged in an Appendix or Methods section of any piece of academic work
Localized display only
The Library guide requires acknowledgement of functional GenAI use in academic work.
Research
Trinity's research guidance says researchers remain responsible for scientific output, should cite GenAI usage in outputs, and should attend to privacy, confidentiality and intellectual-property issues when sharing sensitive information with AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: researchers_responsible_transparent_and_privacy_aware
Original evidence
Evidence 1Researchers remain ultimately responsible for scientific output. Researchers should use GenAI transparently, i.e. by citing usage in outputs.
Localized display only
The research page emphasizes researcher responsibility and transparent citation of GenAI use.
Academic Integrity
Trinity College Dublin says specific uses of GenAI in an assessment must be disclosed, properly acknowledged, and referenced; students should explain what, when, and how they used GenAI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: GenAI assessment use must be disclosed, acknowledged, referenced, and explained.
Original evidence
Evidence 1To maintain academic integrity when using GenAI in an assessment, the specific uses of GenAI must be disclosed, properly acknowledged and referenced. Students should explain in detail what, when, and how they used GenAI in their assignment.
Teaching
Trinity's teaching and learning guidance says staff embedding GenAI should set clear parameters, support prompting practice, align use with learning outcomes, and ensure equitable access at no additional cost.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: teaching_use_requires_clear_parameters_access_practice_alignment
Original evidence
Evidence 1students have equitable access to tools at no additional costs; students are given opportunities to practice using GenAI tools; parameters... are clear
Localized display only
The teaching page says staff should address access, practice opportunities, clear parameters and alignment.
Source Status
Trinity's Centre for Academic Practice states that policies on ethical and appropriate use of generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment are currently under development.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_policy_under_development
Original evidence
Evidence 1Policies are currently under development relating to the ethical and appropriate use of generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment
Localized display only
Trinity says GenAI-related teaching, learning and assessment policies are under development.
Security Review
Trinity IT Services says AI tools such as ChatGPT raise information-security and data-protection considerations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: it_services_ai_security_data_protection_considerations
Original evidence
Evidence 1important considerations to keep in mind, including information security and data protection, when using AI tools such as ChatGPT
Localized display only
IT Services flags information security and data protection considerations for AI tools.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
8 source attribution
Academic Integrity Policies & Supports at Trinity
tcd.ie
Acknowledging & Referencing Gen AI - Generative AI - Library Guides at Trinity College Dublin
libguides.tcd.ie
Artificial Intelligence (AI) - IT Services
tcd.ie
College Statement on Artificial Intelligence and Generative AI in Teaching, Learning, Assessment & Research
tcd.ie
Gen AI Hub - Centre for Academic Practice, Trinity Teaching & Learning
tcd.ie
GenAI and Assessment
tcd.ie
GenAI in Research
tcd.ie
Using GenAI in Teaching and Learning
tcd.ie