University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Bahasa
ENZHFRPLMS

Dublin, Ireland

Technological University Dublin

PenarafanQS World University Rankings 2026: 781-790Updated19 Jul 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Tuntutan disemak

8 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Technological University Dublin in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan97%

Nilai ternormalisasi: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"Technological University Dublin provides or institutionally supports Microsoft Copilot.","howToObtain":"Sign in with a TU Dublin Office 365 account.","costToUser":"No individual price is stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Terakhir diperiksa
19 Jul 2026
Terkini diubah
19 Jul 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Users who are signed in with a TU Dublin Office 365 account can access Microsoft Copilot

Paparan setempat only

Users who are signed in with a TU Dublin Office 365 account can access Microsoft Copilot

Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
17ee6a99…
Diperoleh
19 Jul 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 2
Microsoft Copilot is the only AI assistant supported for use at TU Dublin.

Paparan setempat only

Microsoft Copilot is the only AI assistant supported for use at TU Dublin.

Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
17ee6a99…
Diperoleh
19 Jul 2026

Penyelidikan

TU Dublin's research GenAI guidance says artificial intelligence systems and generative models cannot be included as co-authors on research, innovation, or scholarly outputs.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan96%

Nilai ternormalisasi: AI systems and generative models cannot be co-authors

Terakhir diperiksa
20 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
20 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
In line with the University’s Authorship and Publication policy, artificial intelligence systems and/or generative models cannot be included as co-authors on any research, innovation or scholarly output.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
b2c80812…
Diperoleh
20 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Principle 6

Ai Tool Treatment

For student assessment, TU Dublin guidance says generative AI can only be used in ways approved in advance by the lecturer, and that failure to follow the guidelines or inappropriate AI use may result in disciplinary action as a breach of academic integrity.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%

Nilai ternormalisasi: Student GenAI use requires advance lecturer approval for assessments

Terakhir diperiksa
20 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
20 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
To support academic integrity, GenAI can only be used by students in ways that are approved in advance by their lecturer. Failure to adhere to these guidelines or the inappropriate use of AI, as determined by the relevant Faculty, may result in disciplinary action as it is a breach of academic integrity.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
e2659fa8…
Diperoleh
20 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Principles Underpinning use of AI and GenAI in TU Dublin

Pengajaran

TU Dublin recommends using the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale when designing assessments and communicating with students about how generative AI may be used in a specific assessment.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%

Nilai ternormalisasi: AIAS recommended for assessment design and student communication

Terakhir diperiksa
20 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
20 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
TU Dublin recommends the use of the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale in the design of assessments and for communication with students about assessments.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
e2659fa8…
Diperoleh
20 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Use of Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS)

Penyelidikan

TU Dublin's research GenAI guidance says use of generative AI tools must follow applicable institutional, national, EU and international laws, regulations, and data protection standards, and that users are wholly responsible for checking the veracity, accuracy, creative merit, falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism risks of model output.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%

Nilai ternormalisasi: Research GenAI use must meet law/data protection obligations and user responsibility

Terakhir diperiksa
20 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
20 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Use of generative AI systems/tools must follow applicable institutional, national, EU and international laws, regulations and data protection standards. The user of generative AI systems/tools is wholly responsible for ensuring the veracity, accuracy and/or creative merit of the output generated by the model, and for assessing the potential for falsification, fabrication and plagiarism due to the use of the system.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
b2c80812…
Diperoleh
20 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Principles for use of Generative AI, Principles 1 and 3

Privasi

TU Dublin's GenAI teaching and learning guidance says personal data should not be entered into GenAI systems that are not supported or approved by the University, and that students should not collect, store, or upload personal data to a GenAI system without permission or consent.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%

Nilai ternormalisasi: Personal data restricted in unsupported or unapproved GenAI systems

Terakhir diperiksa
20 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
20 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Personal data should not be entered into GenAI systems that are not supported/approved by the University. No personal data should be collected, stored or uploaded to a GenAI system, without permission/consent, including images or photographs.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
e2659fa8…
Diperoleh
20 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Ethical Principles on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence - Respect for privacy

Academic Integrity

TU Dublin's academic integrity page lists submitting work created artificially, including by machine or artificial intelligence, as a form of academic misconduct when submitted as the student's own assessment work.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan92%

Nilai ternormalisasi: AI-created work submitted as own work can be academic misconduct

Terakhir diperiksa
20 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
20 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Submitting work as your own for assessment, which has, in fact, been done in whole or in part by someone else or submitting work which has been created artificially, e.g., by a machine or through artificial intelligence.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
59ae93dc…
Diperoleh
20 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
What is Academic Misconduct

Security Review

For sensitive, confidential, intellectual-property, or peer-review research contexts, TU Dublin guidance says only GenAI systems that do not retain data by default or allow retention to be disabled, or systems on closed or bespoke University hardware platforms, should be used.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan91%

Nilai ternormalisasi: Sensitive research contexts limited to non-retaining or University-controlled GenAI systems

Terakhir diperiksa
20 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
20 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
While a broad range of systems and tools are available, only the following should be used in the context of research activities where the information is sensitive, confidential or where there are/may be intellectual property issues, including during peer review practices: Systems which by default do not retain data or which permit user to disable data retention. Systems where the data is created and saved on closed/bespoke University hardware platforms.
Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
b2c80812…
Diperoleh
20 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Principle 8

Source record

Sumber rasmi

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Semakagent reviewedKeyakinan97%Snapshot statusTidak diterbitkanJSONJSON awam

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Technological University Dublin AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/technological-university-dublin

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Buka log perubahan