University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Dublin, Ireland

Technological University Dublin

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: 781-790UpdatedJul 19, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

8 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Technological University Dublin in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"Technological University Dublin provides or institutionally supports Microsoft Copilot.","howToObtain":"Sign in with a TU Dublin Office 365 account.","costToUser":"No individual price is stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Last checked
Jul 19, 2026
Last changed
Jul 19, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Users who are signed in with a TU Dublin Office 365 account can access Microsoft Copilot

Localized display only

Users who are signed in with a TU Dublin Office 365 account can access Microsoft Copilot

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
17ee6a99…
Retrieved
Jul 19, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 2
Microsoft Copilot is the only AI assistant supported for use at TU Dublin.

Localized display only

Microsoft Copilot is the only AI assistant supported for use at TU Dublin.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
17ee6a99…
Retrieved
Jul 19, 2026

Research

TU Dublin's research GenAI guidance says artificial intelligence systems and generative models cannot be included as co-authors on research, innovation, or scholarly outputs.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: AI systems and generative models cannot be co-authors

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
In line with the University’s Authorship and Publication policy, artificial intelligence systems and/or generative models cannot be included as co-authors on any research, innovation or scholarly output.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
b2c80812…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Principle 6

Ai Tool Treatment

For student assessment, TU Dublin guidance says generative AI can only be used in ways approved in advance by the lecturer, and that failure to follow the guidelines or inappropriate AI use may result in disciplinary action as a breach of academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: Student GenAI use requires advance lecturer approval for assessments

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
To support academic integrity, GenAI can only be used by students in ways that are approved in advance by their lecturer. Failure to adhere to these guidelines or the inappropriate use of AI, as determined by the relevant Faculty, may result in disciplinary action as it is a breach of academic integrity.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
e2659fa8…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Principles Underpinning use of AI and GenAI in TU Dublin

Teaching

TU Dublin recommends using the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale when designing assessments and communicating with students about how generative AI may be used in a specific assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: AIAS recommended for assessment design and student communication

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
TU Dublin recommends the use of the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale in the design of assessments and for communication with students about assessments.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
e2659fa8…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Use of Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS)

Research

TU Dublin's research GenAI guidance says use of generative AI tools must follow applicable institutional, national, EU and international laws, regulations, and data protection standards, and that users are wholly responsible for checking the veracity, accuracy, creative merit, falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism risks of model output.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: Research GenAI use must meet law/data protection obligations and user responsibility

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Use of generative AI systems/tools must follow applicable institutional, national, EU and international laws, regulations and data protection standards. The user of generative AI systems/tools is wholly responsible for ensuring the veracity, accuracy and/or creative merit of the output generated by the model, and for assessing the potential for falsification, fabrication and plagiarism due to the use of the system.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
b2c80812…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Principles for use of Generative AI, Principles 1 and 3

Privacy

TU Dublin's GenAI teaching and learning guidance says personal data should not be entered into GenAI systems that are not supported or approved by the University, and that students should not collect, store, or upload personal data to a GenAI system without permission or consent.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: Personal data restricted in unsupported or unapproved GenAI systems

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Personal data should not be entered into GenAI systems that are not supported/approved by the University. No personal data should be collected, stored or uploaded to a GenAI system, without permission/consent, including images or photographs.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
e2659fa8…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Ethical Principles on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence - Respect for privacy

Academic Integrity

TU Dublin's academic integrity page lists submitting work created artificially, including by machine or artificial intelligence, as a form of academic misconduct when submitted as the student's own assessment work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: AI-created work submitted as own work can be academic misconduct

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Submitting work as your own for assessment, which has, in fact, been done in whole or in part by someone else or submitting work which has been created artificially, e.g., by a machine or through artificial intelligence.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
59ae93dc…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
What is Academic Misconduct

Security Review

For sensitive, confidential, intellectual-property, or peer-review research contexts, TU Dublin guidance says only GenAI systems that do not retain data by default or allow retention to be disabled, or systems on closed or bespoke University hardware platforms, should be used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: Sensitive research contexts limited to non-retaining or University-controlled GenAI systems

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
While a broad range of systems and tools are available, only the following should be used in the context of research activities where the information is sensitive, confidential or where there are/may be intellectual property issues, including during peer review practices: Systems which by default do not retain data or which permit user to disable data retention. Systems where the data is created and saved on closed/bespoke University hardware platforms.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
b2c80812…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Principle 8

Source record

Official sources

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence97%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Technological University Dublin AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/technological-university-dublin

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log