public-release-20260719-011
Compared with public-release-20260718-009.
Technological University Dublin public-release-20260719-011 diff
Comparing public-release-20260718-009 to public-release-20260719-011.
Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Technological University Dublin currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: Jul 19, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
This page combines all public release diffs for Technological University Dublin. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Comparing public-release-20260718-009 to public-release-20260719-011.
1 public release diff
Compared with public-release-20260718-009.
Comparing public-release-20260718-009 to public-release-20260719-011.
8 claim records
Microsoft Copilot is listed for Technological University Dublin in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
TU Dublin's research GenAI guidance says artificial intelligence systems and generative models cannot be included as co-authors on research, innovation, or scholarly outputs.
For student assessment, TU Dublin guidance says generative AI can only be used in ways approved in advance by the lecturer, and that failure to follow the guidelines or inappropriate AI use may result in disciplinary action as a breach of academic integrity.
TU Dublin recommends using the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale when designing assessments and communicating with students about how generative AI may be used in a specific assessment.
TU Dublin's research GenAI guidance says use of generative AI tools must follow applicable institutional, national, EU and international laws, regulations, and data protection standards, and that users are wholly responsible for checking the veracity, accuracy, creative merit, falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism risks of model output.
TU Dublin's GenAI teaching and learning guidance says personal data should not be entered into GenAI systems that are not supported or approved by the University, and that students should not collect, store, or upload personal data to a GenAI system without permission or consent.
TU Dublin's academic integrity page lists submitting work created artificially, including by machine or artificial intelligence, as a form of academic misconduct when submitted as the student's own assessment work.
For sensitive, confidential, intellectual-property, or peer-review research contexts, TU Dublin guidance says only GenAI systems that do not retain data by default or allow retention to be disabled, or systems on closed or bespoke University hardware platforms, should be used.
5 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:39 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:40 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:40 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:39 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at Jul 19, 2026, 12:41 PM