Change log

Technological University Dublin

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Technological University Dublin currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: Jul 19, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

This page combines all public release diffs for Technological University Dublin. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted1Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added1Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Technological University Dublin combined release diff

Comparing public-release-20260718-009 to public-release-20260719-011.

+5-0
11 # Technological University Dublin AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Microsoft Copilot is listed for Technological University Dublin in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
5+Evidence (en, 17ee6a9915cc): Users who are signed in with a TU Dublin Office 365 account can access Microsoft Copilot
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-19T12:41:52.600Z
47 ## Source attribution added
58 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
9+Source https://www.tudublin.ie/connect/technology-services/guides/microsoft-copilot-/ snapshot 17ee6a9915ccdd51222f26bcdca24aa0e0efbdfe3c2d725784ec6f5169168e77
10+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-19T12:41:52.600Z

Release history

1 public release diff

public-release-20260719-011

Compared with public-release-20260718-009.

Policy text0Newly extracted1Source snapshots0Source text0

Technological University Dublin public-release-20260719-011 diff

Comparing public-release-20260718-009 to public-release-20260719-011.

+5-0
11 # Technological University Dublin AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Microsoft Copilot is listed for Technological University Dublin in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
5+Evidence (en, 17ee6a9915cc): Users who are signed in with a TU Dublin Office 365 account can access Microsoft Copilot
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-19T12:41:52.600Z
47 ## Source attribution added
58 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
9+Source https://www.tudublin.ie/connect/technology-services/guides/microsoft-copilot-/ snapshot 17ee6a9915ccdd51222f26bcdca24aa0e0efbdfe3c2d725784ec6f5169168e77
10+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-19T12:41:52.600Z

Claim changes

8 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Technological University Dublin in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence2Languagesen

research

TU Dublin's research GenAI guidance says artificial intelligence systems and generative models cannot be included as co-authors on research, innovation, or scholarly outputs.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

For student assessment, TU Dublin guidance says generative AI can only be used in ways approved in advance by the lecturer, and that failure to follow the guidelines or inappropriate AI use may result in disciplinary action as a breach of academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

TU Dublin recommends using the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale when designing assessments and communicating with students about how generative AI may be used in a specific assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

research

TU Dublin's research GenAI guidance says use of generative AI tools must follow applicable institutional, national, EU and international laws, regulations, and data protection standards, and that users are wholly responsible for checking the veracity, accuracy, creative merit, falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism risks of model output.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

TU Dublin's GenAI teaching and learning guidance says personal data should not be entered into GenAI systems that are not supported or approved by the University, and that students should not collect, store, or upload personal data to a GenAI system without permission or consent.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

TU Dublin's academic integrity page lists submitting work created artificially, including by machine or artificial intelligence, as a form of academic misconduct when submitted as the student's own assessment work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

For sensitive, confidential, intellectual-property, or peer-review research contexts, TU Dublin guidance says only GenAI systems that do not retain data by default or allow retention to be disabled, or systems on closed or bespoke University hardware platforms, should be used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

5 source attributions