research
TU Dublin's research GenAI guidance says artificial intelligence systems and generative models cannot be included as co-authors on research, innovation, or scholarly outputs.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Technological University Dublin
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Technological University Dublin currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
7 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
For student assessment, TU Dublin guidance says generative AI can only be used in ways approved in advance by the lecturer, and that failure to follow the guidelines or inappropriate AI use may result in disciplinary action as a breach of academic integrity.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
TU Dublin recommends using the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale when designing assessments and communicating with students about how generative AI may be used in a specific assessment.
Review: Agent reviewed
research
TU Dublin's research GenAI guidance says use of generative AI tools must follow applicable institutional, national, EU and international laws, regulations, and data protection standards, and that users are wholly responsible for checking the veracity, accuracy, creative merit, falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism risks of model output.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
TU Dublin's GenAI teaching and learning guidance says personal data should not be entered into GenAI systems that are not supported or approved by the University, and that students should not collect, store, or upload personal data to a GenAI system without permission or consent.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
TU Dublin's academic integrity page lists submitting work created artificially, including by machine or artificial intelligence, as a form of academic misconduct when submitted as the student's own assessment work.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
For sensitive, confidential, intellectual-property, or peer-review research contexts, TU Dublin guidance says only GenAI systems that do not retain data by default or allow retention to be disabled, or systems on closed or bespoke University hardware platforms, should be used.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
Academic Integrity
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:39 AM
GUIDE 6.0 Breaches of Assessment Regulations
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:40 AM
Guidelines on the responsible use of Generative AI in Teaching, Learning, Feedback and Assessment in TU Dublin
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:40 AM
Responsible use of Generative AI in Research V1.0
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:39 AM