University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Dublin, Ireland

Technological University Dublin

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: 781-790Updated2026年7月19日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

8 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Technological University Dublin in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"Technological University Dublin provides or institutionally supports Microsoft Copilot.","howToObtain":"Sign in with a TU Dublin Office 365 account.","costToUser":"No individual price is stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

最后检查时间
2026年7月19日
最后更改时间
2026年7月19日

原始证据

证据 1
Users who are signed in with a TU Dublin Office 365 account can access Microsoft Copilot

本地化显示 only

Users who are signed in with a TU Dublin Office 365 account can access Microsoft Copilot

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
17ee6a99…
已检索
2026年7月19日

原始证据

证据 2
Microsoft Copilot is the only AI assistant supported for use at TU Dublin.

本地化显示 only

Microsoft Copilot is the only AI assistant supported for use at TU Dublin.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
17ee6a99…
已检索
2026年7月19日

研究

TU Dublin's research GenAI guidance says artificial intelligence systems and generative models cannot be included as co-authors on research, innovation, or scholarly outputs.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: AI systems and generative models cannot be co-authors

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
In line with the University’s Authorship and Publication policy, artificial intelligence systems and/or generative models cannot be included as co-authors on any research, innovation or scholarly output.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
b2c80812…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Principle 6

Ai Tool Treatment

For student assessment, TU Dublin guidance says generative AI can only be used in ways approved in advance by the lecturer, and that failure to follow the guidelines or inappropriate AI use may result in disciplinary action as a breach of academic integrity.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: Student GenAI use requires advance lecturer approval for assessments

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
To support academic integrity, GenAI can only be used by students in ways that are approved in advance by their lecturer. Failure to adhere to these guidelines or the inappropriate use of AI, as determined by the relevant Faculty, may result in disciplinary action as it is a breach of academic integrity.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
e2659fa8…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Principles Underpinning use of AI and GenAI in TU Dublin

教学

TU Dublin recommends using the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale when designing assessments and communicating with students about how generative AI may be used in a specific assessment.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: AIAS recommended for assessment design and student communication

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
TU Dublin recommends the use of the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale in the design of assessments and for communication with students about assessments.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
e2659fa8…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Use of Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS)

研究

TU Dublin's research GenAI guidance says use of generative AI tools must follow applicable institutional, national, EU and international laws, regulations, and data protection standards, and that users are wholly responsible for checking the veracity, accuracy, creative merit, falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism risks of model output.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: Research GenAI use must meet law/data protection obligations and user responsibility

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
Use of generative AI systems/tools must follow applicable institutional, national, EU and international laws, regulations and data protection standards. The user of generative AI systems/tools is wholly responsible for ensuring the veracity, accuracy and/or creative merit of the output generated by the model, and for assessing the potential for falsification, fabrication and plagiarism due to the use of the system.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
b2c80812…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Principles for use of Generative AI, Principles 1 and 3

隐私

TU Dublin's GenAI teaching and learning guidance says personal data should not be entered into GenAI systems that are not supported or approved by the University, and that students should not collect, store, or upload personal data to a GenAI system without permission or consent.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: Personal data restricted in unsupported or unapproved GenAI systems

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
Personal data should not be entered into GenAI systems that are not supported/approved by the University. No personal data should be collected, stored or uploaded to a GenAI system, without permission/consent, including images or photographs.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
e2659fa8…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Ethical Principles on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence - Respect for privacy

Academic Integrity

TU Dublin's academic integrity page lists submitting work created artificially, including by machine or artificial intelligence, as a form of academic misconduct when submitted as the student's own assessment work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%

标准化值: AI-created work submitted as own work can be academic misconduct

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
Submitting work as your own for assessment, which has, in fact, been done in whole or in part by someone else or submitting work which has been created artificially, e.g., by a machine or through artificial intelligence.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
59ae93dc…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
What is Academic Misconduct

Security Review

For sensitive, confidential, intellectual-property, or peer-review research contexts, TU Dublin guidance says only GenAI systems that do not retain data by default or allow retention to be disabled, or systems on closed or bespoke University hardware platforms, should be used.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%

标准化值: Sensitive research contexts limited to non-retaining or University-controlled GenAI systems

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
While a broad range of systems and tools are available, only the following should be used in the context of research activities where the information is sensitive, confidential or where there are/may be intellectual property issues, including during peer review practices: Systems which by default do not retain data or which permit user to disable data retention. Systems where the data is created and saved on closed/bespoke University hardware platforms.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
b2c80812…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Principle 8

Source record

官方来源

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Technological University Dublin AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/technological-university-dublin

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志