Dublin, Ireland

Dublin City University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage7 reviewedEvidence-backed claims7Reviewed7Candidate0Official sources6Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/dublin-city-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

Teaching guidance

Dublin City University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records1

AI tools

Dublin City University

Tool
AI tools
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Allowed
Review
Agent reviewed
Sources

Evidence-backed claims

7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

DCU's Academic Integrity Policy lists submitting unauthorised Generative Artificial Intelligence generated work as academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Academic misconduct includes, but is not limited to the following: ... Submitting unauthorised Generative Artificial Intelligence generated work.

Privacy

DCU Graduate Studies guidance tells research students not to submit research data, personal data, or sensitive information to free AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
For free AI tools, it is strongly recommended that you think first before uploading data. Do not submit research data, personal data, or sensitive information to free AI tools.

Research

DCU Graduate Studies guidance says that, from September 2025, research-degree regulations will require declarations on which generative AI tools were used and how.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
From September 2025, DCU's regulations for academic awards by research degrees will mandate declarations on which (if any) Gen AI tools have been used... Candidates are also required to make a declaration on what Gen AI tools (if any) have been used and how.

Privacy

DCU's AI position statement tells staff to act legally, ethically and transparently, disclose generative AI use for university-related work, and avoid sharing personal, confidential, institutional or strategic data with AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Be transparent and document your use of AI. The use of generative AI for any University related research, scholarship or work, should be clearly disclosed... Ensure that you do not share any content that compromises an individual's privacy, confidential university processes...

Source Status

DCU has a public position statement on the use of AI tools and says it will develop a policy on AI use; this run did not find a finalized central AI-use policy page.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
It is timely that we adopt a clear statement on our position on the use of Artificial Intelligence tools in the university. This will be a living document... As our position evolves DCU will: Develop a Policy on AI use...

Ai Tool Treatment

DCU's DTS AI Hub states that, to keep data protected, users must use only DCU authorised AI tools and must be logged in with their DCU account.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
To mitigate this risk, DCU has established formal contractual and data governance agreements with the authorised tools listed below. To ensure your data remains protected, you must use only these tools ensuring you are logged in with your DCU account.

Teaching

DCU's Teaching Enhancement Unit asks staff to consider assessment design for GenAI by designing tools in or redesigning assessment to avoid possible academic integrity breaches, and says DCU is not employing GenAI detectors for student assessments at this time.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Staff are asked to consider their assessment design and have GenAI tools designed into them (designed-in) or (re-)designed to avoid possible breaches of academic integrity... We are not employing GenAI detectors for student assessments at this time...

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

6 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities