University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Bahasa
ENZHFRPLMS

London, United Kingdom

Royal Holloway, University of London

PenarafanQS World University Rankings 2026: =461Updated16 Mei 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Tuntutan disemak

7 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

Royal Holloway academic misconduct regulations list requesting or engaging an artificial intelligence tool to write or rewrite work for unfair advantage, and presenting AI-generated content as one’s own unless authorised and acknowledged, as examples of assessment offences.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan96%

Nilai ternormalisasi: ai_commissioning_and_unauthorised_ai_in_regulations

Terakhir diperiksa
16 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
16 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Commissioning, which is requesting or engaging another person or artificial intelligence tool whether paid or unpaid to write or rewrite work in order to obtain an unfair advantage for oneself. Presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools as your own unless specifically authorised in writing as part of the assessment brief and appropriately acknowledged.

Paparan setempat only

Commissioning, which is requesting or engaging another person or artificial intelligence tool whether paid or unpaid to write or rewrite work in order to obtain an unfair advantage for oneself. Presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools as your own unless specifically authorised in writing as part of the assessment brief and appropriately acknowledged.

Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
22a9f752…
Diperoleh
16 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Regulations on Academic Misconduct 2025/26, section 1(2)(b)-(c)

Penyelidikan

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance for postgraduate researchers says AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose, or other academic content, and that researchers are responsible for every output they submit.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%

Nilai ternormalisasi: pgr_ai_may_not_author_research_claims_or_thesis_prose

Terakhir diperiksa
16 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
16 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Originality: AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose or other academic content. Transparency: declare that any AI use is within the permitted guidance outlined in this document. Accountability: you, the student, are responsible for every output that you submit.

Paparan setempat only

Originality: AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose or other academic content. Transparency: declare that any AI use is within the permitted guidance outlined in this document. Accountability: you, the student, are responsible for every output that you submit.

Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
3b1a0e17…
Diperoleh
16 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Principles and scope

Academic Integrity

Royal Holloway requires students to include declaration statements for generative AI use or non-use, and says a list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%

Nilai ternormalisasi: ai_declaration_and_prompt_list_required

Terakhir diperiksa
16 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
16 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Explicit acknowledgment of use of generative AI tools such as Large Language Models like Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini or ChatGPT or any other media generated through similar tools is required. If you have not used any such tools in any way a declaration statement is still required. Prompt List: A list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

Paparan setempat only

Explicit acknowledgment of use of generative AI tools such as Large Language Models like Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini or ChatGPT or any other media generated through similar tools is required. If you have not used any such tools in any way a declaration statement is still required. Prompt List: A list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
760f945e…
Diperoleh
16 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
The Requirement of Declaration Statements; Prompt List

Privasi

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance says postgraduate researchers should not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party AI tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%

Nilai ternormalisasi: pgr_no_confidential_personal_sensitive_data_to_third_party_ai_without_dpa_consent

Terakhir diperiksa
16 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
16 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Data protection: do not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required. Uploading Personal, Special-category, or Confidential Data to Public AI Services: Any content that could identify individuals, organisations, or sensitive locations. No.

Paparan setempat only

Data protection: do not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required. Uploading Personal, Special-category, or Confidential Data to Public AI Services: Any content that could identify individuals, organisations, or sensitive locations. No.

Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
3b1a0e17…
Diperoleh
16 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Principles and scope; Data, privacy, and confidentiality

Ai Tool Treatment

Royal Holloway tells Foundation, undergraduate, and postgraduate taught students that module assessment briefs take precedence for AI use; if a brief says AI is not permitted, students must not use it and must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%

Nilai ternormalisasi: assessment_brief_precedence

Terakhir diperiksa
16 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
16 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
This guidance provides a broad overview, but all students must follow specific instructions in module assessment briefs as local guidance always takes precedence. If the brief says AI is not permitted, you must not use it. You must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

Paparan setempat only

This guidance provides a broad overview, but all students must follow specific instructions in module assessment briefs as local guidance always takes precedence. If the brief says AI is not permitted, you must not use it. You must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
8fac0216…
Diperoleh
16 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Key principles for using AI at Royal Holloway

Ai Tool Treatment

Royal Holloway recommends Microsoft Copilot for generative AI use when students log in with Royal Holloway account details, and warns students to be extremely careful when entering data into other generative AI tools.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan92%

Nilai ternormalisasi: microsoft_copilot_recommended_with_rhul_login

Terakhir diperiksa
16 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
16 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
From the many generative AI tools, Royal Holloway recommends that you use Microsoft Copilot, logging in with your Royal Holloway account details. Please be extremely careful when entering data into a generative AI tool: this is particularly important if you are using one other than MS Copilot and your RHUL login.

Paparan setempat only

From the many generative AI tools, Royal Holloway recommends that you use Microsoft Copilot, logging in with your Royal Holloway account details. Please be extremely careful when entering data into a generative AI tool: this is particularly important if you are using one other than MS Copilot and your RHUL login.

Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
4bcf2424…
Diperoleh
16 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
AI Tools

Source Status

The official AI guidance verified in this crawl is scoped to Foundation, undergraduate, postgraduate taught students, and postgraduate researchers; this crawl did not verify a separate staff-wide binding AI teaching policy.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan78%

Nilai ternormalisasi: verified_sources_student_and_pgr_scoped_no_staffwide_policy_found

Terakhir diperiksa
16 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
16 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Guidance for our Foundation, Undergraduate and Postgraduate Taught Students. This guidance outlines how students at the University may and may not use Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in their academic work.

Paparan setempat only

Guidance for our Foundation, Undergraduate and Postgraduate Taught Students. This guidance outlines how students at the University may and may not use Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in their academic work.

Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
8fac0216…
Diperoleh
16 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Guidance scope statements

Bukti asal

Bukti 2
This guidance sets out expectations for the ethical and responsible use of generative artificial intelligence by postgraduate researchers. It aligns with institutional research integrity, data protection, and academic misconduct regulations.

Paparan setempat only

This guidance sets out expectations for the ethical and responsible use of generative artificial intelligence by postgraduate researchers. It aligns with institutional research integrity, data protection, and academic misconduct regulations.

Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
3b1a0e17…
Diperoleh
16 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Guidance scope statements

Source record

Sumber rasmi

8 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Semakagent reviewedKeyakinan96%Snapshot statusTidak diterbitkanJSONJSON awam

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Royal Holloway, University of London AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/royal-holloway-university-of-london

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Buka log perubahan