Policy presence
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
České Budějovice, Czechia
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice has 7 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 7 reviewed claims. Last checked May 25, 2026.
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice has 7 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 7 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 25, 2026. Discovery context: University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice is listed as QS 2026 rank 1001-1200.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 25, 2026 and last changed on May 25, 2026. The record contains 7 source-backed claims, including 7 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-south-bohemia-in-ceske-budejovice.json. The entity-level confidence is 96%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Security review claims.
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice has 4 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Named AI services
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Security Review
For AI tools used in student work, Rector Measure R 567 forbids students from reusing their university-system passwords for AI-tool registration and forbids providing sensitive personal data or confidential, internal, protected, sensitive, or other non-public information, including university intellectual property, to AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: no university password reuse; no sensitive personal data or non-public university information in AI tools
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Při registraci do nástrojů AI nesmí být použita stejná hesla jakými se studenti přihlašují do systémů JU. ... Při registraci do nástrojů AI a jejich užívání je zakázáno poskytovat těmto nástrojům citlivé informace o sobě či jiných osobách včetně osobních údajů. ... je zakázáno poskytovat těmto nástrojům důvěrné, interní, chráněné, citlivé a další neveřejné informace, včetně informací zahrnujících univerzitní duševní vlastnictví.
Paparan setempat only
Students may not reuse university-system passwords for AI tools and may not provide sensitive personal data or non-public/confidential university information to AI tools.
Source Status
University of South Bohemia Rector Measure R 567 is an official university source setting basic rules for ethical, creative, and safe AI use when students prepare written works and other final-work types.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: official rector measure on AI use in student written and final works
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Toto opatření upravuje základní pravidla pro etické, tvůrčí a bezpečné využívání umělé inteligence (dále také jako „AI“) při tvorbě písemných prací a jiných typů závěrečných prací studentů Jihočeské univerzity v Českých Budějovicích.
Paparan setempat only
The measure sets basic rules for ethical, creative, and safe AI use in students' written works and other final works.
Academic Integrity
Rector Measure R 567 states that AI outputs are only input material for the author; the author is responsible for using, critically examining, and verifying those outputs, and the author of the student work is the student, not the AI tool.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: AI output is input material; student remains author and responsible for verification
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Výstupy AI jsou proto vždy pro autora jen a pouze vstupním podkladem. Autor je zodpovědný za využití těchto výstupů a za jejich kritické zkoumání a ověřování. ... Základním pravidlem, které platí pro všechny nástroje AI je, že autorem studentské práce je jen a pouze autor sám, nikoliv nástroj, který používá.
Paparan setempat only
AI outputs are only input material; the student author is responsible for use, critical examination, and verification, and remains the author of the work.
Academic Integrity
Rector Measure R 567 says proven use of AI tools contrary to the measure is treated like plagiarism, as unethical conduct with possible disciplinary consequences, and proven unauthorized or undeclared AI use after a successful defense can lead to proceedings on invalidity of the state examination or defense.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: AI misuse contrary to the measure is treated like plagiarism with disciplinary or invalidity-proceeding consequences
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Pokud se prokáže, že student použil ve své práci nástroje AI v rozporu s pravidly stanovenými tímto opatřením, je na ni pohlíženo stejně jako na plagiát, tj. jako na neetické jednání se všemi potenciálními disciplinárními důsledky ... V případě úspěšné obhajoby a následného prokázání nepovoleného či nepřiznaného užití AI v kvalifikační práci je na ni pohlíženo stejně jako na plagiát...
Paparan setempat only
Proven AI use contrary to the measure, or unauthorized/undeclared AI use found after defense, is treated like plagiarism with potential disciplinary or invalidity consequences.
Academic Integrity
For student work covered by Rector Measure R 567, authors must always declare and specify use of generative AI tools, while other AI tools such as translation, language editing, or publication-analysis tools do not need declaration unless the assignment explicitly and transparently says so.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: generative AI use must be declared; some non-generative AI tools are exempt unless assignment says otherwise
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Generativní nástroje AI jsou např. nástroje, které slouží pro generování textů (např. Copilot) či obrázků (např. Midjourney). ... Povinností autora práce je užití takových nástrojů vždy deklarovat a specifikovat. Ostatní nástroje AI ... nejsou primárně zaměřeny na generování nového obsahu. Pokud to není explicitně a transparentně uvedeno v zadání písemné práce, není použití takových nástrojů nutné deklarovat a specifikovat.
Paparan setempat only
Generative AI tools must always be declared and specified; some other AI tools need not be declared unless the assignment explicitly requires it.
Ai Tool Treatment
Under Rector Measure R 567, a thesis supervisor or adviser may prohibit or discourage the use of specified AI tools in a student work, but that prohibition or recommendation must be stated transparently and explicitly in the assignment with a clear justification.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: supervisor may prohibit or discourage specified AI tools if stated explicitly with justification in the assignment
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Vedoucí práce či školitel má právo užití určitých nástrojů AI ve studentské práci zakázat či nedoporučit ... Je-li vedoucím práce či školitelem použití určitých nástrojů AI v dané studentské práci zakázáno nebo se nedoporučuje, musí to být transparentně a explicitně uvedeno v zadání této práce, včetně jasného odůvodnění.
Paparan setempat only
A supervisor may prohibit or discourage specific AI tools, but this must be explicit and justified in the assignment.
Source Status
Rector Measure R 567 says use of artificial intelligence in research and scientific works will be handled by a separate rector measure; this staged crawl did not identify that separate official measure as a usable source.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research/scientific-work AI rules reserved for a separate rector measure not found in this crawl
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Problematika využívání umělé inteligence při provádění vědy a výzkumu, včetně tvorby vědeckých prací, bude řešena samostatným opatřením rektora.
Paparan setempat only
The measure says AI use in science and research, including scientific works, will be addressed by a separate rector measure.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
1 source attribution
Opatření rektora k využívání umělé inteligence při tvorbě písemných prací a jiných typů závěrečných prací studentů Jihočeské univerzity v Českých Budějovicích
jcu.cz
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.